I have a web application for tagging data and viewing data by tag, so my UI is a list of checkboxes for each tag, a list of checkboxes for each data item, a "Tag" button, which adds the checked tags to the checked data, and a "Filter" button, which ignores the checked data and just displays only the data items with the given tag.
My problem is that the former operation (tagging data) is "obviously" a POST operation, whereas the latter operation (viewing data according to a tag) is "obviously" a GET operation. But the method attribute is attached to the form, not the submit button, so I have to choose one or other for both buttons.
I don't want to make two forms, since as far as I can tell this would force me to duplicate the entire tag list. Is there any way I can choose my method based on the choice of submit button?
A JavaScript solution is permissible, but one without would be preferred.
(I am going to post an answer to this question, but I don't particularly like it, so I would welcome alternatives).
In principle, you could use the formmethod attribute in a submit button, as per HTML5. However, it is not recognized by IE, even in IE 9. The existence of the feature in HTML5 indirectly proves that previous versions of HTML lack a feature for this.
On the other hand, the POST method can be used even for simple viewing that does not cause any changes in the outside world, and in many situations it has to be used for technical reasons (e.g., too much data). So I think the method issue is not very relevant; just use POST.
I would honestly go with a javascript solution, in the onsubmit of the form fire a method which a) checks the submit button that was pressed and b) based on this changes the method of the form.
One possible solution would be to use POST, and then have the server give a 303 See Other header to change it into a GET request. This involves making two requests to serve the purpose of one, which is unfortunate, but at least means that the URL will change so people can link to a specific tag selection.
I agree with javascript solution, proposed by Jon Taylor, the problem is not if your form's method is GET or POST, but how do you filter/validate/sanitize user input. If your concern is related to the fact, that the user can manipulate the form's method, then you should implement solution to that matter on server side.
I'm working on a large application with lots of editable objects on a page. One page for example contains a list of categories and each category has a list of tasks. Both categories and tasks can be editted via a modal dialog window with a form inside.
The current solution is to embed a hidden form prepopulated with data next to each object in the html. When the edit button is clicked, the form is displayed inside the modal dialog and submitted via ajax. The advantage to this solution is that modal dialogs pop up quick. The disadvantage is the growing number of dom elements and page size as each object requires another hidden form.
I am looking for ways to reduce the page weight and reduce the number of dom elements. I am looking for a balance of performance vs maintainability, as there are lots of pages with lots of different objects to consider.
Use ajax to dynamically load the modal populated form. This reduces the page weight considerably, but causes a delay when the edit button is clicked and is the worst for user experience. It also requires each form to have an ajax handler for this specific function.
Store the form parameters as json data and populate the form values from a cloned template form when an element is edited. This reduces dom elements significantly, and the page weight a little as well. A generic piece of javascript needs to be written to insert the json data into input elements.
Store the entire form HTML as a json object inside a data attribute of a dom element. This does nothing for page weight but will reduce the number of dom elements. On edit, the html can be injected into the modal dialog. Its also the easiest to implement.
Scrape the content of the page for the values of the form, and inject them into a cloned template form. This reduces the duplication of content, and does the most to reduce page weight and dom elements. However it feels brittle and intrusive, there needs to be id coordination for content and special care needs to be taken so that hidden input fields are also injected into the page.
Those are the options I've come up with. The JSON solutions are the most appealing to me currently. I'm curious if anyone has other solutions or insight to any of these?
The most light-weight is probably store the entire form definition as JSON and write some sort of engine that would dynamically build the form HTML on the fly. You'd then use another JSON file to represent the data layer that populates/contains the form data.
The fun you run into is how to manage the layout of the form on top of all this. For a standard two-column layout it's simply. Beyond that it's an awful lot of work.
I started writing one using prototype.js about five years ago. I never finished it but it works. Feel free to view the source and steal the code.
If you look at advanced client libraries like ext.js, this is how they're doing it.
If you're going for speed, and don't have a framework handy, don't think "HTML", think "DOM element." Maintain as much data as possible in a "global" data object, and only go to the server for information you don't have. Initialize a modal <div> either on demand or asynchronously after form load, and populate its options via JavaScript in response to a handled event from each <input> element.
For performance, consider storing categorical information in some localStorage option.
Realistically, however, you want a framework. (If you don't use one someone else wrote, you should write your own.) I'm a fan of the Enyo framework leftover from WebOS personally, but there are others out there to help you do this.
I'm trying to come up with a good enough anti-spamming mechanism to prevent automatically generated input. I've read that techniques like captcha, 1+1=? stuff work well, but they also present an extra step impeding the free quick use of the application (I'm not looking for anything like that please).
I've tried setting some hidden fields in all of my forms, with display: none;
However, I'm certain a script can be configured to trace that form field id and simply not fill it.
Do you implement/know of a good anti automatic-form-filling-robots method? Is there something that can be done seamlessly with HTML AND/OR server side processing, and be (almost) bulletproof? (without JS as one could simply disable it).
I'm trying not to rely on sessions for this (i.e. counting how many times a button is clicked to prevent overloads).
I actually find that a simple Honey Pot field works well. Most bots fill in every form field they see, hoping to get around required field validators.
http://haacked.com/archive/2007/09/11/honeypot-captcha.aspx
If you create a text box, hide it in javascript, then verify that the value is blank on the server, this weeds out 99% of robots out there, and doesn't cause 99% of your users any frustration at all. The remaining 1% that have javascript disabled will still see the text box, but you can add a message like "Leave this field blank" for those such cases (if you care about them at all).
(Also, noting that if you do style="display:none" on the field, then it's way too easy for a robot to just see that and discard the field, which is why I prefer the javascript approach).
An easy-to-implement but not fool-proof (especially on "specific" attacks) way of solving anti-spam is tracking the time between form-submit and page-load.
Bots request a page, parse the page and submit the form. This is fast.
Humans type in a URL, load the page, wait before the page is fully loaded, scroll down, read content, decide wether to comment/fill in the form, require time to fill in the form, and submit.
The difference in time can be subtle; and how to track this time without cookies requires some way of server-side database. This may be an impact in performance.
Also you need to tweak the threshold-time.
What if - the Bot does not find any form at all?
3 examples:
Insert your form using AJAX
If you are OK with users having JS disabled and not being able to see/ submit a form, you can notify them and have them enable Javascript first using a noscript statement:
<noscript>
<p class="error">
ERROR: The form could not be loaded. Please enable JavaScript in your browser to fully enjoy our services.
</p>
</noscript>
Create a form.html and place your form inside a <div id="formContainer"> element.
Inside the page where you need to call that form use an empty <div id="dynamicForm"></div> and this jQuery: $("#dynamicForm").load("form.html #formContainer");
Build your form entirely using JS
// THE FORM
var $form = $("<form/>", {
appendTo : $("#formContainer"),
class : "myForm",
submit : AJAXSubmitForm
});
// EMAIL INPUT
$("<input/>",{
name : "Email", // Needed for serialization
placeholder : "Your Email",
appendTo : $form,
on : { // Yes, the jQuery's on() Method
input : function() {
console.log( this.value );
}
}
});
// MESSAGE TEXTAREA
$("<textarea/>",{
name : "Message", // Needed for serialization
placeholder : "Your message",
appendTo : $form
});
// SUBMIT BUTTON
$("<input/>",{
type : "submit",
value : "Send",
name : "submit",
appendTo : $form
});
function AJAXSubmitForm(event) {
event.preventDefault(); // Prevent Default Form Submission
// do AJAX instead:
var serializedData = $(this).serialize();
alert( serializedData );
$.ajax({
url: '/mail.php',
type: "POST",
data: serializedData,
success: function (data) {
// log the data sent back from PHP
console.log( data );
}
});
}
.myForm input,
.myForm textarea{
font: 14px/1 sans-serif;
box-sizing: border-box;
display:block;
width:100%;
padding: 8px;
margin-bottom:12px;
}
.myForm textarea{
resize: vertical;
min-height: 120px;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="formContainer"></div>
Bot-bait input
Bots like (really like) saucy input elements like:
<input
type="text"
name="email"
id="email"
placeholder="Your email"
autocomplete="nope"
tabindex="-1"
They wll be happy to enter some value such as
`dsaZusil#kddGDHsj.com`
After using the above HTML you can also use CSS to not display the input:
input[name=email]{ /* bait input */
/* do not use display:none or visibility:hidden
that will not fool the bot*/
position:absolute;
left:-2000px;
}
Now that your input is not visible to the user expect in PHP that your $_POST["email"] should be empty (without any value)! Otherwise don't submit the form.
Finally,all you need to do is create another input like
<input name="sender" type="text" placeholder="Your email"> after (!) the "bot-bait" input for the actual user Email address.
Acknowledgments:
Developer.Mozilla - Turning off form autocompletition
StackOverflow - Ignore Tabindex
What I did is to use a hidden field and put the timestamp on it and then compared it to the timestamp on the Server using PHP.
If it was faster than 15 seconds (depends on how big or small is your forms) that was a bot.
Hope this help
A very effective way to virtually eliminate spam is to have a text field that has text in it such as "Remove this text in order to submit the form!" and that text must be removed in order to submit the form.
Upon form validation, if the text field contains the original text, or any random text for that matter, do not submit the form. Bots can read form names and automatically fill in Name and Email fields but do not know if they have to actually remove text from a certain field in order to submit.
I implemented this method on our corporate website and it totally eliminated the spam we were getting on a daily basis. It really works!
How about creating a text field input box the same color as the background which must remain blank. This will get around the problem of a bot reading display:none
http://recaptcha.net/
reCAPTCHA is a free antibot service that helps digitize books
It has been aquired by Google (in 2009):
https://www.google.com/recaptcha
https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/
Also see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReCAPTCHA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAPTCHA for more general information
Many of those spam-bots are just server-side scripts that prowl the web. You can combat many of them by using some javascript to manipulate the form request before its sent (ie, setting an additional field based on some client variable). This isn't a full solution, and can lead to many problems (eg, users w/o javascript, on mobile devices, etc), but it can be part of your attack plan.
Here is a trivial example...
<script>
function checkForm()
{
// When a user submits the form, the secretField's value is changed
$('input[name=secretField]').val('goodValueEqualsGoodClient');
return true;
}
</script>
<form id="cheese" onsubmit="checkForm">
<input type="text" name="burger">
<!-- Check that this value isn't the default value in your php script -->
<input type="hidden" name="secretField" value="badValueEqualsBadClient">
<input type="submit">
</form>
Somewhere in your php script...
<?php
if ($_REQUEST['secretField'] != 'goodValueEqualsGoodClient')
{
die('you are a bad client, go away pls.');
}
?>
Also, captchas are great, and really the best defense against spam.
I'm surprised no one had mentioned this method yet:
On your page, include a small, hidden image.
Place a cookie when serving this image.
When processing the form submission, check for the cookie.
Pros:
convenient for user and developer
seems to be reliable
no JavaScript
Cons:
adds one HTTP request
requires cookies to be enabled on the client
For instance, this method is used by the WordPress plugin Cookies for Comments.
With the emergence of headless browsers (like phantomjs) which can emulate anything, you can't suppose that :
spam bots do not use javascript,
you can track mouse events to detect bot,
they won't see that a field is visually hidden,
they won't wait a given time before submitting.
If that used to be true, it is no longer true.
If you wan't an user friendly solution, just give them a beautiful "i am a spammer" submit button:
<input type="submit" name="ignore" value="I am a spammer!" />
<input type="image" name="accept" value="submit.png" alt="I am not a spammer" />
Of course you can play with two image input[type=image] buttons, changing the order after each load, the text alternatives, the content of the images (and their size) or the name of the buttons; which will require some server work.
<input type="image" name="random125454548" value="random125454548.png"
alt="I perfectly understand that clicking on this link will send the
e-mail to the expected person" />
<input type="image" name="random125452548" value="random125452548.png"
alt="I really want to cancel the submission of this form" />
For accessibility reasons, you have to put a correct textual alternative, but I think that a long sentence is better for screenreaders users than being considered as a bot.
Additional note: those examples illustrate that understanding english (or any language), and having to make a simple choice, is harder for a spambot than : waiting 10 seconds, handling CSS or javascript, knowing that a field is hidden, emulating mouse move or emulating keyboard typing, ...
A very simple way is to provide some fields like <textarea style="display:none;" name="input"></textarea> and discard all replies that have this filled in.
Another approach is to generate the whole form (or just the field names) using Javascript; few bots can run it.
Anyway, you won't do much against live "bots" from Taiwan or India, that are paid $0.03 per one posted link, and make their living that way.
I have a simple approach to stopping spammers which is 100% effective, at least in my experience, and avoids the use of reCAPTCHA and similar approaches. I went from close to 100 spams per day on one of my sites' html forms to zero for the last 5 years once I implemented this approach.
It works by taking advantage of the e-mail ALIAS capabilities of most html form handling scripts (I use FormMail.pl), along with a graphic submission "code", which is easily created in the most simple of graphics programs. One such graphic includes the code M19P17nH and the prompt "Please enter the code at left".
This particular example uses a random sequence of letters and numbers, but I tend to use non-English versions of words familiar to my visitors (e.g. "pnofrtay"). Note that the prompt for the form field is built into the graphic, rather than appearing on the form. Thus, to a robot, that form field presents no clue as to its purpose.
The only real trick here is to make sure that your form html assigns this code to the "recipient" variable. Then, in your mail program, make sure that each such code you use is set as an e-mail alias, which points to whatever e-mail addresses you want to use. Since there is no prompt of any kind on the form for a robot to read and no e-mail addresses, it has no idea what to put in the blank form field. If it puts nothing in the form field or anything except acceptable codes, the form submission fails with a "bad recipient" error. You can use a different graphic on different forms, although it isn't really necessary in my experience.
Of course, a human being can solve this problem in a flash, without all the problems associated with reCAPTCHA and similar, more elegant, schemes. If a human spammer does respond to the recipient failure and programs the image code into the robot, you can change it easily, once you realize that the robot has been hard-coded to respond. In five years of using this approach, I've never had a spam from any of the forms on which I use it nor have I ever had a complaint from any human user of the forms. I'm certain that this could be beaten with OCR capability in the robot, but I've never had it happen on any of my sites which use html forms. I have also used "spam traps" (hidden "come hither" html code which points to my anti-spam policies) to good effect, but they were only about 90% effective.
Another option instead of doing random letters and numbers like many websites do, is to do random pictures of recognizable objects. Then ask the user to type in either what color something in the picture is, or what the object itself is.
All in all, every solution is going to have its advantages and disadvantages. You are going to have to find a happy median between too hard for users to pass the antispam mechanism and the number of spam bots that can get through.
the easy way i found to do this is to put a field with a value and ask the user to remove the text in this field. since bots only fill them up. if the field is not empty it means that the user is not human and it wont be posted. its the same purpose of a captcha code.
I'm thinking of many things here:
using JS (although you don't want it) to track mouse move, key press, mouse click
getting the referral url (which in this case should be one from the same domain) ... the normal user must navigate through the website before reaching the contact form: PHP: How to get referrer URL?
using a $_SESSION variable to acquire the IP and check the form submit against that list of IPs
Fill in one text field with some dummy text that you can check on server side if it had been overwritten
Check the browser version: http://chrisschuld.com/projects/browser-php-detecting-a-users-browser-from-php.html ... It's clear that a bot won't use a browser but just a script.
Use AJAX to send the fields one by one and check the difference in time between submissions
Use a fake page before/after the form, just to send another input
I've added a time check to my forms. The forms will not be submitted if filled in less than 3 seconds and this was working great for me especially for the long forms. Here's the form check function that I call on the submit button
function formCheck(){
var timeStart;
var timediff;
$("input").bind('click keyup', function () {
timeStart = new Date().getTime();
});
timediff= Math.round((new Date().getTime() - timeStart)/1000);
if(timediff < 3) {
//throw a warning or don't submit the form
}
else submit(); // some submit function
}
Decided to add another answer, sorry.
We use a combination of two:
Honeypot field with name="email" (already mentioned by other answers) just be sure to use a sophisticated way to hide it , like moving off the screen or something. Because bots can detect display:none
A hidden field that is set by JavaScript when the user clicks (or focuses if you want to be TAB-friendly) on a required field (wasn't mentioned in other answers)
The 2nd option can even protect from a headless-browser type of spam (using phatnom.js or Selenium) because even JavaScript-bots don't bother actually clicking textboxes.
Blocks 99% of bots.
PS. Make sure to use the focus trick only on fields that are not being filled by password managers like LastPass or 1Passwor.
For the same reasons - mark your honeypot with autocomplete="false" tabindex="-1"
The best solution I've found to avoid getting spammed by bots is using a very trivial question or field on your form.
Try adding a field like these :
Copy "hello" in the box aside
1+1 = ?
Copy the website name in the box
These tricks require the user to understant what must be input on the form, thus making it much harder to be the target of massive bot form-filling.
EDIT
The backside of this method, as you stated in your question, is the extra step for the user to validate its form.
But, in my opinion, it is far simpler than a captcha and the overhead when filling the form is not more than 5 seconds, which seems acceptable from the user point of view.
Its just an idea, id used that in my application and works well
you can create a cookie on mouse movement with javascript or jquery and in server side check if cookie exist, because only humans have mouse, cookie can be created only by them
the cookie can be a timestamp or a token that can be validate
In my experience, if the form is just a "contact" form you don't need special measures. Spam get decently filtered by webmail services (you can track webform requests via server-scripts to see what effectively reach your email, of course I assume you have a good webmail service :D)
Btw I'm trying not to rely on sessions for this (like, counting how
many times a button is clicked to prevent overloads).
I don't think that's good, Indeed what I want to achieve is receiving emails from users that do some particular action because those are the users I'm interested in (for example users that looked at "CV" page and used the proper contact form). So if the user do something I want, I start tracking its session and set a cookie (I always set session cookie, but when I don't start a session it is just a fake cookie made to believe the user has a session). If the user do something unwanted I don't bother keeping a session for him so no overload etc.
Also It would be nice for me that advertising services offer some kind of api(maybe that already exists) to see if the user "looked at the ad", it is likely that users looking at ads are real users, but if they are not real well at least you get 1 view anyway so nothing loss. (and trust me, ads controls are more sophisticated than anything you can do alone)
Actually the trap with display: none works like a charm. It helps to move the CSS declaration to a file containing any global style sheets, which would force spam bots to load those as well (a direct style="display:none;" declaration could likely be interpreted by a spam bot, as could a local style declaration within the document itself).
This combined with other countermeasures should make it moot for any spam bots to unload their junk (I have a guest book secured with a variety of measures, and so far they have fallen for my primary traps - however, should any bot bypass those, there are others ready to trigger).
What I'm using is a combination of fake form fields (also described as invalid fields in case a browser is used that doesn't handle CSS in general or display: none in particular), sanity checks (i. e. is the format of the input valid?), time stamping (both too fast and too slow submissions), MySQL (for implementing blacklists based on e-mail and IP addresses as well as flood filters), DNSBLs (e. g. the SBL+XBL from Spamhaus), text analysis (e. g. words that are a strong indication for spam) and verification e-mails (to determine whether or not the e-mail address provided is valid).
One note on verification mails: This step is entirely optional, but when one chooses to implement it, this process must be as easy-to-use as possible (that is, it should boil down to clicking a link contained in the e-mail) and cause the e-mail address in question to be whitelisted for a certain period of time so that subsequent verifications are avoided in case that user wants to make additional posts.
I use a method where there is a hidden textbox. Since bots parse the website they probably fill it. Then I check it if it is empty if it is not website returns back.
Add email verification. The user receives an email and he needs to click a link. Otherwise discard the post in some time.
You can try to cheat spam-robots by adding the correct action atribute after Javascript validation.
If the robot blocks Javascript they can never submit the form correctly.
HTML
<form id="form01" action="false-action.php">
//your inputs
<button>SUBMIT</button>
</form>
JAVASCRIPT
$('#form01 button').click(function(){
//your Validations and if everything is ok:
$('#form01').attr('action', 'correct-action.php').on("load",function(){
document.getElementById('form01').submit()
});
})
I then add a "callback" after .attr() to prevent errors.
I need to validate a date/time field on a webpage but want it to do it without reloading the page and would like 'instant' feedback for the users.
What's the best/easiest solution.
BTW: easiest scores 65% of total points
Edit:
What if best was 65% of total points?
If you would like to use JavaScript then it has built in date validation functions. However, if you do not want to go the JavaScript route, you could change the UI to dropdown controls which would limit the users ability to enter invalid data. You would still need to check server side to ensure nobody submits Feb 30th.
Check out this javascript date validation function.
It uses javascript, regular expressions and the 'onblur' event of a text input.
#David H. Aust
Using onblur for validation is problematic, because some folks use the enter key, not the mouse, to submit a form. Using onblur and the form's onsubmit event in conjunction could be a better solution. Back when I did JS validation for forms a lot more, I would run against keyup events. This gave the user instant feedback on whether or not their entry was correct. You can (and I did) also put checks in place so that the user doesn't receive an "incorrect" message until they've left the field (since you shouldn't tell them they're incorrect if they aren't done yet).
I would recommend using drop-downs for dates, as indicated above. I can't really think of any reason not to--you want the user to choose from pre-defined data, not give you something unique that you can't anticipate.
You can avoid February 30 with a little bit of Javascript (make the days field populate dynamically based on the month).
#Brian Warshaw
That is a really good point you make about not forgetting the users who navigate via the keyboard (uh, me).
Thanks for bringing our attention to that.
A simple javascript method that reads what's in the input field on submit and validates it. If it's not valid, return false so that the form is not submitted to the server.
... onSubmit="return validateForm();" ...
Make sure you validate on the server side too, it's easy to bypass javascript validation.
If you're using ASP.NET, it has validator controls that you can point to textboxes which you can then use to validate proper date/time formats.
There are a couple of date widgets available out in the aether. Then you can allow only valid input.
I've used this small bit of js code in a few projects, it'll do date quickly and easily along with a few others.
Link
Looks like there's a great video about the ASP.NET AJAX Control Toolkit provides the MaskedEdit control and the MaskedEditValidator control that works great. Not easy for beginners but VERY good and instant feedback.
Thanks for all the answers though!
asp.net
Unfortunately I can't accept this answer.