I am trying to create a fluid circle using HTML and CSS. I am almost done but as it should be fluid and content inside is dynamic, it's changing its shape from circle to oval and others.
body {
position: relative;
}
.notify {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 20%;
background: red;
border: 2px solid white;
border-radius: 50%;
text-align: center;
}
.notify > div {
padding: 20px;
}
<div class="notify">
<div>
12
</div>
</div>
Can you help me please?
The border-radius:50% hack which you're using makes the assumption that the <div> is square prior to the rounded corners being applied, otherwise it will produce an oval rather than a circle, exactly as you've noted.
Therefore, if you want the circle to remain circular as the content expands, you need to dynamically adjust the height to match the width. You'd probably need to use Javascript to achieve this.
Also, please note that border-radius is not supported in older versions of IE, so users with IE6, IE7 or IE8 won't see your circle at all. (though there is a hack for it called CSS3Pie)
Of course, adjusting the height will have the side effect of making the element take up more space vertically. This may not be what you want; you may want the the circle to be the same size regardless of what content is in it? In this case, you should fix the height and width of the circle, and give the content position:absolute; to prevent it from affecting the size of its parent.
An alternative to using the border-radius hack to produce a circle would be to use SVG. SVG is a vector graphics format which is embedded into most browsers.
Again, the notable exception is IE8 and earlier, but IE supports an alternative format called VML. Various scripts exist which can convert between SVG and VML, so you can produce a cross-browser solution with SVG plus Javascript.
If we're going to accept the Javascript is part of the solution, you could simply use a javascript library to draw it in the first place. My suggestion for this would be Raphael, which generates SVG or VML graphics according to the browser it's running it.
Hope that helps.
You need to set both width and height to the maximum of these both, in order to render a square, that with 50% radius corners, results into a circle.
You can do this in jQuery:
$(function() {
var $elem = $(".notify > div");
var maxSize = Math.max($elem.width(), $elem.height());
$elem.width(maxSize).height(maxSize);
});
Try to change content (both in width and height) here
Example of a fluid circle using only HTML and CSS. As mentioned in my comments to the question, the technique is explained in my blog post. Also as mentioned, Safari does not currently play nice with a border radius specified as a percentage.
The way as Jose Rui Santos did you can achieve your goal. But do few changes in your css.
Like remove padding from .notify > div and adding styles like this:
.notify > div
{
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
and add padding into .notify class like this:
.notify
{
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 20%;
background: red;
border: 2px solid white;
border-radius: 50%;
padding: 30px;
text-align: center;
}
and Jquery code as mentioned by Jose Rui Santos:
var $elem = $(".notify > div");
var maxSize = Math.max($elem.width(), $elem.height());
$elem.width(maxSize).height(maxSize);
See the working Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/2j5Ek/63/
Forcing it's maximum height and weight by setting max-width:XXpx; max-height:XXpx will do the job.
Please note that you may need to use CSS3 word-wrap: break-word; to break the words. Cross-browser compatibility might be an issue.
you need a way to enforce height / width otherwise it will just go oval... its possible!
on this html
<div class="notify">
<div class="child">
12334
</div>
</div>
this jQuery script should do it..
var cw = $('.child').width();
$('.child').css({
'height': cw + 'px',
'line-height': cw + 'px'
});
Related
I have a text which is generated randomly to a div. And this text has different width depending on what is currently generated. And I want this text to marquee only when is too big. html:
<div id="random_word"> <!--here appears something--> </div>
css:
#random_word {
color: white;
position: absolute;
width: 50%;
left: 0%;
text-align: center;
font-size: 8vw;
margin-top: 22%;
font-variant: small-caps
text-shadow: 0 0 20px #000;
text-align: center;
z-index: 2;
overflow: hidden;
white-space: nowrap;
line-height: 100%;
}
I found already this css property in internet: overflow-x:-webkit-marquee;
but I'm not sure how to use it. Can anyone help?
The easiest way to determine if an element is overflowing is to compare its scroll height/width to its offset height/width. If any of the scroll values are larger than their offset pairs, your element's contents are overflowing.
function isElementOverflowing(element) {
var overflowX = element.offsetWidth < element.scrollWidth,
overflowY = element.offsetHeight < element.scrollHeight;
return (overflowX || overflowY);
}
From here it's a simple question of checking the return value of this function and adding a marquee effect if true. To achieve this, you can wrap your div's contents in a <marquee>, or achieve the same visual effect using the prefixed marquee CSS rules or simulating it via a CSS animation.
NB: while the <marquee> tag still works as expected in most browsers, it is considered deprecated hence not futureproof.
Here is a quick fiddle on wrapping in a marquee tag, play around with text length to see how it works. (alternatively, you can set the marquee's behavior to alternate from side to side: here's how )
here is a tutorial on CSS marquee
and here is a thread on visually simulating a marquee with animations
Good luck!
I dont think the accepted answer is working when the overflow is hidden.
Better add another div inside and check their widths
Check with jquery if div has overflowing elements
I would like to vertically align the div ".person-user" so that is vertically in the center of the parent element ".person" (The text to be in the center of the photo but to the right) How can I do this?
Thanks
http://jsfiddle.net/mpBW5/5/
This is something that should be simple, but is actually a pain in the backside to do. Here's a quick jsFiddle, using display: table on the person div, and display: table-cell on the picture wrapper and info divs:
http://jsfiddle.net/2yfDs/1/
What follows is a combination of markup and style that will accomplish exactly what you want, without JavaScript and JQuery.
Markup:
<div class="person">
<img class="profile" src="http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/320450_10151028382307410_534533150_n.jpg"/>
<div class="profile">
<div class="name">Colin Pacelli</div>
<div class="fact">Ohio University</div>
</div>
</div>
Style:
.person {
display: table;
}
.person img.profile{
height: 50px;
margin-right: 10px;
/*border-radius: 4px 4px 4px 4px;*/
}
.person div.profile {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
/*font-family: calibri;
font-size: 14px;
color: #444;*/
}
/*.person .profile .name {
font-weight: bold;
}*/
I have commented out the rules that do not principally affect the solution, so that all can see how little it takes with CSS if done right. Compared to 10 lines of code running using 32Kb of client side code running on top of a virtual machine. And you thought Adobe Flash Player was evil. I do not mind JQuery much, especially for things it can do well, but frankly, involving JQuery in a clear cut case of pure style is a just bit too much.
As you probably can figure, I have edited your JSFiddle, stripping it of non-essentials and cutting it down to a minimal example that exhibits the desired behavior while leaving the visuals in place.
Since you specified html and css as tags, and since it is in nearly all cases a better idea not to resort to JavaScript/JQuery when they can be avoided, I would really use a markup and style solution like the above instead.
The most precise way is to do this with jQuery and calculate it dynamically for each div. This is useful if some/all image/text divs have different heights. The example. The code:
$("div.person-user").each(function() {
$(this).css("marginTop", function() {
var imgH = $(this).prev("div.person-user-pic").height(),
thisH = $(this).height(),
h = (imgH/2) - (thisH/2);
return h;
});
});
BUT: if every div and image has the same height, you could just do this:
div.person-user {margin-top: 8px;}
I hope that this answers your question?
This is a very common question and the best explanation so far is here:
http://phrogz.net/css/vertical-align/index.html
I have a canvas object in a div. The canvas seems to have a padding around it somehow. I want its edges to touch the edges of the browser screen:
// my html file:
<body>
<div id="canvasholder"></div>
</body>
// my java gwt code
Canvas canvas = Canvas.createIfSupported();
canvas.setWidth("100%");
canvas.setHeight("100%");
RootPanel.get("canvasholder").add(canvas);
but yeah the page still has a ~20px margin around the canvas element. There is nothing else on the page beside what's copied above.
I don't think this is a GWT specific problem, might be that html elements have default padding/margin to them?
Thanks
------ Update ------------
I'm weirdly still seeing the padding, the firebug plugin is showing me that the body element has a 10px margin somehow:
// firebug inspection of the body element:
body {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #FFFFFF;
border: 0 none;
color: black;
direction: ltr;
margin: 10px; // huh?
padding: 0;
}
// my css file:
hml, body, div, canvas {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
div.logParent {
position: absolute;
top: 20px; left: 20px;
color: black;
z-index: 2;
}
I had similar problem, the absolutely positioned div with canvas inside (added via JS so no extra spaces around) was causing overflow on page when I positioned div at the bottom of the page.
The solution was to set canvas display property to 'block' (didn't know it's 'inline-block' by default at the time) and now no extra padding is added and scrollbars are gone.
As you've correctly noted, browsers implement default styles for various HTML elements (and they're not standardised, so every browser implements slightly different defaults). For your purposes, given your posted HTML, you'd need something like the following:
html, body, div, canvas {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
This does, of course, over-simplify things and it might be worth setting font-size and default color and background-color properties too (among many, many others).
References:
CSS Reset Reloaded, by Eric Meyer.
YUI reset.
And there are many others, though I really can only think of those two, the css-reset might be of use to you, though.
Question
Can I style just a part of a single character?
Meaning
CSS attributes cannot be assigned to parts of characters. But if you want to style only a certain section of a character, there is no standardized way to do that.
Example
Is it possible to style an "X" which is half-way red and then black?
Not working code
<div class="content">
X
</div>
.content {
position: relative;
font-size: 50px;
color: black;
}
.content:after {
content: 'X';
color: red;
width: 50%;
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
}
Demo on jsFiddle
Purpose
My intention is styling the Font Awesome icon-star symbol. If I have an overlay with dynamic width, shouldn't it be possible to create an exact visualization of scores?
While playing around with a demo fiddle, i figured it out myself and wanted to share my solution. It's quite simple.
First things first: The DEMO
To partly style a single character, you need extra markup for your content. Basically, you need to duplicate it:
<div class="content">
<span class="overlay">X</span>
X
</div>
Using pseudo-elements like :after or :before would be nicer, but i didn't found a way to do that.
The overlay needs to be positioned absolutely to the content element:
.content {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
color: black;
}
.overlay {
width: 50%;
position: absolute;
color: red;
overflow: hidden;
}
Do not forget overflow: hidden; in order to cut off the remaing part of the "X".
You can use any width instead of 50% which makes this approach very flexible. You can even use a custom height, other CSS attributes or a combination of multiple attributes.
Extended DEMO
Great work on your solution. I’ve got a version that uses :after (instead of duplicating the content in the HTML) working in Chrome 19.
http://jsfiddle.net/v5xzJ/4/
Basically:
Set position:relative on .content
Position :after absolutely
Set :after to overflow:hidden
Adjust the width, height, text-indent and line-height of :after to hide bits of it.
I’m not sure if it’ll work well cross-browser though — the em values will probably work out a bit differently. (Obviously it definitely won’t work in IE 7 or below.)
In addition, you end up having to duplicate the content in your CSS file instead of the HTML, which might not be optimal depending on the situation.
I display a few images of varying width and height, and I'd like to be able to add a class or two, say new or hot that would add small overlay star or something.
Normally this would be solved by making a div with the intended image being the background, but having my images all of unknown size, I'm getting stuck trying to figure out how to achieve this. Current HTML is of structure: <a><img></a>
I'm looking for a CSS feature that doesn't exist:
img.new { foreground:transparent url('/images/new.png') no-repeat bottom right }
I'm really hoping to solve this without databasing my image sizes, and without using javascript. But if you have a JS/jquery approach that's elegant, I'm all ears.
I'm not sure how well this would work for you, but if you can add the class to your <a> element instead of your <img>:
<a class="new" href="..."><img src="..." alt="alt text"></a>
Then you can try adding an a:after pseudo-element positioned absolutely over your <img> and giving it the overlay icon as a background image:
a.new {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
a.new:after {
display: block;
position: absolute;
content: '';
width: /* width of overlay image or anything you choose */;
height: /* height of overlay image or anything you choose */;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background: transparent url('/images/new.png') no-repeat;
}
There's a bit of an issue with the positioning of the overlay image as the <a> is made an inline block for positioning to work, but you can always give it a little bottom offset to make up for it. Here's a fiddle to show you what I mean.
Without knowing more details about your setup, there are a few things that come to mind that you can do:
Use img.new:after (Some Quirksmode info on it.). It does have some browser support limitations, though. If you don't mind that some of the older browsers don't support this, then I recommend this one. I've used it before with nice results (and you could also fall back to JavaScript wrapped in IE conditional comments if you really need to, since IE appears to be the only browser out after the feature that doesn't support it).
If you're not using overflow:hidden, you might be able to set it as the background of either your image, its anchor tag, or even the next parent up. This, of course, depends on your exact design.
Use an absolutely positioned div or span within your anchor tag and display only on anchors with the .new class. So, something like this:
<a class="new">
<span class="newBanner">
<img/>
</a>
<style>
.newBanner {
display: none;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
.new .newBanner {
display: block;
}
</style>
This last one's kind of rough and will likely need tweaked, but the point is in the styling, specifically the .new .newBanner { display: block; } part. Again, it depends largely on your exact design, so the more information you can give us, the better help we'll be able to give you.