I'm having difficulties naming an enum that should have the values Include and Exclude. If the enumerations were In and Out, I'd name the enum Direction, but what's the similar and appropriate word to group Include and Exclude?
The context and application of the enum is to set whether a selection of objects are to be included in or excluded from a larger set.
How about "Inclusion"?
Filter maybe? Or Condition?
That would really depend on the context I guess, it hard to give a single name to such vague concepts.
Integration ? Integration(Rule|Policy) ? Yeah, not convincing I know.
That seems to be related to Sets and Subsets. I would say something like SetRelation. If you're talking about Set elements, then maybe you should use Element (BelongsTo|DoesNotBelongTo)
SelectionUsage or SelectionUsageType
T(Filter)Operation = (foInclude, foExclude)
Related
I have a certain bunch of XPath locators that hold the elements I want to extract, and they have a similar structure:
/div/ul/li[1]/div/div[2]/a
/div/ul/li[2]/div/div[2]/a
/div/ul/li[3]/div/div[2]/a
...
They are actually simplified from Pixiv user page. Each /div/div[2]/a element has a title string, so they are actually artwork titles.
I want to use a single expression to fetch all the above a elements in an WebExtension called PageProbe. Although I've tried a bunch of methods, it just can't return the wanted result.
However, the following expression does return all the a elements, including the ones I don't need.
/div/
The following expression returns the a element under only the first li item.
/div/ul/li/div/div[2]/a
Sorry for not providing enough info earlier. Hope someone can help me out. Thanks.
According to the information you gave here you can simply use this xpath:
/div/ul/li/div/div[2]/a
however I'm quite sure it should be some better locator based on other attributes like class names etc.
I got this:
{{columns.field}} and this {{resultado.!!!}}
and inside the !!! I need to put the {{columns.field}} I can't find a way to do it
I need to do it like this because I don't know the field in !!!, for that reason I got the {{columns.field}}, in this expression I picked up the value I need to put in !!!.
I'm sorry for my bad way of expressing myself
I tried something like this
Ready for top level Javascript ?
{{resultado[columns.field]}}
I have used Safe Navigation Operator for Objects to load on Asynchronous calls and it is pretty amazing. I thought I could reproduce the same for Arrays but it displays a template parse error in my Angular code. I know *ngIf is an alternative solution, but is there a more simpler(by code) way just like the Safe Navigation Operator?
<div class="mock">
<h5>{{data?.title}}</h5> //This works
<h6>{{data?.body}}</h6> //This works
<h6>{{simpleData?[0]}}</h6> // This is what I tried to implement
</div>
Is there something like a Safe Navigation Operator that can be used on Arrays?
Yes, what you are looking for is known as the Optional Chaining operator (JavaScript / TypeScript).
The syntax shown in the MDN JavaScript documentation is:
obj.val?.prop
obj.val?.[expr]
obj.arr?.[index]
obj.func?.(args)
So, to achieve what you want, you need to change your example from:
<h6>{{simpleData?[0]}}</h6>
To:
<h6>{{simpleData?.[0]}}</h6>
^
Also see How to use optional chaining with array in Typescript?.
is there a more simpler(by code) way just like the Safe Navigation Operator?
There is ternary operator.
condition ? expr1 : expr2
<h6>{{simpleData?simpleData[0]:''}}</h6>
Of cause it's a matter of taste, but in such cases I tend to use a shorter approach:
<h6>{{(simpleData || [])[0]}}</h6>
The other answers amount to the same thing, but I find foo && foo[0] to be the most readable. The right side of the logical-and operator won't be evaluated if the left side is falsy, so you safely get undefined (or I guess null, if you don't believe Douglas Crockford.) with minimal extra characters.
For that matter, you asked for a "simpler" solution, but actually *ngIf is probably correct for the use case you gave. If you use any of the answers here, you'll wind up with an empty h6 tag that you didn't need. If you make the tag itself conditional, you can just put foo[0] in the handlebars and be confident that it won't be evaluated when foo is still undefined, plus you never pollute the page with an empty tag.
I know this has been asked at least a thousand times but I can't find a proper regex that will match a name in this string here:
<td><div id="topbarUserName">Donald</div></td>
I want to get the name 'Donald' and the regex that's the closest is >[a-zA-Z0-9]+ but the result is >Donald.
I'm coding in PureBasic (It's syntax is similar to that of Basic) and it uses the PCRE library for regular expressions.
Can anyone help?
Josh's pattern will work if you only make use of the numbered group, not the whole match. If you have to use the whole match, use something like (?<=>)(\w+?)(?=<)
Either way, regex is widely known to not be good for parsing HTML.
Explanation:
(?<=) is used to check if something appears before the current item.
\w+? will match any "word"-character, one or more times, but stop whenever the rest of the pattern matches something, for this situation the ? could have been left out.
(?=) is used to check if something appears after the current item.
Try this
It should capture anything that is a letter / number
>([\w]+)<
Also I'm not exactly sure what your project limitations are, but it would be much easier to do something like this
$('#topbarUserName').text();
in jQuery instead of using a regex.
>([a-zA-Z]+) should do the Trick. Remember to get the grouping right.
Why not doing it with plain old basic string-functions?
a.w = FindString(HTMLstring.s, "topbarUserName") + 16 ; 2 for "> and topbar...
If a > 0
b.w = FindString(HTMLstring, "<", a)
If b > 0
c.w = b - a
Donald.s = Mid(HTMLstring,a, c)
EndIf
EndIf
Debug Donald
Is there a way to indicate that two or more regex phrases can occur in any order? For instance, XML attributes can be written in any order. Say that I have the following XML:
Home
Home
How would I write a match that checks the class and title and works for both cases? I'm mainly looking for the syntax that allows me to check in any order, not just matching the class and title as I can do that. Is there any way besides just including both combinations and connecting them with a '|'?
Edit: My preference would be to do it in a single regex as I'm building it programatically and also unit testing it.
No, I believe the best way to do it with a single RE is exactly as you describe. Unfortunately, it'll get very messy when your XML can have 5 different attributes, giving you a large number of different REs to check.
On the other hand, I wouldn't be doing this with an RE at all since they're not meant to be programming languages. What's wrong with the old fashioned approach of using an XML processing library?
If you're required to use an RE, this answer probably won't help much, but I believe in using the right tools for the job.
Have you considered xpath? (where attribute order doesn't matter)
//a[#class and #title]
Will select both <a> nodes as valid matches. The only caveat being that the input must be xhtml (well formed xml).
You can create a lookahead for each of the attributes and plug them into a regex for the whole tag. For example, the regex for the tag could be
<a\b[^<>]*>
If you're using this on XML you'll probably need something more elaborate. By itself, this base regex will match a tag with zero or more attributes. Then you add a lookhead for each of the attributes you want to match:
(?=[^<>]*\s+class="link")
(?=[^<>]*\s+title="Home")
The [^<>]* lets it scan ahead for the attribute, but won't let it look beyond the closing angle bracket. Matching the leading whitespace here in the lookahead serves two purposes: it's more flexible than matching it in the base regex, and it ensure that we're matching a whole attribute name. Combining them we get:
<a\b(?=[^<>]*\s+class="link")(?=[^<>]*\s+title="Home")[^<>]+>[^<>]+</a>
Of course, I've made some simplifying assumptions for the sake of clarity. I didn't allow for whitespace around the equals signs, for single-quotes or no quotes around the attribute values, or for angle brackets in the attribute values (which I hear is legal, but I've never seen it done). Plugging those leaks (if you need to) will make the regex uglier, but won't require changes to the basic structure.
You could use named groups to pull the attributes out of the tag. Run the regex and then loop over the groups doing whatever tests that you need.
Something like this (untested, using .net regex syntax with the \w for word characters and \s for whitespace):
<a ((?<key>\w+)\s?=\s?['"](?<value>\w+)['"])+ />
The easiest way would be to write a regex that picks up the <a .... > part, and then write two more regexes to pull out the class and the title. Although you could probably do it with a single regex, it would be very complicated, and probably a lot more error prone.
With a single regex you would need something like
<a[^>]*((class="([^"]*)")|(title="([^"]*)"))?((title="([^"]*)")|(class="([^"]*)"))?[^>]*>
Which is just a first hand guess without checking to see if it's even valid. Much easier to just divide and conquer the problem.
An first ad hoc solution might be to do the following.
((class|title)="[^"]*?" *)+
This is far from perfect because it allows every attribute to occur more than once. I could imagine that this might be solveable with assertions. But if you just want to extract the attributes this might already be sufficent.
If you want to match a permutation of a set of elements, you could use a combination of back references and zero-width
negative forward matching.
Say you want to match any one of these six lines:
123-abc-456-def-789-ghi-0AB
123-abc-456-ghi-789-def-0AB
123-def-456-abc-789-ghi-0AB
123-def-456-ghi-789-abc-0AB
123-ghi-456-abc-789-def-0AB
123-ghi-456-def-789-abc-0AB
You can do this with the following regex:
/123-(abc|def|ghi)-456-(?!\1)(abc|def|ghi)-789-(?!\1|\2)(abc|def|ghi)-0AB/
The back references (\1, \2), let you refer to your previous matches, and the zero
width forward matching ((?!...) ) lets you negate a positional match, saying don't match if the
contained matches at this position. Combining the two makes sure that your match is a legit permutation
of the given elements, with each possibility only occuring once.
So, for example, in ruby:
input = <<LINES
123-abc-456-abc-789-abc-0AB
123-abc-456-abc-789-def-0AB
123-abc-456-abc-789-ghi-0AB
123-abc-456-def-789-abc-0AB
123-abc-456-def-789-def-0AB
123-abc-456-def-789-ghi-0AB
123-abc-456-ghi-789-abc-0AB
123-abc-456-ghi-789-def-0AB
123-abc-456-ghi-789-ghi-0AB
123-def-456-abc-789-abc-0AB
123-def-456-abc-789-def-0AB
123-def-456-abc-789-ghi-0AB
123-def-456-def-789-abc-0AB
123-def-456-def-789-def-0AB
123-def-456-def-789-ghi-0AB
123-def-456-ghi-789-abc-0AB
123-def-456-ghi-789-def-0AB
123-def-456-ghi-789-ghi-0AB
123-ghi-456-abc-789-abc-0AB
123-ghi-456-abc-789-def-0AB
123-ghi-456-abc-789-ghi-0AB
123-ghi-456-def-789-abc-0AB
123-ghi-456-def-789-def-0AB
123-ghi-456-def-789-ghi-0AB
123-ghi-456-ghi-789-abc-0AB
123-ghi-456-ghi-789-def-0AB
123-ghi-456-ghi-789-ghi-0AB
LINES
# outputs only the permutations
puts input.grep(/123-(abc|def|ghi)-456-(?!\1)(abc|def|ghi)-789-(?!\1|\2)(abc|def|ghi)-0AB/)
For a permutation of five elements, it would be:
/1-(abc|def|ghi|jkl|mno)-
2-(?!\1)(abc|def|ghi|jkl|mno)-
3-(?!\1|\2)(abc|def|ghi|jkl|mno)-
4-(?!\1|\2|\3)(abc|def|ghi|jkl|mno)-
5-(?!\1|\2|\3|\4)(abc|def|ghi|jkl|mno)-6/x
For your example, the regex would be
/<a href="home.php" (class="link"|title="Home") (?!\1)(class="link"|title="Home")>Home<\/a>/