mysql int fields does not truncate - mysql

as all you know, when you describe varchar or integer fields you should set the length of them...
something like int(5) or varchar(5)...
but when you try add 123456 to both fields.. while varchar field truncates the value, integer field does not truncate it...
so what's the aim of describing int length?

int(5) does not do what you think it does: it specifies an integer field with a display width of 5 digits, i.e. numbers shorter than 5 digits will be padded with space characters.
In MySQL, int values are always 4 bytes wide and can go from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647.
See http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/numeric-types.html.

The N in INT(N), indicating application display length; is was very misleading, due to the syntax similarity to VARCHAR(N), and understandably, often misunderstood. It's effectively meaningless for all applications I've seen.
This goes for all TINYINT, SMALLINT, MEDIUMINT, INT, BIGINT.

It appears this "length" is used for display only: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/numeric-types.html
For example, INT(4) specifies an INT with a display width of four digits. This optional display width may be used by applications to display integer values having a width less than the width specified for the column by left-padding them with spaces. (That is, this width is present in the metadata returned with result sets. Whether it is used or not is up to the application.)

The size of the INT type is neither bits nor bytes. It's just the display width that is used when the field has ZEROFILL specified.
See this blog article for an in depth explanation.

FRom 10.2. Numeric Types
MySQL supports an extension for
optionally specifying the display
width of integer data types in
parentheses following the base keyword
for the type. For example, INT(4)
specifies an INT with a display width
of four digits. This optional display
width may be used by applications to
display integer values having a width
less than the width specified for the
column by left-padding them with
spaces. (That is, this width is
present in the metadata returned with
result sets. Whether it is used or not
is up to the application.)
The display width does not constrain
the range of values that can be stored
in the column. Nor does it prevent
values wider than the column display
width from being displayed correctly.

Related

How to write a large number in SQL table with Workbench?

When I tried to fill in a big number, error. How to add the maximum limit of INT?
UPDATE `test`.`number` SET `idNumber` = '36552124313028521236524313028' WHERE (`idNumber` = '365521');
You could try use a BigInt
If you want a number larger than the largest 64-bit unsigned integer 18,446,744,073,709,551,615 then you will need to store it as a varchar or some other Text form
refer to the MySQL data types for further info
It depends on how the column is to be used. For calculations or auto_increment attribute, numerics should be used. As you say you would like to add a maximum limit, by ADD I suppose you would like to define a length value to your liking. However, the whole number types such as small int, int, big int have a predefined maximum range , which can not be changed.(MySQL 8.0 users may try the check option, which is ignored in previous versions) If you need to define the limit for the whole number, there is a workaround by using decimal(n,0) to make the number always appear as a whole number.
For identifiers which do not require numerical calculations, varchar is generally acknowledged for strings that have a dynamic range, and char is more suitable for those having a static length,such as province acronym e.g AZ (Arizona) AR (Arkansas) CA (California). At the first glance of your idNumber column, I reckon it's better used for it's string's nature rather than numerics.
Last but not least. Please refrain from using a varchar for string-looking values that are prone to calculations,such as IP ADDRESS. It appears as a string in its dotted format, but deep inside it has an inherent nature of numerics. For instance, IPV4 has a range from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 , which can be treated as a formula of (256 * 256 * 256 * 256) . Thus it is a perfect fit for the unsigned integer type in terms of length and can be calculated when necessary. To display it in its dotted format , use the inet_ntoa() function. e.g select inet_ntoa(3232235777);

Effects of changing datatype of a column from varchar to text

The text data I have for a column in database in an enterprise application (uses hibernate) is huge and after increasing varchar size to a specific number, I don't have any other choice but to change the datatype to text. Can anyone help me understand how it may affect my application. Do I need to take care of anything else or just changing the datatype works ?
You should use TEXT. Although, that's the same thing as VARCHAR:
If the declared type of the column contains any of the strings "CHAR",
"CLOB", or "TEXT" then that column has TEXT affinity. Notice that the
type VARCHAR contains the string "CHAR" and is thus assigned TEXT
affinity
Also note
Note that numeric arguments in parentheses that following the type
name (ex: "VARCHAR(255)") are ignored by SQLite - SQLite does not
impose any length restrictions (other than the large global
SQLITE_MAX_LENGTH limit) on the length of strings, BLOBs or numeric
values.
Your application work fine with datatype text.You don't need to take care of any thing
if you want to be sure, create backup database first just in case,
or at least backup/duplicate table you were going to make changes
for me I also prefer varchar than text
because varchar used to be using smaller memory than text
ex : address (100) , records only using 80 character, will be saved as 80 character in varchar
while in text , will be saved as 100 character

BIGINT max 255 characters?

I need my integer column to be able to go up to 2000, so I made it INT(2000), but it keeps saying;
Display width out of range for column (max = 255)
I have tried using MEDIUMINT(2000) and BIGINT(2000), but both give the same message.
The number used in a SQL type is the width of the type, not the maximum value. When used on a numeric type, it represents the maximum number of base-10 digits used to represent a value in that column: for instance, an INT(5) can represent any value up to 99999.
A number with a maximum value of 2000 can be stored in any numeric column with a width of 4 or greater. But don't worry about the width; just use a normal INT and let the database use whatever size is default for that type. (It will be more than 4, but that's OK.)
BIGINT(255) Means a Big Integer with 255 digits.
And well , It's a very big number especially when the UNSIGNED flag is used.
BIGINT is mostly used for Id of something.
So i don't think that you need a number more than a 255-digit number.
Or if you do need , keep it in a string.

MySQL truncates my first zeros data

I have a MySQL column "phone" , and when data comes from my php form, if there's a zero at the beginning, it will disappear in the table, for example :
"06719823" becomes "6719823"
I first though it was a problem from php, cause I'm using mysql_real_escape_string(), but then I tried to modify the SQL field directly on phpmyadmin, and I can't add a first 0, it always delete it.
Colonne Type Interclassement Attributs Null Défaut Extra
phone int(10) Oui NULL
What's wrong ? Should I assign an "interclassement" utf8_general_ci ?
Change your column type to char(10) for 10 digit phone numbers.
If the column type is int (integer), the number will be internally represented as an integer, meaning "first 0s" won't be stored, as they hold no meaning for integers.
Since what you are actually trying to store has meaning as a sequence of characters, and not as a quantity, it would make more sense to store it as a char(n), for n-digit sequences, or as a varchar for sequences whose size varies a lot.
Make your phone attribute as Varchar or Text to avoid this.
Phone numbers can at time also contain brackets and hyphens plus you can avoid your problem as well.
Change your data type. Int Data type will not store the starting 0's.
You can try as suggested above char or varchar
Integers : 06719823 = 6719823 = 0006719823
Save the phone as varchar if you would like to retain zeros in the begining

What is maximum value for tinyint(2) in MySQL?

What is the maximum value allowed for a column of type tinyint(2)?
Are values like 255 or 99 allowed? I am confused because (2) after tinyint(2) denotes only the display... Am I correct?
It takes 127.
refer link : http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/numeric-types.html
MySQL 5.0 Reference Manual: Numeric Types
The display width does not constrain the range of values that can be stored in the column. Nor does it prevent values wider than the column display width from being displayed correctly.
Edit: No. Note that UNSIGNED is a non-standard attribute that affects the range. Neither value given in your question is the correct upper-limit of a normal TINYINT(2).
Edit for the comment edit: Trust the documentation unless there is a reason not to. If something seems fishy, TIAS (try it and see).
For tinyint data type:
if db column is SIGNED : min:-128 , max:127
if db column is UNSIGNED : min:0 , max:255
Just this.
more help! :
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/integer-types.html
I believe the correct answer to this question is:
255
not 127.
Check this page out: Mysql Integer types
What other answers are failing to tell you is that the maximum can be 255 if you don't use negative numbers.
If you're using negative numbers then the maximum value can only be 127.
That's really what the unsigned and signed words mean, unfortunately no one explained this to you so I can see why it's confusing.
usigned means it cannot contain negative numbers so if you set your column to be unsigned then you can use 255 as the maximum. If you don't explicitly set the column as unsigned it means it will accept negative numbers (thus being a signed column) in which case the maximum will now be 127.
The other answers are technically correct because by default Mysql will set all integer columns as signed (able to use negative numbers). I just think this answer explains things a little more and is, perhaps, more germane to your original question.