I work in lending and we are trying to get the percentages of purchases and refis to show for the months. The problem that I am having is that I cannot get the scope correct.
Here is the current list
Andhere are the row groups
I know this is definitely a scope issue - I just can't figure out a way to have it take into account the month and the year. I have had success with it doing the percent of the year value. I am trying to simply show the percent of purchases and Refis for a given month for a given year.
For example, If we have 60 purchases and 40 Refinances for January of 2019 - I want it to show 60% and 40%.
I have tried messing around with the row and columns groups every which way and I still cannot seem to figure it out. Any help would be largely appreciated.
= SUM(Fields!TOTALLOANAMT.Value, "Grouped_Loan_Purpose5") /
SUM(Fields!TOTALLOANAMT.Value, "App_Sent_Year1")
I have a fairly simple solution that you could use to avoid any headache involved with grouping. I would suggest simply using the values in the textboxes to calculate your percentages. You can just do something like the following.
=(ReportItems!PurchasesTextbox.Value / ReportItems!TotalTextbox.Value) * 100
=(ReportItems!RefinanceTextbox.Value / ReportItems!TotalTextbox.Value) * 100
Then you can just format as percentages and leave everything else alone.
I’m working with a golf database. Most of the reports are grouped by players and sorted by holes 1 to 18.
However, in some cases, I would like to sort the report by holes like 10 11 … 18 1 2 …. 9 (= actual order the holes are played). Again I’m running out of ideas and any help would be appreciated.
You are probably looking for a sort expression like this:
=([hole]+18-[StartHole]) Mod 18
I'm trying to multiplay a field of type time. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. This is in phpmyadmin with MySQL.
Things I have tried already:
I have tried googling 'sql multiplying time type returns 00:00:00'
but have no luck with that or similar searches.
I ran a python script that pulled all these times and multiplied them
by 6 and 11 and all of them worked - there were no 00:00:00.
I have also tried doing it individually on a row, and it didn't work
for the same ones.
Below are pictures before and after I run this query:
UPDATE journeys, travel_type
SET journeys.jo_duration = journeys.jo_duration * travel_type.tt_duration_multiplier
WHERE journeys.jo_type = travel_type.tt_id
I get no errors.
Some probably helpful information:
Type 1 means 11 - so I want the value in jo_duration to be multiplied by 11. Type 3 means 6 (same principle). 2 means 1 (so nothing changes).
There are more rows in this table that have this problem but I didn't want to screenshot the whole table. I thought this should be enough. There are 70 total rows. When I run the above query it says '47 rows affected' (when all rows should technically be affected I think?). I'm not sure if the remaining aren't affected because they're type 2 or if they're the ones being turned to 00:00:00 (or both)?
If you need more information, feel free to ask!
As you can see below, rows with jo_id; 1, 3, 4, 6 are 00:00:00. But others multiply correctly?
Does anyone know why this is? And how I can prevent it?
Sorry for the long post and I hope my problem has made sense!
Thank you!
Before:
After:
You can't directly multiply number to a time datatype.
Use function time_to_sec and sec_to_time:
update journeys, travel_type
set journeys.jo_duration = sec_to_time(
time_to_sec(journeys.jo_duration)
* travel_type.tt_duration_multiplier
mod 86400)
where journeys.jo_type = travel_type.tt_id
mod 86400 is there to remove the day part if the time becomes more than a day
I am having an issue with Microsoft access running a query and don't know how to go about running the query I need. i am trying to find duplicate S/N's in 2 columns, for example
COMPUTER SN HARD DR SN MONITOR 1 SN MONITOR 2 SN
1 456 123 654
2 528 234 758
3 963 654 234
as shown above computer 3 is showing the same monitor from both 1 and 2 and I can get Microsoft access to show duplicates from up and down or side by side and I cant figure out how to do diagonal as well. I am using Microsoft access 2016 and any help would be great thank you. I have been looking for the past few days and I don't know what SQL is or how to do that in access but everything I can find shows me how to do up and down (I got that working) or direct side by side (I got that working as well) nothing showing me how to do diagonal as well.
so I had someone else from my work come up and help and we created a query with this in the comment block,
In (SELECT [MONITOR 2] FROM [COMPUTER S/N] WHERE [COMPUTER S/N].[MONITOR 2] NOT IN ("NA")) And Not In ("NA")
and had monitor 1 as the column selected. so it will take each S/N from monitor 1 and check monitor 2 for the same data, then I have to have another query for each column duplicates. the end phrase and not in ("NA") is only to take out the spots where people only have one monitor.
Access 2007 is telling me that my new expression is to complex. It used to work when we had 10 service levels, but now we have 19! Great! I've asked this question in SuperUser and someone suggested I try it over here. Suggestions are I turn it in to a function - but I'm not sure where to begin and what the function would look like.
My expression is checking the COST of our services in the [PriceCharged] field and then assigning the appropriate HOURS [Servicelevel] when I perform a calculation to work out how much REVENUE each colleague has made when working for a client. The [EstimatedTime] field stores the actual hours each colleague has worked.
[EstimatedTime]/[ServiceLevel]*[PriceCharged]
Below is the breakdown of my COST to HOURS expression. I've put them on different lines to make it easier to read - please do not be put off by the length of this post, it's all the same info in the end.
Many thanks,Mike
ServiceLevel: IIf([pricecharged]=100(COST),6(HOURS),
IIf([pricecharged]=200 Or [pricecharged]=210,12.5,
IIf([pricecharged]=300,19,
IIf([pricecharged]=400 Or [pricecharged]=410,25,
IIf([pricecharged]=500,31,
IIf([pricecharged]=600,37.5,
IIf([pricecharged]=700,43,
IIf([pricecharged]=800 Or [pricecharged]=810,50,
IIf([pricecharged]=900,56,
IIf([pricecharged]=1000,62.5,
IIf([pricecharged]=1100,69,
IIf([pricecharged]=1200 Or [pricecharged]=1210,75,
IIf([pricecharged]=1300 Or [pricecharged]=1310,100,
IIf([pricecharged]=1400,125,
IIf([pricecharged]=1500,150,
IIf([pricecharged]=1600,175,
IIf([pricecharged]=1700,200,
IIf([pricecharged]=1800,225,
IIf([pricecharged]=1900,250,0)))))))))))))))))))
UPDATE (16/04/10 14:46 GMT)
I've built a new table as recommended below. Now it's matter of removing my expression and making my original SELECT query use the new table. However, I'm not at all clear on how this is done.
Using the DLookUP example I imagine I keep the original query where I have my PRICECHARGED field, include a new DLookUp field that uses the example below to refer to the PRICECHARGED and populate the rows with the appropriate SERVICELEVEL (hours).
I become confused at this point because in my original SELECT query all the calculation happened in that query (expressions, after expression), which meant that the final result of my query was a list of colleagues with HOURS, and REVENUE (Cost) against their name. I have a feeling that I'm in need of another query in the middle to manage the DlookUp process.
`Any directions or road map very much appreciated.
Final update. Added another table as mentioned above, created the appropriate links from the new table to the field in the 'fixed'table. Voila. It worked a charm, and without me doing anything that caused it to crash or give me an error warning. It was easier than I thought. I don't understand why I didn't manage it this way before.
Thanks again, Mike
You're making life really, really, really hard for yourself.
Create a table PriceToHours with columns PriceCharged and Hours. Put the appropriate rows into it so it matches the tabular data in your expression. Now JOIN that table to your main data table to get the Hours from the PriceCharged. When this information changes in the future, simply update the data in the table. This is much more transparent (no data hidden in a query expression) and requires no additional programmer time when the values change in the future.
I would suggest changing the way this works and keeping the service level to price charged logic in a separate table. This would allow you to change it quickly if the business need changed.
The table would just be as simple as two columns and “ServiceLevel” and “PriceCharged”. Then in your query link that to your table.
For a quick check however what would happen in the price charged was say 1105 i.e. not in the list? The function would possibly return a null which would then cause the expression to fail maybe that is causing it?
EDIT::
After a bit of searching around it looks like the maximum number of nested IIF statements in access is 10 hence why it worked fine before but now does not. Looks like your only option is to redesign it to how it should have been in the first place!
Put all the data into a table and do a dLookup! Here is a table called CostHours
Cost Hours
---- ------
100 6
200 12.5
210 12.5
300 19
400 25
410 25
500 31
600 37.5
700 43
800 50
810 50
900 56
1000 62.5
1100 69
1200 75
1210 75
1300 100
1310 100
1400 125
1500 150
1600 175
1700 200
1800 225
1900 250
And to get the hours from the cost, here is a dLookup
dLookup ("Hours", "CostHours", "Cost=" & 100)
This will return the hours where the Cost is 100. Use that value in your calculations.
The beauty of MS Access is that dLookup can sit in the same place you do your calculations - in code, in a report, in a query.
Instead of a DLookup, you can do this in a SQL Statement as well
"SELECT Hours From CostHours Where Cost" = & CostVariable