Related
I want to make body have 100% of the browser height. Can I do that using CSS?
I tried setting height: 100%, but it doesn't work.
I want to set a background color for a page to fill the entire browser window, but if the page has little content I get a ugly white bar at the bottom.
Try setting the height of the html element to 100% as well.
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
Body looks to its parent (HTML) for how to scale the dynamic property, so the HTML element needs to have its height set as well.
However the content of body will probably need to change dynamically.
Setting min-height to 100% will accomplish this goal.
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
As an alternative to setting both the html and body element's heights to 100%, you could also use viewport-percentage lengths.
5.1.2. Viewport-percentage lengths: the ‘vw’, ‘vh’, ‘vmin’, ‘vmax’ units
The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block. When the height or width of the initial containing block is changed, they are scaled accordingly.
In this instance, you could use the value 100vh - which is the height of the viewport.
Example Here
body {
height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
}
This is supported in most modern browsers - support can be found here.
If you have a background image then you will want to set this instead:
html{
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
This ensures that your body tag is allowed to continue growing when the content is taller than the viewport and that the background image continues to repeat/scroll/whatever when you start scrolling down.
Remember if you have to support IE6 you will need to find a way to wedge in height:100% for body, IE6 treats height like min-height anyway.
If you want to keep the margins on the body and don't want scroll bars, use the following css:
html { height:100%; }
body { position:absolute; top:0; bottom:0; right:0; left:0; }
Setting body {min-height:100%} will give you scroll bars.
See demo at http://jsbin.com/aCaDahEK/2/edit?html,output .
After testing various scenarios, I believe this is the best solution:
html {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: table;
}
body {
width: 100%;
display: table-cell;
}
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
It is dynamic in that the html and the body elements will expand automatically if their contents overflow. I tested this in the latest version of Firefox, Chrome, and IE 11.
See the full fiddle here (for you table haters out there, you can always change it to use a div):
https://jsfiddle.net/71yp4rh1/9/
With that being said, there are several issues with the answers posted here.
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
Using the above CSS will cause the html and the body element to NOT automatically expand if their contents overflow as shown here:
https://jsfiddle.net/9vyy620m/4/
As you scroll, notice the repeating background? This is happening because the body element's height has NOT increased due to its child table overflowing. Why doesn't it expand like any other block element? I'm not sure. I think browsers handle this incorrectly.
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
Setting a min-height of 100% on the body as shown above causes other problems. If you do this, you cannot specify that a child div or table take up a percentage height as shown here:
https://jsfiddle.net/aq74v2v7/4/
Hope this helps someone. I think browsers are handling this incorrectly. I would expect the body's height to automatically adjust growing larger if its children overflow. However, that doesn't seem to happen when you use 100% height and 100% width.
html, body
{
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
A quick update
html, body{
min-height:100%;
overflow:auto;
}
A better solution with today's CSS
html, body{
min-height: 100vh;
overflow: auto;
}
What I use on the start of literally every CSS file I use is the following:
html, body{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
min-width: 100%;
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
The margin of 0 ensures that the HTML and BODY elements aren't being auto-positioned by the browser to have some space to the left or right of them.
The padding of 0 ensures that the HTML and BODY elements aren't automatically pushing everything inside them down or right because of browser defaults.
The width and height variants are set to 100% to ensure that the browser doesn't resize them in anticipation of actually having an auto-set margin or padding, with min and max set just in case some weird, unexplainable stuff happens, though you probably dont need them.
This solution also means that, like I did when I first started on HTML and CSS several years ago, you won't have to give your first <div> a margin:-8px; to make it fit in the corner of the browser window.
Before I posted, I looked at my other fullscreen CSS project and found that all I used there was just body{margin:0;} and nothing else, which has worked fine over the 2 years I've been working on it.
Hope this detailed answer helps, and I feel your pain. In my eyes, it is dumb that browsers should set an invisible boundary on the left and sometimes top side of the body/html elements.
Here:
html,body{
height:100%;
}
body{
margin:0;
padding:0
background:blue;
}
You can also use JS if needed
var winHeight = window.innerHeight ||
document.documentElement.clientHeight ||
document.body.clientHeight;
var pageHeight = $('body').height();
if (pageHeight < winHeight) {
$('.main-content,').css('min-height',winHeight)
}
I would use this
html, body{
background: #E73;
min-height: 100%;
min-height: 100vh;
overflow: auto; // <- this is needed when you resize the screen
}
<html>
<body>
</body>
</html>
The browser will use min-height: 100vh and if somehow the browser is a little older the min-height: 100% will be the fallback.
The overflow: auto is necessary if you want the body and html to expand their height when you resize the screen (to a mobile size for example)
CSS Height That Works in Both Modern and Legacy Browsers
Most of the other solutions posted here will not work well in legacy browsers! And some of the code people posted will cause a nasty overflow of text beyond 100% height in modern browsers where text flows past background colors, which is bad design! So please try my code solution instead.
The CSS code below should support flexible web page height settings correctly in all known browsers, past and present:
html {
height: 100%; /* Fallback CSS for IE 4-6 and older browsers. Note: Without this setting, body below cannot achieve 100% height. */
height: 100vh;/* Overrides 100% height in modern HTML5 browsers and uses the viewport's height. Only works in modern HTML5 browsers */
}
body {
height: auto; /* Allows content to grow beyond the page without overflow */
width: auto; /* Allows content to grow beyond the page without overflow */
min-height: 100%; /* Starts web page with 100% height. Fallback for IE 4-6 and older browsers */
min-height: 100vh;/* Starts web page with 100% height. Uses the viewport's height. Only works in modern HTML5 browsers */
overflow-y: scroll;/* Optional: Adds an empty scrollbar to the right margin in case content grows vertically, creating a scrollbar. Allows for better width calculations, as the browser pre-calculates width before scrollbar appears, avoiding page content shifting.*/
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background:yellow;/* FOR TESTING: Next add a large block of text or content to your page and make sure this background color always fills the screen as your content scrolls off the page. If so, this works. You have 100% height with flexible content! */
}
NOTES ON THE CODE ABOVE
In many older, as well as newer browsers, if you do not set 100% height on the <html> selector, body will never achieve 100% height! So that is critical here.
The new viewport units ("vh") are redundant on the body selector and not necessary as long as you have set html selector to a height of either 100% or 100vh. The reason is the body always derives its values from the html parent. The exception is a few very old browsers from the past, so its best to set some height value for the body.
Some modern browsers using the body selector will not know how to inherit the viewport height directly. So again, always set your html selector to 100% height! You can still use "vh" units in body to bypass the parent html value and get its property dimensions directly from the viewport in most modern browsers, however. But again, its optional if the parent or root html selector has 100% height, which body will always inherit correctly.
Notice I've set body to height:auto, not height:100%. This collapses the body element around content initially so it can grow as content grows. You do NOT want to set body height and width to 100%, or specific values as that limits content to the body's current visual dimensions, not its scrollable dimensions. Anytime you assign body height:100%, as soon as content text moves beyond the browser's height, it will overflow the container and thus any backgrounds assigned to the original viewport height, creating an ugly visual! height:auto is your best friend in CSS!
But you still want body to default to 100% height, right? That is where min-height:100% works wonders! It will not only allow your body element to default to 100% height, but this works in even the oldest browsers! But best of all, it allows your background to fill 100% and yet stretch farther down as content with height:auto grows vertically.
Using overflow:auto properties are not needed if you set height:auto on the body. That tells the page to let content expand height to any dimension necessary, even beyond the viewport's height, if it needs to and content grows longer than the viewport page display. It will not break out of the body dimensions. And it does allow scrolling as needed. overflow-y:scroll allows you to add an empty scrollbar to the right of the page content by default in every web browser. The scrollbar only appear inside the scroll bar area if content extends beyond 100% height of the viewport. This allows your page width, and any margins or paddings to be calculated by the browser beforehand and stop the pages from shifting as users view pages that scroll and those that do not. I use this trick often as it sets the page width perfectly for all scenarios and your web pages will never shift and load lightning fast!
I believe height:auto is the default on body in most UA browser style sheets. So understand most browsers default to that value, anyway.
Adding min-height:100% gives you the default height you want body to have and then allows the page dimensions to fill the viewport without content breaking out of the body. This works only because html has derived its 100% height based on the viewport.
The two CRITICAL pieces here are not the units, like % or vh, but making sure the root element, or html, is set to 100% of the viewport height. Second, its important that body have a min-height:100% or min-height:100vh so it starts out filling the viewport height, whatever that may be. Nothing else beyond that is needed.
STYLING HEIGHT FOR LEGACY BROWSERS
Notice I have added "fallback" properties for height and min-height, as many browsers pre-2010 do not support "vh" viewport units. It's fun to pretend everyone in the web world uses the latest and greatest but the reality is many legacy browsers are still around today in big corporate networks and many still use antiquated browsers that do not understand those new units. One of the things we forget is many very old browsers do not know how to fill the the viewport height correctly. Sadly, those legacy browsers simply had to have height:100% on both the html element and the body as by default they both collapsed height by default. If you did not do that, browser background colors and other weird visuals would flow up under content that did not fill the viewport. The example above should solve all that for you and still work in newer browsers.
Before modern HTML5 browsers (post-2010) we solved that by simply setting height:100% on both the html and body selectors, or just min-height:100% on the body. So either solution allows the code above to work in over 20+ years of legacy web browsers rather than a few created the past couple of years. In old Netscape 4 series or IE 4-5, using min-height:100% instead of height:100% on the body selector could still cause height to collapse in those very old browsers and cause text to overflow background colors. But that would be the one issue I could see with this solution.
Using my CSS solution, you now allow your website to be viewed correctly in 99.99% of browsers, past and present rather than just 60%-80% of browsers built the past few years.
Good Luck!
Try
<html style="width:100%; height:100%; margin: 0; padding: 0;">
<body style="overflow:hidden; width:100%; height:100%; margin:0; padding:0;">
Please check this:
* {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
html, body { width: 100%; height: 100%;}
Or try new method Viewport height :
html, body { width: 100vw; height: 100vh;}
Viewport:
If your using viewport means whatever size screen content will come full height fo the screen.
If you don't want the work of editing your own CSS file and define the height rules by yourself, the most typical CSS frameworks also solve this issue with the body element filling the entirety of the page, among other issues, at ease with multiple sizes of viewports.
For example, Tacit CSS framework solves this issue out of the box, where you don't need to define any CSS rules and classes and you just include the CSS file in your HTML.
html {
background: url(images/bg.jpg) no-repeat center center fixed;
-webkit-background-size: cover;
-moz-background-size: cover;
-o-background-size: cover;
background-size: cover;
min-height: 100%;
}
html body {
min-height: 100%
}
Works for all major browsers: FF, Chrome, Opera, IE9+. Works with Background images and gradients. Scrollbars are available as content needs.
For the true purists, this one respects the default margins of the browser, and prevents the undesired scroll generated by the other methods, besides growing if the content grows. Tested in Chrome, Safari and Firefox. The backgrounds are just for show...
html {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100%;
background: red;
}
body {
flex:1;
background: green;
}
Only with 1 line of CSS… You can get this done.
body{ height: 100vh; }
all answers are 100% correct and well explained,
but i did something good and very simple to make it responsive.
here the element will take 100% height of view port but when it comes to mobile view it don't look good specially on portrait view ( mobile ), so when view port is getting smaller the element will collapse and overlap on each other. so to make it little responsive here is code.
hope someone will get help from this.
<style>
.img_wrap{
width:100%;
background: #777;
}
.img_wrap img{
display: block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
padding: 50px 0px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.img_wrap img:nth-child(2){
padding-top: 0;
}
</style>
<div class="img_wrap">
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/84/fc/7184fc63db0516a00e7d86900d957925.jpg" alt="">
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/84/fc/7184fc63db0516a00e7d86900d957925.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<script>
var windowHeight = $(window).height();
var elementHeight = $('.img_wrap').height();
if( elementHeight > windowHeight ){
$('.img_wrap').css({height:elementHeight});
}else{
$('.img_wrap').css({height:windowHeight});
}
</script>
here is JSfiddle Demo.
I style the div container - usually the sole child of the body with the following css
.body-container {
position: fixed;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
overflow-y: auto;
}
Over 20 answers later and none seem to have mentioned the factor that I found was the most crucial - the markup.
After trying basically every answer in this question and a few others, I restructured my markup to something like the following:
<body>
<div class="section1">
<nav>
</nav>
...
</div>
<div class="section2">
</div>
</body>
Essentially, it requires two different outer containers. The first container is for the purpose of containing the navbar and extending the background colour/image all the way to the height of the browser, and the second one for containing everything "below the fold" - including the second background colour/image.
This solution allows the first container's background to expand all the way to the bottom while keeping the second container free to take up as much space as it needs.
From this point on, the only CSS needed to get the result both I and the original question wanted is the following:
body {
height: 100%;
}
.section1 {
height: 100%;
background: black; /* for demo purposes */
}
.section2 {
background: white; /* for demo purposes */
}
Here Update
html
{
height:100%;
}
body{
min-height: 100%;
position:absolute;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
About the extra space at the bottom: is your page an ASP.NET application? If so, there is probably a wrapping almost everything in your markup. Don't forget to style the form as well. Adding overflow:hidden; to the form might remove the extra space at the bottom.
CSS3 has a new method.
height:100vh
It makes ViewPort 100% equal to the height.
So your Code should be
body{
height:100vh;
}
I'm trying to build a website that has lots of boxes that are of equal width and height. For example, I have a page that has 2 equal size boxes side by side.
The simple solution was to set the width and height to 50vw. This works great until there is a scroll bar. I've Googled around for hours and can't understand why on earth vw and vh would include the scrollbars as part of the viewport.
Here's a sample of my issue
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="box red"></div>
<div class="box green"></div>
</div>
<div class="lotta-content"></div>
CSS
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.container {
width: 100vw;
}
.box {
float: left;
width: 50vw;
height: 50vw;
}
.red {
background-color: red;
}
.green {
background-color: green;
}
.lotta-content {
height: 10000px;
}
Notice the unwanted horizontal scrollbar
https://jsfiddle.net/3z887swo/
One possible solution would be to use percentages for the widths, but vw for the height, but it won't ever be a perfect box which isn't the worst thing in the world, but still not ideal. Here's a sample
https://jsfiddle.net/3z887swo/1/
Does anyone know why vw/vh include scrollbars as part of the viewport? Also, if someone has a better solution than my own, I'd love to hear it. I'm looking for a pure CSS solution. I rather not have javascript.
I have a different answer, and feel the need to share my frustration
BECAUSE STANDARD-MAKERS ARE STUPID
(committees, in general, always are)
One simple (simplicistic) workaround is keeping the scrollbar always around and be dealt with it
html,body {margin:0;padding:0}
html{overflow-y:scroll}
(use overflow-x for a layout that uses vh)
I believe they seriously screwed the pooch on this one.
It would be convenient if viewport units didn't include cause scrollbars but it is the display size (screen) after all. Have look at this solution with a pseudo element though:
http://www.mademyday.de/css-height-equals-width-with-pure-css.html
Makes for a square in your example as well:
https://jsfiddle.net/3z887swo/4/
.box {
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
.box::before {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
}
Edit - if anyone is wondering why this works (vertical padding responding to the original element's width)... that's basically how it's defined in the specification:
The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block, even for 'padding-top' and 'padding-bottom'.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/box.html#padding-properties
After coming across my own answer, I think it needed some refinement. Semantic ambiguity is why I replaced the word "include" with "cause" at the top. Because it's more the fact that vw units only take the viewport size into account - not including any scrollbar and causing overflow and a scrollbar in the other direction when its width is added to 100vw (making the total space that is needed the viewport plus scrollbar width, exceeding the screen).
As with the question here, the best way to handle vw units is likely to avoid them if you can because they just aren't very compatible with desktop browser (that don't have overlaying scrollbars).
I edited out the idea that included a CSS variable, however hopeful it seemed.
html { overflow-x: hidden; }
seems to work
This question is old, and answered well above, so I'm going to focus on obtaining scrollbar width to then be used to calc element widths, as that's why I landed here. Hopefully this will help other Googlers.
A sloppy CSS solution
I started writing the pure CSS solution based on the calculation below but once you start factoring in elements inside variable width containers, especially when they aren't 100% of the visible width, the calc functions start getting convoluted and unreadable.
For anybody interested, this calc on the root element (<html>) (assuming the doc is full width and no wider) will give you the scrollbar width or 0 when no scrollbar is displayed.
calc( 100vw - 100% );
A robust solution
Personally, I wouldn't battle CSS on this one. Use the right tool for the job:
(function get_scrollbar_width() {
// Get window width including scrollbar.
const withScrollBar = window.innerWidth;
// Get window width excluding scrollbar.
const noScrollBar = document.querySelector("html").getBoundingClientRect().width;
// Calc the scrollbar width.
scrollbarWidth = parseInt((withScrollBar - noScrollBar), 10) + 'px';
// Update the CSS custom property value.
let root = document.documentElement;
root.style.setProperty('--scrollbar', scrollbarWidth);
})();
:root {
--scrollbar: 0px;
}
body {
overflow: scroll;
}
.demobox {
display: grid;
grid: auto / var(--scrollbar) max-content;
width: calc(10em + var(--scrollbar) );
margin: 0 auto;
}
.demobox > div {
background: red;
}
.demobox > p {
padding: 1em;
text-align: center;
width: 10em;
}
<div class="demobox">
<div></div>
<p>
This red grid cell represents the scrollbar width as set
on the CSS custom property by the JavaScript function.
</p>
</div>
I have a solution here. It'll include the scrollbar width when you use 100vw, right? so if we can't make it right, then we can remove the scrollbar, make it invisible. like this: Hide scroll bar, but while still being able to scroll
I've been looking around all over, but I can't solve this, so I'm turning here.
I want to make a layout that looks like this:
The layout consists of three fields:
A header at the top with a fixed height, dynamic width, and vertically scrollable content.
Body below header, with dynamic width and height, with vertically scrollable content.
A sidebar to the right, with a fixed width, dynamic height, and no scroll. (This should remain fixed when you scroll the body content)
Dynamic height and/or width means it will resize with the window, not that it resizes with content.
If anything is unclear or there's any questions, I'll do my best to answer.
edit: one of my (very failed) attempts here: http://jsfiddle.net/uYTht/34/
html structure:
<body>
<div id="header">
header content
</div>
<div id="content">
body content
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
sidebar content
</div>
</body>
css code:
#header {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
margin-right: 150px;
background-color: green;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
#content {
background-color: blue;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
#sidebar {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 100%;
margin-left: -150px;
width: 150px;
height: 100%;
float: right;
background-color: red;
overflow: hidden;
}
edit: David below helped me find the way. Basically what I had to use to make it work as I wanted was the calc()-function.
edit edit: Jack below came up with a solution that didn't use calc(), which I must say I prefer. Thank you all very much for the help!
I created a simple fiddle, that doesn't use calc (support isn't great - http://caniuse.com/calc, and then there's the big unknown of any performance penalty you may/may not hit using it..)
It's very straight forward, using simple CSS.
http://jsfiddle.net/ruYGH/3/
You can do this by using defined heights and widths for each of the elements with the overflow property.
To make a box scrollable (if the content doesn't fit inside):
overflow:auto;
To make a box not scrollable:
overflow:hidden;
Note that if the height and width are undefined, the element will grow to fit all of the contents.
I made a (not very pretty, but functional) example here:
JSFiddle
Edit:
You can make the sidebar a fixed width and adjust the other elements accordingly with calc:
.sidebar{
width: 200px;
}
.left{
width: calc(100% - 200px);
}
The JSFiddle has been updated to reflect this.
Style the divs with "overflow" to put the scroll bars where you want them and prevent them where you don't want them. You will also use overflow to specify what you want to happen to your content if it should happen to be too big to fit in your fixed width areas.
Chris Coyer is always a knowledgeable CSS resource
As far as the layout goes, it is a walk in the park if you use a two column table with rowspan="2" on the second column of the first row and only one column in the second row.
If you don't want to use tables (there is no good reason not to, but there are thousands of people that will look down on you if you do) then look at using divs with style="display: table...."
Once again Chris Coyer has an explanation
Thanks for the fiddle, your overflow css is working it is just that your header and content divs are 100% wide (full screen) and the scroll bars are conceptually under the sidebar. I need to sell you on using that table layout so that you can "dynamically" fix your dimensions so that the browser can know when to scroll instead of expanding the content down indefinitely to fit the size of the content instead of overflowing with the scroll bar.
How can I have div 'lower' fill the lower part of the screen with it's bg image?
Div 'upper' grows depending on the content.
The red line marks the viewport.
Here I have an example how I did it with a table : Splendid
But I want it tableless!!
Warning: This answer does not solve the original problem, I misunderstood his question. What the author wants to achieve is probably impossible with CSS only, because we have a combination of sticky footer, a footer-head that is always visible (like taskbar) and dynamic height of both the main content and the footer.
I'm leaving the snippet for anyone that might look for a sticky footer.
Fiddle: Dynamic Content with Sticky Footer
I used a timer to illustrate filling the 'Upper' Container with content constantly.
Basically you have the following HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="upper">
<span></span>
<div class="push">
</div>
</div>
<div class="lower">
Footer content goes there.
</div>
</div>
And of course, CSS:
.upper{
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
background: blue;
margin: 0 auto -100px; /* The negative value of the footer height. */
color: white;
}
.lower, .push {
height: 100px; /* Footer and Push need to have equal height */
background: red;
color: white;
}
Code explanation:
This is basically the so called Sticky Footer concept on which you can do additional research. You have your main content, you have your footer and we use a little trick with the push container to literally push the footer so it doesn't overlap any of your content.
The extra CSS is just for the sake of the Demo, I hope you can clean it up and implement it the way you need it.
This is not precisely what you are asking for, but you could scrap the bottom div, and add the large background image to body. Apply background-position: center bottom; to make the image hug the bottom of the screen. This will work particularly well if the image has a clear background.
body {
background: url('largeImage.png') no-repeat center bottom;
}
Ummm just set the height of div 'lower'? Or even min-height if you want it to be content flexible.
You could use Javascript to subtract the height of the upper div from the browser's window height, and if the result is larger than 0, set the lower div at that height?
For getting the window size, I suggest using this function. I believe it's cross-platform, though I haven't tested it recently.
function getDocHeight() {
var D = document;
return Math.max(
Math.max(D.body.scrollHeight, D.documentElement.scrollHeight),
Math.max(D.body.offsetHeight, D.documentElement.offsetHeight),
Math.max(D.body.clientHeight, D.documentElement.clientHeight)
);
}
I want to make body have 100% of the browser height. Can I do that using CSS?
I tried setting height: 100%, but it doesn't work.
I want to set a background color for a page to fill the entire browser window, but if the page has little content I get a ugly white bar at the bottom.
Try setting the height of the html element to 100% as well.
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
Body looks to its parent (HTML) for how to scale the dynamic property, so the HTML element needs to have its height set as well.
However the content of body will probably need to change dynamically.
Setting min-height to 100% will accomplish this goal.
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
As an alternative to setting both the html and body element's heights to 100%, you could also use viewport-percentage lengths.
5.1.2. Viewport-percentage lengths: the ‘vw’, ‘vh’, ‘vmin’, ‘vmax’ units
The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block. When the height or width of the initial containing block is changed, they are scaled accordingly.
In this instance, you could use the value 100vh - which is the height of the viewport.
Example Here
body {
height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
}
This is supported in most modern browsers - support can be found here.
If you have a background image then you will want to set this instead:
html{
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
This ensures that your body tag is allowed to continue growing when the content is taller than the viewport and that the background image continues to repeat/scroll/whatever when you start scrolling down.
Remember if you have to support IE6 you will need to find a way to wedge in height:100% for body, IE6 treats height like min-height anyway.
If you want to keep the margins on the body and don't want scroll bars, use the following css:
html { height:100%; }
body { position:absolute; top:0; bottom:0; right:0; left:0; }
Setting body {min-height:100%} will give you scroll bars.
See demo at http://jsbin.com/aCaDahEK/2/edit?html,output .
After testing various scenarios, I believe this is the best solution:
html {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: table;
}
body {
width: 100%;
display: table-cell;
}
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
It is dynamic in that the html and the body elements will expand automatically if their contents overflow. I tested this in the latest version of Firefox, Chrome, and IE 11.
See the full fiddle here (for you table haters out there, you can always change it to use a div):
https://jsfiddle.net/71yp4rh1/9/
With that being said, there are several issues with the answers posted here.
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
Using the above CSS will cause the html and the body element to NOT automatically expand if their contents overflow as shown here:
https://jsfiddle.net/9vyy620m/4/
As you scroll, notice the repeating background? This is happening because the body element's height has NOT increased due to its child table overflowing. Why doesn't it expand like any other block element? I'm not sure. I think browsers handle this incorrectly.
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
Setting a min-height of 100% on the body as shown above causes other problems. If you do this, you cannot specify that a child div or table take up a percentage height as shown here:
https://jsfiddle.net/aq74v2v7/4/
Hope this helps someone. I think browsers are handling this incorrectly. I would expect the body's height to automatically adjust growing larger if its children overflow. However, that doesn't seem to happen when you use 100% height and 100% width.
html, body
{
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
A quick update
html, body{
min-height:100%;
overflow:auto;
}
A better solution with today's CSS
html, body{
min-height: 100vh;
overflow: auto;
}
What I use on the start of literally every CSS file I use is the following:
html, body{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
min-width: 100%;
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
The margin of 0 ensures that the HTML and BODY elements aren't being auto-positioned by the browser to have some space to the left or right of them.
The padding of 0 ensures that the HTML and BODY elements aren't automatically pushing everything inside them down or right because of browser defaults.
The width and height variants are set to 100% to ensure that the browser doesn't resize them in anticipation of actually having an auto-set margin or padding, with min and max set just in case some weird, unexplainable stuff happens, though you probably dont need them.
This solution also means that, like I did when I first started on HTML and CSS several years ago, you won't have to give your first <div> a margin:-8px; to make it fit in the corner of the browser window.
Before I posted, I looked at my other fullscreen CSS project and found that all I used there was just body{margin:0;} and nothing else, which has worked fine over the 2 years I've been working on it.
Hope this detailed answer helps, and I feel your pain. In my eyes, it is dumb that browsers should set an invisible boundary on the left and sometimes top side of the body/html elements.
Here:
html,body{
height:100%;
}
body{
margin:0;
padding:0
background:blue;
}
You can also use JS if needed
var winHeight = window.innerHeight ||
document.documentElement.clientHeight ||
document.body.clientHeight;
var pageHeight = $('body').height();
if (pageHeight < winHeight) {
$('.main-content,').css('min-height',winHeight)
}
I would use this
html, body{
background: #E73;
min-height: 100%;
min-height: 100vh;
overflow: auto; // <- this is needed when you resize the screen
}
<html>
<body>
</body>
</html>
The browser will use min-height: 100vh and if somehow the browser is a little older the min-height: 100% will be the fallback.
The overflow: auto is necessary if you want the body and html to expand their height when you resize the screen (to a mobile size for example)
CSS Height That Works in Both Modern and Legacy Browsers
Most of the other solutions posted here will not work well in legacy browsers! And some of the code people posted will cause a nasty overflow of text beyond 100% height in modern browsers where text flows past background colors, which is bad design! So please try my code solution instead.
The CSS code below should support flexible web page height settings correctly in all known browsers, past and present:
html {
height: 100%; /* Fallback CSS for IE 4-6 and older browsers. Note: Without this setting, body below cannot achieve 100% height. */
height: 100vh;/* Overrides 100% height in modern HTML5 browsers and uses the viewport's height. Only works in modern HTML5 browsers */
}
body {
height: auto; /* Allows content to grow beyond the page without overflow */
width: auto; /* Allows content to grow beyond the page without overflow */
min-height: 100%; /* Starts web page with 100% height. Fallback for IE 4-6 and older browsers */
min-height: 100vh;/* Starts web page with 100% height. Uses the viewport's height. Only works in modern HTML5 browsers */
overflow-y: scroll;/* Optional: Adds an empty scrollbar to the right margin in case content grows vertically, creating a scrollbar. Allows for better width calculations, as the browser pre-calculates width before scrollbar appears, avoiding page content shifting.*/
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background:yellow;/* FOR TESTING: Next add a large block of text or content to your page and make sure this background color always fills the screen as your content scrolls off the page. If so, this works. You have 100% height with flexible content! */
}
NOTES ON THE CODE ABOVE
In many older, as well as newer browsers, if you do not set 100% height on the <html> selector, body will never achieve 100% height! So that is critical here.
The new viewport units ("vh") are redundant on the body selector and not necessary as long as you have set html selector to a height of either 100% or 100vh. The reason is the body always derives its values from the html parent. The exception is a few very old browsers from the past, so its best to set some height value for the body.
Some modern browsers using the body selector will not know how to inherit the viewport height directly. So again, always set your html selector to 100% height! You can still use "vh" units in body to bypass the parent html value and get its property dimensions directly from the viewport in most modern browsers, however. But again, its optional if the parent or root html selector has 100% height, which body will always inherit correctly.
Notice I've set body to height:auto, not height:100%. This collapses the body element around content initially so it can grow as content grows. You do NOT want to set body height and width to 100%, or specific values as that limits content to the body's current visual dimensions, not its scrollable dimensions. Anytime you assign body height:100%, as soon as content text moves beyond the browser's height, it will overflow the container and thus any backgrounds assigned to the original viewport height, creating an ugly visual! height:auto is your best friend in CSS!
But you still want body to default to 100% height, right? That is where min-height:100% works wonders! It will not only allow your body element to default to 100% height, but this works in even the oldest browsers! But best of all, it allows your background to fill 100% and yet stretch farther down as content with height:auto grows vertically.
Using overflow:auto properties are not needed if you set height:auto on the body. That tells the page to let content expand height to any dimension necessary, even beyond the viewport's height, if it needs to and content grows longer than the viewport page display. It will not break out of the body dimensions. And it does allow scrolling as needed. overflow-y:scroll allows you to add an empty scrollbar to the right of the page content by default in every web browser. The scrollbar only appear inside the scroll bar area if content extends beyond 100% height of the viewport. This allows your page width, and any margins or paddings to be calculated by the browser beforehand and stop the pages from shifting as users view pages that scroll and those that do not. I use this trick often as it sets the page width perfectly for all scenarios and your web pages will never shift and load lightning fast!
I believe height:auto is the default on body in most UA browser style sheets. So understand most browsers default to that value, anyway.
Adding min-height:100% gives you the default height you want body to have and then allows the page dimensions to fill the viewport without content breaking out of the body. This works only because html has derived its 100% height based on the viewport.
The two CRITICAL pieces here are not the units, like % or vh, but making sure the root element, or html, is set to 100% of the viewport height. Second, its important that body have a min-height:100% or min-height:100vh so it starts out filling the viewport height, whatever that may be. Nothing else beyond that is needed.
STYLING HEIGHT FOR LEGACY BROWSERS
Notice I have added "fallback" properties for height and min-height, as many browsers pre-2010 do not support "vh" viewport units. It's fun to pretend everyone in the web world uses the latest and greatest but the reality is many legacy browsers are still around today in big corporate networks and many still use antiquated browsers that do not understand those new units. One of the things we forget is many very old browsers do not know how to fill the the viewport height correctly. Sadly, those legacy browsers simply had to have height:100% on both the html element and the body as by default they both collapsed height by default. If you did not do that, browser background colors and other weird visuals would flow up under content that did not fill the viewport. The example above should solve all that for you and still work in newer browsers.
Before modern HTML5 browsers (post-2010) we solved that by simply setting height:100% on both the html and body selectors, or just min-height:100% on the body. So either solution allows the code above to work in over 20+ years of legacy web browsers rather than a few created the past couple of years. In old Netscape 4 series or IE 4-5, using min-height:100% instead of height:100% on the body selector could still cause height to collapse in those very old browsers and cause text to overflow background colors. But that would be the one issue I could see with this solution.
Using my CSS solution, you now allow your website to be viewed correctly in 99.99% of browsers, past and present rather than just 60%-80% of browsers built the past few years.
Good Luck!
Try
<html style="width:100%; height:100%; margin: 0; padding: 0;">
<body style="overflow:hidden; width:100%; height:100%; margin:0; padding:0;">
Please check this:
* {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
html, body { width: 100%; height: 100%;}
Or try new method Viewport height :
html, body { width: 100vw; height: 100vh;}
Viewport:
If your using viewport means whatever size screen content will come full height fo the screen.
If you don't want the work of editing your own CSS file and define the height rules by yourself, the most typical CSS frameworks also solve this issue with the body element filling the entirety of the page, among other issues, at ease with multiple sizes of viewports.
For example, Tacit CSS framework solves this issue out of the box, where you don't need to define any CSS rules and classes and you just include the CSS file in your HTML.
html {
background: url(images/bg.jpg) no-repeat center center fixed;
-webkit-background-size: cover;
-moz-background-size: cover;
-o-background-size: cover;
background-size: cover;
min-height: 100%;
}
html body {
min-height: 100%
}
Works for all major browsers: FF, Chrome, Opera, IE9+. Works with Background images and gradients. Scrollbars are available as content needs.
For the true purists, this one respects the default margins of the browser, and prevents the undesired scroll generated by the other methods, besides growing if the content grows. Tested in Chrome, Safari and Firefox. The backgrounds are just for show...
html {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100%;
background: red;
}
body {
flex:1;
background: green;
}
Only with 1 line of CSS… You can get this done.
body{ height: 100vh; }
all answers are 100% correct and well explained,
but i did something good and very simple to make it responsive.
here the element will take 100% height of view port but when it comes to mobile view it don't look good specially on portrait view ( mobile ), so when view port is getting smaller the element will collapse and overlap on each other. so to make it little responsive here is code.
hope someone will get help from this.
<style>
.img_wrap{
width:100%;
background: #777;
}
.img_wrap img{
display: block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
padding: 50px 0px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.img_wrap img:nth-child(2){
padding-top: 0;
}
</style>
<div class="img_wrap">
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/84/fc/7184fc63db0516a00e7d86900d957925.jpg" alt="">
<img src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/71/84/fc/7184fc63db0516a00e7d86900d957925.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<script>
var windowHeight = $(window).height();
var elementHeight = $('.img_wrap').height();
if( elementHeight > windowHeight ){
$('.img_wrap').css({height:elementHeight});
}else{
$('.img_wrap').css({height:windowHeight});
}
</script>
here is JSfiddle Demo.
I style the div container - usually the sole child of the body with the following css
.body-container {
position: fixed;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
overflow-y: auto;
}
Over 20 answers later and none seem to have mentioned the factor that I found was the most crucial - the markup.
After trying basically every answer in this question and a few others, I restructured my markup to something like the following:
<body>
<div class="section1">
<nav>
</nav>
...
</div>
<div class="section2">
</div>
</body>
Essentially, it requires two different outer containers. The first container is for the purpose of containing the navbar and extending the background colour/image all the way to the height of the browser, and the second one for containing everything "below the fold" - including the second background colour/image.
This solution allows the first container's background to expand all the way to the bottom while keeping the second container free to take up as much space as it needs.
From this point on, the only CSS needed to get the result both I and the original question wanted is the following:
body {
height: 100%;
}
.section1 {
height: 100%;
background: black; /* for demo purposes */
}
.section2 {
background: white; /* for demo purposes */
}
Here Update
html
{
height:100%;
}
body{
min-height: 100%;
position:absolute;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
About the extra space at the bottom: is your page an ASP.NET application? If so, there is probably a wrapping almost everything in your markup. Don't forget to style the form as well. Adding overflow:hidden; to the form might remove the extra space at the bottom.
CSS3 has a new method.
height:100vh
It makes ViewPort 100% equal to the height.
So your Code should be
body{
height:100vh;
}