Does any database support revision control on its command line interface?
So for instance, I'm at the mysql> command prompt. I'm going to add a column to a table. I type
ALTER TABLE X ADD COLUMN Y bigint;
and then the database prompts me:
"OK. Check these changes in using git?"
I respond yes, and it prints out the revision number for the schema.
(No need for a mysqldump to get the schema, removing the data, and checkin at the bash command line.)
At another time, I decide to check in all of my data as well. So I type something like
CHECKIN SNAPSHOT TABLE X
Seems like a common sense approach to me, but has anyone modified a database to support such behavior?
Thanks
Well, for one thing, checking in one table makes no sense; its a relational database for a reason; you can't just roll back one table to a previous state and expect that to be OK.
Instead, you can roll back the entire database to a previous state. The database world calls this "point in time recovery"; and you can do it in MySQL with a combination of a full backup and replication logs.
I have no idea why you'd want to store your backups in git.
What you're looking I believe are "migrations". These are usually done at the code level rather than at the database level. Rails supports migrations, Django does with South, I'm sure there's others out there as well.
These migrations are just code files (either in the programming language of choice, or sql scripts) that can be checked in.
The usual case is Schema migrations that don't migrate data but some (most?) allow you to write custom code to do so if you wish.
Generally speaking you wouldn't want to version control data, but there are exceptions when some of the data is part of the logic, but you generally want to separate the type of data that you consider part of the functionality and the parts that you don't.
If you want to store everything, that's just called backing up. Those generally don't do into version control just because of the size. Either it's in a binary format that doesn't diff well, or it's many times larger than it needs to be in a text format. If you need to diff the data, there are tools for that as well.
Related
After reading a few articles here and around, I have realised that database version control in a development team is actually of high importance.
Until now I have been using a simple dump whole database each time there is an update, if only 1 table was altered sometimes we can get away with just dumping the single table then reimporting. Not the best but it works quite well, for additive changes and we haven't had any hiccups yet.
Now, I save a .mwb (Mysql Workbench diagram) file in the git repository of the project I'm working on.
Then I also use dbv for schema management, along with git, with each branch being named based on the project and it's working quite well. This allows me to version schematic changes with the ability to revert or rollback.
However, what about the data contained in the tables. How can this be maintained? Maybe I'm better off just sticking with the old method. I understand on projects with the same DB structure but different data that's fine but what about sites with specific database data that needs to be versioned and managed.
Also what about the base of already deployed sites that need database changes, how can this be seamless. Some have suggested the use of update/alter scripts and that works fine with default values and such. But what if I have made a change on a website platform that requires every websites database to be changed, and keep the data intact?
I've worked mostly in business application development and configuration management. Your question is representative for the challenges in such an environment; when you upgrade for instance Microsoft Word, you don't need to change all documents right away from doc to docx. And the documents even have a more simple structure a full relation database.
Not so for business applications; users skip releases, make unauthorized changes to the data model and the system needs to keep running and providing the correct numbers...
We use for our own applications (largest one is like 600 tables) a self-developed CASE tool which includes branching/merging, but the approach can also be done manually.
Versioning Datamodel
The data model can be written down in a structured way. For instance as table contents (CSV to be loaded in a table with meta data) or as code that detects the version in use and adds columns and tables when missing, including non-trivial migrations.
This even allows multiple users at the same time to change the data model.
When you use auto-detection (for instance, we use a call named "verify_column" instead of "add_column"), this even allows smooth migration independent of the release number the customer is starting the upgrade from. Such a procedure analyzes the table to be changed and issues the correct DDL such as alter table t1 add col1 number not null when a column is missing or alter table t1 modify col1 not null when the column was already present but nullable.
For Oracle and SQL Server I can provide you with a few sample procedures. In MySQL I would code this using a client side language, preferably OS independent to allow installations to run on Windows and Linux. Maybe using Apache Ant when you have experience with that.
Versioning Data
We split the tables in four categories:
R: referential data; data the application site must provide before he actually use the system. For instance, general ledger account codes. The referential data seldomly changes after go live and does not continuously grow in size. The contents reflect the site's business model where the application is used.
T: transaction data; data the site registers, changes and removes during use of the application. For instance, general ledger entries. The transaction data starts at 0 an grows continuously. When company doubles in revenues, transaction data also doubles.
S: seeded data; data NOT maintained by the user at the site but provided and maintained by the developing party. Essentially this is code turned into data. For example, 'F' stands for 'Female'. Errors in seeded data can lead to system errors.
O: the rest (ideally not needed, since they are technical, but some systems require a temporary table A or a scratch table B).
The contents of tables of category 'S' (seeded data) is placed under version control. We normally register these as metadata in our case tool, then named 'data sets', but you can also use for instance Microsoft Excel or even code.
For example, in Excel you would have a list of rows of seeded data. In column A you might enter an Excel function like =B..&"|"&C..& "|" & ... which concatenates everything and makes it suitable for loading by a loader tool.
For example in code, you might have a call like:
verifySeed('TABLE_A', 'CODE', 'VALUE')
The Excel is a little bit hard to bring under version control allowing multiple users to change contents at the same time. The approach with code is very simple.
Please remember to also add features to remove obsoleted seeded data. For instance, by explicitly listing obsoleted seeded data or by automatically removing all seeded data present in the tables but not touched by the last installation.
You would need to keep a journal of transactions on your datamodel that is synchronised to your code versions. For each update that adds information (i.e. a new field) you can simply enter the statements like 'ALTER TABLE x ADD COLUMN y ...' and provide a DEFAULT VALUE (with a function perhaps) in an update script. And a 'ALTER TABLE x REMOVE COLUMN y ...' for the downdate script. You would need to export your data before you truncate information in a table. You can convert the dumped table data to SQL for the inverse transaction so that you can add the missing information using these.
You can use a 'journal' table within your data-model to keep track of these transactions using simple ordinals that denote the applied scripts. Whenever the software is installed it can compare these numbers to create a list of transactions to play to move the database from state N to state X, backwards or forwards, without losing any data!
I would like to implement a custom database initialization strategy so that I can:
generate the database if not exists
if model change create only new tables
if model change create only new fields without dropping the table and losing the data.
Thanks in advance
You need to implement IDatabaseInitializer interface.
Eg
public class MyInitializer : IDatabaseInitializer<MyDbContext>
{
public void InitializeDatabase(MyDbContext context)
{
//your logic here
}
}
And then set your initializer at your application startup
Database.SetInitializer<ProductCatalog>(new MyInitializer());
Here's an example
You will have to manually execute commands to alter the database.
context.ObjectContext.ExecuteStoreCommand("ALTER TABLE dbo.MyTable ADD NewColumn VARCHAR(20) NULL");
You can use a tool like SQL Compare to script changes.
There is a reason why this doesn't exist yet. It is very complex and moreover IDatabaseInitializer interface is not very prepared for such that (there is no way to make such initialization database agnostic). Your question is "too broad" to be answered to your satisfaction. With your reaction to #Eranga's correct answer you simply expect that somebody will tell you step by step how to do that but we will not - that would mean we will write the initializer for you.
What you need to do what you want?
You must have very good knowledge of SQL Server. You must know how does SQL server store information about database, tables, columns and relations = you must understand sys views and you must know how to query them to get data about current database structure.
You must have very good knowledge of EF. You must know how does EF store mapping information. You must be able to explore metadata get information about expected tables, columns and relations.
Once you have old database description and new database description you must be able to write a code which will correctly explore changes and create SQL DDL commands for changing your database. Even this look like the simplest part of the whole process this is actually the hardest one because there are many other internal rules in SQL server which cannot be violated by your commands. Sometimes you really need to drop table to make your changes and if you don't want to lose data you must first push them to temporary table and after recreating table you must push them back. Sometimes you are doing changes in constraints which can require temporarily turning constrains off, etc. There is good reason why tools which do this on SQL level (comparing two databases) are probably all commercial.
Even ADO.NET team doesn't implemented this and they will not implement it in the future. Instead they are working on something called migrations.
Edit:
That is true that ObjectContext can return you script for database creation - that is exactly what default initializers are using. But how it could help you? Are you going to parse that script to see what changed? Are you going to execute that script in another connection to use the same code as for current database to see its structure?
Yes you can create a new database, move data from the old database to a new one, delete the old one and rename a new one but that is the most stupid solution you can ever imagine and no database administrator will ever allow that. Even this solution still requires analysis of changes to create correct data transfer scripts.
Automatic upgrade is a wrong way. You should always prepare upgrade script manually with help of some tools, test it and after that execute it manually or as part of some installation script / package. You must also backup your database before you are going to do any changes.
The best way to achieve this is probably with migrations:
http://nuget.org/List/Packages/EntityFramework.SqlMigrations
Good blog posts here and here.
I am very new to this and a good friend is in a bind. I am at my wits end. I have used gui's like navicat and sqlyog to do this but, only manually.
His band info data (schedules and whatnot) is in a MYSQL database on a server (admin server).
I am putting together a basic site for him written in Perl that grabs data from a database that resides on my server (public server) and displays schedule info, previous gig newsletters and some fan interaction.
He uses an administrative interface, which he likes and desires to keep, to manage the data on the admin server.
The admin server db has a bunch of tables and even table data the public db does not need.
So, I created tables on the public side that only contain relevant data.
I basically used a gui to export the data, then insert to the public side whenever he made updates to the admin db (copy and paste).
(FYI I am using DBI module to access the data in/via my public db perl script.)
I could access the admin server directly to grab only the data I need but, the whole purpose of this is to "mirror" the data not access the admin server on every query. Also, some tables are THOUSANDS of rows and parsing every row in a loop seemed too "bulky" to me. There is however a "time" column which could be utilized to compare to.
I cannot "sync" due to the fact that the structures are different, I only need the relevant table data from only three tables.
SO...... I desire to automate!
I read "copy" was a fast way but, my findings in how to implement were too advanced for my level.
I do not have the luxury of placing a script on the admin server to notify when there was an update.
1- I would like to set up a script to check a table to see if a row was updated or added on the admin servers db.
I would then desire to update or insert the new or changed data to the public servers db.
This "check" could be set up in a cron job I guess or triggered when a specific page loads on the public side. (the same sub routine called by the cron I would assume).
This data does not need to be "real time" but, if he updates something it would be nice to have it appear as quickly as possible.
I have done much reading, module research and experimenting but, here I am again at stackoverflow where I always get great advice and examples.
Much of the terminology is still quite over my head so verbose examples with explanations really help me learn quicker.
Thanks in advance.
The two terms you are looking for are either "replication" or "ETL".
First, replication approach.
Let's assume your admin server has tables T1, T2, T3 and your public server has tables TP1, TP2.
So, what you want to do (since you have different table structres as you said) is:
Take the tables from public server, and create exact copies of those tables on the admin server (TP1 and TP2).
Create a trigger on the admin server's original tables to populate the data from T1/T2/T3 into admin server's copy of TP1/TP2.
You will also need to do initial data population from T1/T2/T3 into admin server's copy of TP1/TP2. Duh.
Set up the "replication" from admin server's TP1/TP2 to public server's TP1/TP2
A different approach is to write a program (such programs are called ETL - Extract-Transform-Load) which will extract the data from T1/T2/T3 on admin server (the "E" part of "ETL"), massage the data into format suitable for loading into TP1/TP2 tables (the "T" part of "ETL"), transfer (via ftp/scp/whatnot) those files to public server, and the second half of the program (the "L") part will load the files into the tables TP1/TP2 on public server. Both halfs of the program would be launched by cron or your scheduler of choice.
There's an article with a very good example of how to start building Perl/MySQL ETL: http://oreilly.com/pub/a/databases/2007/04/12/building-a-data-warehouse-with-mysql-and-perl.html?page=2
If you prefer not to build your own, here's a list of open source ETL systems, never used any of them so no opinions on their usability/quality: http://www.manageability.org/blog/stuff/open-source-etl
I think you've misunderstood ETL as a problem domain, which is complicated, versus ETL as a one-off solution, which is often not much harder than writing a report. Unless I've totally misunderstood your problem, you don't need a general ETL solution, you need a one-off solution that works on a handful of tables and a few thousand rows. ETL and Schema mapping sound scarier than they are for a single job. (The generalization, scaling, change-management, and OLTP-to-OLAP support of ETL are where it gets especially difficult.) If you can use Perl to write a report out of a SQL database, you probably know enough to handle the ETL involved here.
1- I would like to set up a script to check a table to see if a row was updated or added on the admin servers db. I would then desire to update or insert the new or changed data to the public servers db.
If every table you need to pull from has an update timestamp column, then your cron job includes some SELECT statements with WHERE clauses based on the last time the cron job ran to get only the updates. Tables without an update timestamp will probably need a full dump.
I'd use a one-to-one table mapping unless normalization was required... just simpler to my opinion. Why complicate it with "big" schema changes if you don't have to?
some tables are THOUSANDS of rows and parsing every row in a loop seemed too "bulky" to me.
Limit your queries to only the columns you need (and if there are no BLOBs or exceptionally big columns in what you need) a few thousand rows should not be a problem via DBI with a FETCHALL method. Loop all you want locally, just make as few trips to the remote database as possible.
If a row is has a newer date, update it. I will also have to check for new rows for insertion.
Each table needs one SELECT ... WHERE updated_timestamp_columnname > last_cron_run_timestamp. That result set will contain all rows with newer timestamps, which contains newly inserted rows (if the timestamp column behaves like I'd expect). For updating your local database, check out MySQL's ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE syntax... this will let you do it in one step.
... how to implement were too advanced for my level ...
Yes, I have actually done this already but, I have to manually update...
Some questions to help us understand your level... Are you hitting the database from the mysql client command-line or from a GUI? Have you gotten to the point where you've wrapped your SQL queries in Perl and DBI, yet?
If the two databases have different, you'll need an ETL solution to map from one schema to another.
If the schemas are the same, all you have to do is replicate the data from one to the other.
Why not just create identical structure on the 'slave' server to the master server. Then create a small table that keeps track of the last timestamp or id for the updated tables.
Then select from the master all rows changed since the last timestamp or greater than the id. Insert them into the matching table on the slave server.
You will need to be careful of updated rows. If a row on the master is updated but the timestamp doesn't change then how will you tell which rows to fetch? If that's not an issue the process is quite simple.
If it is an issue then you need to be more sophisticated, but without knowing the data structure and update mechanism its a goose chase to give pointers on it.
The script could be called by cron every so often to update the changes.
if the database structures must be different on the two servers then a simple translation step may need to be added, but most of the time that can be done within the sql select statement and maybe a join or two.
Just some pointers here.
I am making fairly extensive modifications to a site, including the MySQL database.
My plan is to do everything on my development server, export the new MySQL structure for the db and import it onto the clients server.
Basically I need to know that performing a structure only import will not overwrite/delete existing data. I am not making changes to the data type or field length.
In my experience, when you export a database (through phpMyAdmin for instance), part of the SQL script that is created includes a "DROP TABLE IF EXISTS 'table_name';" before doing a "CREATE TABLE 'table_name'...;" to build the new table.
My guess is that this is not what you want to do! Certainly use the dev system to alter the structure in order to make everything correct, but then look around for a database synchronisation routine where you can provide the old structure, the new structure, and the software will create the appropriate "ALTER TABLE 'table_name'...;" scripts to make the required changes.
You should then really examine these change files before executing them on the live database, and of course BACKUP the live database, and ensure you are able to fully recover from the backup before starting any of the alterations!
I've had to do this a lot, and it always goes like this:
Make a backup of the live database, complete with data.
Make a backup of the live database schema only.
Calculate the differences between the old (live) schema and the new (devel) schema.
Create all of the 'ALTER TABLE ...' DDL statements necessary to upgrade from the old schema to the new one. Keep in mind that if you rename a field, you probably won't be able to just rename it -- you'll need to create the new field, copy the data from the old field, and then drop the old field.
If you changed relationships between tables, you'll probably need to drop indexes and foreign key relationships first, and then add them back afterwards.
You'll need to populate any new fields based upon their default values, if any.
Once you've got all the pieces working, you'll need to combine them into one large script, and then run it on a copy of the live database.
Dump the schema and compare it against the desired new schema -- if they don't match, go back to step 3 and repeat.
Dump the data and compare it against the expected changes -- again, if they don't match, go back to step 3 and repeat.
You're going to learn a lot more about SQL DDL/DML during this process than you ever thought you'd learn. (For one project, where we were switching from natural keys to UUID keys for 50+ tables, I ended up writing programs to generate all of the DDL/DML.)
Good luck, and make frequent backups.
I'd recommend to prepare a sql script for every change you do on development server, so you will be able to reproduce it on development. You shouldn't get to the point where you need to calculate differences between database structures
This is how I do it, all changes are reflected in sql scripts, and I can reconstruct the history of my database running all these files if needed.
Test the final release version on a "staging" mysql server. Make a copy of your production server on another machine and test your script to make sure everything's ok.
Of course, preliminary database backup is a must.
I need to convert data that already exists in a MySQL database, to a SQL Server database.
The caveat here is that the old database was poorly designed, but the new one is in a proper 3N form. Does any one have any tips on how to go about doing this? I have SSMS 2005.
Can I use this to connect to the MySQL DB and create a DTS? Or do I need to use SSIS?
Do I need to script out the MySQL DB and alter every statement to "insert" into the SQL Server DB?
Has anyone gone through this before? Please HELP!!!
See this link. The idea is to add your MySQL database as a linked server in SQL Server via the MySQL ODBC driver. Then you can perform any operations you like on the MySQL database via SSMS, including copying data into SQL Server.
Congrats on moving up in the RDBMS world!
SSIS is designed to do this kind of thing. The first step is to map out manually where each piece of data will go in the new structure. So your old table had four fields, in your new structure fileds1 and 2 go to table a and field three and four go to table b, but you also need to have the autogenerated id from table a. Make notes as to where data types have changed and you may need to make adjustments or where you have required fileds where the data was not required before etc.
What I usually do is create staging tables. Put the data in the denormalized form in one staging table and then move to normalized staging tables and do the clean up there and add the new ids as soon as you have them to the staging tables. One thing you will need to do if you are moving from a denormalized database to a normalized one is that you will need to eliminate the duplicates from the parent tables before inserting them into the actual production tables. You may also need to do dataclean up as there may be required fileds in the new structure that were not required in the old or data converstion issues becasue of moving to better datatypes (for instance if you stored dates in the old database in varchar fields but properly move to datetime in the new db, you may have some records which don't have valid dates.
ANother issue you need to think about is how you will convert from the old record ids to the new ones.
This is not a an easy task, but it is doable if you take your time and work methodically. Now is not the time to try shortcuts.
What you need is an ETL (extract, transform, load) tool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extract,_transform,_load#Tools
I don't really know how far an 'ETL' tool will get you depending on the original and new database designs. In my career I've had to do more than a few data migrations and we usually always had to design a special utility which would update a fresh database with records from the old database, and yes we coded it complete with all the update/insert statements that would transform data.
I don't know how many tables your database has, but if they are not too many then you could consider going the grunt root. That's one technique that's guaranteed to work after all.
If you go to your database in SSMS and right-click, under tasks should be an option for "Import Data". You can try to use that. It's basically just a wizard that creates an SSIS package for you, which it can then either run for you automatically or which you can save and then alter as needed.
The big issue is how you need to transform the data. This goes into a lot of specifics which you don't include (and which are probably too numerous for you to include here anyway).
I'm certain that SSIS can handle whatever transformations you need to do to change it from the old format to the new. An alternative though would be to just import the tables into MS SQL as-is into staging tables, then use SQL code to transform the data into the 3NF tables. It's all a matter of what your most comfortable with. If you go the second route, then the import process that I mentioned above in SSMS could be used. It will even create the destination tables for you. Just be sure that you give them unique names, maybe prefixing them with "STG_" or something.
Davud mentioned linked servers. That's definitely another way that you can go (and got my upvote). Personally, I prefer to copy the tables over into MS SQL first since linked servers can sometimes have weirdness, especially when it comes to data types not mapping between different providers. Having the tables all in MS SQL will also probably be a bit faster and saves time if you have to rerun or correct portions of the data. As I said though, the linked server method would probably be fine too.
I have done this going the other direction and SSIS works fine, although I might have needed to use a script task to deal with slight data type weirdness. SSIS does ETL.