I have designed a layout and i find some gaps in the stacking of divs over each other.
can some one help me http://uniquedl.com/3closets/about.html
and
You need this in style.css:
img { display: block }
and you need to change the height on .introduction .intro-message to 384px, to match the height of the image on the left.
Doing this solves both problems.
As an alternative to img { display: block }, you could instead do: img { vertical-align:bottom }. This also fixes.
See this answer for a good explanation of what's going on here.
#Alohci explains it very nicely.
You have a <div class="clear"></div> in both instances there. I would say that the page is behaving as expected.
Edit: If you use Google Chrome to view this page, you can right click on an area and choose "inspect element". It will provide a window that will display the code as it's rendered by the browser, and on the right there will be another properties window that displays the css being assigned to the elements you're looking at.
in their div .introduction you have an image larger than the div itself, this must be the problem, including the other divs
First gap: your class .introduction is having height of 384px where else class .intro-message (which is a child of .introduction) is having a height of 390px.
Hi for your website :http://uniquedl.com/3closets/about.html just make the style like
.introduction {
height: 384px;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
Then it will work
Related
I'm making a website using fullPage.js, On the second page (or equivalently, second section) I want to achieve a very simple layout where I have a header fixed on top of the page displaying an image which should be responsive, or decreases in size as the window shrinks but stays at the top.
Currently, I'm wrapping the image to be displayed in a div. I then scale the div fullscreen using,
.post-header {
background: #22BDA0;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
The img tag inside of the div has a class header-image which I style as,
.post-header .header-image {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
margin: 0;
}
However, I'm not getting the desired result. There is a small space on top of the second page which I can't get rid of. You can see the website I'm making along with the source code HERE. Just scroll down to second page, or click Personal Details on the homepage.
Thanks a lot for the help!
What if you just give height:100%; to .section2-container? Will it solve your issue?
Remove display: table-cell; from .fp-tableCell and the padding disappears. Does this need to have display set to table-cell?
fullPage.js has an option: verticalCentered that can be set to false. This seems like a good solution, since the alternative means always trying to ensure that the content of the containing element is always 100%.
Please check the following link in the latest safari:
http://www.grupoguion.com/
The footer is fixed at the bottom and supossed to revealed with the scrolling, so the previous section has a margin-bottom but it doesn't work, only in Safari.
Everywhere else is ok, even in I.E.
I tried to add overflow: auto in the page-wrapper, but everything gets weird in all browsers with elements dissapear and appear.
I also have read that removing height: 100% in the body and html may fix that, but that is not an option for me, because i need the images to fix the browser height.
Does anybody have another possible solution please?
Thank in advance.
You can add a div with the size of your bottom and make it transparent.
html:
<div id='tr-footer'>
</div>
css :
#tr-footer{
height: ?px;
width:100%;
background:transparent;
}
Try making the element
display:inline-block
and Safari should respect its dimensions and margin.
The accepted answer is way too complicated. Consider this approach (taken from another thread):
It's a normal weird behaviour calling margin collapse.
To simply avoid it add overflow: auto; on the [footer] container.
Your footer container could look something like this:
.footer-container {
overflow: auto;
}
I am creating a horizontal scrolling site that will dynamically resize itself when i add the javascript to it later. However i started setting up the HTML and the code seems to cause a issue when i put another div inside of the div that makes up my dynamic code.
Also, would someone with more experience like to explain the drawbacks of using such a code if there are any?
#main_cont {
height : 500px;
white-space : nowrap;
overflow-x: scroll;
width: auto;
}
.ads {
display : inline-block;
height : 100%;
}
Is there a way for me to adjust the code below so that i can put divs and potentially images inside of it. I don't want to use a Javascript fix for this. thank you in advance.
http://jsfiddle.net/YVyFA/
You're just missing vertical-align: top; for your panels
.wlds {
vertical-align: top;
}
Updated fiddle
Also you don't need javascript to resize your layout, use a fluid layout by setting height and width in percentage values
I found a link that might be able to explain how to make a website that requires horizontal scrolling. Try this tutorial by CSS-Tricks. Hope this helped. Have a good day.
Well, the quickest and dirtiest solution to this is to give the #main-cont div a specific width and make the .wlds divs floated. So add the following CSS rules:
#main-cont {
width: 783px;
}
.wlds {
float: left;
}
JSFiddle.
I'm trying to add a content rotator to a site I'm building. The rotator works fine. In fact, it works out better than I had hoped. I need to tweak some styling things, but that's besides the point.
For some reason, the rotator (which is relatively positioned and inside my container/wrapper div) pulls my wrapper and menu down with it when I add a margin to the top of it (margin:65px auto 0; or something like that). Any words of advice?
Page here:
http://technoheads.org/test/ice/index.htm
This sounds like a classic case of collapsing margins.
You can fix this by giving the container a border-top, margin-top, padding-top, or an overflow other than visible. (jsFiddle)
you can probably accomplish what you want by giving #wrapper top padding instead giving #slideshow top margin.
I run into this problem a lot when I put elements inside of inline elements. You should be able to fix it by doing one of the following:
Set the element you're having trouble with to display: block; (Usually a good enough fix)
Use top-padding like already suggested (nothing wrong with using band-aids if it works...)
Set the element to float: left; (Not really recommended, can cause some problems down the line, but will definitely allow you to add top and bottom margins)
How about this?
#menu {
position: relative;
width: auto;
height: 100px;
left: 383px;
top: 0px;
}
In the following HTML, I'd like the frame around the image to be snug -- not to stretch out and take up all the available width in the parent container. I know there are a couple of ways to do this (including horrible things like manually setting its width to a particular number of pixels), but what is the right way?
Edit: One answer suggests I turn off "display:block" -- but this causes the rendering to look malformed in every browser I've tested it in. Is there a way to get a nice-looking rendering with "display:block" off?
Edit: If I add "float: left" to the pictureframe and "clear:both" to the P tag, it looks great. But I don't always want these frames floated to the left. Is there a more direct way to accomplish whatever "float" is doing?
.pictureframe {
display: block;
margin: 5px;
padding: 5px;
border: solid brown 2px;
background-color: #ffeecc;
}
#foo {
border: solid blue 2px;
float: left;
}
img {
display: block;
}
<div id="foo">
<span class="pictureframe">
<img alt=''
src="http://stackoverflow.com/favicon.ico" />
</span>
<p>
Why is the beige rectangle so wide?
</p>
</div>
The right way is to use:
.pictureframe {
display: inline-block;
}
Edit: Floating the element also produces the same effect, this is because floating elements use the same shrink-to-fit algorithm for determining the width.
The beige rectangle is so wide because you have display: block on the span, turning an inline element into a block element. A block element is supposed to take up all available width, an inline element does not. Try removing the display: block from the css.
Adding "float:left" to the span.pictureFrame selector fixes the problem as that's what "float:left" does :) Apart from everything else floating an element to the left will make it occupy only the space required by its contents. Any following block elements (the "p" for example) will float around the "floated" element. If you "clear" the float of the "p" it would follow the normal document flow thus going below span.pictureFrame. In fact you need "clear:left" as the element has been "float:left"-ed.
For a more formal explanation you can check the CSS spec although it is beyond most people's comprehension.
Yes
display:inline-block is your friend.
Also have a look at: display:-moz-inline-block and display:-moz-inline-box.
The only way I've been able to do picture frames reliably across browsers is to set the width dynamically. Here is an example using jQuery:
$(window).load(function(){
$('img').wrap('<div class="pictureFrame"></div>');
$('div.pictureFrame').each(function(i) {
$(this).width($('*:first', this).width());
});
});
This will work even if you don't know the image dimensions ahead of time, because it waits for the images to load (note we're using $(window).load rather than the more common $(document).ready) before adding the picture frame. It's a bit ugly, but it works.
Here is the pictureFrame CSS for this example:
.pictureFrame {
background-color:#FFFFFF;
border:1px solid #CCCCCC;
line-height:0;
padding:5px;
}
I'd love to see a reliable, cross-browser, CSS-only solution to this problem. This solution is something I came up with for a past project after much frustration trying to get it working with only CSS and HTML.