HTML or Javascript Decompiler Available [closed] - html

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any HTML or Javascript decompiler available?

There is not, since it's not compiled in the first place...is a javascript unpacker or un-minifier what you are after? If not, right click (or view menu), view source.
Also, Google Chrome has built-in tools for this and Firefox has Firebug, right click, inspect element in either.

Ctrl + U :D
On a serious note HTML and JS are not compiled as such , the code is generally open for all to see

I just came up on this question from Google and decided to put in my two cents as things have changed.
You can use the Spidermonkey Javasccript shell. From this shell, you can actually disassemble script and view interpreter bytecode.

Try this JS Beautifier DOT org
It's unpack and deofuscate any JS
or this JS Beauty

In your browser, go to View->Source (short-cut Cntr+U in some browsers). Everything is there in front of you.

Related

How to spell check a website? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Ideally, content should be spell-checked before being marked up with HTML. Unfortunately that does not always happen.
Once the content is integrated with HTML, it's very difficult to run that through a spell checker, e.g. by pasting into MS Word. What strategy should I use to spell check a website?
I would recommend browser extension, this is easy install and work or user output content,
You can install Firefox Spell Checker extension.
I would say make a python script to take HTML in as a single text string and remove anything enclosed by <>. It wouldn't be perfect but you'd mostly have plaintext that can go into msword.
Using a ide like netbeans is usually the best way to recheck HTML code or spell check your code. What do you ise to develope your websites

Is there a version of scintilla (scilexer.dll) that includes "style"(CSS) lexing for HTML? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm fairly sure that text-highlighting (through separating the different kinds of text) is part of the scintilla lexer's job. If it's not and is instead program specific, then please correct me.
The current version of scintilla's HTML lexer has support for script tag elements (i.e. <script>) and other types of embedded code, but not for stylesheet tag elements (i.e. <style>) such as CSS.
My friend uses Notepad++ (which uses Scintilla) for web editing and would like this feature. Before I run off and build him a custom version, I figured I'd ask if anyone else has already added this though.
Before people recommend checking the latest version of Scintilla (because Notepad++'s version is 2 years behind) for if it's got this feature already, I've built the latest version and tested it. It does not work with embedded CSS either.
Upgrade to the latest version of Notepad++ (6.3.2) as it already caters for CSS syntax highlighting.

Are there any viable alternatives to wkhtmltopdf on windows, for html to pdf conversion? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I've found wkhtmltopdf, which looks good on the surface and works fine in very small cases, but it doesn't provide any real css control over the rendering.
By that I mean it doesn't use the print media type and page breaks are not respected, as well, on windows you can't control the names of some header/footer variables, or generate a TOC off of teh h1 tags.
Are there any real open source alternatives, I've tried xhtml2pdf which is a python library actually called pisa, but it requires reportlab which doesn't play nice windows.
I'm actually programming in .net but if its good and open source, the language isn't a huge issue.
This is an old stackoverflow question, but because google took me here, it could be helpful for somebody else.
Weasyprint should support what the author was looking for.
It supports print css features like page break.
Try weasyprint
It turns out there was no open source alternative that was simpler, but on windows wkhtmltopdf is just not the best thing, so we paid for a better solution.
Winnovative's PDF library is what we used
While it is not open-source, I use ABCPDF. I have a template page in .NET that I use for a wrapper to set up a custom stylesheet for generating PDFs only.

Is there any tools for check html quality? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I know about html, css validation and some rules in pagespeed about css performance.
Is there any all in one tool for checking?
May be it can check some best practice for html markup.
For HTML, consider using HTML Tidy
Use this Html Validator 0.8.5.8 with firefox .
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/249
It will show error and will give best suggestion
And this CodeBurner for Firefox 1.0
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/13048
And if you need software, then use this http://www.freehtmlvalidator.com/
And if you need online tool, then go for this http://www.onlinewebcheck.com/
Consider YSlow firefox extension from yahoo.
Web Page Analyzer
Google SpeedTracer
Safari/Webkit Web Inspector
Have a look at The W3C QA Toolbox (for Markup, Links, CSS validation) and the popular YSlow Firefox extension, PageSpeed (another Firefox extension) and SpeedTracer (sort of like YSlow!, but for Google Chrome) which are more performance oriented.

Cross platform, multi-syntax highlighting editor [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there an editor that is:
Available for at least windows and linux
Highlights multiple syntaxes in the same document. (Ala Dreamweaver)
Tabbed interface
All the editors I tried highlighted by file extension only which isn't fine grained enough.
At the very least it needs to distinguish scripting from html, css and javascript in the same document.
Scite!
The answer is emacs. You can do pretty much anything you want with that editor. There is a 'nxhtml-mode' which you can use to edit javascript, php, html,ruby, jsp,css, whatever on the same file. If you're still at university, the best advice I can give you is to start learning how to use emacs. It will change your life, really.
Eclipse (very good, but heavy)
vim (doesnt have tabs, but aprt from that very lightweight and very good)
emacs (only heard about it that is is very good, but it has a steap learning curve)
hop it helps
Netbeans.
I've only tried it with HTML av Javascript for two languages in the same file though.
I have used jedit. Just need a java runtime.
Handling syntax highliting and completion for multi-language files is something the NetBeans people have been working on and has been available for javascript since 6.1. I got the impression from JavaPosse#214 that this has seen further work in 6.5.
I don't Netbeans myself (my primary tools are Emacs and Eclipse), but It might be worth a look for you.
SciTE FTW!!! Doesn't even need an installation! A portable single exe.