Well, imagine the scenario where i have 3 objects, hanging from the "ceiling", each one by a string (inside a b2World). They are touching each other side by side.
Each object has a Flash Mouse_Over event that makes itself use tweenlite to scale bigger, and Mouse_Out it scales back to the original size.
My question is: do the other two objects respond to those TweenLite animations, using the Box2D motor?
Thanks
Answer: Sort of.
Box2D objects do not scale. But you can make it appear that they do.
Here is a great tutorial walking you through exactly how to do that:
http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/12/16/scaling-objects-with-box2d-part-2/
Related
I've been charged with designing a demo for an isometric video game in ActionScript 3. I have the bitmap spritesheets that show the avatar I'm using standing and walking in each direction. The walking animation is made up of three frames.
My problem, though, is that I need to figure out how to make use of them. I'm not familiar with animation in Flash, and I need input on how to gotoAndPlay() the walking frames for the right direction. I don't think isolating the necessary DIRECTION is going to be a challenge, so much as starting it and keeping it going while the arrow keys are down.
My current code is basically comprised of keyboard handlers for KEY_UP and KEY_DOWN, each containing a switch-case statement that changes the Avatar.currentDirection property. The handler continues to fire while the keys are down, but I need to add animation to the game.
I've seen some examples where they simply embed the animations into an SWF, propagate an array of the various walking stages, and alternate between them using an EnterFrame event handler, but this seems really clunky. I guess in the end I'm trying to make use of Adobe Animate, but I don't know how you're supposed to do that.
Ops, fortunately i'm working with sprites (atlas animations) right now!.
if i'm right, you just needs to use them for playing some animation with functionality.
if you have a well sized sprite which is tiled with isometric slots like it:
(9 frames sized 64x128)
your work is very easy, only create new movieclip from library, inside it, create a borderless rectangle (which is our mask) in a layer (named mask) then import image to the project, and its better to disabling smooth ability from image properties,
now, inside your movieclip, you have to create new layer (under the mask layer) and add your sprite image for each frame, and change its position:
at last, enable masking for mask layer, then its time of coding,
name your animation queries (like image 3) and for loopable animations, insert gotoAndPlay('anim_name') inside last frame. i hope you are familiar with controling movieclip animations which is basic consept of any flash project.
now to extend it for 8 directions support, you just need to play and switch between dirctions according single and multi keypreses,
I'm programming a game using ActionScript 3.0 and included Box2D classes for its physics. It's a maze/labyrinth game having a lot of walls and a ball inside.
In my main fla when I call the maze.create(), the maze is created (visually and physically) and it will dispatch an event so I know when it's done working and then I call my frameHandler which calls another function from my maze class every frame and the big delay accrues exactly at world.step() in it. BUT THE THING IS that it lags only the first two times this function runs!!!
The reason I notice this lag, is that I've got another object starting to move according to mouse position in the same frame handler.
The reason I'm sure the world.step() is causing it, is that everything works fine when I dont call it.
I've seen many codes using Box2d, some had more objects than i have and I know that I've created my b2World and all the objects correctly, similar to all the Box2d tutorials and stuff BUT THEY DONT LAG AT ALL. Its just mine lagging and all!!
Do you have any Idea or similar experience?
Do you have any suggestion in general how to deal with heavy functions?
PLEEEEASE +.-
A maze will have a lot of fixtures in close proximity making a very dense dynamic tree (the method Box2D uses to optimize collision checks). There is unlikely to be any way around this. Perhaps you could just call Step a few times after adding the static walls, but before you add the dynamic ball bodies, and consider it part of the loading process. At least the lagging movements will not be visible to the player.
I'm a beginner to AS3 and programming in general, but have learned enough that I want to now start learning how to render animations on the screen. These are the methods that I know of from two days of "researching" on google.
I'm not in a situation where I could afford to take courses from an educational institution, so my only means of learning are through online sources.
Update an objects x or y positions in a loop on every frame. Very basic. Of course any kind of advanced animation (say, showing a character running) is not possible with this method alone.
Using Flash and creating animation on a movie clip's timeline and, combined with moving the position of the object we can achieve some proper animation this way. However I cannot afford Flash, so this is not an option available to me. It also doesn't seem to be a popular option among more experienced programmers either (I think, due to having poor performance when lots of objects animating on the screen?)
Using a sprite sheet and then blitting the relevant image from the sprite sheet onto the screen.
Is there any other way to put an image from a sprite sheet onto the screen other than blitting?
And what other methods of rendering animation are available?
Some online websites claim that blitting is all I'll ever need, but I want to know all the options available so I could choose the most appropriate one for any given situation.
Any help would be appreciated :)
Another option for blitting is Stage3D. Take a look at Starling for 2D animations.
Blitting would be my best opinion. The only other thing I can think of is manually taking the images from the sprite sheet and putting it into each frame of an animation.
To render animation, you can create a frame in a MovieClip and convert it into a MovieClip and name the frame 'running'. Then you need to create an Enter Frame event where the MovieClip's instance name is 'Guy' and in the code on the function write 'Guy.x += 5;' to make your MovieClip go 5 pixels to the right every frame and also in the function write "Guy.gotoAndStop('running');"
Use TweenMax engine for better animation purposes. Easy coding, more Animation!!
I have a problem with a game that I'm doing. I basically have objects that are in a map and I have to check for each of them if they collide with the walls (and then do something). Since was working with AS2, I thought about doing the same way: I drew a picture with only the walls, so with only rectangles and everything else in between is transparent (does not exist, then the floor for example). In AS2 I put the image to the screen, let's call it wall, and then I did a hitTest to wall with every object. That is for instance, the object was actually on the image, since that the transparent parts were part of it, but the function was testing only on the visible parts, and so with the walls. So it worked.
Now in AS3 there is no HitTest but hitTestObject, which I used, and I do for example wall.hitTestObject(object). The problem is that this function is as if it doens't see the transparencies, and the objects while not touching the walls collide with them!
I found the PixelPerfectCollisionDetection that actually solves the problem but it is huge and heavy so in my case, with so many objects to be tested (at least 60) at each frame, the game slows down a lot!
What I need is a function like hitTestObject (i don't need a lot of accuracy!) that take care of the transparent parts of an image.
How can I do?
As mentioned in the comments, physics/game libraries will have this code built-in for you and should work out of the box.
But if you want to build it yourself, or even introduce your own optimizations, the first step (which is very inexpensive) is checking for bounds collision using entirely built-in functionality of DisplayObject.getBounds and Rectangle.intersects (though you must do so in a consistent coordinate space, i.e. the stage):
if (obj1.getBounds(stage).intersects(obj2.getBounds(stage)) {
// Cheap bounds intersection is true, now do pixel-perfect detection...
}
Then if the bounds check is true, perform the pixel-perfect collision detection.
It seems that BitmapData.hitTest is your best bet - see a blog post by Mike Chambers.
Prior to this method, if you're interested in neat techniques, there was a method outlined by Grant Skinner in his blog. It's quite a clever algorithm using built-in bitmap routines (aka, fairly fast), creating a BitmapData only as large as the overlapping region (or even scaling that down), and drawing the two objects into specific channels of the bitmapdata, then using BitmapData.getColorBoundsRect() to determine if there are any pixels touch. I'm guessing BitmapData.hitTest is faster, but it'd be fun to compare.
I ran into the same problem and to be honest i found the easy way to get rid of that is just generating a "mask" layer for the collisions. You can always place this under your background so it doesn't show, or change the transparencies and whatsoever. Do this in Flash, and after "covering" with rectangles (or whatever) the collisions, just select them all and make that a movie clip.
I'm guessing since you made the symbol in Flash, it obviously knows that even if the symbol consists of several individual drawings or whatever, it's not just an image.
For me this worked fine .
I'm trying to create a multi-level dungeon adventure in Flash CS4. The layout is an instance created of a symbol called Level, within the symbol are multiple wall subsymbols (wall), instances of Wall. There is a collision routine to stop the player walking through the walls, called from Wall.As.
Level is drawn about the centre point (0,0).
When I create an instance on the stage of Level (level), the collision tester is using the xy coordinates for the walls drawn about 0,0, not the "real" xy where it's appearing on the stage.
So what I need to know, is how to "update" the xy for each wall subsymbol with the live stage information, overriding the XYs drawn in the parent. It has to be updated unfortunately (I can't keep it static), as the levels are big so have to scroll.
Thanks for your advice.
With all due respect forget your approach, you're reinventing the wheel for nothing and probably to end up getting worse performance. What you need is pixel-perfect collision detection and probably including basic physics so already we're talking a huge amount of work. If you want to build levels in a design way for a game, use this, it'll blow your mind how awesome/easy/cool this is:
http://www.gotoandlearn.com/play.php?id=135
Its always a guess when trying to answer questions like this, as there are a lot of unknowns. That being said, in programming, there are always more than a few ways to solve a problem. Examine your collision detection routine - if you worked with hitTestPoint, and the point that was being tested (mouseX,Y or your main actor) with localToGlobal, you likely wouldn't need to test for the x,y variables of your collision objects. Read up on those two subjects and this question might be rendered moot.
At any rate, you could update relative coordinates in your Wall.as instance by leveraging globlaToLocal:
public function get curLoc():Point
{
return globalToLocal(new Point(this.x, this.y));
}
and retrieve them from your parent class as a point you can then test against:
trace(_wall.curLoc);
Hope that helps
I suppose you could accomplish what you're trying to do by manipulating the transform property of the wall symbols, but honestly I would concur with Ascension Systems and just abandon your collision testing routine for something different.
You may not need to go all out with a physics engine for your game, in which case just use hitTestObject to do the collision detection.