I declared an iFrame in my html, and the source is my XQuery file. In my XQuery, I defined a <div>, within which I also declared a button named "convert".
My XQuery file basically looks like this (this is the source for the iFrame）
return
<div id="content">
<table>
....
<tbody>
{
...
<td>
<a id="{$t/#id}"
rel="nofollow"
target="_new"
name="{util:document-name($t)}:{util:node-id($t)}"
href=
"http://localhost:8080/exist/rest/db/motorola/xquery/toDita.xql?xml={
util:document-name($t)
}&xsl=mot2dita.xsl">
<input type="submit" value="convert"/>
</a>
</td>
...
}
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
As you can see, in a td, I declared a button called "convert", and the "href" gives the link. Right now this button works perfectly in Firefox and Chrome(opening a new window to do the task), but in IE, after clicking it, it just doesn't do anything.
I wonder if this is a browser issue or my XQuery script has problems. Thanks in advance for helping out.
<input> tags are not valid inside <a> tags. The XHTML code is therefore not valid, which will account for the inconsistent behaviour - some browsers are better at compensating for odd cases like this than others.
Recommend you remove the <input> entirely and use CSS to style your <a> tag to look like a button, if it's just the look of a button that you're after.
Unless you're inside a form, it's not going to submit anything...definitely not an A tag.
I prefer to do these with Jquery UI's button feature. It gets the desired behavior you're looking for, is progressively enhanced and tested to handle the full gamut of browsers, and can be done use a href links, button elements, or input type=submit elements. Plus, styling looks great and is instantaneous.
Here's a quick tut: http://www.filamentgroup.com/lab/styling_buttons_and_toolbars_with_the_jquery_ui_css_framework/
Related
This is the code currently, I've tried adding target="_Blank" but it still opens in the same tab.
We are using WordPress and this is the code we use in the text box for a button to appear.
button color="extra-color-1" hover_text_color_override="#ffffff" size="large" url="https://www.insideeducation.ca/learning-resources/classroom-learning-resources/elementary-school/#flying-animals-scavenger-hunt" text="Flying Animals | Scavenger Hunt"]
did you try anchor tag because i think target attribute works pretty well with anchor
I can't tell you that any of these approaches will work for sure, but there are three methods or workarounds I've thought of that you could try out.
1. Use target="_blank"
I would usually use lower case letters in target attributes. So instead of target="_Blank", you could try target="_blank".
However, this is more likely to be a matter of preference, and I think browsers will most likely accept both of these options.
2. Use some simple javascript
You could use the javascript window.open() function as a workaround for this problem.
Replace target="_Blank" with onclick="window.open('https://www.example.com')" and see if that works any better!
3. Use an anchor tag
At the moment, you seem to be using a button element which looks something like this:
<button color="extra-color-1" ... target="_blank" url="https://...">
Click here!
</button>
You could wrap an a tag around the button and instead apply the target attribute to that. It may be that target attributes work better directly on anchor tags. Here's what it would look like:
<a href="https://..." target="_blank">
<button color="extra-color-1" ... >
Click here!
</button>
</a>
I have used <a> tag inside <div> which is not working in IE
my code structure is like :
<div>
<a target="_top" href="address">
<button>
</button>
</a>
</div>
So It is working fine in all browsers except IE.
When I click on button it is not redirected to specified url from tag.
What you are doing is not recommended - don't wrap a button in a link. Style your link like a button or use an onclick:
<button onclick="window.open(href);">
</button>
(Addendum: Just for accessibility, don't use target on your links since it messes with people who use screen readers. Only apply a target after page load when there is javascript available. Also, people like to control where their new page opens - it's not something you should try to dictate too much.)
button tag is only allowed within a <form> tag. Since there is no form, IE is ignoring this. Other browser have a more defensive "do what I mean" parser probably ...
You might do it like this:
<input type="button" onClick="document.location='address'; return false" value="click me" />
In html5 can I use <button> outside the <form>, like this:
<body>
<form action="page.html" method="get" id="myForm">
...
</form>
<button type="submit" form="myForm" value="Submit">Send</button>
</body>
But I do not want to use the form, only the <button>, because my project is all done with Javascript/Ajax
I wanted to make a "noscript-friendly" design, but it is a closed intranet and for a company project and do not have much time for this.
Use <button> without <form> is semantic?
<body>
<div>
<button type="button">test</button>
</div>
</body>
Or would be better to continue to use <a href="javascript:void(0)">?
Note: Remember not all valid code by W3 is a semantic code
Your use of the button element is appropriate.
That’s why there is the Button state in the first place. The HTML5 spec also shows an example, very similar to your use case:
The following button is labeled "Show hint" and pops up a dialog box when activated:
<button type=button
onclick="alert('This 15-20 minute piece was composed by George Gershwin.')">
Show hint
</button>
Note: Your question has nothing to do with the Semantic Web. There is a difference between "semantic (markup)" and "Semantic Web".
Your use of the button element is "semantic" in the sense that you are using it correctly according to the HTML5 specification, and that there is no other element defined which would be more appropriate.
You might want to use the a element in cases where you are navigating to another resource (no matter how it’s implemented technically). For apps, the difference is sometimes not very clear. A rule of thumb: if the URL changes (could users want to bookmark/share it?) and/or you could use a link type (even only theoretically), it’s likely that you should use a instead of button. But as this is a different question, please take it just as a side note.
I have a form within a table which is within another form. My problem is that the embedded form tag is not appearing - the input and iframe appears, but the form tags do not appear. The table and outer form appear. What's wrong?
<form>
<table id=\"mytableid\">
<tr class=\"form_row\">
<td align=\"right\">
Upload Photo:
</td>
<td align=\"left\">
<form action=\"/myuploadpath\" method=\"post\" enctype=\"multipart/form-data\" target=\"upload_target\" id=\"photo_url_upload_form\" name=\"venue_photo_url_upload_form\">
<input type=\"file\" name=\"photo_url\" id=\"photo_url\" size=\"40\" />
<iframe id=\"upload_target\" name=\"upload_target\" src=\"#\" style=\"width:0;height:0;border:0px solid #fff;\"></iframe>
</form>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
Putting a form inside another form is not valid HTML. When this happens each browser will do different things with the markup. Some ignore parts, some break, etc. Either way you shouldn't do this.
Edit
If you are using tables for layout purposes, you technically shouldn't be. They are only meant for tabular data. You should use divs/spans and CSS to create the look you want on your site. A great place to learn about this stuff is W3C Schools.
I assume you're using something like Firebug or the Chrome DOM Inspector to look at your DOM tree and you can't see the inner <form>. These tools inspect the DOM itself, not the HTML source. That is, they show you what the browser has interpreted from your HTML. The problem in this case is that nesting a <form> within another <form> is invalid, and hence the browser has ignored it and continued parsing the rest of the document.
Obviously, the fix is to ditch that outer form since it's not doing anything. If you have it there for styling purposes, perhaps use a <div> with a class.
I'm trying to get everything in the anchor tag to be a clickable link. Unfortunately, in IE6 (which is the only browser I'm concerned with currently), the only thing that isn't a clickable link are the inline images. I know that it's not valid html to put a div inside of an anchor but it's not my markup and I've been asked to avoid changing it. Any suggestions to altering the CSS to enable the images as clickable links? If changing the markup is the only solution... any suggestions there? My initial thought was to set the image as a background of it's parent (.ph-item-featured-img), although I'm unclear if that will solve the problem.
Thanks!
<div class="tab-panel-init clear ui-tabs-panel ui-widget-content ui-corner-bottom" id="ph-flashlights">
<a href="#" class="last ph-item-featured clear">
<div class="ph-item-featured-img">
<img src="#">
</div>
<strong>
PRODUCT CODE
</strong>
<p>
PRODUCT CODE Heavy Duty Aluminum Led Flashlight
</p>
<span>Learn more ></span> </a>
<a href="#" class="last ph-item-featured clear">
<div class="ph-item-featured-img">
<img src="#">
</div>
<strong>
PRODUCT CODE
</strong>
<p>
PRODUCT CODE Heavy Duty Aluminum Led Flashlight
</p>
<span>Learn more ></span> </a>
</div>
The problem is that it isn't valid html. Explain that you have to change the markup to make it work as desired. Changing the div to a span and setting the class .ph-item-featured-img to display: block should produce the same look-and-feel and be correct html.
Edit: Another, not as clean solution, is to add a click-listener with JavaScript and invoke the link upon a click on the image.
If you can't change the mark up (which you admit isn't valid), I don't think there is anything you can do here.
You should reconsider changing the markup. This example is bad in so many ways it could serve as a textbook example of what not to do.
Alternate strategies:
Remove everything but the image and
give it an onclick handler that does
the link mechanics.
Remove the DIV and just have the IMG
inside the anchor tag.
etc.
Well i looks like youre already using jQueryUI so why not just through a click even on the containing DIV. Also you should definitely change the markup. If its not valid, its not valid. That can lead to all kinds of problems other than the one youre currently facing. If there is a good reason for change this is it.
This is what the w3c validator returns when I pass in the snippet you posted:
Line 15, Column 46: document type does not allow element "DIV" here; missing one of "OBJECT", "MAP", "BUTTON" start-tag
<div class="ph-item-featured-img">
The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which you've placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned. This might mean that you need a containing element, or possibly that you've forgotten to close a previous element.
One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted to put a block-level element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an inline element (such as "<a>", "<span>", or "<font>").
If I remember correctly, IE6 requires that every element inside of the <a> tag to be an element with CSS display: inline set on it (or inline-by-default elements like <span>, <b>, <strong>, etc.), or else it doesn't get linked, or links act weird.
Perhaps it is even IE6's HTML parser that is to blame. Maybe it sees the <img src="#"> and thinks, "that's not a valid URL to an image! :ignore:". IE6 is strange that way, often acting in a way that is a diametric opposite to how standards-compliant browsers act.
Truth is, this I have no way of checking all this; thankfully, every Windows computer I have access to has IE7+ on it. Perhaps you should take Google's route and just explicitly say that you're not going to support IE6, redirecting all IE6 browsers to a place where they can upgrade.
I believe you can do this with conditional comments like so:
<html>
<head>
<!--[if lte IE 6]>
<meta http-equiv="refresh"
content="2;url=http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/default.aspx" />
<![endif]-->
...
</head>