I am trying the post an invoice to SAP using the F-47 transaction and using SHDB to record the transaction and learn how it works. I see there that sometimes BU and ZK BDC OK codes are used. I would like to understand the difference between them, but could not find any official documentation. Please, explain the difference between the two?
I found the meaning of some of the status codes. I post it here, so I can remember:
/00. Enter
/AB Go to overview
=ZK Go to additional information
=ENTE Enter (don't know exactly what is difference between /00)
=PI select cursor location
=STER Go to taxes
=DELZ delete cursor
=GO continue
=BU post (save)
/EEND end processing
=Yes select "yes" from message box
=BP park (save)
=ENTR Enter (don't know exactly what is difference between =ENTE or /00)
=AE save when changing document
=BK change document header (parking or posting parked document)
=P+ next page
=BL delete parked document
A BDC_OKCODE indicates which action is (will) be executed on a screen (things like save, back, exit etc). The BU code is used for a SAVE function (like in MM01 transaction). Sorry but I cannot recall to which function ZK maps to. Obviously their difference lies in the fact that they map to different functions. You can still find out which function each button utilizes by using System->Status->GUI status.
By the way, BTCI transactions are not fully robust- minor changes in GUI flow let your program break. Error handling / analysis is tedious.... DId you have a look to posting methods more preferably? E.g. like BAPI_* function modules? With the help of LSMW you can browse for different input methods and use them later standalone. Or you can use transaction BAPI directly.
Related
According to the documentation for setting error (and warning) messages you can specify a number of parameters (file, line, col, etc). What is the intended purpose of this? I've spent a fair amount of hours attempting to make use of them but I can't see GitHub actually using them.
I can confirm that title and message does work. It would be very nice if this could link directly to the code into the pull requests or action results.
I logged in today to make another logic app today, and i noticed the return output for (in this example) a Http-call has changed.
Before, i have a memory of the whole object showing in the output of an action in the workflow. Now i just se this:
Picture below:
The output body is only a string in some kind of encryption...
Does the Workflow definition Language where i want to reach one specific value in the Json-body still work? Or was this Update a major overhall.
I'm lost here.
Does the Workflow definition Language where i want to reach one specific value in the Json-body still work?
Yes, We can still do it, seems like you at the designer over view of a run, if you want to see full of inputs and output click on the Run details tab on top of this screen.
enter image description here
The content is base64 encoded, if you want to decode with in the logic apps for any other action input, we can use the base64 function which are explained here (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/logic-apps/logic-apps-workflow-definition-language#functions)
Thanks for your reply for my question: Is this a bug of Box API v2 when getting events
This is a new problem related to this. The problem is that I cannot reliably use the next_stream_position I got from previous calls to track events.
Given this scenario:
Given the following two GET HTTP queries:
1. GET https://api.box.com/2.0/events?stream_position=1336039062458
This one returns the JSON file which contains one file entry of myfile.pdf and the next stream position = 1336039062934
2. GET https://api.box.com/2.0/events?stream_position=1336039062934
This call uses the stream position I got from the first call. However, it returns the JSON contains the exactly same file entry of myfile.pdf with the first call.
I think if the first call gives a stream position, it should be used as a mark for that exact time (say: TIme A). If I use that stream position in subsequent queries, no events before "Time A" should be returned.
Is this a bug? Or did I use the API in the wrong way?
Many thanks.
Box’s /events endpoint is focused on delivering to you a highly reliable list of all the events relevant to your Box account. Events are registered against a time-sequenced list we call the stream_position. When you hit the /events API and pass in a stream_position we respond to you with the events that happened slightly before that stream position, up to the current stream_position, or the chunk_size, whichever is lesser. Due to timing lag and our preference to make sure you don’t miss some event, you may receive duplicate events when you call the /events API. You may also receive events that look like they are ‘before’ events that you’ve already received. Our philosophy is that it is better for you to know what has happened, than to be in the dark and miss something important.
Box events currently give you a window roughly 5 seconds into the past, so that you don't miss some event.
We have considered just delaying the events we send you by about 5 seconds and de-duplicating the events on our side, but at this point we've turned the dial more towards real-time. Let us know if you'd prefer a fully de-duped stream, that was slower.
For now, (in beta) if you write your client to check for duplicate events, and discard them, that will be best. We are about to add an event_id to the payload so you can de-duplicate on that. Until then, you'll have to look at a bunch of fields, depending on the event type... It's probably more challenging that it is worth.
In order to help you be able to figure out if an event is a duplicate, we have now added to each event an event_id that will be unique. It is our intention that the event_id will allow you to de-duplicate the responses you receive from subsequent GET /events calls.
You can see this reflected in the updated documentation here, including example payloads.
Ok so here is what is happening:
I have a client that I am building an application for. My client has a flowchart that they would like posted on the front page of their application. Check. My client then wants this flowchart to be set up as an image map so that a user could click one of the boxes in this flowchart and be taken to a report in another part of the application. Check.
All of that is elementary and, in a technical sense, works. The issue is, and it is an issue I have encountered before with APEX, is that every time a user clicks one of these links it takes them to the login screen. It seems that linking directly to a page's URL breaks the session and requires you to login again, even if you are linking from one page in the application to another in the same application.
I have played with all of the authentication settings in a hopes of fixing this and tried to determine what is breaking the session exactly but with no luck.
Has anyone else had this problem and could share their method for fixing it? I really cant have users logging in every time they click a link and I also cannot simply remove the authentication on the pages. Thanks in advance.
You should pass on the session id in your links. If you don't, then apex will see this as a new session. You can tell from the url: take note of the session id in your url when you are on your image map. When you select an application, take another look at the session id part in the url. If they are different, then you are starting a new session each time.
/apex/f?p=190:90:1674713700462259:::::
190 -> application id
90 -> page id
1674713700462259 -> Session id
To pass on the session, it depends where you construct your links.
In PLSQL, you can find it through :SESSION or :APP_SESSION
For example, in a plsql dynamic region: htp.p('the session id is '||:SESSION);
In javascript code you can use $v("pInstance") to retrieve the value dynamically, or use &APP_SESSION. which will have the value substituted at runtime.
Small example:
function printsome(){
var d = $("<div></div>");
d.text('&APP_SESSION. = ' + $v("pInstance"));
$("body").append(d);
};
So you probably just need to alter the construction of your link somewhat to include the session!
I was assuming the binding variables will do the job. But they were helpless.
Best way is to pass the current session id to an item then use the item value in the link.
f?p=&APP_ID.:32:&P31_SESSION.:::P32_CUSTOMER_ID:#CUSTOMER_ID#
Alright dudes... I have a problem that is looking for an answer more specific than the seemingly obvious solution.
I have a block of code that I want to execute directly after a url is known to be valid. What I mean by 'valid' is that the program has checked to see if that filepath actually exists. This could be accomplished by a COMPLETE listener, because after all, a loader couldn't finish loading its content if the referenced file didn't exist, but I want it to happen before any of the bytes begin to get sucked in. I have also tried the HTTPS_STATUS event, with a conditional saying "if the status is this [some non-error status number], then run this block of code." This would have worked great, except that different environments produce different network codes, and some even can't distinguish between errors and non-errors, just returning 0's no matter what. Because of this, I can't write a conditional that works no matter what browser....
So, anyone got any ideas?!?!?!?!
If this doesn't work post your code.
myUrlLoader.addEventListener(Event.OPEN, openHandler);
//Dispatched when the download operation commences following a call to the URLLoader.load() method.