I creating an new layout for a personal website.
I'm using Twitter Bootstrap 3, and my initial layout was made using as exemple
the "Bootstrap with sticky footer" sample (http://getbootstrap.com/examples/sticky-footer-navbar/)
This is my html:
<body>
<!-- Wrap all page content here -->
<div id="wrap">
<!-- Begin page navigation -->
<nav id="nav-container" class="navbar navbar-default container" role="navigation">
<div class="container">
<!-- Here I put a very normal Bootstrap 3 navbar -->
</div>
</nav>
<!-- Begin page content -->
<div id="main-container" class="container">
<!-- All my content goes here! -->
</div>
</div>
<!-- Begin page footer -->
<footer id="footer" class="container">
<div class="container">
</div>
</footer>
</body>
The Sticky Footer CSS:
html, body {
height: 100%;
/* The html and body elements cannot have any padding or margin. */
}
/* Wrapper for page content to push down footer */
#wrap {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
/* Negative indent footer by its height */
margin: 0 auto -100px;
/* Pad bottom by footer height */
padding: 0 0 100px;
}
/* Set the fixed height of the footer here */
#footer {
height: 100px;
}
And the custom style for my layout:
body {
/* Body's background will be grey */
background-color: #C0C0C0;
}
#main-container {
/* A box where I'll put the content will be white */
background-color: #FFFFFF;
}
#wrap {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
#main-container {
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
This code generate this layout:
But, as you can see, the div #main-container don't grow 'till the end of the layout.
The div keep with the height of his content.
What I want is that this div always fills the entire page, like this:
Many solutions on internet said me to fix min-height to some tested value, but this way
I'll not be able to keep my website responsive (it's very important to me keep my layout
always responsive, that's the main reason I use Bootstrap 3).
Other solution goes to calculate the div height with javascript. Personally I don't like
this solution. I whish I could solve this only by using CSS.
Someone knows how to solve this problem?
As long as you are working on percentage, your site will be responsive. So using
min-height:100% does solve your problem which is just CSS. And if you don't want Javascript involved here, that is the way to go.
See the JS Fiddle DEMO. Your container is filling the entire page.
#main-container {
min-height: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
If you want to have sticky footer AND fullheight #main-container, you have to modify your structure. First, let me explain why you can't solve this with the sticky-footer method you're using right now:
Setting #main-container's height:100% or min-height:100% won't work because you can't use percentage height with a parent whose height is not strictly defined. Note that in the currently accepted answer this is considered a bug but it is not, it's just the way it is supposed to work. In your example #wrap's height is set to auto, so #main-container height just ignores the 100% and fallsback to auto.
To have both sticky footer and REAL fullheight #main-container (instead of faking with background) you have to use display:table and display:table-row. This works because when you use display:table, height:100% works just as your regular min-height:100% and the display:table-rows inside will always stretch to use all the vertical space available.
NOTE: this is different from using html tables, because in this case you don't need to bloat your markup with non-semantic tags, as you'll see in the following example.
Here's the example HTML code:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="maincontainer" class="astable">
<div id="header" class="astablerow">
header
</div>
<div id="middlecontainer" class="astablerow">
content
</div>
<div id="footer" class="astablerow">
footer
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
And here's the CSS
html, body{
margin:0;
padding:0;
height:100%;
}
.astable{
display:table;
height:100%;
table-layout:fixed;
width:100%;
}
.astablerow{
display: table-row;
}
#header{
height:30px;
background-color:#00ff00;
}
#footer{
height:30px;
background-color:#0000ff;
}
#middlecontainer{
background-color:#ff0000;
}
I think that min-height doesn't work due to a reported bug. See this: stackoverflow.com/questions/8468066.
An easy way to create the illusion that #main-container grows till the end, is to set #wrap's background-color the same value as #main-container's.
I am using the following basic html and css pattern (although my live code looks very different)
html, body {height: 100%;}
#wrap {min-height: 100%;}
#main {overflow:auto;
padding-bottom: 150px;} /* must be same height as the footer */
#footer {position: relative;
margin-top: -150px; /* negative value of footer height */
height: 150px;
clear:both;}
/*Opera Fix*/
body:before {
content:"";
height:100%;
float:left;
width:0;
margin-top:-32767px;/
}
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">
</div>
<div id="main">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
to get a sticky footer to the bottom of my page.
I have applied two backgrounds to the body tag. One is a repeating wood texture then a shadow that goes on top. Both of these go under the footer.
It almost works, but on long pages (where you have to scroll down to see the footer) when you resize the browser window the shadow (and not the wood) creeps up the page. I have tried moving the shadow to the bottom right position but that doesnt work at all.
Here is a staging of it:
I have repeated the problem in FF and Safari
http://www.dnbsandbox.com/diablo/
Remove this from the first line of the css:
html {
height: 100%;
}
If my browser window is large enough, the web page is fine. If it is smaller and I scroll to the right, my backgrounds don't go horizontally across the entire browser window. They stop inside the webpage. I have made the body background blue so you can see where the background is ending. I want to make it so the actual content and background pictures end where the browser window ends and have there be no blue. The site is up at avidest.com/schneer. Here is the CSS:
.main {width:100%; padding:0; margin:0 auto; min-width: 1020px;}
.header { background:url(images/slider_bgpng200.png); background-repeat: repeat-x; padding:0; margin:0 auto; width: 100%; }
.header .headertop{width: 100%; background: #d3e5e8; height: 30px;}
.block_header {margin:0 auto; width:1200px; padding:0; border:none; }
.slider { background: transparent; margin:0 auto; padding:0; height:420px;}
.slider .gallery { margin:0 auto; width:980px; height:420px; padding:0;}
And here is the html:
<div class="header">
<div class="headertop">
<div class="header_text">Email | Client Login </div>
</div>
<div class="block_header">
<div class="slider">
<div class="gallery">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Thanks.
You have contents that go beyond the .main div.
If you add in your div.main { overflow: hidden; } you will see that it works as expected, because nothing is pushing it to a bigger width than expected.
for 100% height, you need html and body tags to be 100% also
add this to your CSS
html, body { height: 100%; width: 100%; }
you would then have to create a fake background out of a 100% by 100% wrapper div and place your background within that to get the effect you are looking for
Why do you have .main class? Didnt you forgot some elements?
In your .header, you set up background and width 100%. so the width of element with .header class will be 100% of its parent element. Whats the parent element of <div class="header">?
I see a huge amount of variance in your widths. I would think "main" "header" "block_header" all would be the same width. Also note that 100% is not 100% of the parent element it is 100% of the window size especially when the parent element is larger than the window. Set the widths to a definitive numbers. If you want the content to fill the users screen then set the parent to 100% first and then all the child element can be set to 100% to fit the parent elements width.
Problem
I'm using this implementation of a CSS sticky footer. It does:
html,body{
height:100%;
}
I use (would like to) use a repeating background, however, the height:100% causes this issue:
(image from another sticky footer question with unsatisfactory answers)
It's my understanding that the image gets sized to the size of the window at rendering, and thus never sizes past that.
Question
Is it possible to continue to use my existing choice of CSS sticky footer with a repeating background image rendered completely on long pages
OR
is there another option of CSS sticky footers which does support the repeating background?
For reference
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">Header text</div>
<div id="main">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">Footer Text</div>
CSS
* {margin:0;padding:0;}
html, body {height: 100%;}
#wrap {min-height: 100%;}
#main {overflow:auto;
padding-bottom: 180px;} /* must be same height as the footer */
#footer {position: relative;
margin-top: -180px; /* negative value of footer height */
height: 180px;
clear:both;}
Simply add additional wrapper. At least I always do exactly that. And attach bg-image to div#no-footer, it will stretch to the bottom
html, body {
height:100%;
}
#wrap {
min-height:100%;
background-image:url(...) top left repeat-x;
}
#no-footer-pad {
padding-bottom:100px;
}
#footer {
height:100px;
margin-top:-100px;
}
html markup:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<div id="no-footer-pad"></div>
</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</body>
So you have almost this markup, you must simply add additional div (#no-footer-pad), so that your content would not overlap footer
Hey now used to position fixed for this sticky footer as like this
.footer{
position:fixed;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
height:xxxx;
}
I have a header element and a content element:
#header
#content
I want the header to be of fixed height and the content to fill up all the remaining height available on the screen, with overflow-y: scroll;.
It this possible without Javascript?
forget all the answers, this line of CSS worked for me in 2 seconds :
height:100vh;
1vh = 1% of browser screen height
source
For responsive layout scaling, you might want to use :
min-height: 100vh
[update november 2018]
As mentionned in the comments, using the min-height might avoid having issues on reponsive designs
[update april 2018] As mentioned in the comments, back in 2011 when the question was asked, not all browsers supported the viewport units.
The other answers were the solutions back then -- vmax is still not supported in IE, so this might not be the best solution for all yet.
The trick to this is specifying 100% height on the html and body elements.
Some browsers look to the parent elements (html, body) to calculate the height.
<html>
<body>
<div id="Header">
</div>
<div id="Content">
</div>
</body>
</html>
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
#Header
{
width: 960px;
height: 150px;
}
#Content
{
height: 100%;
width: 960px;
}
Actually the best approach is this:
html {
height:100%;
}
body {
min-height:100%;
}
This solves everything for me and it helps me to control my footer and it can have the fixed footer no matter if page is being scrolled down.
Technical Solution - EDITED
Historically, 'height' is tricky thing to mold with, compared to 'width', the easiest. Since css focus on <body> for styling to work. The code above - we gave <html> and <body> a height. This is where magic comes into picture - since we have 'min-height' on playing table, we are telling browser that <body> is superior over <html> because <body> holds the min-height. This in turn, allows <body> to override <html> because <html> had height already earlier. In other words, we are tricking browser to "bump" <html> off the table, so we could style independently.
You can use vh on the min-height property.
min-height: 100vh;
You can do as follows, depending on how you are using the margins...
min-height: calc(100vh - 10px) //Considering you're using some 10px margin top on an outside element
The accepted solution will not actually work.
You will notice that the content div will be equal to the height of its parent, body.
So setting the body height to 100% will set it equal to the height of the browser window. Let's say the browser window was 768px in height, by setting the content div height to 100%, the div's height will in turn be 768px. Thus, you will end up with the header div being 150px and the content div being 768px. In the end you will have content 150px below the bottom of the page. For another solution, check out this link.
With HTML5 you can do this:
CSS:
body, html{ width:100%; height:100%; padding: 0; margin: 0;}
header{ width:100%; height: 70px; }
section{ width: 100%; height: calc(100% - 70px);}
HTML:
<header>blabablalba </header>
<section> Content </section>
For me, the next worked well:
I wrapped the header and the content on a div
<div class="main-wrapper">
<div class="header">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
I used this reference to fill the height with flexbox. The CSS goes like this:
.main-wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 100vh;
}
.header {
flex: 1;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
}
For more info about the flexbox technique, visit the reference
Please let me add my 5 cents here and offer a classical solution:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idHeader {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px red;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idHeader" style="height:30px; top:0;">Header section</div>
<div id="idContent" style="top:36px; bottom:0;">Content section</div>
</div>
This will work in all browsers, no script, no flex. Open snippet in full page mode and resize browser: desired proportions are preserved even in fullscreen mode.
Note:
Elements with different background color can actually cover
each other. Here I used solid border to ensure that elements are placed
correctly.
idHeader.height and idContent.top are adjusted to include border,
and should have the same value if border is not used. Otherwise
elements will pull out of the viewport, since calculated width does
not include border, margin and/or padding.
left:0; right:0; can be replaced by width:100% for the same
reason, if no border used.
Testing in separate page (not as a snippet) does not require any
html/body adjustment.
In IE6 and earlier versions we must add padding-top and/or
padding-bottom attributes to #idOuter element.
To complete my answer, here is the footer layout:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
#idFooter {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px blue;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idContent" style="bottom:36px; top:0;">Content section</div>
<div id="idFooter" style="height:30px; bottom:0;">Footer section</div>
</div>
And here is the layout with both header and footer:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idHeader {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px red;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
#idFooter {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px blue;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idHeader" style="height:30px; top:0;">Header section</div>
<div id="idContent" style="top:36px; bottom:36px;">Content section</div>
<div id="idFooter" style="height:30px; bottom:0;">Footer section</div>
</div>
You can also set the parent to display: inline. See http://codepen.io/tommymarshall/pen/cECyH
Be sure to also have the height of html and body set to 100%, too.
The accepted answer does not work. And the highest voted answer does not answer the actual question. With a fixed pixel height header, and a filler in the remaining display of the browser, and scroll for owerflow. Here is a solution that actually works, using absolute positioning. I also assume that the height of the header is known, by the sound of "fixed header" in the question. I use 150px as an example here:
HTML:
<html>
<body>
<div id="Header">
</div>
<div id="Content">
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS:(adding background-color for visual effect only)
#Header
{
height: 150px;
width: 100%;
background-color: #ddd;
}
#Content
{
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 150px;
bottom: 0;
background-color: #aaa;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
For a more detailed look how this works, with actual content inside the #Content, have a look at this jsfiddle, using bootstrap rows and columns.
In this instance I want my main content div to be liquid height so that the whole page takes up 100% of the browser height.
height: 100vh;
Unless you need to support IE 9 and below, I would use flexbox
body { display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
.header { height: 70px; }
.content { flex: 1 1 0 }
You also need to get body to fill the whole page
body, html{ width:100%; height:100%; padding: 0; margin: 0;}
CSS PLaY | cross browser fixed header/footer/centered single column layout
CSS Frames, version 2: Example 2, specified width | 456 Berea Street
One important thing is that although this sounds easy, there's going to be quite a bit of ugly code going into your CSS file to get an effect like this. Unfortunately, it really is the only option.
#Header
{
width: 960px;
height: 150px;
}
#Content
{
min-height:100vh;
height: 100%;
width: 960px;
}
The best solution I found so far is setting a footer element at the bottom of the page and then evaluate the difference of the offset of the footer and the element we need to expand.
e.g.
The html file
<div id="contents"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
The css file
#footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
The js file (using jquery)
var contents = $('#contents');
var footer = $('#footer');
contents.css('height', (footer.offset().top - contents.offset().top) + 'px');
You might also like to update the height of the contents element on each window resize, so...
$(window).on('resize', function() {
contents.css('height', (footer.offset().top -contents.offset().top) + 'px');
});
Have you tried something like this?
CSS:
.content {
height: 100%;
display: block;
}
HTML:
<div class=".content">
<!-- Content goes here -->
</div>