I am using 0.3.1-pre Node.js
Doing this:
typeof global.parseInt
results in
'undefined'
However when pressing [Tab] in the console after typing 'global.' gives a list of functions, including parseInt.
So is parseInt a member of the global namespace or not?
As of NodeJS v0.8.14 global seems to work across modules like the window object does in the browser.
Test:
a.js:
a1 = console.log; // Will be accessed from b.js
global.a2 = console.log; // Will be accessed from b.js
require('./b.js');
b1('a: b1');
b2('a: b2');
global.b1('a: global.b1');
global.b2('a: global.b2');
b.js:
a1('b: a1');
a2('b: a2');
global.a1('b: global.a1');
global.a2('b: global.a2');
b1 = console.log; // Will be accessed from a.js
global.b2 = console.log; // Will be accessed from a.js
Running a.js outputs:
b: a1
b: a2
b: global.a1
b: global.a2
a: b1
a: b2
a: global.b1
a: global.b2
Apparently, the global object isn't the global object as window is in the browser. It's (according to micheil in #nodejs # freenode) really only used internally. Something about global closures and whatnot.
parseInt and setTimeout and all those buddies are globals on their own. Not part of any visible global object.
Defining variable in app.js without var, just like myvar='someval' makes it visible inside every .js in your project
FAILS:
if( global[ some_object_i_want_to_exist ] ){ ... }
WORKS:
//: outside of all functions, including IIFE.
const THE_GLOBAL_YOU_PROBABLY_WANT_IS_THIS=( this );
//: Within a function:
const G = THE_GLOBAL_YOU_PROBABLY_WANT_IS_THIS;
if( G[ some_object_i_want_to_exist ] ){ ... }
I am assuming you got to this page about "global" in node.js because you wanted the equivalent of "window" in order to check for globally declared variables. bFunc's solution didn't work for me, as it seems to require that one explicitly does something like:
global.some_object_i_want_to_exist = whatever;
as a pre-requisit to using
global[ some_object_i_want_to_exist ]
EDIT: Looking at my code it seems that the only reason my solution worked is because I used "exports.some_object_i_want_to_exist" somewhere else in the
file. Without that, my solution fails. So... I have no clue how to reliable determine if an object exists in a given scope in Node.js.
Here is the documentation on global object:
https://nodejs.org/api/globals.html
I am going to leave my answer here because I hear people are more likely to correct you when you are wrong, so maybe someone will correct me with the answer to the problem.
Related
I would like to create a CMake function as:
function(test src_list dst_list)
# do something
endfunction()
usage:
test(${my_list} chg_list)
It means, my_list is a list with several fields, and chg_list will receive a list modified inside test function.
How can I create a function in CMake to do that?
In CMake, functions have their own scope, and by default, all modification of variables are local, unless you pass CACHE or PARENT_SCOPE as parameter to set. Inside a function, if you want to modify a variable in the scope of the caller, you should use:
set(${dst_list} <something> PARENT_SCOPE)
See documentation:
A function opens a new scope: see set(var PARENT_SCOPE) for details.
Check that inside your function you are set()ing not dst_list but ${dst_list}. You need this to return data to the parent scope.
Here's how I solved a similar problem which was marked a duplicate of this question. This function takes a string BinaryName and adds it to the list OutVariable which is available in the parent scope. If the list is not defined it is created. I use this strategy for creating new test targets and adding the name of these targets to a list of targets in the main scope.
Thanks to #Tsyvarev for the comments that lead me to figure this out.
function(AddToListFromFunction BinaryName OutVariable)
if ("${${OutVariable}}" STREQUAL "")
message(STATUS "1")
set(${OutVariable} ${BinaryName} PARENT_SCOPE)
message(STATUS "OutVariable: ${OutVariable} ${${OutVariable}}")
else ()
message(STATUS "2")
set(${OutVariable} "${${OutVariable}}" "${BinaryName}" PARENT_SCOPE)
endif ()
endfunction()
AddToListFromFunction(MyBinary1 MyTests)
AddToListFromFunction(MyBinary2 MyTests)
message(STATUS "MyTests Variable: ${MyTests}")
Lets say I'm working with a 3D file which is the combination of one Architectural model and one Structural model.
The instance tree or Model Browser looks like this
root/
Arch/
Level 01/
Level 02/
...
Str/
Level 01/
Level 02/
...
I want to display only the Level 01.
So I:
Followed the steps in the Viewer tutorial
Add an event listener to both Autodesk.Viewing.GEOMETRY_LOADED_EVENT & Autodesk.Viewing.OBJECT_TREE_CREATED_EVENT
When the 2 are fired, I use the code in this article to display only the Level 01 without ghosting.
I have 2 problem with this approach
I have to wait until the entire model is loaded before I can filter the level
After filtering the level, if I click on Model Browser, I can still see the entire model structure (but with everything as hidden except Level 01). How can I set the instance tree to only have what's below?
root/
Arch/
Level 01/
Str/
Level 01/
EDIT
At what point am I supposed to override the shouldInclude() function?
I've tried this and put a breakpoint but it seems it never gets called... I also tried to move it around but in vain.
const start = Date.now();
Autodesk.Viewing.UI.ModelStructurePanel.shouldInclude = (node) => {
Logger.log(node);
return true;
};
Autodesk.Viewing.Initializer(options, () => {
Logger.log(`Viewer initialized in ${Date.now() - start}ms`);
const config = {};
// prettier-ignore
Autodesk.Viewing.theExtensionManager.registerExtension('MyAwesomeExtension', MyAwesomeExtension);
viewerApp = new Autodesk.Viewing.ViewingApplication('MyViewerDiv');
viewerApp.registerViewer(viewerApp.k3D, Autodesk.Viewing.Private.GuiViewer3D, config);
loadDocumentStart = Date.now();
// prettier-ignore
viewerApp.loadDocument(documentId, onDocumentLoadSuccess, onDocumentLoadFailure);
});
Regarding #1: the object tree is stored in the file's internal database which - for performance reasons - is only loaded after the actual geometry.
Regarding #2: you can subclass the ModelStructurePanel class and add your own behavior, for example, by overriding the ModelStructurePanel#shouldInclude method.
Since I wasn't able to understand how to use ModelStructurePanel, I overrode Autodesk.Viewing.ViewingApplication.selectItem to only modify the options which are either passed to loadDocumentNode or startWithDocumentNode as below:
const options = {
ids: leafIDs.length > 0 ? leafIDs : null, // changed this line
acmSessionId: this.myDocument.acmSessionId,
loadOptions,
useConsolidation: this.options.useConsolidation,
consolidationMemoryLimit: this.options.consolidationMemoryLimit || 100 * 1024 * 1024, // 100 MB
};
With leafIDs being an array of objectIDs to display. I was able to build it by:
querying the ModelDerivativeAPI using GET :urn/metadata/:guid
going through the tree to find the ids which I am interested in.
There's probably a more elegant way to do this but that's the best I could do so far.
I am not sure what the proper heading / title for this question should be. I am new to WinJS and am coming from a .NET webform and winclient background.
Here is my scenario. I have a navigation WinJS application. My structure is:
default.html
(navigation controller)
(settings flyout)
pages/Home.html
pages/Page2.html
So at the top of the default.js file, it sets the following variables:
var app = WinJS.Application;
var activation = Windows.ApplicationModel.Activation;
var nav = WinJS.Navigation;
It seems like I cannot use these variables anywhere inside my settings flyout or any of my pages:ready functions. They are only scoped to the default.js?
In the same regard, are there resources on the interwebs (links) that show how to properly share variables, events, and data between each of my "pages"?
The scenario that I immediately need to overcome is settings. In my settings flyout, I read and allow the user to optionally set the following application setting:
var applicationData = Windows.Storage.ApplicationData.current;
var localSettings = applicationData.localSettings;
localSettings.values["appLocation"] = {string set by the user};
I want to respond to that event in either my default.js file or even one of my navigation pages but I don't know where to "listen". My gut is to listen for the afterhide event but how do I scope that back to the page where I want to listen from?
Bryan. codefoster here. If you move the lines you mentioned...
var app = WinJS.Application;
var activation = Windows.ApplicationModel.Activation;
var nav = WinJS.Navigation;
...up and out of the immediate function, they'll be in global scope and you'll have access to them everywhere. That's one of the first things I do in my apps. You'll hear warnings about using global scope, but what people are trying to avoid is the pattern of dropping everything in global scope. As long as you control what you put in there, you're fine.
So put them before the beginning of the immediate function on default.js...
//stuff here is scoped globally
var app = WinJS.Application;
var activation = Windows.ApplicationModel.Activation;
var nav = WinJS.Navigation;
(function () {
//stuff here is scoped to this file only
})();
If you are saving some data and only need it in memory, you can just hang it off the app variable instead of saving it into local storage. That will make it available to the whole app.
//on Page2.js
app.myCustomVariable = "some value";
//on Page3.js
if(app.myCustomVariable == "some value") ...
Regarding your immediate need:
like mentioned in the other answer, you can use datachanged event.
Regards sharing variables:
If there are variables that you would like to keep global to the application, they can be placed outside the anonymous function like mentioned in the Jeremy answer. Typically, that is done in default.js. Need to ensure that scripts using the global variables are placed after the script defining the global variable - in default.html. Typically - such variable will point to singleton class. For example: I use it in one of my apps to store authclient/serviceclient for the backend service for the app. That way - the view models of the multiple pages need not create instance of the object or reference it under WinJS namespace.
WinJS has also concept of Namespace which lets you organize your functions and classes. Example:
WinJS.Namespace.define('Utils.Http',
{
stringifyParameters: function stringifyParameters(parameters)
{
var result = '';
for (var parameterName in parameters)
{
result += encodeURIComponent(parameterName) + '=' + encodeURIComponent(parameters[parameterName]) + '&';
}
if (result.length > 0)
{
result = result.substr(0, result.length - 1);
}
return result;
},
}
When navigating to a page using WinJS.Navigation.navigate, second argument initialState is available as options parameter to the ready event handler for the page. This would be recommended way to pass arguments to the page unless this it is application data or session state. Application data/session state needs to be handled separately and needs a separate discussion on its own. Application navigation history is persisted by the winjs library; it ensures that if the app is launched again after suspension - options will be passed again to the page when navigated. It is good to keep the properties in options object as simple primitive types.
Regards events:
Typically, apps consume events from winjs library. That can be done by registering the event handler using addEventListener or setting event properties like onclick etc. on the element. Event handlers are typically registered in the ready event handler for the page.
If you are writing your own custom control or sometimes in your view model, you may have to expose custom events. Winjs.UI.DOMEventMixin, WinJS.Utilities.createEventProperties can be mixed with your class using WinJS.Class.mix. Example:
WinJS.Class.mix(MyViewModel,
WinJS.Utilities.createEventProperties('customEvent'),
WinJS.UI.DOMEventMixin);
Most often used is binding to make your view model - observable. Refer the respective samples and api documentation for details. Example:
WinJS.Class.mix(MyViewModel,
WinJS.Binding.mixin,
WinJS.Binding.expandProperties({ items: '' }));
Here is what I ended up doing which is kinda of a combination of all the answers given:
Created a ViewModel.Settings.js file:
(function () {
"use strict";
WinJS.Namespace.define("ViewModel", {
Setting: WinJS.Binding.as({
Name: '',
Value: ''
}),
SettingsList: new WinJS.Binding.List(),
});
})();
Added that file to my default.html (navigation container page)
<script src="/js/VMs/ViewModel.Settings.js"></script>
Add the following to set the defaults and start 'listening' for changes
//add some fake settings (defaults on app load)
ViewModel.SettingsList.push({
Name: "favorite-color",
Value: "red"
});
// listen for events
var vm = ViewModel.SettingsList;
vm.oniteminserted = function (e) {
console.log("item added");
}
vm.onitemmutated = function (e) {
console.log("item mutated");
}
vm.onitemchanged = function (e) {
console.log("item changed");
}
vm.onitemremoved = function (e) {
console.log("item removed");
}
Then, within my application (pages) or my settings page, I can cause the settings events to be fired:
// thie fires the oniteminserted
ViewModel.SettingsList.push({
Name: "favorite-sport",
Value: "Baseball"
});
// this fires the itemmutated event
ViewModel.SettingsList.getAt(0).Value = "yellow";
ViewModel.SettingsList.notifyMutated(0);
// this fires the itemchanged event
ViewModel.SettingsList.setAt(0, {
Name: "favorite-color",
Value: "blue"
});
// this fires the itemremoved event
ViewModel.SettingsList.pop(); // removes the last item
When you change data that needs to be updated in real time, call applicationData.signalDataChanged(). Then in the places that care about getting change notifications, listen to the datachanged on the applicationData object. This is also the event that is raised when roaming settings are synchronized between computers.
I've found that many times, an instant notification (raised event) is unnecessary, though. I just query the setting again when the value is needed (in ready for example).
Background:
I'm trying to run a callback when something inside the code of a directive in AngularJS happen.
Pertinent code:
HTML:
<img-cropper onselect="updateAvatarData" x="100" y="100" src="{{tempAvatar}}" id="avatarCropper"/>
Controller:
$scope.updateAvatarData = function(c){
alert("¡¡¡Funciona!!!!");
};
Directive:
<<more code up here>>
link: function(scope,element, attr) {
scope.wsId = attr.id+'WS';
scope.pvId = attr.id+'preview';
scope.x = attr.x;
scope.y = attr.y;
scope.aspectRatio = scope.x/scope.y;
scope.previewStyle = "width:"+scope.x+"px;height:"+scope.y+"px;overflow:hidden;";
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);
<<more code down here>>
The problem is in that last line "scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);". That "scope.$eval(attr.onselect);" returns 'undefined'. The attr.onselect works fine, it returns the name of the function typed on the 'onselect' attribute.
I have made others directives with functions passed via attibutes with no problem, but am unable to find what I am doing wrong here.
Thanks in advance
Why you are doing like this when u can easily use '&' feature available with angular
calling method of parent controller from a directive in AngularJS
Still if you want to call parent function like this then you should be using $parse instead of eval see a very below small example when using
link: function (scope,element,attrs) {
var parentGet = $parse(attrs['onselect']);
var fn = parentGet(scope.$parent);
fn();
},
scope.$eval(attr.onselect) should work.
Here is a working fiddle (tested in Chrome) with a minimal link function:
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect);
console.log(attr.onselect, ',', scope.onSelectFn);
scope.onSelectFn();
},
The only other thing I can think of is that since onselect is an HTML attribute, maybe it doesn't work on some other browsers. So maybe try using a different attribute name.
By default, $eval only evaluates the given expression against the current scope. You can pass in a different data object to evaluate against, and in your case it is the parent scope. You should call it like this:
scope.onSelectFn = scope.$eval(attr.onselect, scope.$parent);
See the documentation here
var abc:int=123
trace(abc)
//actual output:
123
//my expected output:
abc:123
Although I can type trace("abc:"+abc) by hands,but I still want to have a more simple way to trace
I have tried something like
function tracee(word){
trace("word:"+word)
}
function traceee(word){
var wordd:Srting=word
trace(wordd+word)
}
but these functions are not working.
is it possible to have the expected output?
import flash.utils.describeType;
var num:Number = 47;
function customTrace(word:*){
trace(describeType(this).variable.#name + " : "+word)
}
customTrace(num);
SOURCE
No. Variables are passed to functions by link (memory offset) or by value, so you don't have any data about names.
The one thing I can propose - is to use automatic code generation in IDEs. For example, in IntelliJ Idea it is in Settings -> Live Templates, that you can use via ctrl+J in editor.