What's more correct, an empty string link or a pound?
For example for anchor tags
Or if I were to reference a style sheet, basically anywhere in the html document where a link should be, if I want to remove all these links is it better to make it a pound or blank?
If you need more details i'm basically canning them and need to remove all external dependencies.
You can use to avoid any loading or scrolling.
If an anchor tag has a blank href, clicking it would cause the page to reload, whereas a pound would stay on the page, but bring them back to the top. Neither are ideal since the user would be confused...
For removing stylesheets...why not remove the whole line altogether?
Related
I want to place some external links inside Jetpack's [recipe-ingredients] shortcode block.
However, when I view the published post, the links are being treated as internal links instead of external links.
Here's an image of the problem:
As you can see; the link gets appended to the end of my blog URL instead of just linking to the external website. This happens even if I add https:// to the a href link. Links that are in normal paragraphs (not shortcode blocks) behave normally.
Is there someway I can fix this?
I fixed it! What worked was removing the quotes ("") around the URL in the a href tag.
For some reason, the quotes are being auto-applied to the URL, so it ended up doubling them in the output, thus creating the internal linking issue.
I have two pages on my website. I tried to make it so that they had the same appearance but they do not.
This page has a blank area at top of page. Please, show me how to remove it. I cannot find what HTML code is causing this blank area.
http://ec2-50-17-62-126.compute-1.amazonaws.com/dev/chia-se-dia-diem
This page is normal without unexpected blank area
http://ec2-50-17-62-126.compute-1.amazonaws.com/dev
Thank You!
I think you forget to close any tag in your site. Most probably it is problem of javascript. so, remove one by one javascript and check this out...
I have hash(#) links in my own website, and I realised that when I click on them, a hash sign will always appear at the end of my url. But in other web pages that I was fiddling around with, no matter how many times I clicked the link which had a source of '#', it would never add a hash to the end of my URL. Why is this?
They probably have javascript attached to the link that prevents the link action from starting.
A simple
return false;
will do this
It's normal behaviour of anchor links. If you click link with href like something#anchor, you are redirected to url something (if you aren't already on it) and #anchor appended to url. This anchor refers to some part of page. Single "#" sign is simply the empty anchor.
To avoid this sign appearing in url, you should remove href attribute entirely (but sometimes after this action you need to fix stylesheet because appearance of links depends on href attribute presence). Or, if you are using javascript handlers of click event, you should change them to return false.
I see on some website (like StackOverflow, yahoo, the US Homeland Security department, ...) a word associated to a link that, when clicked, not only loads a page, but also, displays that page at the exact location where the contain related to the word starts.
How can I obtain that with ASP.NET MVC? (by the way, do I need javascript for that?)
Thanks for helping
Go to the other content
<a name="jumpHere">Some content</a>
Also the URL can have /yourpage.html#jumpHere or with variables, /yourpage.html?var1=foo&var2=bar#jumpHere.
Since we're talking about the hash (#), it's usually used for jumping to a specific part of the page. Because of that, it won't reload the whole page. This is useful for web applications that move from one view to another using only AJAX. To make each view bookmarkable, JavaScript "saves" the state (what view you are on) using location.hash to the URL. The next time you open the URL, JavaScript reads it and loads the correct view. In HTML5 this is superseded by pushState.
1) Find the coordinates of the element on the page
2) window.scrollTo(x,y)
Its called an anchor tag.
Place this in your HTML.
<a name="name"></a>
If you call this URL, it will jump to that place.
html-file.html#name
See: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_a.asp
You can use a named anchor to do this with HTML, without javascript. here is a link explaining this.
It is very simply done with id tag of differnt html elements
for eg :- an div element if it is having "footer" as its id and is placed at the bottom of the page then, http://url-address-to-thatpage.html#footer will load the page and scroll it too the footer. (adding the "#idoftheelement" after the page url)
It is also possible to load and scroll the page with javascript.
You need to create a named anchor within the page. This will have the result you're talking about, almost like creating a "bookmark" within a page. No javascript required.
First, create the anchor using the <a> tag with the name attribute specified (in this case, section1):
<a name="section1"></a>
Then, to link to that anchor from the same page, just use something like this:
Go to Section 1
If you're linking to that anchor from another page (in this case, mypage.html), append #section1 at the end of the url:
Go to Section 1 in MyPage.html
For more information, see here.
Another way to do it is with the "id" attribute if it's not an anchor tag you'd like to bookmark. For example:
<div id="bookmark1">Content...</div>
Then, you can link to it with an anchor tag like this:
Go to content
Or link to that spot on the page by appending a #bookmark1 to
http://yourwebsite.com/page#bookmark1
I have inspected some sites and they have a pound(#) sign in the url. What does it do?
<a href="#" >Link name</a>
It's a "fragment" or "named anchor". You can you use to link to part of a document. Typically when you link to a page, the browser opens it up at the top of the page. But you link to a section half-way down, you can use the fragment to link to that heading (or whatever).
If there is no <a name="whatever"/> tag within the page, then the browser will just link to the top of the page. If the fragment is empty, then it will also just link to the top of the page.
For a fragment only Link name, then that's just a link to the top of the current page.
You often see that kind of link used in conjuction with javascript. Standards compliant HTML requires a href attribute, but if you're planning to handle the request with javascript then "#" serves as a reasonable place holder.
... just to add a few extra useful tips.
You can access and change it with document.location.hash in JavaScript.
It can point to a named anchor (e.g. <a name="top"></a>) or to an element with a corresponding id (e.g. <div id="top"></div>).
Seeing one on its own (e.g. popup) generally means a link is being used to run JavaScript exclusively. This is bad practice.
Any a element should have a href that points to a valid resource. If one does not exist, consider using another element, such as button.
The pound sign (#) indicates to locate an anchor on the page. For example, if you include this somewhere on the page:
<a name="foo"></a>
or, more recently:
<div id="foo">*part of page*</div>
and then you click on a link on the page that has the href #foo, it will navigate to the anchor with the name or div with the id foo.
However, if you just have the href #, it will lead to the top of the page.
# indicates a link to an anchor.
I thougt I'd also mention something else:
Using '#' as the href for a link that activates JavaScript is bad because it scrolls the page to the top - which is probably not what you want. Instead, use javascript:void(0).
This links back to the page itself. It's often used with links which actually run some JavaScript.
I think most of the posters here forgot how to use Internal Links.
A typical <a> element uses an href attribute to link to an external URL/URI (website). But most new developers do not realize you can also link to internal sections of your web page by using a "#" and an identifier instead. The easiest way to do this cross-browser, is using the following HTML:
This page link...
Go to Section 1
...goes to this page location.
<a id="section1" name="section1"></a>
The "#section1" href value is called a "fragment identifier" and will appear in your browser's url when you click the link. Your page will then look for this identifier in your HTML page and automatically scroll down the page to it.
Notice I have used the anchor <a> tag as my receiver to the link. Traditionally this is how most web pages used to use these types of page links. Using anchors you avoid having to rename existing elements. It is also semantically correct and a better way to manage these types of bookmarks. But....it's ok practice to use a <div> or other HTML element with an id and name matching attribute assigned as the bookmark for the fragment identifier.
I like to use both id and name attributes with the fragment identifier, as HTML5 often does not support the name attribute on some elements, while id may not be recognized for the page marker identifier in older browsers.
This shortened, nameless version below is often used by developers as a default URL "stub" for an unknown URL added later to an anchor, to trigger a page refresh, or enable a link but let a Javascipt method capture the click event and route off somewhere else. This makes the "#" a nice fallback should the Javascript piece fail. It then becomes a nice Javascript-free refresh link. The "#" can also be a useful URL "filler for the "href" value when a missing or blank URL on an element might otherwise trigger some problem or style:
Go to the Top
The specific question was "I have inspected some sites and they have a pound(#) sign in the url. What does it do?"
An example is then given:
<a href="#" >Link name</a>
A consistent valid answer is given for jumplinks (whatever you want to call them) however the CSS :target psuedoselector would absolutely makes use of the hash in a URL as well.
It doesn't change the answers. However gives another use case I thought would be valuable, to not belabor, see the below excellent link which explains:
However, https://css-tricks.com/on-target/