Take this code:
#wh_wrapper #slider .scrollButtons.left {
width: 100px;
}
the width of 100px is being applied only to:
#wh_wrapper -> #slider -> scollButtons left
If I do this:
.left {
width: 50px;
}
all the
.left
classes has now a width of 50px, including the one from before.
Now, I completely understand how to avoid this error (setting specific classes, putting .left before #wh_wrapper #slider .scrollButtons.left etc..) what I'm asking is if there is a way to specify properties that cannot be overwritten by "global" properties.
I hope I was able to explain myself.
Thanks
EDIT:
I now understand !important :-)
But look at this other example:
#wh_wrapper #slider .scrollButtons.left {
width: 100px !important;
}
.left {
width: 50px;
}
Now #wh_wrapper #slider .scrollButtons.left will still be 100px, but what about:
.left {
width: 50px;
border: 1px solid #000;
}
since I haven't decalred a border before I can't put an important on it, still the #wh_wrapper #slider .scrollButtons.left will now have a border property.
Any way areound this?
Yes, put !important behind them:
.class{
height:100px !important;
width: ...etc
}
Watch out though: Internet Explorer 6 and previous versions simply ignore !important, while IE 7 supports them. More info on this can be found here or here.
!important is something to consider, butyou should try to avoid it. Most of the times it can be avoided by building a better html/css tree or adding a class (try to keep them generic though ;)).
#EDIT: You should always put the most generic selectors on top, and the build down to the more specific ones. for example: put a img{} selector on top to provide a global specifier for all your images, then you go down more and more specific.
wrapper img{}
wrapper container img{}
wrapper container div.something img{}
and so on. Don't try to overdo the classes and ID's, the more generic your html/css is the better. containers and wrappers are often overused and unnescessary. Try to write good semantic html and keep html and css seperated. Don't use css when you should us HTML (and vice versa)
Often it is better to create your whole html file, and when everything looks good, provide css for the finishing touch.
Tried !important?
I tested your code in Opera, Chrome, FF and IE and all prefer the first line over the second one, no matter what the order of the rules is. In the sample you pasted there's a space missing in ".scrollButtons.left" - if I use that code then it (of course) always matches the second rule. Are you sure this isn't the problem?
Related
For whatever reason, I can't seem to put the right words in my search engine. It seems like a really easy thing. Let's say I have simple markup as follows:
<div>Hello!</div>
And I apply the following styles:
body {
background: blue;
}
div {
background: green;
width: 100%;
}
Now ideally, I'd like the green to stretch across the entire screen, but for whatever reason theres a buffer between the ends of the window and the div, that are blue. When I go to inspect the div, I note that there is 0 padding/margin and just the content box. When I inspect the HTML element. it's just the content with no padding/margin as well.
I guess my question is, how can I get rid of that blue buffer area between the html and the containing div? The only way I have successfully done it, is negative margins on the div, but that seems hacky. Any thoughts?
Even without any CSS applied, every browser does some default styling of elements. This includes margin on the body element. To overwrite these default styles (which you can inspect via your browser's developer tools, if any - for example via F12 in Chrome), you just set custom CSS rules accordingly. For your specific problem, you should add margin: 0 to the styling of the body tag.
Now, since every browser has different defaults, many developers decide to reset the styling entirely before applying their own. This can make for a more consistent and streamlined CSS developing process. There are several of these reset stylings available, a famous one being Eric Meyer's CSS reset.
Body element has default margin at every direction 8px long, so just rewrite this default.
body {
margin: 0;
background: blue;
}
#Edit:
...also It's great example to practice 'Developer Tools' using. There's nice guide: https://developers.google.com/web/tools/chrome-devtools/inspect-styles/
You should consult the CSS box model when you have questions like this one. You just need to remove the margin from the body.
body {
background: blue;
margin: 0px
}
div {
background: green;
width: 100%;
}
<div>Hello!</div>
Forgive me if I've worded the question wrongly. I'll try to explain my question briefly and accurately. First of all I am using an online website builder for my website called PortfolioBox.
What I am trying to do is clip an image within a container without the image automatically re-sizing itself to fit to the width of the container. The code I used is simple:
HTML:
<div id="imageContainer">
<img src="http://www.kirupa.com/html5/images/circle_colorful.png">
</div>
CSS:
#imageContainer {
background-color: #333;
width: 350px;
height: 200px;
border-radius: 5px;
overflow: hidden;
}
The following code should result in something that looks like this:
http://www.kirupa.com/html5/examples/clipping_content.htm
However, if you check the result of the same code on my website you will see that the image being clipped is shrinking to fit the width of the container:
http://roryhammoud.com/test-new
Because I am using a webhost/builder, the pages come prebuilt with CSS code. There must be something in the preloaded CSS that is causing this. I however don't have access to that CSS code.
The Question
So my question is, is there anything that I can do to override this issue?? I do have the ability to add CSS code to pages, so I am hoping I can override it somehow. I would greatly appreciate any help..
Here is the page on JSFIDDLE http://jsfiddle.net/0e5nda2b/ (Please note I cannot remove CSS code, I can only ADD)
Thank you in advance.
You have a CSS rule in your file that sets the max-width to 100%. Remove it.
.textContent object, .textContent embed, .textContent video, .textContent img, .textContent table {
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
}
If you can't simply remove that rule, create your own that sets the max-width to initial and make your rule more specific, or use !important (not recommended). For example, #imageContainer img {max-width:initial;}
Because you are not able to modify the existing CSS, you must override it.
You need to be more specific with your selectors to target the element in question like so:
#imageContainer img {
max-width: inherit;
}
I'm very inexperience with html and only know the basics for my Tumblr blog. My question is probably very simple but I'm very pissed off at it and I'm losing sleep because I will not sleep without fixing it. So waaay in the beginning of my code, I have:
.post img { width: 100%; }
and then waaay later in the code, I have:
div class="asker-info"><img src="{AskerPortraitURL-24}" alt="" class="asker-avatar" /> {Asker}></div>
My problem here is that whenever someone asks me a question, their avatar appears 20x literally the size it should be. I've checked it out on Google Chrome's "inspect element" and found that the .post img part of my code cancels out with the width part in this section:
.asker-avatar {
float: left;
width: 24px;
margin: 5px 10px 5px 10px;
}
I'm so goddamn pissed off and nothing makes sense
Could you try this and tell what happens ?
Here you create a css class with the image size you want. You set the width what you want, and the height auto, it must pick a good value depending on height
.asker-avatar
{
width: 24px;
height: auto;
margin: 5px 10px 5px 10px;
}
Another question, can you put here the asker-info class you use in the div ? Could be that class the problem with your img ? And maybe you could try to remove the .post img {width:100%} because can make the img to resize to the 100% width of the div
And here you can practise with images sizes and resizes, and you can read some explanation about the img attributes, it's an useful page:
HTML_IMAGES W3SCHOOL
I fixed it!! Oh my god, am I relieved! I noticed that my own avatar was not affected by the .post img so I looked over the class and found out that by simply adding an id="_", you can change it!!
It's not working because the CSS selector .post img is "more specific" than the selector .asker-avatar.
Since .asker-avatar appears lower in the style-sheet that .post img, it will be enough to make that selector as specific as the one you want to override.
I'm not an expert on CSS specificity (this guy is), but try changing the .asker-avatar selector to img.asker-avatar (note - no space between img and .).
I was wondering; is it possible to style the css3 resize property?
div {
resize: both;
overflow: auto;
}
I want a horizontal resize, and would like a vertical bar, rather than the little thingamagig in the corner in the default. See images. In short, can I make this:
Into something like this:
...and if this is not possible through css, any other ideas? I would like to keep things as lightweight as possible.
Obs: This answer is for WebKit only, couldn't find for other browsers nor testing with their - names worked.
Code:
Considering you have an element with the following CSS:
.styled {
resize:both;
overflow:auto;
background:orange; /* just for looks */
}
If you add webkit's specific pseudo-selector ::-webkit-resizer, you can style the handle:
::-webkit-resizer {
border: 2px solid yellow;
background: blue;
box-shadow: 0 0 2px 5px red;
outline: 2px dashed green;
/*size does not work*/
display:block;
width: 150px !important;
height: 150px !important;
}
Visual:
http://jsfiddle.net/RaphaelDDL/ryphs/1/
Final thoughts
I've tested with ::-moz-resizer on FF22, didn't worked. so yeah, you are stuck into making the javascript version, mimicking StackOverflow's textarea handle.
Extra info
When styling shadow dom pseudo selectors, do NOT stack them into a single selector ::-webkit-resizer, ::-moz-resizer { /*css*/} because will invalidate the entire selector.
Here is mapped all (or most of) Shadow DOM selectors: https://gist.github.com/afabbro/3759334
More info about Shadow Dom (HTML5Rocks) here and here.
Better looking and organized list of shadow dom selectors with screens
List of Mozilla's selectors (there is no pseudo-selector for resizer)
I would like to propose my solution
https://jsfiddle.net/tomoje/x96rL2sv/26/
It works on every browser, type of device, can be operated with mouse and finger (touch) and doesn't use any image etc.
The trick is to give to user a handle and to expand the handle to whole working area, to avoid mouse/touch to step out from the handle area during moving (it can happen when the javascript function will slow down due to some computer occupation or else)
<div class="cSuwakT" id="idSuwakKontenerGalka"></div>
I am trying to get a label to fill a table cell whilst having some sort of padding applied to the label.
I have tried a method I found through my searches but this does not seem to work... here is my CSS:
tr {
height: 1px;
}
td {
height:100%;
}
label {
background-color: #DCDCDC;
display: block;
font-weight:bold;
vertical-align:top;
text-align:right;
padding: 8px 5px 8px 8px;
margin: 1px 3px 1px 0px;
min-width: 120px;
min-height:100%;
height:auto !important;
height:100%;
}
Any help with this would be gratefully appreciated
From the given CSS it looks like there may be browser default padding on the table cells.
td {padding: 0;}
label {display: block; padding: 1em;}
seems to do the trick for me : http://jsfiddle.net/Fb7bS/
But a more complex table and/or inherited styles from elsewhere may add complications.
Hy,
I came over this problem long time ago. It seems that some sort of webbrowsers add a standard padding and margin to tables. How much they add, always depends on the webbrowser. But to overcome this problem you should consider the method of css reseting. What's that ? You simply add a .css file you include in your HTML Page which setts all margins/paddings and other formations done by default to zero. With this you avoid such problems.
There goes the link for CSS Reset: http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/
Well, in older browsers, a label cannot be set as a block level element. You could try placing a div within the label and transferring the label's styles to the div, and see if that fixes your issue.
Though also for height: 100% to work, the element must be absolutely positioned, and the parent element relatively positioned, but in some browsers table elements like td can't be relatively positioned, either. Also unless the td is meant to fill the entire length of the screen vertically, the height: 100% on both elements is unnecessary anyway.
I removed some of the "unnecessary" code and changed your format a bit here, though I'm not sure exactly what you wanted, so it might turn out to not be so unnecessary and that something else was just missing: http://jsfiddle.net/mGykJ/1/
Could you see if that's more like what you had in mind? Though if you could post your HTML, that would be helpful.