I'm facing a rather difficult issue at the moment; really appreciate your help.
I have a table with 2 columns, td1 and td2, and containing texts and both of which have fixed widths.
td1.width = 10px and td2.width = 20px
the fixed width are set at runtime one by one from the left using JQuery (as this table is nested inside another table...)
The text width may be longer than these fixed widths in which scenarios the expected behaviour is that
the fixed width of the columns should stay the same 1) if there are extra texts, the text should wrap, it should not increase or decrease the td width 2) if there are empty spaces, the cell width should not be reduced when resizing other columns or page; it should stay intact.
I have set the td.whitespace property to pre-wrap and td.word-wrap: break-word but they haven't helped.
how would these be possible using css 2.0 (not 3.0)?
Thanks,
In this case, because the widths are so small, and the text doesn't typically have words that small, it has no way to wrap them, so it extends the width of the td even with a set width!
It decreases the width of the second td because the first is using an extra width.
Also, you could have a situation where the text is so wide (a long word for example) and in that case there is no way to wrap it. Unless using javascript, IMO it is the only way.
I recommend reading this answers: HTML TD wrap text
ok, I got it resolved. My table had thead and colgroups. Althought their display attribute was hidden, IE 9.0 ignores it whereas IE 6.0 takes them into account in calculating the width of columns!
I removed them using jquery and sorted out!
$('.myTable thead, .myTable colgroup').remove();
Related
I have a pretty nested structure of tables from a CMS. Each column has a specified width e.g. width="61" for the first column.
Nevertheless Chrome ignores the width and adds random spacing so none of the columns have the right width in the end and it looks like this:
Other browsers display the code just fine.
I have tried to use table-layout: fixed but that made everything worse.
Here's the fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/xv8U5/
Help greatly appreciated.
I believe there is a difference of rules depending on the browser. Most browser will scale the TD to the largest TD of the same column. Chrome, however, seems to use the first TD's width as column width.
Hence, if you specify the width of a TD after the first row, that width will be ignored if the first row already contained a TD for that column.
The solution is to specify the width right from the first row.
I have been trying to lay out a table with the following:
two or three columns that automatically size to fit the content in them
anywhere from 1 to 4 columns that resize according to the width of the table, and which truncate the text inside them
one column that contains three buttons and which I want to be exactly 220 pixels wide
I got it pretty much working thanks to the answers on this question. I set "min-width" on the first two or three columns, and "width" on the last column, and in the middle columns I wrap the text in a div, and then set "max-width" on the td and on the div I set width: 100%;text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden;. All that works fine on Chrome and Firefox and Safari and even IE 10.
The problem happens on IE7, 8, and 9. On all three "browsers", the middle divs don't truncate, they instead push out the width of columns to fit all the text, which blows out the table wider than the page.
I tried putting a table-layout: fixed; on the table on IE, but instead of getting what I expected or indeed anything sane at all, instead what I get is that all the columns are given the same width, ignoring the "width: 220px" on the last column's tds, and then after everything is laid out the last column expands to 220px, and blows out the table. If you don't understand what I'm saying, have a look at
http://jsfiddle.net/ptomblin/rHJk9/
in IE debugger or "Inspect Element" in Chrome or Firefox. If you look at the "Layout" of a td of last column, and it shows a small width same as all the other columns, even though the contents are 220px wide.
On the live site, putting the "ie8" class on the body is done using conditional <IF IE8> code, but jsfiddle doesn't seem to like that.
What I'm looking for is either a way to make the table work the same way on IE7-9 as it does on real browsers (without table-layout:fixed) or some "good enough" work-around that would at least fit on the screen, with or without table-layout:fixed.
http://imgur.com/44DeZv5 has a screen shot showing it on IE9. I've added a red line to show the actual edge of the table. Note how the button bar, which is in a td in that table, extends beyond not just the table, but beyond the actual screen width. (The browser is set to 1024x768, the table is inside a .content div that's 940 pixels wide)
http://imgur.com/0Zielaf is what it looks like in IE9 when you don't have the "table-layout: fixed"
http://imgur.com/K8Ob6VR is what it looks like on Chrome without the "table-layout: fixed". Note how it all fits on the screen and in the table. That's what I'm aiming for.
I found out what the problem was that caused table-layout: fixed to allocate all the columns exactly the same width, no matter what the width parameter on the actual column values: It was happening because the first row on the table had a single column with colspan="7". I figured it out because on W3Schools in the description of table-layout: fixed they mentioned:
The browser can begin to display the table once the first row has been received
which made me realize that it was probably only looking at the first row. I stuck in a dummy first row with empty columns, but with the appropriate classes on each one to give them appropriate widths, and it laid them out much better. (I also set the font size, height, and line-height, top and bottom margins and padding to 0 for this dummy row so it isn't distracting)
I am trying to create an input mechanism using the flex box model. I know it's not supported by all browsers, but that doesn't matter in this case. It really only needs to work on web-kit browsers.
I am trying to build a nice two column layout without needing to use specific widths. I have the flex property set to one on both the label and the input. However, as you can see, when the label element gets long, it messes up the width of the input that is next to it.
I want both label and input to be the same width down the column, but I want them to grow and shrink as the size of the window/device changes.
Is there a way to do this without having to set a width on either of the elements?
Update
I can set a max-width on the label elements to 5% and I basically get the desired effect. However, I'm still wondering if there is a way to do this without setting any width and using purely the flex box?
Here is a working jsFiddle.
The example you provided doesn't have columns at all, just the appearance that there are columns. Without actual columns you will have to set widths to make these 3 unreleated blocks look they are joined in some way.
You should be using the new CSS3 Flexible Box syntax, which is now 'flex' rather than 'box'. See the spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/ With this you can set the elements to have a <grow> <shrink> <default width> of 1 1 50%, so they will grow and shrink at the same rate and will each take up 50% of available width (you can adjust this or make it 60/40 or whatever).
Example JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/XTa98/4/
Otherwise, if you want actual columns so that you don't have to set widths, you need to wrap all of the labels in their own "column" div and all of the inputs in their own "column" div.
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/XTa98/5/
This has actual columns and no widths set, but it does not degrade gracefully anymore since the elements are not in their own rows. To alleviate this you could always provide text-overflow: ellipses to truncate the text.
In any case, you have a trade-off. If you want the appearance of columns without actually using columns, you will need to set some type of width. Otherwise, you can use real columns but the elements are no longer joined as rows and you will need to account for the overflow when shrinking the browser width.
You don't have to wrap the elements in column divs to avoid setting widths. Just set each label and input to flex:1, and you'll get them dividing up the width equally. However, this is effectively just the same as setting each to be 50% wide, in this case, so I'm not sure what advantage it really has.
How can you enforce the minimum width for a TD that can optionally contain an image? I ask this because I'm using a Javascript chess widget but when there are no pieces in any of the squares of a particular column, regardless of the width style of the td's being set to 36px, this column renders much narrower than those that have at least one row that contains the image of a chess piece.
Note that all the style is being set directly on each td cell. I read somewhere that a possible solution would be to instead create a div inside the td and set the width on that. Am hoping to avoid that as it might require significant modification to the underlying Javascript library. I've tried specifying !important along with the width but it had no effect.
Using firebug I can modify the width attribute but it seems the numbers are incorrect. For instance I can decrease the width all the way to 0 and it still appears the same. Or I can set the width to more than 36 and it appears to grow by width-36, but if for instance I set both the height and width of one of these narrow cells to the same number, lets say 60px, the height of what gets displayed is greater than the width and it appears as a rectangle not a square.
Furthermore not only can the td optionally contain an image, but each square specifies a background image too. So I am at a loss :( Thanks in advance
When I alter the CSS in your file using Firebug or the JS inspector in Chrome, setting the min-width property instead of the width property does the trick. Might want to try that? Not sure how IE will like that, though.
BTW: Why not use classes to do the CSS? It's kinda horrible to debug, this way.
By default tables will auto-size their columns.
If you set the table style to include:
table-layout: fixed;
then you'll have much better control of it via css and attributes.
You can use the td tags width attribute or you could use css and set the width.
I have a table in a HTML form. It has a fixed height for optical reasons. The number of rows in the table varies depending on the number of form fields available.
Problem: If there are very few rows, all rows are stretched vertically, increasing the space between input elements.
I could avoid this by giving the data rows a (fake) fixed height. I don't like that approach because there is no fixed height I could give it (relative font sizes, accessibility) and I fear future problems - say for example that IE9 decides to take cell heights literally.
What can I do?
I have a last (empty) row but no idea what to put in there so that it automatically occupies all "available" space.
Put heightless table in a div with a fixed height which mimics the table (border? bgcolor?).
By the way, just doing tbody { display: inline; } instead of an empty row works in all real browsers. No, not in MSIE. The tbody element has a lot of shortcomings in MSIE. It also lacks the ability to overflow: scroll; which would be great to have a scrollable table with a fixed header.
Couldn't you set the cell height to 100% for the last empty row, this should presumably cause that last row to take up the rest of the fixed space
I guess this is not doable.
Yeah, table based websites are beyond ages, however you would still need tables to display data. In fact I have to agree with Pekka that this is not doable on the table cell itself, but there is something we can fashion:
Try wrapping the data inside the td cell into a div and style that div to the height you want and set its overflow property to hidden.