We develop multiple branches of a project concurrently. Each developer has multiple working copies, each working copy uses its own DB schema. (There will typically be a working copy per branch, but sometimes even more than one working copy per branch.) We need to let Maven know the DB credentials (for the db-migration plugin, for unit tests, for the dev instance of the servlet).
We can't put the credentials in the pom.xml because each developer might use different DB schema names. We can't put the credentials in settings.xml because each developer uses more than one schema.
Where do we put the credentials?
For example, http://code.google.com/p/c5-db-migration/ describes that the DB credentials need to be present in pom.xml but I would like to externalize them out to a file that's not under revision control.
You could put them into a properties file inside the project directory but which is excluded from source control.
With Maven it's possible to read properties from an external file by using a <build><filters><filter> element as instructed here.
Read following answers:
How to read an external properties file in Maven
Reading properties file from Maven POM file
Read a file into a Maven property
or just:
<project>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>properties-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>initialize</phase>
<goals>
<goal>read-project-properties</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<configuration>
<files>
<file>dev.properties</file> <======== IT IS!!!!!
</files>
</configuration>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
Related
I've a pretty standard Java-Maven build with some plain JUnit tests and some for Arquillian. JaCoCo is hooked via Maven like this:
<properties>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
</properties>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<argLine>${argLine}</argLine>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.8.4</version>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
Running Sonar now seems to work, however the code coverage is all wrong. I'm not sure if these are separate issues or if there is one problem with the configuration producing all of them, so I'll just list them:
test suites are not run at all (meaning JUnit tests with #RunWith(AllTests.class))
Arquillian tests (with #RunWith(Arquillian.class)) are run, but the code coverage is wrong, i.e. entities have a code coverage of 0%
an entire module is not tested and I'm not sure why (all but one of the tests has #RunWith(Parameterized.class), but this annotation works in another module)
(After Qword's suggestion I tried it without the reportPath. However the reports in target/sites/jacoco/ are still missing the coverage.)
I'm wondering if the problem is with the JUnit runners or maybe because some of these tests are in another module than the classes they test (Arquillian / integration tests especially). On the other hand, some of the JUnit runners seem to work as well. Maybe it's a third component that breaks the build.
I tried arquillian-extension-jacoco as well, this plug-in doesn't seem to work at all (tests won't even start).
Is the problem with the JUnit runners? With the integration tests? How do I fix this?
You don't actually need to specify sonar.jacoco.reportPath. First of all, it's been deprecated in favor of sonar.jacoco.reportPaths. Second, if you specify the latter property, all reports will be created in a single binary file, but this is not default Jacoco behaviour (and SonarQube deprecated that as well).
I would suggest, as a first step, to
Entirely remove properties sonar.jacoco.reportPath and sonar.jacoco.reportPaths
Remove the configuration node from Jacoco plugin definition
Now, you'll won't find anymore the jacoco.exec file but instead for every module you'll find a new directory target/sites/jacoco in which there will be reports in CSV, XLM, and HTML. This is the standard Jacoco behaviour in v0.8.4.
I'm not entirely sure this will fix all your problems, but at least
I'm quite sure SonarQube will be able to correctly pick up the reports and show the coverage
You'll be able to analyse coverage with a simple mvn clean install on your local machine without having to go to SonarQube every time
I'm struggling getting the F8 CD-Pipeline to work on OpenShift. I use a Jenkinsfile downloaded from the F8 Jenkinsfile Library for Maven builds with steps "CanaryReleaseAndStage". The stage deploy step there looks like the following:
stage('Rollout Staging') {
kubernetesApply(environment: envStage)
}
I looked up the implementation of kubernetesApply() from the Kubernetes Pipeline Plugin. If no file parameter is present in the call (like here) it applies the Kubernetes/OpenShift resources defined in file "target/classes/META-INF/fabric8/openshift.yml", which is generated upon build.
In this file (which is also uploaded as artifact to the nexus, so I can easily fetch it) there are three resources defined:
A Service
A Deployment config, containing a Docker image reference (without tag), also containing a ConfigChange trigger listening for an ImageStreamTag 'my-project:latest'
A Route
... but no ImageStream. However on the build log I see that an image stream definition apparently got generated on a different file:
[INFO] F8: Found tag on ImageStream my-project tag: sha256:c15b56841387a7e0aea960020ccf2efb48f21bd4d12d826e2cd04a94f4d9d748
[INFO] F8: ImageStream my-project written to /home/jenkins/workspace/my-project-dir/target/my-project-is.yml
But I'm afraid that one never gets applied to Kubernetes. Hence there is no image stream in the staging project.
In this configuration the staging deployment cannot even deploy the pod. If I add an image stream manually to the staging project it deploys but is never updated when new builds occur.
I've updated to the newest fabric/jenkins image 2.2.331, but it also does not seem to work here.
My pom.xml (parts essential for f8 building):
<project ...>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>my.package</groupId>
<artifactId>myproject/artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<properties>
<fabric8.mode>openshift</fabric8.mode>
<fabric8.build.strategy>docker</fabric8.build.strategy>
<maven.compiler.source>1.8</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.8</maven.compiler.target>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>io.fabric8</groupId>
<artifactId>fabric8-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.2.28</version>
<configuration>
<images>

</images>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>resource</goal>
<goal>build</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
So I'd like to know:
How is the CD pipeline supposed to work regarding updates to the staging deployments here?
Why is this image stream definition created if it is not applied. Am I missing some configuration here maybe.
Thanks for any insight!
Any chance of seeing your pom.xml and full build? It sounds like you are using fabric8-maven-plugin right? Its doing a S2I binary build and generating an image stream? It just sounds like somethings going wrong and the generated image stream isn't being included in your target/classes/META-INF/fabric8/openshift.yml maybe?
I wonder if something is going wrong in the order of your maven goals or something (e.g. typically fabric8:resource is first, then fabric8:build which then adds the ImageStream into the generated YAML files)
I have a project that's been written using FlashDevelop on the AIR platform.
I'm in the process of setting up Jenkins to build the project.
Within the ActionScript sources files are regions which use a values held in the .as3proj to pass to the compiler.
Extract from the .as3proj file:
<build>
<option additional="-define=CONFIG::desktop,true
-define=CONFIG::mobile,false" />
</build>
However my pom.xml file is specifying that a specific ActionScript file is being used as an entry point, meaning that these compiler options aren't being set. This leads to Jenkins giving errors like the following when it attempts to compile the code:
workspace\src\AppMain.as:[47,10] Access of undefined property mobile. CONFIG::mobile {
How can I specify these values in the pom.xml file so that Jenkins is able to compile?
I found the following resource which referenced how to achieve this:
<project>
<build>
<sourceDirectory>src</sourceDirectory>
<plugins>
<plugin> <!-- Allows SWF to be compiled -->
<groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId>
<artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>4.0-RC2</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
<configuration>
<sourceFile>AppMain.as</sourceFile>
<defines>
<property>
<name>CONFIG::desktop</name>
<value>true</value>
</property>
</defines>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
I have some integration tests (with Selenium) which are run with failsafe maven plugin. Failsafe generates XML reports files only.
1) I want to generate HTML reports
2) I want to have a link in Jenkins to the html reports
For the 1) I installed the "maven-surefire-report-plugin" to use the failsafe-report-only goal.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.13</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>failsafe-report-only</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
But in the standard output, nothing seems to be generated :
[INFO]
[INFO] >>> maven-surefire-report-plugin:2.13:failsafe-report-only (default) # BaseContrats >>>
[INFO]
[INFO] <<< maven-surefire-report-plugin:2.13:failsafe-report-only (default) # BaseContrats <<<
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-report-plugin:2.13:failsafe-report-only (default) # BaseContrats ---
In my failsafe-reports directory, I have only XML report files but not the HTML ones.
Is it the good plugin to generate html reports for failsafe?
For the 2), I installed the Jenkins plugin "Selenium HTML report" and added the post build action "Publish Selenium HTML report" and configured it with "target/failsafe-reports" value for "Selenium tests results location" parameter, but nothing is displayed in Jenkins interface (surely because my html reports file are not generated...).
Could you help me for these 2 points?
Answer for the part 1) to generate HTML reports for Failsafe.
Add the following to pom.xml
<reporting>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-report-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<configuration>
<skipSurefireReport>${skipSurefireReport}</skipSurefireReport>
<reportsDirectories>
<reportsDirectory>${basedir}/target/failsafe-reports</reportsDirectory>
</reportsDirectories>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</reporting>
<properties>
<skipSurefireReport>true</skipSurefireReport>
</properties>
I am assuming you are using mvn verify to run the integration tests using failsafe-plugin.
By default, this generates the (*.txt & *.xml) reports in {basedir}/target/failsafe-reports. This should be specified in <reportDirectories>. You can point to any directory which has TEST-*.xml reports.
And then run the cmd
mvn site
This would generate html reports for the Failsafe run integration tests. By default, The files would be in {basedir}/target/site/failsafe-report.html.
This location be changed.
I try to use JAXB2 maven plugin to generate java code from a bunch of .xsd files. If I try to generate from all xsds in a single execution I'll get org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: 'root' is already defined. I cannot modify the xsd files so I need to generate each independently. I found the following pom configuration to achieve that:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>jaxb2-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.3</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>jaxb-Execution1</id>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals><goal>xjc</goal></goals>
<configuration>
<schemaDirectory>${jaxbSchemaDirectory}</schemaDirectory>
<outputDirectory>${jaxbGenerateDirectory}</outputDirectory>
<staleFile>${jaxbGenerateDirectory}/.staleFlagExecution1</staleFile>
<bindingDirectory>${jaxbSchemaDirectory}</bindingDirectory>
<bindingFiles>bindings1.xml</bindingFiles>
<schemaFiles>schema1.xsd</schemaFiles>
<clearOutputDir>false</clearOutputDir>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jaxb-Execution2</id>
<phase>generate-sources</phase>
<goals><goal>xjc</goal></goals>
<configuration>
<schemaDirectory>${jaxbSchemaDirectory}</schemaDirectory>
<outputDirectory>${jaxbGenerateDirectory}</outputDirectory>
<staleFile>${jaxbGenerateDirectory}/.staleFlagExecution2</staleFile>
<bindingDirectory>${jaxbSchemaDirectory}</bindingDirectory>
<bindingFiles>bindings2.xml</bindingFiles>
<schemaFiles>schema2.xsd</schemaFiles>
<clearOutputDir>false</clearOutputDir>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
But this is not working. The problem is that configurations are not read from inside of the execution block. Why is that? I am using maven 2.2.1.
I had the same issue when I tried to run the plugin using:
mvn jaxb2:xjc
A workaround for me was using:
mvn generate-sources