I am working on a system that performs continuous integration and I am looking for a method I can use to get the most recent changeset from a Mercurial repository without creating a repository locally.
I have considered using clone but this method will only work if you have set a working directory locally (since this will be occurring on a build server, I would prefer not to do this because of inclusion of the .hg file and the diffs - all I want is essentially an export of the files from the tip revision and nothing more.)
This request may not even be possible, and it's very likely that I just do not understand DVCS very well. However, if I cannot do what I want to do, is there a workaround?
It's possible using 'hg archive' depending how your remote repository is set up.
If it's available over HTTP using hgweb.cgi or hg serve you can hit the archive link programmatically to get the files you want. Example:
wget https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/archive/tip.zip --output-document=- | unzip -
or it's available over ssh:
ssh you#there.com hg archive --type=zip - | unzip -
You can use:
$ hg clone http://your_repo
$ hg archive ../export/
$ rm -rf *
$ cd ..
$ cd export
From Mercurial's help files:
$ hg help archive
hg archive [OPTION]... DEST
create an unversioned archive of a
repository revision
You can use:
http://merc/raw-file
to retrieve a list of files in the repository or
http://merc/raw-file/filename
to get a specific file.
Related
I'm trying to use mercurial file sets to add all the files in a directory tree, excluding very large files and any binary files. Cribbing from the mercurial documentation, this command should do it:
hg init
hg add 'set: size("<1M") and not binary()'
However this returns a status code of 0, and hasn't added anything to my new, empty repo. I've tried just 'set: not binary()' and that didn't work either.
The frustrating thing is that although I can google for mercurial file sets, and find lots of examples, I can't find anything to help troubleshoot when it doesn't work!
I don't have a .hgignore file, and it's a fresh empty repo. Mercurial 4.2.2.
The directory where I'm testing this has a couple of artificially created files for the purpose of testing. In my real use case, I inherit a multi-gigbyte tarball of assorted sources and binaries from a client, and I want to get all the sources into mercurial before I start hacking to fix their problems, hence the need to exclude the binaries and large files that otherwise choke mercurial.
Here's my little test script:
#!/bin/sh -ex
dd if=/dev/urandom of=binary_1k bs=1 count=1024
dd if=/dev/urandom of=binary_2M bs=1 count=2097152
echo "This. Is, a SMALL text file." > text_small
hexdump binary_1k > text_1k
hexdump binary_2M > text_2M
ls -lh
file binary_1k
file binary_2M
file text_1k
file text_2M
hg init
hg add 'set: size("<1M") and not binary()'
hg status -a
hg add 'set: not binary()'
hg status -a
hg add 'set: size("<1M")'
hg status -a
At the end of this, each status command reports no files in the repo, and the add commands report no errors.
The problem is that file sets do a query of Mercurial's repository data base, which knows only about files that are part of the repository or have been added.
One solution is to add all, and then to get rid of the files that you don't like, e.g.:
hg forget 'set:size(">1M") or binary()'
This works, because the query also requires recently added files, even if they haven't been committed yet.
I have read only permission to an hg repo and am trying to develop and test changes to it locally. The problem is that I am in the middle of changing dev machines and am caught in a weird/akward state across the two machines.
On my old machine I made lots of changes to the repo, locslly. I just cloned the repo on my new machine, but obviously that doesn't contain the changes from my old machine. I need a way to createe a patch/diff from my local working copy on my old machine, and then apply them to my local working copy on my new machine. The problem is that I already commited (hg commit -m "Blah") the changes on my old machine to the distributed repo on it.
What set of specific commands can I use to create a patch/diff of my old machine and then apply it to the repo on my new one?
Update
I commited all changes on my old machine and then ran hg serve, exposing http://mymachine.example.com:8000.
On my new machine, where I had made some different changes (locally) than the changes from my old machine, I ran hg pull http://mymachine.example.com:8000 and got:
myuser#mymachine:~/sandbox/eclipse/workspace/myapp$ hg pull http://mymachine.example.com:8000
pulling from http://mymachine.example.com:8000/
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 16 changes to 10 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
So I run hg merge:
myuser#mymachine:~/sandbox/eclipse/workspace/myapp$ hg merge
abort: uncommitted changes
(use 'hg status' to list changes)
What do I do now?!?
You can use:
$ hg diff > changes.patch
To create a patch file, then:
$ patch -p1 < changes.patch
To apply that patch file on your new machine.
Well, that's actually fantastic, mercurial is a distributed version control system and you do not need to go via any patch file at all: simply pull the changes from your old machine to your new machine:
hg pull URL
where URL can be any network URL or also ssh-login, e.g.
hg pull ssh://mylogin#old.maschine.box or hg pull path/to/old/repository/on/nfs/mount
`
Alternatively you can also use bundle and unbundle. They create bundles which can be imported in the new mercurial easily and keep all meta-information.
hg bundle -r XXX --base YYY > FILENAME
where YYY is a revision you know you have in your new repository. You import it into your new repo with hg unbundle FILENAME. Of course you can bundle several changesets at once by repeating the -r argument or giving a changeset range like -r X:Y.
The least comfortable method is a via diff or export:
hg export -r XXX > FILENAME or equivalent hg diff -c XXX > FILENAME where you need to import the result with patch -p1 < FILENAME or hg import FILENAME.
The easiest way is to do this is to ensure that all work on your old machine is committed. Then use this command on it from the base of your repo:
hg serve
which creates a simple http server on this repo. The monitor should state the name of the http URL it is serving.
On your new machine, just pull from that URL.
Once you've pulled your old changes you can stop the hg serve process with ^C.
The advantages of this method are that it is very quick, and that it works on just about any system. The ssh method is also quick, but it won't work unless your system is configured to use ssh.
Answer to Update
The OPs update is asking an orthogonal question about how to merge changes pulled from a server with local changes. If you haven't already done so, try to digest the information in this merge doc and this one.
Merging is for merging changesets. The error is happening because you have local changes that haven't been committed which mercurial can't merge. So the first thing to do is to commit your local changes, then you will be able to merge.
But before you merge, I strongly recommend that you are merging what you think you are merging. Either ensure there are only 2 heads, or specify which head you are merging with. When merging, you have to be at one of the heads you wish to merge; it's usually better to be at the head with the most changes since the common ancestor because the diffs are simpler.
After you've merged, don't forget to commit the merge. :-)
I am working with Git repositories in the following way:
I have the master repository and several remotes on the different production machines.
I am pushing the production code to the remotes and restart the services for the changes to take effect.
I am about to switch from Git to Mercurial and I would like to know ahead how I can achieve something like that.
You add entries to the [paths] section of your local clone's .hg/hgrc file. Here's an example of a section that would go in the .hg/hgrc file:
[paths]
remote1 = http://path/to/remote1
remote2 = http://path/to/remote2
You can then use commands like hg push remote1 to send changesets to that repo. If you want that remote repo to update is working directory you'd need to put a changegroup hook in place at that remote location that does an update. That would look something like:
[hooks]
changegroup = hg update 2>&1 > /dev/null && path/to/script/restart-server.sh
Not everyone is a big fan of having remote repos automatically update their working directories on push, and it's certainly not the default.
if you want to add default path, you have to work with default in your ~project/.hg/hgrc file. As Follows:
[paths]
default = https://path/to/your/repo
Good Luck.
You could have a look at hg-git GitHub plugin:
adding the ability to push to and pull from a Git server repository from Mercurial.
This means you can collaborate on Git based projects from Mercurial, or use a Git server as a collaboration point for a team with developers using both Git and Mercurial.
Note: I haven't tested that tool with the latest versions of Mercurial.
If you're on Unix and you have Git installed, you can use this bash function to readily add a path to the remotes without a text editor:
add-hg-path() {
git config -f $(hg root)/.hg/hgrc --add paths.$1 $2
awk '{$1=$1}1' $(hg root)/.hg/hgrc > /tmp/hgrc.tmp
mv /tmp/hgrc.tmp $(hg root)/.hg/hgrc
}
Then invoke it with:
$ add-hg-path remote1 https://path.to/remote1
If someone would like to build a Powershell equivalent, I'd like to include that as well. Other potentials improvements include error checking on the parameters and factoring out the call to $(hg root).
I am familiar with TFS and Vault, but having just started using Mercurial I seem to be getting into a bit of a mess.
Heres what I (think) I've done:
-Created a central repository on bitbucket.org
-On my desktop PC, cloned repository from bitbucket, added files, commit them, push them to bitbucket
-On my laptop, cloned repository from bitbucket, pulled files, added more files, commit them, push them to bitbucket
I've continued to add, edit etc on the different computers.
Now I've noticed that some files from each computer are not in the bitbucket repository, and therefore only in the local repository. No amount of pulling and pushing seems to get it into the bitbucket repository.
What is the most likely thing I've done wrong?
Is there a way to 'force' by changes up to the bitbucket repository?
Did they get into your local repository? I suspect not, i.e. they were new files that were not added to the commit. Use hg add to add them to the changeset before committing or whatever the equivalent is for whatever mercurial interface you're using.
Edit:
Here's the help from Mercurial:
C:\Users\Bert>hg add --help
hg add [OPTION]... [FILE]...
add the specified files on the next commit
Schedule files to be version controlled and added to the repository.
The files will be added to the repository at the next commit. To undo an
add before that, see "hg forget".
If no names are given, add all files to the repository.
...
See Mercurial: The Definitive Guide (a.k.a. the hg "red book") for more info:
http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/mercurial-in-daily-use.html
Telling Mercurial which files to track
Mercurial does not work with files in your repository unless you tell it to manage them. The hg status command will tell you which files Mercurial doesn't know about; it uses a “?” to display such files.
To tell Mercurial to track a file, use the hg add command. Once you have added a file, the entry in the output of hg status for that file changes from “?” to “A”.
$ hg init add-example
$ cd add-example
$ echo a > myfile.txt
$ hg status
? myfile.txt
$ hg add myfile.txt
$ hg status
A myfile.txt
$ hg commit -m 'Added one file'
$ hg status
use "hg -v help add" to show global options
For a while I had just my code under source control, but I decided it would be cool to put things like my stuff in my .vim folder among other things in a repo. (I'm obviously not going to store everything in my repo, just various config files, my src directory, and maybe a few other things as well)
I was able to set up a repo fine, then push it to my server where I can access it from my other computers, but I can't clone it to my other computers. When I try to clone it it fails because the home directory isn't empty. Is there a way to do what I want here?
Since the versioned files between my computers are the same, what I did was:
~$ hg clone ssh://myserver/hg/dotfiles mydotfiles
~$ mv mydotfiles/.hg .
~$ rm -rf mydotfiles
and that's it, now your home folder is under version control, but of course if your dot files are not identical between computers you will have to do something about it.
Since I only want to version some files and not everything under my home folder, I have this simple rule in ~/.hgignore
# This .hgignore is for the dotfiles repository only,
# the rest of my HG repositories use the file
# .hgignore_global as referenced by [ui]'s ignore setting.
syntax:glob
*
This way I don't get an ocean of files when I do hg status and only see those files that I have under version control that have been modified.
But since I want to see unversioned files when working within another hg repository, I have this in my ~/.hgrc file
[ui]
ignore=/home/gajon/.hgignore_global
And ~/.hgignore_global contains some filters for common transient files:
syntax: glob
*.pyc
*~
.*.swp
.svn*
*.svn*
*.fasl
syntax: regexp
^\.pc/
Suppose you have proj1 and proj2. proj1 is a mercurial repo you want to clone to proj2, but proj2 already has files in it.
Try this:
hg clone proj1 proj3
mv proj3/.hg proj2
rmdir proj3
cd proj2
hg update -C -r tip
In the other directories that already exist, you could hg init, hg add what you want, hg commit that, hg pull from the central repo, and deal with the resulting merge.