I was wondering which way it would be better to do the stuff bellow (in order to increase performance)..
var _tfShopCoins:TextField = _mcShop.tfCoins;
_tfShopCoins.mouseEnabled = false;
_tfShopCoins.text = "";
var _tfShopMoney:TextField = _mcShop.tfMoney;
_tfShopMoney.mouseEnabled = false;
_tfShopMoney.text = "";
or
var _tfText:TextField = _mcShop.tfCoins;
_tfText.mouseEnabled = false;
_tfText.text = "";
_tfText = _mcShop.tfMoney;
_tfText.mouseEnabled = false;
_tfText.text = "";
My guess is that it's the second one as there I declare only 1 variable.
Go with the first one. I personally would never reassign a variable like you did in the second example because its less readable and the performance increase would be next to nothing.
I don't think combining them into one variable will work the way you've written it out here, since you're reassigning the _tfText variable to something else (to itself, in this case).
If you have multiple text fields with the same behavior, you could put them in an array and iterate over the items -- it might save you a few lines of code, but that's about it.
In your second example, did you mean to type "_tfText.mouseEnabled..." etc.?
In any case, neither of these approaches will have a measurable impact unless you're doing it millions of times, and you're better off directly addressing the text fields in the first place:
_mcShop.tfMoney.mouseEnabled = false;
_mcShop.tfMoney.text = "";
etc.
Related
In nodejs I have these (very long) translation files
gb.json (english)
{
"transHi":"Hello",
"transBye":"Goodbye"
}
de.json (german)
{
"transHi":"Gutentag",
"transBye":"Auf Wiedersehen"
}
I have a lot of controllers that all need these texts available in the many languages so I can call them when ever needed.
The obvious way would be something like this in my app.js:
global.gb = require('../global/language/gb.json');
global.de = require('../global/language/de.json');
And when I need a text I would call like:
myText = global.gb.transHi
myText = global.de.transHi
But!! the language is always determined by a variable
usersLanguage = "de"
myText = global.usersLanguage.transHi
And that wont work.
I also tried:
usersLanguage = "de"
myText = global.usersLanguage.transHi
Perhaps I could solve it with a function that has a long switch structure
var findText = (language,textkey) => {
switch(language) {
case "gb:
return gb.textkey
break;
case "de:
return de.textkey
break;
}
}
myText = translate(usersLanguage, "transHi");
But I cant seem to make that work either.
How would I do this in a simple and flexible way?
UPDATE: Is it possible to do this?
Any object property accessed via . can also be accessed using array index notation []. So,
var langObj = texts.gb;
is the same as
var langObj = texts["gb"];
which is also the same as
var lang = "gb";
var langObj = texts[lang];
Same for the textkey, using the .textkey you get the property called textkey, which probably doesn't exist. If you want a different property depending on the value of the variable textkey, do
var text = langObj[textkey];
I don't really know how to word this.
If I have mutliple variables like
var aHeight:Number = 30;
var bHeight:Number = 43;
var cHeight:Number = 02;
var dHeight:Number = 60;
var aHeight:Number = 20;
and I make a function like
function (mc:MovieClip,heightLetter:String) {
mc.y = ?;
}
if I just want to reference the letter but not the whole variable is there a way to find it like
[heightLetter+"Height"]
or something like that?
You can, if these vars are in fact object properties, that is, they are declared outside any functions, and are thus available via this.aHeight etc. And then indeed, you use this[heightLetter+"Height"] to get the required variable. Although it would be better that you use an array instead.
Introduction:
I have an AdvancedDataGrid displaying hierarchical data illustrated by the image below:
The branch nodes "Prosjekt" and "Tiltak" display the sum of the leaf nodes below.
Problem: I want the root node "Tavle" to display the total sum of the branch nodes below. When i attempted to do this by adding the same SummaryRow the sum of the root node was not calculcated correctly(Every node's sum was calculated twice).
dg_Teknikktavles = new AutoSizingAdvancedDataGrid();
dg_Teknikktavles.sortExpertMode="true";
dg_Teknikktavles.headerHeight = 50;
dg_Teknikktavles.variableRowHeight = true;
dg_Teknikktavles.addEventListener(ListEvent.ITEM_CLICK,dg_TeknikktavlesItemClicked);
dg_Teknikktavles.editable="false";
dg_Teknikktavles.percentWidth=100;
dg_Teknikktavles.minColumnWidth =0.8;
dg_Teknikktavles.height = 1000;
var sumFieldArray:Array = new Array(context.brukerList.length);
for(var i:int = 0; i < context.brukerList.length; i++)
{
var sumField:SummaryField2 = new SummaryField2();
sumField.dataField = Ressurstavle.ressursKey + i;
sumField.summaryOperation = "SUM";
sumFieldArray[i] = sumField;
}
var summaryRow:SummaryRow = new SummaryRow();
summaryRow.summaryPlacement = "group";
summaryRow.fields = sumFieldArray;
var summaryRow2:SummaryRow = new SummaryRow();
summaryRow2.summaryPlacement = "group";
summaryRow2.fields = sumFieldArray;
var groupField1:GroupingField = new GroupingField();
groupField1.name = "tavle";
//groupField1.summaries = [summaryRow2];
var groupField2:GroupingField = new GroupingField();
groupField2.name = "kategori";
groupField2.summaries = [summaryRow];
var group:Grouping = new Grouping();
group.fields = [groupField1, groupField2];
var groupCol:GroupingCollection2 = new GroupingCollection2();
groupCol.source = ressursTavle;
groupCol.grouping = group;
groupCol.refresh();
Main Question: How do i get my AdvancedDataGrid's (dg_Teknikktavles) root node "Tavle" to correctly display the sum of the two branch nodes below?
Side Question: How do i add a red color to the numbers of the root node's summary row that exceed 5? E.g the column displaying 8 will exceed 5 in the root node's summary row, and should therefore be marked red
Thanks in advance!
This is a general answer, without code examples, but I had to do the same just couple of days ago, so my memory is still fresh :) Here's what I did:
Created a class A to represent an item renderer data, extended it from Proxy (I had field names defined at run time), and let it contain a collection of values as it's data member. Once accessed through flash_proxy::getPropery(fieldName) it would find a corresponding value in the data member containing the values and return it. Special note: implement IUID, just do it, it'll save you couple of days of frustration.
Extended A in B, added a children property containing ArrayCollection of A (don't try to experiment with other collection types, unless you want to find yourself examining tons of framework code, trust me, it's ugly and is impossible to identify as interesting). Let B override flash_proxy::getPropery - depending of your compiler this may, or may not be possible, if not possible - call some function from A.flash_proxy::getPropery() that you can override in B. Let this function query every instance of A, which is a child of B, asking the same thing, as DataGrid itself would, when building item renderers - this way you would get the total.
When creating a data provider. Create an ArrayCollection of B (again, don't try to experiment with other collections--unless you are ready for lots of frustration). Create Hierarchical data that uses this array collection as a source.
Colors - that's what you use item renderers for, just look up any tutorial on using item renderers, that must be pretty basic.
In case someone else has the same problem:
The initial problem that everything was summed twice, was the result of using the same Array of SummaryField2 (sumFieldArray in the code) for both grouping fields(GropingField2 tavle and kategori)
The Solution to the main question: was to create a new array of summaryfields for the root node(in my intial for loop):
//Summary fields for root node
var sumFieldRoot:SummaryField2 = new SummaryField2();
sumFieldRoot.dataField = Ressurstavle.ressursKey + i;
sumFieldRoot.summaryOperation = "SUM";
sumFieldArrayRoot[i] = sumFieldRoot;
Answer to the side question:
This was pretty much as easy as pointed out by wvxyw. Code for this solution below:
private function summary_styleFunction(data:Object, col:AdvancedDataGridColumn):Object
{
var output:Object;
var field:String = col.dataField;
if ( data.children != null )
{
if(data[field] >5){
output = {color:0xFF0000, fontWeight:"bold"}
}
else {
output = {color:0x006633, fontWeight:"bold"}
}
//output = {color:0x081EA6, fontWeight:"bold", fontSize:14}
}
return output;
}
How to make a kind of array that index things based on a object? but not being strict like dictionary.
What I mean:
var a:Object = {a:3};
var b:Object = {a:3};
var dict:Dictionary = new Dictionary();
dict[a] = 'value for a';
// now I want to get the value for the last assignment
var value = dict[b];
// value doesn't exits :s
How to make something like that. TO not be to heavy as a lot of data will be flowing there.
I have an idea to use the toString() method but I would have to make custom classes.. I would like something fast..
Why not make a special class that encapsulates an array, put methods in there to add and remove elements from the array, and then you could make a special method (maybe getValueByObject(), whatever makes sense). Then you could do:
var mySpecialArrayClass:MySpecialArrayClass = MySpecialArrayClass();
var a:Object = {a:3};
var b:Object = {a:3};
mySpecialArrayClass.addElement(a,'value for a');
var value = mySpecialArrayClass.getValueByObject(a);
I could probably cook up a simple example of such a class if you don't follow.
Update:
Would something like this help?
http://snipplr.com/view/6494/action-script-to-string-serialization-and-deserialization/
Update:
Could you use the === functionality? if you say
if ( object === object )
it compares the underlying memory address to see if two objects are the same reference...
Here's a example that I've to use when I want to create a button with mouse-over effect:
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = true;
this.buttonExample.useHandCursor = true;
this.buttonExample.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,myaction);
I'm new to AS3 - is there any way, to simplify this code like this:
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = true;.useHandCursor = true;.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,myaction);
why does it not works ?
Its already as simple as it gets. Firstly
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = true;
this.buttonExample.useHandCursor = true;
this.buttonExample.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,myaction)
is much more readable than
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = true;.useHandCursor = true;.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK,myaction);
Always go for readbility over anything else. And secondly,
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = true;
does not return an object so you can't interact with anything.
If you're using that pattern a lot, you can make a helper function:
public function setAsButton(button:Sprite, clickHandler:Function):void {
button.buttonMode = button.userHandCursor = true;
button.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, clickHandler);
}
Then call it somewhere:
setAsButton(this.buttonExample, myaction);
If you feel that typing this.buttonExample over and over again is too repetitive, simply assign that object to a variable and use that variable in the rest of the statements:
var b : Button = this.buttonExample;
b.buttonMode = true;
b.useHandCursor = true;
b.addEventListener(...);
As other's have mentioned, there's also the with statement, but it's use is discouraged since it makes the code harder to read, and may lead to weird results:
with (this.buttonExample) {
buttonMode = true;
useHandCursor = true;
addEventListener(...);
}
You can, of course, combine these suggestions with other tricks, like chaining assignments:
var b : Button = this.buttonExample;
b.buttonMode = b.useHandCursor = true;
b.addEventListener(...);
Be very careful to only chain assignments in this way if the assigned value is immutable (e.g. true, false, numbers and strings, but not arrays or most other objects), because the same object will be assigned to all variables on the left side. If the value is immutable this doesn't matter, but if it's mutable you can end up with weird results, like this in this example:
a = b = [ ];
a.push(1);
b.push(2);
trace(a); // outputs 1, 2
trace(b); // also outputs 1, 2
The reason for this result is that a and b both reference the same array, and since arrays are mutable it doesn't matter how you access the object, it will still be changed. a and b don't reference different arrays just because they are different variables.
You may think that you could do something like the following, but it will not work.
// this will NOT work
var b : Button = this.buttonExample;
(b.buttonMode = b.useHandCursor = true).addEventListener(...);
The reason why it works to say b.buttonMode = b.useHandCursor = true, but not to add .addEventListener(...) is that the value of an assignment expression (e.g. b.buttonMode = true) is the value assigned to the left hand side (e.g. true). If you add .addEventListener(...) to that you are essentially saying true.addEventListener(...), which clearly is not what you want. In other words
b.buttonMode = b.useHandCursor = false;
is equivalent to
b.useHandCursor = false;
b.buttonMode = b.useHandCursor;
Which should hopefully also make the caveats mentioned above plain.
you can use the with statement. however I'd not encourage you to do so, since it leads to a lot of ambiguity and unclearness.
also, you can have multiple assignments:
this.buttonExample.buttonMode = this.buttonExample.useHandCursor = true;
this sometimes is useful, but for the sake of readability, you shouldn't overuse it.
greetz
back2dos