Why doesn't the "aaaaaaaaa..." go to a new line and go out of div?
<head>
<style type="text/css">
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#container {
background: #888888;
color: white;
width: 200px;
padding: 20px;
}
#container li {
list-style: none;
}
#container td {
padding-right: 20px;
}
</style>
</head>
<div id="container">
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>one</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>two</li>
<li>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
If there aren't any spaces in your word then your table will expand to fit the word. There isn't much you can do about that (not with css anyway). Word wrap only works with actual word (i.e. with spaces in them).
A solution that will work for you though is to use the (soft hyphen)
<li>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</li>
will break in the middle. It will only break there if it needs to - if it doesn't fit in the parent container.
There are a number of other solutions available, most of them are unreliable cross-browser or break your design:
The word break tag : <wbr> is unreliable.
The overflow CSS statement will either break your design (overflow:auto) or hide content (overflow:hidden)
So basically, no easy solution. Soft-hyphen will work best if you can use it.
You could look into hyphenator, a way to automate work breaks like that on your website.
For your edit, if it's a variable then I would definitely with hyphenator.
What you are looking for is css3 feature word wrap: http://www.css3.info/preview/word-wrap/
This have some browser compatibility issues but I think if you are determined to use such long words, this is an option.
This is a sample: http://jsfiddle.net/VXgdS/2/
Related
1.) This works in Chrome.
In Firefox, however, a django tables table that we are rendering on our site is not observing the overflow style. From what I read, table cell elements may be a "per browser" decision because they aren't pure block elements (if I am understanding the standard correctly), but here's a picture of my problem.
I've tried fussing with the max-width tag (to no effect other than the width changes but the overflow is still garbled into the next cell). I could technically wrap the line (white-space), but we don't want huge table rows on the page.
The Mozilla developer page (Overflow) says "In order for overflow to have an effect, the block-level container must have either a set height (height or max-height) or white-space set to nowrap." The height property doesn't seem to change this either. No other CSS property I've tried seems to have an effect.
I keep thinking that this is something Firefox may not support (i.e. table cells aren't "block-level"?), but I can't quite say that for certain.
EDIT: Here's the html. It's just a basic table produced by django tables. Please ignore the inline style I attempted which is commented out.
EDIT: Here's inline code and a JSFiddle link at the bottom.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<head>
<style>
<body {font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;}
th {
padding: 8px;
}
td {
padding: 8px;
}
td.content {
overflow-x: scroll;
max-width: 0;
white-space: nowrap;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<thead><th>Column 1</th><th>Column 2</th><th>Column 3</th></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td>Other stuff</td><td class="content">A REALLY REALLY REALLY
REALLY LONG MESSAGE</td><td>Other stuff</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</html>
JSFiddle
I made a simple code for you, i hope help you, tell me if this is what you want:
.msg_list{
border:1px solid red;
}
.td-content{
border:1px solid blue;
max-height:100px;
max-width:100px;
}
.content{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
overflow: auto;
}
.content div{
width:200px;
}
<table class="msg_list">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="td-content">
<div class="content">
<div>One really really really really really long message</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
If you watch you can see in the css the class .content and his property max-width, i tested it in firefox, you can try it
So I'm designing an org chart based on the table element and I have a problem. I'm using <hr> elements to create the connectors; however, I can't get the dead space inbetween elements to go away. I've spent the last hour trying to figure out how the hell to get it to work and I just can't seem to figure it out.
I've included a picture to show:
The other issue is more of a question I haven't really looked into but figured I'd ask anyway. How can I lock the height of my table items. I've locked the width just fine but I can't seem to lock the height to 70px.
And here is some choice code:
<table class="orgchart" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td class="item">Director</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="divider"><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><hr width="1" size="20"></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
<tr>
<td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td class="item">Assistant to the Director</td><td></td><td class="item">Deputy Director</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td>
</tr>
And the CSS:
.orgchart td {
width: 70px;
height: 70px;
text-align: center;
overflow: hidden;
white-space: no-wrap;
}
.divider td {
height: 20px;
}
.item {
border: 2px solid black;
}
And here is the CodePen: http://codepen.io/jacob_johnson/pen/GpEjmm?editors=110
There's a margin all the way around the <hr>. Remove the top and bottom margins from the <hr>. All browsers apply default styling to elements, though not always the same. As a result you will see reset and normalize stylesheets used to improve visual consistency and development pains.
Updated Codepen with CSS below added.
hr {
margin: 0 auto;
}
If I was doing this project I would find a simple grid framework to layout with DIVs or more than likely I would create this chart as an inline SVG.
Is there anything I can do to make IE display table cells as actual blocks?
Given this style:
table,tbody,tr,td,div {
display: block;
border: 1px solid #0f0;
padding: 4px;
}
And this html:
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>R1C1</td>
<td>R1C2</td>
<td>R1C3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>R1C1</div>
<div>R1C2</div>
<div>R1C3</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The table renders exactly the same as the nested divs in both Firefox and Safari/Chrome. But in Internet Explorer (8) the property display: block has no effect. The table renders exactly as if I don't set that property.
My main problem is that the cells don't break; They all render on one line. (The tbody and tr elements don't get any borders nor padding. That is not a problem for me right now, though.)
I haven't found any information on the problem when searching. Compatibility charts on quirksmode and elsewhere states that IE supports display: block since v. 5.5. Any discussion on table display problems seems to be when doing the reverse - giving non-table elements any of the display: table-* properties.
So once again, is there anything I can do to make IE render table cells as block?
(The real table is really a table, with tabular data. I would like to keep it that way, and restyle it unobtrusively.)
I applied float: left to stuff. It kinda works.
Live Demo
The biggest problem is width: 100% combined with the padding is making things too wide.
So:
Live Demo (without the problematic padding)
That looks a bit better, but I'm not sure how you can easily add padding everywhere if you need it.
This fails --> miserably <-- in IE7 (it just won't get over the fact that it's a <table>), and even if you don't care about IE7, it will need tweaking for your use case (if it's usable at all).
IE7:
The following worked for me for IE6+:
tr {
display: block;
position: relative
}
td.col1 {
display: block;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 90px;
}
td.col2 {
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 30px;
}
td.col3 {
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 60px;
}
Assumptions:
cell height 30px
Drawbacks:
Fixed cell height
Cumbersome specification of top property (maybe generate)
Only works when HTML provides classes for columns
Advantage:
Works in all browsers.
When to use:
When you have no control over HTML, but have control over CSS. Some hosted payment solutions come to mind that display in an IFRAME and offer a custom style sheet.
Just figured it out with a collegue of mine.
ALTHOUGH I STRONGLY RECOMMEND TO NOT SUPPORT IE8 AT ALL ANYMORE!
Since you are facilitating the use of an unsupported and currently unsafe product that is not up to par with current standards and techniques. It would be way better to tell your users to upgrade and give them some browser downloadlinks to choose from.
That being said. The CSS below is the minimum css you need to fix it in Internet Explorer 8.
table {
width: 100%;
}
td {
float: left;
width: 100%;
}
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>cell-1</td>
<td>cell-2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
add this code:
<!DOCTYPE html>
我这里是这么解决的，加上上面那条声明语句，display:block对td就会有效。
you need add this code in the top.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style>
td {
display: block;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>First Name</td>
<td>Last Name</td>
<td>Job Title</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><div>James</div></td>
<td><div>Matman</div></td>
<td><div>Chief Sandwich Eater</div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><div>The</div></td>
<td><div>Tick</div></td>
<td><div>Crimefighter Sorta</div></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Add this line of code in the top, but use 'float' and 'width' is very good.
sorry, my english so poor.
make it display:table-row; instead of display:block
It will work like it is supposed to
I have an html table within a div of a specific size. I want the table to apply margin collapse and be 100% wide. Here is my code. It renders how I want it to in IE8 and incorrectly in Firefox. Firefox may be doing the spec correctly, but whatever. How do I fix my css to work in both browsers?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<title>Untitled 1</title>
<style type="text/css">
table
{
border-collapse: collapse;
border-spacing: 0;
}
table
{
margin: 10px 0;
width: 100%;
display: block;
}
p
{
margin: 10px 0;
}
td, th
{
border: 1px solid #000000;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div style="width: 600px; border: 1px purple solid;">
<p>Some text at the top. Notice that the margin collapse does not work unless display:block.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Header 1</th>
<th>Header 2</th>
<th>Header 3</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Label 1</td>
<td>1.A</td>
<td>1.B</td>
<td>1.c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Label 2</td>
<td>2.A</td>
<td>2.B</td>
<td>2.c</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Some text at the bottom. Notice that the margin collapse does not work unless display:block. Its stupid.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I need the display:block for margin collapsing to work in Firefox. If you remove the display:block, you should notice that the spacing between the <p> tags widens from 10px to 20px.
This is also an edit to this question that I posted earlier, but it won't let me edit for some reason. I've been messing around with my internet cache so I probably messed up a cookie.
You need to add table-layout: fixed to the style assigned to the table, that's all.
Use display: table and your problem will be solved.
just remove the display: block;, the border-collapse works fine
remove
display: block;
change this
table
{
margin: 10px 0;
width: 100%;
display: block;
}
to
table
{
margin: 10px 0;
width: 100%;
}
for live demo
http://jsfiddle.net/dN5DM/1/
Margin collapsing is only defined for block elements.
Tables are special. In the CSS specs, they're not quite block elements - special rules apply to size and position, both of their children (obviously), and of the table element itself.
check links
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#block-box
Solution to margin collapsing is
You could use a 1-pixel top padding or border to avoid margins from collapsing.
Okay, this is my first post on Stack Overflow, and I believe I have solved your issue. All I did was change the line "display: block;" to "position: relative;" and that seemed to have fixed the "stretching" issue.
I am using Chromium and I understood what you mean when the tables weren't stretching out as they were in Internet Explorer. I know Chromium and Firefox handle pages pretty similar, so that might have resolved your issue.
I'm just wondering.. If you're specifying div width="600" and then require the table to fit 100%.. Why not put a width on the table instead of the containing div.
don't mind me, Just curious to know what specifically you're trying to achieve other than the border-collapse.
You need to define the parent elements as 100% too, so the table knows what it is a percentage of.
You can fix any width trouble simply by adding a short JScritp ... first add this to your BODY tag: onload="autoadjustw"; and this little script in the head tag:
function autoadjustw(){
AN=document.getElementById("parent_object").offsetWidth;
document.getElementById("Table_Id").style.width=AN+"px";
}
if removing display: block breaks in IE use '\9' to target IE only like:
table
{
margin: 10px 0;
width: 100%;
display: block\9; /*for ie only"*/
}
Tables do not use display: block; Simple width: 100%; should do the display: block; trick.
Never have, never will!
Ok, I had a simple layout problem a week or two ago. Namely sections of a page needed a header:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Title Button |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
Pretty simple stuff. Thing is table hatred seems to have taken over in the Web world, which I was reminded of when I asked Why use definition lists (DL,DD,DT) tags for HTML forms instead of tables? Now the general topic of tables vs divs/CSS has previously been discussed, for example:
DIV vs Table; and
Tables instead of DIVs.
So this isn't intended to be a general discussion about CSS vs tables for layout. This is simply the solution to one problem. I tried various solutions to the above using CSS including:
Float right for the button or a div containing the button;
Position relative for the button; and
Position relative+absolute.
None of these solutions were satisfactory for different reasons. For example the relative positioning resulted in a z-index issue where my dropdown menu appeared under the content.
So I ended up going back to:
<style type="text/css">
.group-header { background-color: yellow; width: 100%; }
.group-header td { padding: 8px; }
.group-title { text-align: left; font-weight: bold; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">Title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" name="Button"></td>
</tr>
</table>
And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.
So can anyone do the equivalent without tables?
The requirements are:
Backwards compatible: to FF2 and IE6;
Reasonably consistent: across different browsers;
Vertically centered: the button and title are of different heights; and
Flexible: allow reasonably precise control over positioning (padding and/or margin) and styling.
On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:
Why CSS should not be used for layout; and
Tables vs CSS: CSS Trolls begone
EDIT: Let me elaborate on the float issue. This sort of works:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { float: left; padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { float: right; padding: 8px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="group-title">This is my title</div>
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Thanks to Ant P for the overflow: hidden part (still don't get why though). Here's where the problem comes in. Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered. This is problematic because the elements are of different height. Compare this to:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-header td { vertical-align: middle; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">This is my title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
which works perfectly.
There is nothing wrong with using the tools that are available to you to do the job quickly and correctly.
In this case a table worked perfectly.
I personally would have used a table for this.
I think nested tables should be avoided, things can get messy.
Just float left and right and set to clear both and you're done. No need for tables.
Edit: I know that I got a lot of upvotes for this, and I believed I was right. But there are cases where you simply need to have tables. You can try doing everything with CSS and it will work in modern browsers, but if you wish to support older ones... Not to repeat myself, here the related stack overflow thread and rant on my blog.
Edit2: Since older browsers are not that interesting anymore, I'm using Twitter bootstrap for new projects. It's great for most layout needs and does using CSS.
Float title left, float button right, and (here's the part I never knew until recently) - make the container of them both {overflow:hidden}.
That should avoid the z-index problem, anyway. If it doesn't work, and you really need the IE5 support, go ahead and use the table.
This is kind of a trick question: it looks terribly simple until you get to
Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered.
I want to state for the record that yes, vertical centring is difficult in CSS. When people post, and it seems endless on SO, "can you do X in CSS" the answer is almost always "yes" and their whinging seems unjustified. In this case, yes, that one particular thing is hard.
Someone should just edit the entire question down to "is vertical centring problematic in CSS?".
In pure CSS, a working answer will one day be to just use "display:table-cell". Unfortunately that doesn't work across current A-grade browsers, so for all that you might as well use a table if you just want to achieve the same result anyway. At least you'll be sure it works far enough into the past.
Honestly, just use a table if it's easier. It won't hurt.
If the semantics and accessibility of the table element really matter to you, there is a working draft for making your table non-semantic:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#presentation
I think this requires a special DTD beyond XHTML 1.1, which would just stir up the whole text/html vs application/xml debate, so let's not go there.
So, on to your unresolved CSS problem...
To vertically align two elements on their center: it can be done a few different ways, with some obtuse CSS hackery.
If you can fit within the following constraints, then there is a relatively simple way:
The height of the two elements is fixed.
The height of the container is fixed.
The elements will be narrow enough not to overlap (or can be set to a fixed width).
Then you can use absolute positioning with negative margins:
.group-header { height: 50px; position: relative; }
.group-title, .group-buttons { position: absolute; top: 50%; }
# Assuming the height of .group-title is a known 34px
.group-title { left: 0; margin-top: -17px; }
# Assuming the height of .group-buttons is a known 38px
.group-buttons { right: 0; margin-top: -19px; }
But this is pointless in most situations... If you already know the height of the elements, then you can just use floats and add enough margin to position them as needed.
Here is another method which uses the text baseline to vertically align the two columns as inline blocks. The drawback here is that you need to set fixed widths for the columns to fill out the width from the left edge. Because we need to keep the elements locked to a text baseline, we can't just use float:right for the second column. (Instead, we have to make the first column wide enough to push it over.)
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; }
.valign { display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; width: 384px; }
.group-buttons { padding: 8px; width: 84px; text-align: right; }
</style>
<!--[if lt IE 8]>
<style type="text/css">
.valign { display: inline; margin-top: -2px; padding-top: 1px; }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="valign">
<div class="group-title">This is my title.</div>
</div><!-- avoid whitespace between these! --><div class="valign">
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly, but mind the hacks.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The HTML: We add .valign wrappers around each column. (Give them a more "semantic" name if it makes you happier.) These need to be kept without whitespace in between or else text spaces will push them apart. (I know it sucks, but that's what you get for being "pure" with the markup and separating it from the presentation layer... Ha!)
The CSS: We use vertical-align:middle to line up the blocks to the text baseline of the group-header element. The different heights of each block will stay vertically centered and push out the height of their container. The widths of the elements need to be calculated to fit the width. Here, they are 400 and 100, minus their horizontal padding.
The IE fixes: Internet Explorer only displays inline-block for natively-inline elements (e.g. span, not div). But, if we give the div hasLayout and then display it inline, it will behave just like inline-block. The margin adjustment is to fix a 1px gap at the top (try adding background colors to the .group-title to see).
I would recommend not using a table in this instance, because that is not tabular data; it's purely presentational to have the button located at the far right. This is what I'd do to duplicate your table structure (change to a different H# to suit where you are in your site's hierarchy):
<style>
.group-header { background: yellow; zoom: 1; padding: 8px; }
.group-header:after { content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear: both; visibility: hidden; }
/* set width appropriately to allow room for button */
.group-header h3 { float: left; width: 300px; }
/* set line-height or margins to align with h3 baseline or middle */
.group-header input { float: right; }
</style>
<div class="group-header">
<h3>This is my title</h3>
<input type="button" value="Collapse"/>
</div>
If you want true vertical alignment in the middle (ie, if the text wraps the button is still middle-aligned with respect to both lines of text), then you either need to do a table or work something with position: absolute and margins. You can add position: relative to your drop-down menu (or more likely its parent) in order to pull it into the same ordering level as the buttons, allowing you to bump it above them with z-index, if it comes to that.
Note that you don't need width: 100% on the div because it's a block-level element, and zoom: 1 makes the div behave like it has a clearfix in IE (other browsers pick up the actual clearfix). You also don't need all those extraneous classes if you're targeting things a bit more specifically, although you might need a wrapper div or span on the button to make positioning easier.
Do a double float in a div and use the clearfix. http://www.webtoolkit.info/css-clearfix.html Do you have any padding/margin restrictions?
<div class="clearfix">
<div style="float:left">Title</div>
<input type="button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
</div>
<div class="group-header">
<input type="button" name="Button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
<span>Title</span>
</div>
I've chose to use Flexbox, because it made things so much easier.
You basically need to go to the parent of the children you want to align and add display:box (prefixed of course). To make them sit in the sides, use justify-content. Space between is the right thing when you have elements which need to be aligned to the end, like in this case (see link)...
Then the vertical align issue. Because I made the parent of the two elements, you want to align a Flexbox. It's easy now to use align-items: center.
Then I added the styles you wanted before, removed the float from the title and button in the header and added a padding:
.group-header, .group-content {
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.group-header{
border: 1px solid red;
background: yellow;
overflow: hidden;
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: box;
display: -webkit-flex;
display: -moz-flex;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-justify-content: space-between;
-moz-justify-content: space-between;
-ms-justify-content: space-between;
-o-justify-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
webkit-align-items: center;
-moz-align-items: center;
-ms-align-items: center;
-o-align-items: center;
align-items: center;
padding: 8px 0;
}
.group-content{
border: 1px solid black;
background: #DDD;
}
.group-title {
padding-left: 8px;
}
.group-buttons {
padding-right: 8px
}
See Demo
I agree that one should really only use tables for tabular data, for the simple reason that tables don't show until they're finished loading (no matter how fast that is; it's slower that the CSS method). I do, however, feel that this is the simplest and most elegant solution:
<html>
<head>
<title>stack header</title>
<style type="text/css">
#stackheader {
background-color: #666;
color: #FFF;
width: 410px;
height: 50px;
}
#title {
color: #FFF;
float: left;
padding: 15px 0 0 15px;
}
#button {
color: #FFF;
float: right;
padding: 15px 15px 0 0;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="stackheader">
<div id="title">Title</div>
<div id="button">Button</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The button function and any extra detail can be styled from this basic form. Apologies for the bad tags.