quick question, I'm currently trying to style a font to resemble the letters pictured below. Before I proceed any further I just wanted to be sure there wasn't already a standard, web-safe, font that resembles these letters. I'm not familiar with font design terminology, so I'm not sure what the technical description of the letters below would be. Thanks much.
I don't think there is a standard pre-installed web font (Like Arial, Times ....) out there that is this bold. Under some circumstances, you can force super-bold text using the font-weight property but cross-browser support is very shaky, and the font needs to support the boldness.
Google Web fonts has the Coda font which seems to come pretty close. Maybe that is an option?
Your other option is to use #font-face technology (which Google Fonts also uses) to provide your chosen font to your users. Google it - there's a wealth of material.
The only snag is that you must have a licence that allows you to put the font on the web (but fortunately lots of fonts can be licenced that way now).
Fontsquirrel.com is a good starting point.
Related
I want to use the font 'Semplicita Pro' from the site https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-gb/ for my own website project but I can't seem to find the font file on the website. Even if I should be able to get my hands on the file, would it be legal to use the font?
No, this is premium font which could be bought there:
https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/canadatype/semplicita-pro/
This is kind of expensive. Maybe you could use one of the alternatives to this font?
https://www.typewolf.com/google-fonts
I am want to use a font that is not popular. this font exist in google fonts and also in Photoshop. I am confused because both ways will have some loading time, I know that images are not the good way to go for texts (but at least the image will be internal), however google font will introduce some overhead as the font will be requested from an external source
which method has good performance (in terms of load speed):
1) using Photoshop to write the text and save it as an image than use the image in my webpage? or
2) using google font?
3) and if using google font. do i have to download the font file with all formats and then put it in my website folder? or I just use the html link tag to? which one is more efficient.
and thanks a lot in advance.
Google fonts are CDN, so they take up zero of your server resources (while images do). That said, Google fonts can slow down your page. But typically only when you're using a handful of fonts. I wouldn't be concerned at all with 1 or 2. Overall, either method would be little to no concern in the end.
However, using images for text is a flash back to 1998. Bad practice. More so on your end, as updating text, changing design, running A/B tests, accessibility, SEO, and maintaining the site in general will become a major pain in the a**. Simplest answer? Avoid it.
Directly from Google Fonts site:
Tip: Using many font styles can slow down your webpage, so only select
the font styles that you actually need on your webpage.
Tip: If you choose only the languages that you need, you'll help
prevent slowness on your webpage.
Example usage:
// include in the <head/> of your website
<link href='https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>
then:
// in your css:
h1 { font-family: 'Open Sans', Arial, serif; font-weight: 400; }
Done. Very little resources.
Use google fonts.
The Google Fonts CDN is built to deliver content, content loaded from it will probably load faster then it would if it was on your server.
You don't have to download the font, or worry about browser support, simply add the <link> tag to your HTML.
You should NOT use images to display text, for several reasons:
Screen readers can't read text in an image
Size. Depending on the size of the image and font, the image may be larger than the font file.
A major pain to update
UX problems. i.e. Users can't copy text, select, etc.
When should you use images?
When you need a text effect that can't be achieved with CSS, SVG, or canvas(Not that many). As noted by #Stephen P in the comments below, you should still add text, just visually hide it with CSS
You can download google fonts .ttf file or whaterver format you like or supports and call that file instead of accessing from a url. Which will be much much faster. And yes images are truely bad as it makes impossible for search engine to read.
I am currently working on a responsive page which uses unicode symbols on certain elements and I would like them to have the same "look". As I understand, each browser and each operating system have different fonts for unicode symbols, and I noticed that the font-family property was not helping.
My biggest problem right now is that all the unicode symbols that I use show up as colored emojis on smartphones, which often ruins the page's design. Is there any way to fix that? Am I missing something?
The answer to your question can be split into two:
How to not worry about client-side fonts: web fonts
How to use emoji/pictograms without browser changing the rendering: css icon font
The latter part is more relevant as you are specifically dealing with emoji.
Web fonts
Web fonts would solve the cross-system compatibility issue. These are fonts that are served to the browser. Google fonts is a good place to start —it is actually weird to see how much of the web uses them.
If your unicode is more than just Greek or CJK and uses, say, runes, you will need to make your own web font (which is easy, Googling gives many web servers and guides), which takes advantage of #font-face rule (wiki). One serious drawback to the latter is that there is a copyright problem if you use a font you found on some depository or on your machine, so that is something worth looking out for.
Icon font library
An icon font library is a stylesheet library (with a font) that inserts an icon after an empty element with a class named for that icon, e.g. in FontAwesome <i class="fa fa-hand-spock-o"></i>.
As emoji are a recent addition and the support is more than patchy, websites and browsers add the support themselves, often coloring them (e.g. Chromoji extension). Consequently, I strongly suggest using an icon font library.
I am partial to FontAwesome —e.g. an academic tool of mine—, but there are loads of other options, some are:
Bootstrap's Glyphicons
Typicons
Fontello allows a mishmash of various icon font libraries (a longer list can be found there).
If however, the icon you are looking for is absent, you can create an icon font library using one of the many web resources (eg iconmoon.io). For the images themselves, flaticon has large collection of icons that can be converted to a icon library, which saves you time from having to slave away in illustrator.
I need to include Gurmukhi.ttf font which was provided to me. I tried to find answer to my question but found something like this #font-face : converting and displaying a font (CityBlueprint) but no solution.
At first I tred to generate the font on this site
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/tools/webfont-generator
but got the following error "The file gurmukhi.ttf is blacklisted by the Generator. Webfonts from other distributors cannot be regenerated."
Then I used
http://www.font2web.com/
It generated the required data package and I included fonts, how it was shown in demo.html. But nothing happened. By default the browser uses its own fonts, and Gurmukhi are ignored. Interesting thing is that font in demo.html is also ignored by browsers.
Then I was provided another font type Optima.ttc. I have converted it to ttf format.
http://www.fontsquirrel.com/tools/webfont-generator
"Linotype has requested that their font Optima Regular be blacklisted by the Generator. You will not be able to convert this font."
http://www.font2web.com/
Here I only got 2 files and in info.html there was the following:
Sorry, the vendor of Optima nova Regular doesn't allow us to convert this font
But click here to use the Optima nova Regular web font for free
Tip: Click on the purple Sign Up for Free! button and then click on the FREE PLAN link
As I understand both of these files are not free?
This are commercial fonts and you need to purchase atleast the web license in order to use them legally (altough you could always make the .ttf conversion yourself locally without using web generators and avoid the blacklisted check, but this is still not a legal solution and the font is still subject to copyrights).
If you don't have the budget to spend on font license, you could always use a free alternative to Optima Nova - there are similar typefaces available for free - try to search for free alternatives that could suit your design (mind that the alternative font may not be of the same quality and may not support as many glyphs).
(Beginner to HTML)
I have made a Photoshop mock-up of the website I want to make, but the text I have used in the mock-up looks different when viewed in Firefox. The text is Arial font, size 18pt and regular weight, and I have implemented this into HTML code, but it looks different.
Is there a way to make the font look the same in HTML as it does in Photoshop?
Thanks in advance :)
The short answer is "no". Photoshop has a lot more font functionality than a web browser. It applies all kinds of smoothing algorithms, and you can control kerning, tracking and spacing much better.
Each browser and OS has a distinct rendering engine as well, so even if you could get it the same in one browser/OS combination, it would look different in another.
However, check out all the CSS properties for text to see if you can get something you're able to live with. If not, your best bet is to just make an image out of your text and add it to your page with good "alt" text and such.
I'm not sure what OS you're on, but Windows and Macintosh have different font systems.
This post by Joel Spolsky points out that the font rendering is based on philosophical differences.
Is that what you're seeing? Please post images so we can see what you're talking about.
Fonts are something you simply can't get right on the web. If you absolutely have to control the look of fonts, then you have to use images (and get beaten for it, rightly so). It's simply not possible to achieve pixel-perfect text display in HTML. This starts with differences in fonts the operating system has and ends with differences in browser layout engines.
There are two ways to do it:
Take an image of that font and use it in the layout.
Use a custom font creation tool like SIFR or FLIR. This is a tricky option b/c you need to own Adobe Flash and you need to have the distribution rights to the font (similar to books, music, etc.).
Basically, if you want to have it look exactly the same and still stay standards compliant, this is really almost impossible.
If you're looking for how to turn Adobe Photoshop mockups into HTML documents, you should check out the screencast series on CSS-tricks.com, run by Chris Coyier, a very talented designer (no it's not me :) ).
Another thing that you will have to understand is that it is the people with the Web browsers that ultimately control how your page will look. So no matter how much fiddling you do to get a website the way you want to see it, it will view differently on someone else's computer
If you need perfect, crystal clear font matches you can use flash... but that comes with a whole boatload of downsides.