I'm using renderJSON(Object) to return some objects as JSON values, and it's working fine except for one field. Is there an easy way to add in that one field without having to manually create the whole json template?
Play uses GSON to build the JSON string. If your one field is a specific object type, then you can easily do this by providing a customised serialisation for that type. See the documentation here
http://sites.google.com/site/gson/gson-user-guide#TOC-Custom-Serialization-and-Deserializ
However, if it is an Integer class for example, that you want to work in one way for one, and another way for another, then you may have a little more difficulty.
Example
GsonBuilder gson = new GsonBuilder();
gson.registerTypeAdapter(SpecificClass.class, new MySerializer());
private class MySerializer implements JsonSerializer<DateTime> {
public JsonElement serialize(SpecificClass src, Type typeOfSrc, JsonSerializationContext context) {
String res = "special format of specificClass"
return new JsonPrimitive(res);
}
}
Simply do a
JsonElement elem = new Gson().toJsonTree(yourObject);
JsonObject obj = elem.getAsJsonObject();
obj.remove("xxx");
obj.addProperty("xxx", "what you want");
// other stuff ...
renderJSON(obj.toString());
etc.
After evaluating the play framework we hit a stumbling block and decision choice on serializing JSON for an external API. Allot of articles out there suggest using the Lift framework within play which just seem like extra overhead.After trying some of the frameworks / modules with in the play framework a college and myself decided to write a light weight code block that could cater for our needs.
case class User (
user_id: Int,
user_name: Option[String],
password: Option[String],
salt: Option[String]
) extends Serializable {
def toXml =
<user>
<user_id>{user_id}</user_id>
<user_name>{user_name.getOrElse("")}</user_name>
</user>
override def toJson =
"{" + JSON.key("user_id") + JSON.value(user_id) + ", " + JSON.key("user_name") + JSON.value(user_name) + "}"
}
class Serializable {
def toJson = ""
}
object JSON {
def key(x:String) = value(x) + ": "
def value(x:Any):String = {
x match {
case s:String => "\"" + s + "\""
case y:Some[String] => value(y.getOrElse(""))
case i:Int => value(i.toString)
case s:Serializable => s.toJson
case xs:List[Any] => "[" + xs.map(x => value(x)).reduceLeft(_ + ", " + _) + "]"
}
}
}
def searchUserByName(user_name: String) = {
(for (
u <- Users if u.user_name.like(("%"+user_name+"%").bind)
) yield u.*)
.list
.map(User.tupled(_))
}
def toXml(users:List[User]) = {
<users>
{ users.map(u => u.toXml) }
</users>
}
def toJson(users:List[User]) = {
"[" + users.map(u => u.toJson).reduceLeft(_ + ", " + _) + "]"
}
And from the controller.
// -- http://localhost:9000/api/users/getUser/xml
// -- http://localhost:9000/api/users/getUser/json
def getUser(requestType:String) = {
db withSession{
val user = Users.byUserName("King.Kong")
if(requestType == "xml") {
Xml(user.toXml)
} else {
user.toJson
}
}
}
//--- http://localhost:9000/api/users/searchuser/xml
//--- http://localhost:9000/api/users/searchuser/json
def searchUser(requestType:String) = {
db withSession{
val users = Users.searchUserByName("Doctor.Spoc")
if(requestType == "xml") {
Xml(Users.toXml(users))
} else {
val jsonList = Users.toJson(users)
Json(jsonList)
}
}
Related
How can I turn a JSON object, i.e. { username: "john", password: "1234" } into an OData string query in a function using typescript? I could not find a library to do this for me (Angular 6). Here is my attempt:
function ConvertToODataString (json: Object) {
let ret_str: string = "";
for (let key in json) {
ret_str += (key + "=" + json[key] + "&");
}
if (ret_str) {
ret_str = ret_str.substr(0, ret_str.length - 1); // remove last &
}
return ret_str;
}
Does anyone know of a better way? For now, my json is not multi-leveled.
You can use for ... in to enumerate the object properties, adding each key/value pair to an array, and combine the values with Array.join:
function convertObjectToQuery(obj: Object): string {
let values = new Array<string>();
for (let prop in obj) {
values.push(`${prop} eq '${obj[prop]}'`);
}
return encodeURI("$filter=" + values.join(" and "));
}
See this stackblitz for a demo.
JSON.parse function.
Example:
var obj = JSON.parse('{ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"}');
json={ "name":"John", "age":30, "city":"New York"};
var obj = JSON.parse(json+'');
I decided to use the HttpParms module instead:
import { HttpParams } from "#angular/common/http";
const params = new HttpParams()
.set("$filter", "Username eq '" + parameters["Username"] + "' and Password eq '" + parameters["Password"] + "'")
.set("$count", "true");
console.log(params.toString());
I'm little bit confusing about the expected result of Action.async. Here the use case : from the frontend, I receive a JSON to validate (a Foo), I send this data calling an another web service and I extract and validate the received JSON (Bar case class) which I want to validate too. The problem is when I return a result, I have the following error :
type mismatch;
found : Object
required: scala.concurrent.Future[play.api.mvc.Result]
Here my code :
case class Foo(id : String)
case class Bar(id : String)
def create() = {
Action.async(parse.json) { request =>
val sessionTokenOpt : Option[String] = request.headers.get("sessionToken")
val sessionToken : String = "Bearer " + (sessionTokenOpt match {
case None => throw new NoSessionTokenFound
case Some(session) => session
})
val user = ""
val structureId : Option[String] = request.headers.get("structureId")
if (sessionToken.isEmpty) {
Future.successful(BadRequest("no token"))
} else {
val url = config.getString("createURL").getOrElse("")
request.body.validate[Foo].map {
f =>
Logger.debug("sessionToken = " + sessionToken)
Logger.debug(f.toString)
val data = Json.toJson(f)
val holder = WS.url(url)
val complexHolder =
holder.withHeaders(("Content-type","application/json"),("Authorization",(sessionToken)))
Logger.debug("url = " + url)
Logger.debug(complexHolder.headers.toString)
Logger.debug((Json.prettyPrint(data)))
val futureResponse = complexHolder.put(data)
futureResponse.map { response =>
if(response.status == 200) {
response.json.validate[Bar].map {
b =>
Future.successful(Ok(Json.toJson(b)))
}.recoverTotal { e : JsError =>
Future.successful(BadRequest("The JSON in the body is not valid."))
}
} else {
Logger.debug("status from apex " + response.status)
Future.successful(BadRequest("alo"))
}
}
Await.result(futureResponse,5.seconds)
}.recoverTotal { e : JsError =>
Future.successful(BadRequest("The JSON in the body is not valid."))
}
}
}
}
What is wrong in my function ?
Firstly, this is doing nothing:
futureResponse.map { response =>
if(response.status == 200) {
response.json.validate[Bar].map {
b =>
Future.successful(Ok(Json.toJson(b)))
}.recoverTotal { e : JsError =>
Future.successful(BadRequest("The JSON in the body is not valid."))
}
} else {
Logger.debug("status from apex " + response.status)
Future.successful(BadRequest("alo"))
}
}
Because you're not capturing or assigning the result of it to anything. It's equivalent to doing this:
val foo = "foo"
foo + " bar"
println(foo)
The foo + " bar" statement there is pointless, it achieves nothing.
Now to debug type inference problems, what you need to do is assign results to things, and annotate with the types you're expecting. So, assign the result of the map to something first:
val newFuture = futureResponse.map {
...
}
Now, what is the type of newFuture? The answer is actually Future[Future[Result]], because you're using map, and then returning a future from inside that. If you want to return a future inside your map function, then you have to use flatMap instead, this flattens the Future[Future[Result]] to Future[Result]. But actually in your case, you don't need that you can use map, and just get rid of all those Future.successful calls, because you're not actually doing anything in that map function that needs to return a future.
And then get rid of that await as others have said - using await means blocking, which negates the point of using futures in the first place.
Anyway, this should compile:
def create() = {
Action.async(parse.json) { request =>
val sessionTokenOpt : Option[String] = request.headers.get("sessionToken")
val sessionToken : String = "Bearer " + (sessionTokenOpt match {
case None => throw new NoSessionTokenFound
case Some(session) => session
})
val user = ""
val structureId : Option[String] = request.headers.get("structureId")
if (sessionToken.isEmpty) {
Future.successful(BadRequest("no token"))
} else {
val url = config.getString("createURL").getOrElse("")
request.body.validate[Foo].map {
f =>
Logger.debug("sessionToken = " + sessionToken)
Logger.debug(f.toString)
val data = Json.toJson(f)
val holder = WS.url(url)
val complexHolder =
holder.withHeaders(("Content-type","application/json"),("Authorization",(sessionToken)))
Logger.debug("url = " + url)
Logger.debug(complexHolder.headers.toString)
Logger.debug((Json.prettyPrint(data)))
val futureResponse = complexHolder.put(data)
futureResponse.map { response =>
if(response.status == 200) {
response.json.validate[Bar].map {
b =>
Ok(Json.toJson(b))
}.recoverTotal { e : JsError =>
BadRequest("The JSON in the body is not valid.")
}
} else {
Logger.debug("status from apex " + response.status)
BadRequest("alo")
}
}
}.recoverTotal { e : JsError =>
Future.successful(BadRequest("The JSON in the body is not valid."))
}
}
}
}
Do not Await.result(futureResponse, 5 seconds). Just return the futureResponse as is. The Action.async can deal with it (in fact, it wants to deal with it, it requires you to return a Future).
Note that in your various other codepaths (else, recoverTotal) you are already doing that.
If you use Action.async you don't need to await for result. So try to return future as is, without Await.result
I've just started working with Scala in my new project (Scala 2.10.3, Play2 2.2.1, Reactivemongo 0.10.0), and encountered a pretty standard use case, which is - stream all the users in MongoDB to the external client. After navigating Enumerator, Enumeratee API I have not found a solid solution for that, and so I solved this in following way:
val users = collection.find(Json.obj()).cursor[User].enumerate(Integer.MAX_VALUE, false)
var first:Boolean = true
val indexedUsers = (users.map(u => {
if(first) {
first = false;
Json.stringify(Json.toJson(u))
} else {
"," + Json.stringify(Json.toJson(u))
}
}))
Which, from my point of view, is a little bit tricky - mainly because I needed to add Json Start Array, Json End Array and comma separators in element list, and I was not able to provide it as a pure Json stream, so I converted it to String steam.
What is a standard solution for that, using reactivemongo in play?
I wrote a helper function which does what you want to achieve:
def intersperse[E](e: E, enum: Enumerator[E]): Enumerator[E] = new Enumerator[E] {
val element = Input.El(e)
override def apply[A](i1: Iteratee[E, A]): Future[Iteratee[E, A]] = {
var iter = i1
val loop: Iteratee[E, Unit] = {
lazy val contStep = Cont(step)
def step(in: Input[E]): Iteratee[E, Unit] = in match {
case Input.Empty ⇒ contStep
case Input.EOF ⇒ Done((), Input.Empty)
case e # Input.El(_) ⇒
iter = Iteratee.flatten(iter.feed(element).flatMap(_.feed(e)))
contStep
}
lazy val contFirst = Cont(firstStep)
def firstStep(in: Input[E]): Iteratee[E, Unit] = in match {
case Input.EOF ⇒ Done((), Input.Empty)
case Input.Empty ⇒
iter = Iteratee.flatten(iter.feed(in))
contFirst
case Input.El(x) ⇒
iter = Iteratee.flatten(iter.feed(in))
contStep
}
contFirst
}
enum(loop).map { _ ⇒ iter }
}
}
Usage:
val prefix = Enumerator("[")
val suffix = Enumerator("]")
val asStrings = Enumeratee.map[User] { u => Json.stringify(Json.toJson(u)) }
val result = prefix >>> intersperse(",", users &> asStrings) >>> suffix
Ok.chunked(result)
I tried with active annotation of xtend, and I want to create a live annotation which can generate a String[] field to record the names of method parameters.
#Target(ElementType::TYPE)
#Active(typeof(ParameterRecorderProcessor))
annotation ParameterRecorder {
}
class ParameterRecorderProcessor extends AbstractClassProcessor {
override doTransform(MutableClassDeclaration annotatedClass, extension TransformationContext context) {
var iii = 0;
// add the public methods to the interface
for (method : annotatedClass.declaredMethods) {
if (method.visibility == Visibility::PUBLIC) {
iii = iii + 1
annotatedClass.addField(method.simpleName + "_" + iii) [
type = typeof(String[]).newTypeReference // String[] doesn't work
var s = ""
for (p : method.parameters) {
if(s.length > 0) s = s + ","
s = s + "\"" + p.simpleName + "\""
}
val ss = s
initializer = [
'''[«ss»]'''
]
]
}
}
}
}
You can see I use typeof(String[]).newTypeReference to define the type of new created field, but it doesn't work. The generated java code is looking like:
private Object index_1;
It uses Object and the initializer part has be empty.
How to fix it?
This looks like a bug to me. As a workaround, you may want to use typeof(String).newTypeReference.newArrayTypeReference or more concise string.newArrayTypeReference
With reference to this,
How do I change the contents of a ListView in Scala?
I could change ListView contents by changing listData. However, I couldn't get ListView to publish these events, ListElementsAdded, ListElementsAdded and ListChanged. From the looks of ListView source, it would only adds a listener to a read-only empty model. How do I go about this?
Thanks
Later on, I managed to figure out a way to have ListView published these events., please refer to the code.
Is the right to go about it? Is there a better way to do this? Please advise.
Thanks
** code borrowed and modified **
object ListViewTest extends SimpleSwingApplication
{
lazy val top = new MainFrame
{
title = "ListView Test"
contents = new BoxPanel(Orientation.Vertical)
{
border = Swing.EmptyBorder(2, 2, 2, 2)
val listModel = new DefaultListModel
List("First", "Second", "Third", "Fourth", "Fifth").map(listModel.addElement(_))
val myList = ListBuffer()
val listView = new ListView[String](myList)
{
selection.intervalMode = ListView.IntervalMode.Single
peer.setModel(listModel)
//listData = myList
}
listView.peer.getModel.addListDataListener(new ListDataListener {
def contentsChanged(e: ListDataEvent) { publish(ListChanged(listView)) }
def intervalRemoved(e: ListDataEvent) { publish(ListElementsRemoved(listView, e.getIndex0 to e.getIndex1)) }
def intervalAdded(e: ListDataEvent) { publish(ListElementsAdded(listView, e.getIndex0 to e.getIndex1)) }
})
contents += new ScrollPane(listView)
val label = new Label("No selection")
contents += label
val b = new Button("Remove")
contents += b
listenTo(listView.selection, listView, b)
reactions +=
{
case ListSelectionChanged(list, range, live) =>
label.text = "Selection: " + range
case e: ButtonClicked =>
if (listView.listData.isEmpty)
{
b.enabled = false
}
else
{
listView.peer.getModel.asInstanceOf[DefaultListModel].remove(listView.selection.anchorIndex)
}
case ListElementsRemoved(source, range) =>
println("Element at " + (range.start + 1) + " is removed.")
}
}
pack
}