I have this pretty simple method:
internal void Add(RecipeRecord recipeRecord)
{
this.Database.GetTable<RecipeRecord>().InsertOnSubmit(recipeRecord);
this.Database.SubmitChanges();
}
The entity I'm inserting is a valid entity. When I call SubmitChanges, nothing happens. No errors and no row added to the database. There is no transaction active. If I call GetChangeSet() on the context object, I see the single entity to add. After SubmitChanges(), the change set is empty.
Can anyone see what might be wrong?
I think you may have to use context.attach I ran in to a similar issue and that got me going in the right direction.
Related
Django 1.11.7
MySQL
I was trying to change the value of an object like this:
# change the value of the filed and save
def patch(...):
instance.field_name = new_name
instance.save()
print(instance.filed_name)
When I run the code I got the print result as new_name. But when I check the database manually I got the result as old_name.
Then I tried ways like:
instance.save(update_fields=['field'])
and
ModelName.objects.filter(id=instance.id).update(field_name=new_name)
but get the above problem as well. And meanwhile, the project runs perfectly functional except for this segment of code.
Any idea what caused this problem or suggestion on how to solve it?
Is that piece of code inside a transaction? Maybe the transaction gets rolledback somewhere later.
When you read from the DB are you inside a transaction? Some transaction modes may not show you this change.
Are you sure that field_name is the correct field name? Maybe you have a typo and you just set a property of the object without changing model field. From what I see you sometimes type "field_name" and sometimes "filed_name"
Having a strange problem in vba access. I have a text control control called txtUserName on a form and am trying to get the contents which is all but child's play. When I try to run or complie, I get the Method or Data Member not found error. However, when I type me. Intellisense shows txtUserName. I have gone as far as copying and pasting the name from the control's properties and still get the error. What am I missing? I am completely perplexed.
Thanks in advance
Don
In this case, I was just building a SQL string. I did find the problem, there was a bad control reference, however, it was not the one that was highlighted (highlighted was the first value in an insert into string and it was actually the 3rd value)
I have a view ObjectDisplay that is composed of two relevant tables: Object and State. State represents the state of an Object, and the view pulls some of the details from the most recent State for each Object.
On the page that is displaying this information, a user can enter some comments, which creates a new State. After creating the new State, I immediately pull the Object from ObjectDisplay and send it back to be dropped into a partial view and replace the Object in the grid on the page.
// Add new State.
db.States.Add(new State()
{
ObjectId = objectId,
Comments = comments,
UserName = username
});
// Save the changes (executes all of the above).
db.SaveChanges();
// Return the new Object information.
return db.Objects.Single(c => c.ObjectId == objectId);
According to my db trace, the Single call occurs about 70 ms after the SaveChanges call, and it occurs on the same SPID.
Now for the issue: The database defaults the value of RecordDate in State to GETUTCDATE() - I don't provide the date myself. What I'm seeing is that the Object returned has the State's RecordDate of the old State and the Comments of the new State information of the old State. I am seeing that the Object returned has the old State's information. When I refresh the page, all the correct information is there, but the wrong information is returned in the initial call from the database/EF.
So.. what could be wrong? Could the view not be updating quickly enough? Could something be going on with EF? I don't really know where to start looking.
If you've previously loaded the same Object entity in the same DbContext, EF will return the cached instance with the stale values, and ignore the values returned from SQL.
The simplest solution is to reload the entity before returning it:
var result = db.Objects.Single(c => c.ObjectId == objectId);
db.Entry(result).Reload();
return result;
This is indeed odd. In SQL Server views are not persisted by default and therefore show changes in the underlying data right away. You can create a clustered index on a view with effectively persists the query, but in that case the data is updated synchronously, so you should see the change right away.
If you are working with snapshot isolation level your changes might not be visible to other SPIDs right away, but as you are on the same SPID and do not use snapshot isolation, this cant be the culprit either.
The only thing left at this point is the application layer. Are you actually using the result of the Single call higher up in the call stack or does that get lost somewhere. I assume that a refresh of the page uses a different code path, which would explain why it is working there.
I've done some searches (over the web and SO) but so far have been unable to find something that directly answer this:
Is there anyway to force L2S to use a Stored Procedure when acessing a Database?
This is different from simply using SPROC's with L2S: The thing is, I'm relying on LINQ to lazy load elements by accessing then through the generated "Child Property". If I use a SPROC to retrieve the elements of one table, map then to an entity in LINQ, and then access a child property, I believe that LINQ will retrieve the register from the DB using dynamic sql, which goes against my purpose.
UPDATE:
Sorry if the text above isn't clear. What I really want is something that is like the "Default Methods" for Update, Insert and Delete, however, to Select. I want every access to be done through a SPROC, but I want to use Child Property.
Just so you don't think I'm crazy, the thing is that my DAL is build using child properties and I was accessing the database through L2S using dynamic SQL, but last week the client has told me that all database access must be done through SPROCS.
i don't believe that there is a switch or setting that out of the box and automagically would map to using t sprocs the way you are describing. But there is now reason why you couldn't alter the generated DBML file to do what you want. If I had two related tables, a Catalog table and CatalogItem tables, the Linq2SQL generator will naturally give me a property of CatalogItems on Catalog, code like:
private EntitySet<shelf_myndr_Previews_CatalogItem> _shelf_myndr_Previews_CatalogItems;
[global::System.Data.Linq.Mapping.AssociationAttribute(Name="CatalogItem", Storage="_CatalogItems", ThisKey="Id", OtherKey="CatalogId")]
public EntitySet<CatalogItem> CatalogItems
{
get
{
return this._CatalogItems;
//replace this line with a sproc call that ultimately
//returns the expected type
}
set
{
this._CatalogItems.Assign(value);
//replace this line with a sproc call that ultimately
//does a save operation
}
}
There is nothing stopping you from changing that code to be sproc calls there. It'd be some effort for larger applications and I'd be sure that you be getting the benefit from it that you think you would.
How about loading the child entities using the partial OnLoaded() method in the parent entity? That would allow you to avoid messing with generated code. Of course it would no longer be a lazy load, but it's a simple way to do it.
For example:
public partial class Supplier
{
public List<Product> Products { get; set; }
partial void OnLoaded()
{
// GetProductsBySupplierId is the SP dragged into your dbml designer
Products = dataContext.GetProductsBySupplierId(this.Id).ToList();
}
}
Call your stored procedure this way:
Where GetProductsByCategoryName is the name of your stored procedure.
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/08/16/linq-to-sql-part-6-retrieving-data-using-stored-procedures.aspx
I having a weird problem with Entity Framework with MySql database.
Here's the code that I've got.
public class testbase
{
private testEntities db = new testEntities();
public IQueryable<post> GetRecords()
{
return db.record;
}
}
Here record is a table in my database and this could should return all the rows in the table. I have only one row in there and when I do a db.record.Count(), I get 1.
But when I try to retrieve the rows themselves I get 'Function Evaluation timed out'.
What's happening? Anybody got any ideas?
Okay, this turned out to be a dud question. Ben M was right. Some googling revealed: -
EF does not behave well while debugging due to some issues in VS debugger. You get a 'Function evaluation timed out'.
Things work swell when you try the code without debugging.
I was testing as I go for my new EF+MySql+ASP.Net.MVC app, and since I am a n00b at all three I didn't realize that.
I haven't deleted the question yet because there for others like me. It's on the community to decide whether to let this question survive or go.
I pronounce this question officially a dud.