Installing HgEclipse for IBM RAD 7.0 - mercurial

I would like to hear if anybody has had luck with installing HgEclipse on IBM RAD (Rational Application Developer for WebSphere) 7.0? I'm asking this on behalf of my coworkers, who want to use Mercurial, but who cannot make HgEclipse work. Does anybody use this combination, perhaps with an older version of HgEclipse?
RAD 7.0 is built on top of Eclipse 3.2 -- I know this is neither the newest version of RAD nor the newest version of Eclipse but that's the versions they have to work with.

I doubt Eclipse 3.2 is supported.
Actually, ticket 10420 reports Eclipse 3.4 is not supported!...
Even the latest IBM RAD 7.5.5.1 is based only on Eclipse3.4 and would propably not support HgEclipse.

You can try with Rational Application Developer 8.0 Beta.
You find more information on this page.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/rad/Rational+Application+Developer+Version+8.0+Open+Beta
FYI: The help does not list Mercurial as compatible software.
The postings on this site are my own and do not necessarily represent the positions, strategies, or opinions of IBM

Related

Is Enterprise Library still being updated?

I'll be porting an asp.net website in Net 2.0 to a more recent version of .Net 4.5.
I'm looking for more modern libraries to use for SQL Server connectivity, and I noticed that the last update for Enterprise Library was done in April 2013.
Is Enterprise Library still being used or is there something newer?
Thanks.
The CodePlex project page for Enterprise Library (which goes read-only Nov 6, 2017) says:
This project is no longer under development.
Unity has new ownership and has relocated to GitHub.
The remainder of
the application blocks will no longer be developed. However, the
source will continue to be available. We encourage any interested
parties to fork the source as desired.
So, other than Unity it's looking pretty dead. It's unclear if MS will be keeping read-only CodePlex online or not.

Nokia imaging SDK editingsession is not found -windows phone

Im new to nokia image SDK, I ahve installed the latest version(1.0.272.0 ) for windows phone .Whenever I try to use EditingSession, I get error as
"EditingSession is not found.Are you missing an assembly directive?"
I have included the following namespace
using Nokia.Graphics.Imaging;
using Nokia.InteropServices;
Please help..
Image SDK has changed significantly in the RTM version (compared to Beta versions) and in RTM, editing session is gone. With a lot of samples around are still referring to beta code, you can take a look at differences between Beta and RTM versions here (http://developer.nokia.com/Resources/Library/Lumia/#!nokia-imaging-sdk/how-to-upgrade.html) or consult RTM core concepts at Nokia's Imaging SDK site (http://developer.nokia.com/Resources/Library/Lumia/#!nokia-imaging-sdk/core-concepts.html).

Programming for Windows Phone 8 on Microsoft Windows 7

Using Microsoft Windows 7 and either Visual studio 2010 or 2012, how should I program for Windows Phone 8?
Assuming it is not possible, when does Microsoft plan to fix that?
Asked a different but related question, and got this answer, which if correct gives me the answer I was looking for.
You can't - you'll need Windows 8 64-bit to develop for Windows Phone 8, and additionally you'll want the Professional version of Windows 8 to leverage the emulator.
See http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=35471 for details.
I don't think the following is a recommended approach but I don't see any compelling reason for why that is so feel free to read on.
According to this answer it seems that you can make programs that are runnable on Windows Phone 8 (WP8) although it won't have all the features but probably most, and maybe the developer experience will not be the same. Also it does not seem to be an officially supported way ( I am not sure about that point ).
So it seems like you could use SDK 7.1 for example and update it to SDK 7.8. According to the System Requirements it runs on Windows 7. Keep in mind that I don't know if it is officially supported.

How targeting .NET 4.0 with Mvvmcross?

I want to use Mvvmcross to make application for several platforms.
I use Profile 104 for PCL library like Mvvmcross, but this profile target .NET 4.5.
I want to target .NET 4.0 to use my application on Windows XP.
To do that, I add the xml files
MonoAndroid, Version = v1.6 +. Xml
and
VSMonoTouch, Version = v1.0 +. Xml
in the profile 143 which allows me to target. NET framework 4.0.3.
However, I have a compilation error because it can not find the ICommand interface.
This interface is not in the same library between version 4.0 and 4.5, is it why it doesn't work ?
Or should I recompile all Mvvmcross libraries with profile 143?
thanks,
This is a Portable Class Library limitation.
See the table on: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg597391.aspx
Model-View-View Model (MVVM)
Only 4.5
This means that if anyone wants to use MvvmCross on earlier .Net platforms then someone has to build and maintain a non-PCL version.
Since the maintainer of Mvx (me!) has decided to only maintain PCL versions of MvvmCross, then any non-PCL support will have to be created by the community.
For WPF this shouldn't be too large or difficult a job - but it might be...
Alternatively, somebody might be able to do something funky to get the ICommand working... I've retagged this question with portable-class-library to try to lure in some of the MS experts.

visual web in netbeans 6.8

What happened to Visual web in Netbeans 6.8. Has the feature been removed?
Thanks
Yes, it was removed in 6.8. Lots of people that use it are staying at 6.7.1. The reason VW wasn't included is because that project is no longer being developed, and therefore won't be part of future NetBeans editions.
It is an harakiri for Netbeans!!!
The reason i used netbeans instead of eclipse is the Visual web in Netbeans!!!
You should create another tool (a new Java Studio Creator) for those (we are a lot) that want to continue using this plugin!!!
The Visual Web Pack is an important feature and the main reason why we are using the netbeans ide instead of eclipse in our company for java web development. And now, you won't include this nice and very helpful tool in the future netbeans releases since 6.8? I think, netbeans will going down in the future, because now there is no reason to use this ide instead of eclipse. Good by Netbeans - we have a good time :(