I always seems to get this simple HTML stuff wrong. I am currently trying to add side by side divs in the middle of a page on this test page I made:
http://www.comehike.com/hiking_dev.php
The code I added was something like this:
<div style="width: 460px; float: left; ">
<strong>Test hello</strong>
</div>
<div style="width: 300px; float: right; ">
<strong>Test hello 2</strong>
</div>
I added <strong> tags so you can spot it on the page better.
But do you see there is text that appears there that reads like this "When considering the injury risk of any" - but that text is in the <p> tag below. Why is it appearing there?
Is it better practice to wrap my 2 divs that I am trying to align, within another div?
After your two floating divs, add another empty div...
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
This will cause the two floating divs to push all subsequent content below them. As you have it now, there is 200 pixels of empty space after the first div allowing the other content to simply wrap around it.
Increasing the width of the floating divs may not be desirable for your layout so clear:both; is most typical for this situation.
Surround those two divs in a parent div with overflow set to hidden.
<div style="overflow:hidden;">
<div style="width: 460px; float: left; ">
<strong>Test hello</strong>
</div>
<div style="width: 300px; float: right; ">
<strong>Test hello 2</strong>
</div>
</div>
An alternative (as others have pointed out) is to use a third element:
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
It's debatable as to which is better. Usually, either is just fine. Here's a post about the topic:
Floated Child Elements: overflow:hidden or clear:both?
You'll either need to add a div below your two divs with clear:both; as others have suggested, or you could add clear:both; to the following <p> element.
Because you have an entire page width of 960px. You're combined div widths are 760px (400+300). If you add 200px to the second div you should be fine.
Edit: Because of padding, you can increase either of the divs by 150px and be fine.
Related
maybe this is a stupid question but I have a doubt about CSS clear propery use.
I have this template: http://onofri.org/example/WebTemplate/
Why if I delete (you can try with firebug) the propery clear: both from the #footcontainer div I obtain that this div is placed at the top (it seems almost below the header and below the two columns)
My idea is this thing happens because the two columns #content and #sidebar are floated to the left and without setting clear: both on the #footcontainer div the browser try to put also this div on the right of the #content* div but have no space and put at the top.
Is this a right intuition or am I missing something?
Tnx
Andrea
This is happening because everytime you float an element, its container loses its auto height.
If you want to prevent that from happening, there are somethings you can do:
Set a given height to the container
Ex:
<div class="my-container" style="height: 100px">
<div style="float: left;">
Some very interesting text right here.
</div>
<div style="float: left;">
Don't read this and you'll be doomed.
</div>
</div>
Be aware that if you have set a given height, the div won't resize as the content becomes higher than the container.
Append a div with style="clear: both" right after the floated elements
Ex:
<div class="my-container">
<div style="float: left;">
Some very interesting text right here.
</div>
<div style="float: left;">
Don't read this and you'll be doomed.
</div>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
Yeah, it works. But only noobs do it like that. It's not elegant and pollutes your code.
Set overflow: hidden to the parent container
<div class="my-container" style="overflow: hidden">
<div style="float: left;">
Some very interesting text right here.
</div>
<div style="float: left;">
Don't read this and you'll be doomed.
</div>
</div>
This one is great, but you are in danger if you have someting positioned absolutely and have to move it outside the parent div, for example. You'll have an unpleasant surprise.
Use the ClearFix Hack.
This is the way I do it: easy to implement and works like a charm. Check this link out: http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html;
If you mind about not having valid CSS (like me), you can target IE browsers with a different stylesheet and conditional comments, for example.
Further resources about the subject:
Quirks Mode Site: CSS Clearing
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
Chris Coyier's ClearFix Tutorial
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/clear-fix/
I see you code
your code is too complicated according to me but any way you can used to this css than your problem is solve
Used to this css
#c{position:relative;}
#c:after {
position: absolute;
content: "";
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: -42px;
background: url('http://onofri.org/example/WebTemplate/images/footerRight.jpg') no-repeat -3px 0px;
height: 43px;
}
#footerRight{display:none;}
You have no height set on your container. If you change the height of container to the height of its' contents, which in this case is 596 px then when you take away the clear both property on the footer it won't move one iota.
I think it's because if you float an object, the parent object doesn't resize accordingly.
For example, if you had:
<div class="1px-border">
<div class="float">
<h3>TEST</h3>
</div>
</div>
The border would be completely flat, and not resize to the header. You could fix it by having overflow: auto in the container div.
That said, I could be massively wrong.
Okay, so this is going to be hard to explain, so please ask questions if I am not clear
In my html page, I have a main "container" div that has multiple divs within it, but each of the divs inside the container are placed into one of two columns (so if there is a div in the container, it is either in the left column or the right column)
<div id="container">
<div id="column1">
<div id="item1-1"></div>
<div id="item1-2"></div>
<div id="item1-3"></div>
</div column1>
<div id="column2">
<div id="item2-1"></div>
<div id="item2-2"></div>
<div id="item2-3"></div>
</div column2>
</div container>
[NOTE: I know the syntax is incorrect, I am just making it easier to read]
So, in other words, I want two columns of divs that can vary in size (so the page size can vary), and so that item1-2 appears below item1-1, etc. The problem here is I want the divs in the container to appear inside of it, so I cannot use absolute or relative positioning. Something is telling me I should be using a table, but I am not sure how to go about doing this.
So, my question is: using only html and css, is there any to do exactly what is above?
First: make </div column1> and </div column2> just say </div>
Second: CSS:
#container {
width: 100%;
}
#column1, #column2 {
float: left;
width: 50%;
}
To achieve the look you want you should use CSS float property. However, to avoid problems with parent container not displaying correctly, consider following one of the two possible solutions:
Adding a div after floating elements with
clear: both
or applying code below to your parent div
overflow: hidden
Basically what I have is an HTML page with a "main content" block, if you will. All main content for that page goes in the div I have for it. What I want is to have a column with more stuff to the right of it, but whatever I try to do it always ends up going either below it or in some random place. Here is the code for my page, if anyone could help guide me through it that would be awesome.
HTML: http://pastebin.com/Hh2TNGdj
CSS: http://pastebin.com/ZCEJkFmH
Thanks.
You were probably close... putting in your new div straight after #pagecontent, and floating it right, then floating the #pagecontent div left, will allow them to sit side by side.
Note that the next content (footer, for instance) will need to be cleared properly so it won't overlap your floated divs.
I would switch to using HTML5 tags, personally. If I were to do something like this, I would go with code along this line (untested):
<div id="wrapper"> #wrap both sections in a container
<section id="left">Left Section</section>
<section id="right">Right Section</section>
</div>
For the CSS, you can do something like this:
#wrapper {
width: 1000px;
height: auto;
}
#left {
width: 500px;
height: auto;
float: left;
}
#right {
width: 500px;
height: auto;
float: left;
}
Some important things to remember. If you add padding, subtract that from the width (if padding is on both left and right, subtract padding x2). On your footer, put clear: both.
Hope this helps you out.
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/n6D7U/
new div #aside,
both columns are floating with fixed width (700+20+240 pixels here),
last CSS rule is there because parent has only floating children and thus no more content in the flow to push down the background...
I think this should work:
<div style="padding:20px;">
<div id="pagecontent">
<span class="main-content-font">
The title of this page goes in the gray box above. This is the homepage, you can put <u>anything</u> here (the main content of your website
which has some neat features and explains what your site is about should go here)!<br />
<br>
Content, content, and more content!<br />
<br>
Try to make it fill up as much space as possible, making the page longer. Don't fill it with useless junk, just anything
you can think of that will benefit the page.
</span>
<span class="whatever">
some things
</span>
</div>
</div>
I haven't tried it, but making main-content-font a span will not add a newline, so the whatever span will be placed to its right.
This jsfiddle example shows what I'm talking about, I gave the div in question a red border to show how it's displayed.
I'd expect the #searchwrapper_3 div to go inside the #col_st_cautare one, but for some reason that's not how it works. I've been staring at it for a while now and I got no idea why it's showing like that
I also have an example of it looking ok simply because i've added another element after the #searchwrapper div here.
Issue's fixed, TIL a div will collapse if it contains only floating elements.
You need to do a clear:both; - see the end of http://jsfiddle.net/wzYry/3/
<div style="border: 1px solid red;" id="col_st_cautare">
<div style="float: left;" id="searchwrapper_3">
.... code ....
</div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>
On a side note, it may be easier to make clr class in your styles.
.clr{clear:both;}
This way you can use this anytime you need to clear
<div class='clr'></div>
If a div contains only floating elements, it height will collapse.
You can add a <div style="clear:both;"> or use some techniques from this article, for example overflow:hidden:
<div style="border: 1px solid red;overflow:hidden" id="col_st_cautare">
This is happening because the child elements inside are floated and parent lost track of the how to wrap them.
Probably the easiest fix for this
#col_st_cautare { overflow: hidden; }
Demo
Other than this, the stable solution would be to add <div style="clear:both;"></div> before the closing the element.
I am trying to create a 4 column <div> layout.
Why are the row containers not drawing a border around the respective row?
Also, is this a good approach, as in is my css written well to be fluid and for dynamic resizing of the browser window?
Any suggestions or help would be most appreciated.
Here is my current attempt.
You need to set the overflow to auto when using float. http://jsfiddle.net/gJJHs/
The problem seems to be that you are floating your columns, and when you float things, they take up effectively zero space.
I think the solution is to cancel the float in you "last" class and add a "dummy column" to each row.
This CSS seems to work:
.col
{
float: left;
width: 25%;
}
.last{
clear: left;
}
.row{
border: 1px solid green;
}
Revised HTML (with dummy last column):
<div class="row">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
<div class="col">4</div>
<div class="last" />
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">5</div>
<div class="col">6</div>
<div class="col">7</div>
<div class="col">8</div>
<div class="last" />
</div>
When an element is floated, its parent no longer contains it because the float is removed from the flow. The floated element is out of the natural flow, so all block elements will render as if the floated element is not even there, so a parent container will not fully expand to hold the floated child element.
As such, the border will seem like it is not bordering anything :( Take a look at the following article to get a better idea of how the CSS Float property works:
The Mystery Of The CSS Float Property
As others have said, if you add overflow: auto; to your .row class, it'll take care of the problem. Here's another article that explains why to use overflow.
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
I hope this helps.
Hristo
it's the float left. That takes the divs "out of flow" and it's drawing the border around empty space essentially
Yet another option, in addition to the other answers, is to add overflow: hidden; to your .row.
The reason for the behavior you saw is that float takes the div outside of the normal flow. The div then essentially takes up no space in the document.
This makes sense if you think about the ostensible purpose of floating an image in order to wrap text around it. The next p tag (for example) is positioned as if the floated image wasn't there, i.e. overlapping the image. Then, the browser wraps the text within the 'p' tag around the image. (If the floated image was not "removed from the flow", the p tag would naturally appear below the image—not giving the desired effect.)
Here's how I'd write the code.
HTML:
<div class="row">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
<div class="col">4</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">5</div>
<div class="col">6</div>
<div class="col">7</div>
<div class="last">8</div>
</div>
CSS:
.col
{
float: left;
width: 25%;
}
.row{
border: 1px solid green;
overflow: hidden; /* "overflow: auto;" works just as well instead */
width:100%; /* Helps older versions of IE */
}
Add a "float:none;clear:both" to your .row and you'll see the rows appropriately. But for the fluid behavior and design that you are looking for, you'll want to apply some javascript (like jQuery Equal Height: http://www.jainaewen.com/files/javascript/jquery/equal-height-columns/) to be consistent across browsers without a ton of CSS hacking.