Does flex have a long expected lifespan - html

EDIT JAN 2014 - No Longer relevant answer has been played out in the mean time.
This is a cross post. I've already posted the question to flexcoders.
We work in flex as a technology. However a potential client has stated that they are worried about the lifespan of flex as a technology. Especially as apple doesn't support it on their mobile devices, and the increasing support for HTML5 within browsers.
What I would like is to be able to show them some figures about any large adopters. Especially in enterprise. Just to show that it isn't some flash in the pan technology. (No pun indended)
For those interested you can view my original question.

There are many very large enterprises using Flex. Check out some of the testimonials and the Flex Showcase.

Does your client deal with video? If so, then it is likely that over the course of the next 5-10 years the HTML5 video tag could replace Flash as the default video player on the web. However, even if HTML5 chips away at Flash's relevance as a video player; why would that affect Flex's ability to provide a Smart Application GUI?
Does your client build games? It is possible--although I believe unlikely--that the HTML5 Canvas element will be used for a lot of web games. IF this aspect of HTML5 chips away at Flash's relevance as a web game platform, why would that affect Flex's ability to provide a smart Application GUI?
Additionally, why did your client choose Flex over an AJAX solution? Would the same reason apply to an HTML5 choice?
It is also probable that Adobe will keep innovating The Flash Player and Flex faster than HTML5. Flex has a mature toolset with lots of support.
I'd also ask why is it important for your client to provide applications support on mobile devices? The answer to that question will have a big affect on the client's decision whether to use Flash or not.
I don't have any specific numbers or case studies to share, though. YouTube had a Blog post about why they chose Flash. So did Hulu. Of course, I do not know if either of them are using Flex.

This should be an large adopter: SAP

Related

Looking for a working web video player

After several years working with commercial and custom Flash video players, such as Flowplayer and jwplayer, I decided to open my work to html5. I like the idea of having a Flash impersonation of html5, so I tried medialements.js, video.js and jplayer. None of them are production ready and they all fail to meet my goal, which is playing a video on a webpage, desktop and mobile, live and vod.
Does anyone has a suggestion for a working web video player, apart from the commercial ones?
TIA
greg
I can get to what you are saying. Videojs is a leader in HTML5 video and considered state of the art by many though I think it falls short on some aspects especially for iOS/Android and Live streaming. Here is a list that compares some common actors of the market.
After much time playing with the different players available I decided to build my own HTML5 video jQuery based player. I learned so much while doing so and if you are planning on re-using it for your projects it will be much faster to tweak your own player rather than trying to build something up on a player someone else built. Now doing so requires you like JavaScript and are happy to deal with the cross browser testing. This article can give you a place to start. Digging in further would require you take on board the W3C spec.
Live streaming in HTML5 video is limited today: HLS for iOS and Android > 4.1 and coming in fast MPEG DASH (it has a JS lib for live and on demand here). If you want to cover a large audience for live video streaming you still need to consider flash.

Replace HTML5 audio with Web Audio API

HTML5 audio on mobile devices has many limitations and actually I would call them bugs.
My app implementing something like audio player.
Actually all it works fine for desktop but in mobile version I encounter many bugs and have to do many workarounds different for different browsers and os to get it work, and still it sucks.
I haven't dived into web audio api, but it seems to be designed for slightly different tasks.
So my question is, is it make sense (and is it possible?) to replace HTML5 audio with Web Audio API, if I need just to load files and play them (partly, sprites) just to avoid limitations and bugs of HTML5 audio?
I think you're probably going to find at least as many bugs or edge cases with Web Audio on mobile as you're seeing using the <audio> element. Plus, support for Web Audio on mobile platforms isn't great. If it were me, I'd be inclined to stick with <audio> unless you have a specific use-case that can only be addressed by the Web Audio API.
Actually, I'll disagree - if your goal is to play short snippets of sounds, particularly simultaneously - e.g., providing sound for a platform jumper game - Web Audio is going to be a lot easier to use, including on mobile. has issues managing multiple files/instances. On the other hand, if the problems you're running in to are due to decoding issues, or you're using mostly long files, it's not going to help, as Kevin and Brad said.
I recommend SoundJS which I develop, it takes a lot of the pain out of supporting audio on multiple devices. Basically it lets you write a single code base that works everywhere and already deals with edge cases where it can.
HTML Audio element implementation on mobile devices is really terrible, so if not SoundJS I would at least recommend switching to Web Audio which works well on iOS and Android Chrome but is not supported in Android Native browser.
idbehold's comment is accurate, the most common problem with mobile devices is having to play audio inside of a user initiated event (touch). I've developed a solution to this problem, shared in the Mobile Safe Approach tutorial.
Hope that helps.

embed quiz into html5 video - cue points in a rich customizable player

Coursera has these interactive questions in the middle of their video lecture
how could I go about implementing this myself,
or better yet, does this feature exist for public use somewhere?
Furthermore, I'm trying to decide which HTML5 video player / platform to invest in and the key criteria would be feature-rich (so as to not reinvent the wheel / spend lots of time implementing video player features) as well as highly customizable (for those custom needs).
I.e. which player should I use to get the quiz up,
but in the near future I would also need to add the speed feature that Coursera has
I need Closed Captions support
and would like to overlay slides every now and then
plus all the expected features of switching between different source resolutions (360p, 720p etc), it should work in IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Android and iOS native browsers etc
Candidates
In terms of customizability and feature-set, SublimeVideo seems to come on top, but I don't know when they will support subtitles.
Haven't researched Flowplayer much, would that be better for my purposes?
Jwplayer is good for all the standard features, and includes subtitle support, but I haven't really seen any plug-ins, aesthetic skinning aside, deep customization does not really seem to be their focus / strength?
Or videojs
Or something else yet ?
Flowplayer and Jwplayer are amazing players and you could do what you want, but in the free version you can't remove their branding. I try to stick to opensource projects you you don't worry about licenses.
I've done something similar as you need with Mediaelementjs. It supports all you need at the moment, and they will support the variable speed at some point on the future as announced in their website. However it has been like that for more than a year now since I started watching, so probably your "near future" is before their "coming soon".
I think your best free option will be Videojs. They also support all you need. For the variable speed there is this plugin.
Basically you set up a listener in the timeupdate event, and when it reaches the point that you need, you attach the quiz html to overlay the video area.
I have used flowplayer extensively. I'm just now starting to dive more into their new HTML5 version. The licensing for flowplayer is reasonable. It does have a plugin for doing subtitles and the cue point functionality works great. I also like that they have the Flash version that works well for fallback and I still use it for rtmp streaming.
I have built a video presenter with synchronized slides using the flash version which I'll be changing over to have an HTML5 version. I use it to produce speaker videos with Powerpoint presentations. Sometimes we have surveys (live) so I have also been planning to build in the option for a survey slide.
You can take a look at what I have built as an example here (it has some lose ends). Example synchronized video slide presentation (I have no affiliation with Flowplayer. WebVideoDesk, branded on the linked page, is a service I am planning to launch someday.)

HTML5 video capture and streaming?

I'm working on kind of an educational site, where there are teachers and students around the world (potentially). Since it's a non-profit site, and I don't have the need for it to be done tomorrow (kind of a side project of something bigger), I wanted to know the best way to figure out how to do this. I'm not a programmer by trade, I've been on the systems side of things for years, but I understand most technology and the question here is more how to gauge what to do so I can get the right resources in place.
That said... here's what I am looking at. I figure the future is HTML5, and that's probably where I'd rather spend my efforts given that it will be cross platform and without the need for plugins. It will work on mobile as well. Question is, how well does HTML5 handle input media, say desktop capture and camera, or on mobile perhaps, where I'd want to use the user's phone camera, etc.
Second question is dynamic streaming... I've read about MPEG DASH, then there are technologies like Smooth Streaming (which I think given the way Silverlight is going is going to be gone or useless), then also Apple and Flash, but if I'm doing HTML5 it doesn't benefit me. Any ideas here would be really helpful, and the more detail the better! :)
That's about it... there are free chat services out there like using the MSN Web Chat controls (how good they are, I don't know, but worldwide most people have a Hotmail/MSN account) so I can use that for chat. I don't know its limitations of course, but that's something if people know or have suggestions, then I'm all ears.
As far as I know the video tags doesn't support input media as such, all it does rather well for the moment is play video files IF the file formats is supported by the given browser (different browsers different extensions) Also I have seen out there a solution where someone stream their own webcam into the video tags but that was on Mac only and using other technologies to help out.
The video tag is not supported by all browsers either, recent modern one will but if you need to support IE flash is still a better alternative way to provide videos across all platforms.
Streaming is only partially supported by some browsers and is not an easy task to achieve.
Here is few links that might help.
http://ishtml5readyyet.com/
http://html5readiness.com/
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Media_formats_supported_by_the_audio_and_video_elements
There are actually several posibilities to do this since HTML5 makes it super easy to stream most the basic input using video tags is however very much limited because you won't have actual access to the bytes like you would want.
But to convert something basic like mp4 to html5 compatible video just use this converter tool:
http://easyhtml5video.com/

Does HTML5 change anything if I don't use video or audio?

I keep hearing all about HTML5 and how great it is, but if I don't really care about audio and video, is there anything it really changes for me? I've read up on the new tags it supports and they just don't seem to be all that revolutionary beyond its video and audio capabilities.
Shamelessly copy-pasted from wikipedia:
The canvas element for immediate mode 2D drawing.
Timed media playback (possibly not interesting for you)
Offline storage database (offline web applications). See Web Storage[21]
Document editing (via DOM API and user interface)
Drag-and-drop
Cross-document messaging
Browser history management
MIME type and protocol handler registration.
Microdata
Browser-based SQL databases
Oh, and WebSockets to replace AJAX and Comet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5#New_APIs
DOM storage
Canvas
Drag'n'drop
Semantic microformats support
One of the biggest deals about HTML5 which is under reported is that HTML4 never defined error handing, but this is well defined in HTML5. All browser vendors are building HTML5 parsers that conform to this spec. While this is not sexy, the end result will be that browsers will become more interoperable with each other (especially in cases where the author makes an error). In the long run this should mean you'll spend less time trying to get all browsers to work correctly, and users will benefit from less broken sites in their browser of choice.
HTML5 also allows you to make more application quality sites, using many of the technologies mentioned in the other answers. Opera Dragonfly (the project I'm involved with) is a complex web app which doesn't use audio or video but takes advantage of a large number of HTML5 technologies. We use AppCache to make sure it still works when you are offline, Web Storage to save user preferences and history (we can store a lot more information than cookies allowed) and will likely use Web Workers to allow the app to use more than one process at once (will speed up performance on mult-core machines).
If you are doing anything with graphics then the Canvas API gives you a lot of drawing options, while SVG (an open vector format) can be used within your HTML pages now. Previously pages had to be served as XML for SVG to be included inside them.