I am making a fighting game in Flash and while I have everything running, I am missing something: a victory/loss screen. Logically, I know how to do it:
if character.hp < 0
{
character.dead = true;
dispatchevent("death", event)
}
My problem is that I have no idea as to how to code it. I know I will use two classes and my two .fla files (unless I am wrong).
I have two .fla files that are in play here: the Menu.fla file and the Arena.fla file. Menu.fla contains the entire navigation of the game, options, character selection screens, etc. and when it is time for the player to engage in battle, it loads the Arena.fla file, which contains only the backgrounds (depending on the selected stage) and for now is set to a length of one frame only. For Arena.fla, the real action happens in my classes, but logically, I would only need HP.as and Character.as.
In Character.as, I have declared the following variable:
var isDead:Boolean = false; //is character dead?
In HP.as, believe I should have the following:
if(currentHp<0)
{
currentHp = 0;
character.isDead = true; //declared as var `character:Object;`
EventDispatcher.dispatchEventListener("playerDead", playerDead);
}
And finally, in Arena.fla, I want to be able to detect the above-mentioned eventlistener and simply move on to a second frame which will display a message in the style of "PLAYER ONE HAS WON" or "PLAYER ONE HAS LOST" with a button that will allow me to go back to the character selection screen. This is the first part in which I am stuck: how do I detect the dispatched event listener in my main .fla file?
Secondly, if the player clicks on the "CONTINUE" button, which displays regardless if the player has won or lost, how can my Menu.fla (which loads the Arena.swf) detect this click event, unload the game, and go back to the character selection screen?
Thank you in advance for helping me out. I realize this is a lot of text but it's the most descriptive I can be. If you have any questions or need any clarification concerning my question, feel free to speak up.
-Christopher
I'm not sure about the code you have to read the HP but do you know that character.dead is actually becoming true?
You could always have the Arena.swf call a function in the HP.as that will end the game and declare a winner.You could add a second Frame to Arena.swf that contains a dimmed background and a WINNER or LOSER text.'
In general, the easiest way for a user-defined class to gain event dispatching capabilities is to extend EventDispatcher. If this is impossible (that is, if the class is already extending another class), you can instead implement the IEventDispatcher interface, create an EventDispatcher member, and write simple hooks to route calls into the aggregated EventDispatcher.
activate
Dispatched when Flash Player or an AIR application gains operating system focus and becomes active.
deactivate
Dispatched when Flash Player or an AIR application loses operating system focus and is becoming inactive.
Event dispatcher
Thank you all for your help, but I have figured it out. Turns out my method was far too complicated for what I wanted to do, and for the time I had left. I will explain how I did it.
Instead of using an EventDispatcher like I thought I would, I used a SharedObject, which simply made everything work like magic.
A SharedObject can be accessed from anywhere in the application/game, as long as it is referred to it correctly. So I simply created a SharedObject called "winLossData" set to "NO WINNERS" in my character selection screen. This cookie is never saved nor written to the disk, so there's no chance for the user to find it (generally speaking).
I have decided to use the Movement.as class which contains all of my controls and wrote an event listener of type Event.ENTER_FRAME that checks constantly my characters' health status. If one of them is below 100, my SharedObject immediately takes for value either "PLAYER ONE" or "PLAYER TWO", depending on who won (i.e. whose health points are not under 100). Afterward, just for precaution, I reset the losing character's health points to 100. Here's the code:
function whoWon(event:Event):void
{
if(playerSpriteBar.getPower() <= 0)
{
winner.data.winner = "Player Two";
playerSpriteBar.update(100);
}
if(playerAIBar.getPower() <= 0)
{
winner.data.winner = "Player One";
playerAIBar.update(100);
}
}
In my Menu.fla, I have another event listener of type Event.ENTER_FRAME that waits for the cookie to change value. As soon as the cookie changes values, Menu.fla automatically unloads the external swf (in our case, Arena.swf) and displays the results, accordingly to the received SharedObject. The rest of the actions happen inside the Menu.fla file, so no need for any extra coding.
Once again, thank you all for your help.
Related
I've been researching this issue for hours and while I've found somewhat similiar situations, i have yet to find a simple fix. Basically I have a timeline where some animation plays. Eventually I get to my main game screen (frame 256) where a stop(); is called and the user then gets to click on one of 3 doors. Clicking on any door takes the user ahead a bunch of frames and they get to play a game. Once the game is done or the user clicks back, it takes the user back to the original frame (frame 256) and every single time it does this, it says my "upDoor" is a null reference and then the upDoor button(instance of upStairsDoor button) is no longer on the stage.
This seems to happen regardless of which door the user picks first. If the user picks the upDoor and plays the minigame there or picks the outsideDoor and plays that specific minigame, when the user returns to this frame (frame 256), it throws this error on the door and then of course because it throws an error, nothing else works at that point and I have to exit the game.
It's not a typo! Please don't suggest I check my instance names. As I mentioned, the door works fine the first time you get to the frame, it's just when you go back to it. I've read that it might have to do with the garbage collector but when we return to the frame, shouldn't it recreate all of the instances that I've placed to the stage? It doesn't error on ANY other button or movieClip that I've dragged to the stage, only this one particular door.
I forgot to mention that it's error'ing on a line of code that references the upDoor button. I have these lines of code here...(frame 256)
if (downDoor.enabled) {
downDoor.enabled = false;
}
if (upDoor.enabled) {
upDoor.enabled = false;
}
if (outDoor.enabled) {
outDoor.enabled = false;
}
What these do is disable the doors until the user clicks another object on the screen which then runs a function that sets all the doors to enabled. The error in question is saying I can't access a property of a null reference.
Thanks for the input guys. What ended up being the solution for me was to implement all of the movieclips and buttons programatically when the frame loads and then remove them all when I switch frames. That way, everytime the frame is reloaded from a gotoAndPlay, everything gets re-created again.
I'm working on game made with libgdx that needs some GUI above my game screen. Something like FrameLayout in Android.
I have GameScreen where everything is happening.
What I want now is to add a "pause" button, highscore information etc.
I've tried to combine a Stage object with regular sprite drawing.
But I had some problems with handling inputs: how to manage if user clicked pause button in stage, or clicked game area (where I should add some bullets)...
You should be able to use a Stage to manage your UI. To get input working correctly, you'll need to add an InputMultiplexer
so that the Stage and then your current input scheme will both get the inputs.
To set it up, you'll do something like this:
InputMultiplexer multiplexer = new InputMultiplexer();
multiplexer.addProcessor(stage);
multiplexer.addProcessor(gameScreenInputProcessor);
Gdx.input.setInputProcessor(multiplexer);
(Code sample based on code from https://code.google.com/p/libgdx/wiki/InputEvent)
Note that the order is important (I'm guessing you'll want the stage to get events first to see if the UI is being touched or not). Also, the boolean return value from input event handlers are more important with a multiplexer, as "handled" events will not be propagated by the mutliplexer. UI events inside the Stage have their own "handled" flag (mostly it does the right thing but there are some subtle differences).
One alternative to the InputMultiplexer would be to create a "GameScreenActor" (a new subclass of Actor) that contains your current game screen that you plug into the global Stage. You'd have to move your input processing to the scene2d approach, though. This probably isn't the right choice for you, but it is a viable one.
I've created a few buttons in Flash. I'm trying to make it so that if you click one button, the audio starts playing for that button. If you click another button, the active audio stops and the new audio of the button you clicked last start playing.
Any help please?
What you're describing is actually quite easy to do.
First things first, I recommend importing the audio into your Flash project. Alternatively, there is a way to play it directly from an external file. This is beyond the scope of my answer, so if you need help on that, you should post a question specifically covering it.
Assuming you have imported the audio file into your Flash project's library, make an as3 instance of it. (Right click the file in the library, click Properties --> ActionScript [tab] --> [Check] Export for ActionScript & [Enter name in] Class)
Now, create a definition of the sound in your code. (Assuming your two sounds were named "mySound1" and "mySound2" in the Class field of the previous step.)
var mySound1:Sound = new mySound1();
var mySound2:Sound = new mySound2();
Now, define your sound channel.
var mySoundChannel:SoundChannel = new SoundChannel();
There are two alternate ways of stopping one sound and playing another. The first is to create one function that does both every time. The second method is to create two formulas, one for "play" and one for "stop". You will need to decide which method works best for you. I'll use the two-function method below:
function stopSound():void
{
//This stops all sound in the sound channel.
//If there is nothing playing, nothing happens.
mySoundChannel.stop();
}
//In this function, we create an argument that allows us to tell the function
//what sound to we want it to play.
function playSound(soundname:String):void
{
mySoundChannel = this[soundname].play(0, 0);
}
[Note, you can tweak the play() properties to meet your needs, doing things like starting in the middle of the song, or looping it forever. 0,0 starts at the beginning, and doesn't loop. See the documentation for this.]
Now you hook up the event listeners for the buttons. (If you need help with event listeners, read the documentation.)
myButton1.addEventListener(Mouse.CLICK, btn1Click);
myButton2.addEventListener(Mouse.CLICK, btn2Click);
function btn1Click(evt:Event):void
{
stopSound();
playSound(mySound1);
}
function btn2Click(evt:Event):void
{
stopSound();
playSound(mySound2);
}
This should be enough information to get you started. In my game core, I actually have a custom class for dealing with sound playback that gives me the ability to repeat sounds, change volume, and keep sounds from conflicting with each other. I say that to emphasize that you can do quite a bit with the sound class. Do some digging in that documentation for ideas and help.
You may also consider putting a try-catch statement in the playSound function, since it will throw an reference error if you pass a name for a sound that doesn't exist.
Is posible something like this: in frame1 I have some user interaction (drag drop graphics etc), when user click some button I open frame2 or frame3 where are fields for taking some input from user, then when user finish, I back him to frame1 but frame is not "reset"? I tried what described here, and I can even send data from frame 2 to frame 1 using global vars, but frame 1 is "reset" all user actions are clean, so is there a way in this situation to keep frame1 in memory or something?
Previous or next go to a frame if the frame is being initialized is natural. There's no way to save it. In other words, move the frame is The following concepts, removeChild(previous-stage), addChild(next-stage)
In my experience, the script code to control the frame, increasing complexity are highly undesirable. Maintenance is difficult and in the future, the readability of the code is very poor. Recommend to handle than that in a single frame. Something like a single frame of the object location, size, status, and stored as a variable because it can restore it, it's more reasonable to think that.
If you are working with Flash & AS3 together you can put the code:
gotoAndStop(3); // 3 is the number of the frame
If you are using:
gotoAndPlay(3); // it will begin to play the frames from 3 till the timeline finds a stop mark.
So, you'll need to put a stop on the frame you want.
e.g. stop();
check out this tutorial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N9vE7wjoc4
I am using the frames in the timeline of a .swf as pages in a flash app. The user can advance to the next page by clicking a button that takes her to the next frame. Similarly, it is possible to navigate to the previous frame/page as well.
Most of the content is placed on the stage (i.e. created by dragging an instance of a library symbol to the stage) but properties of those instances, such as .visible might be changed via actionscript. Also, some objects are loaded from external flash files and displayed programmatically with addChild / addChildAt.
The problem is, if I am on Frame N+1 and there is an object displayed on the stage programmatically (i.e. with addChild, not by having it placed on the stage) and navigate to Frame N where there is an object that is placed on the stage (i.e. dragged from the library),
then the instance of that object is undefined/null and throws an error if I try to set its properties (like .visible).
The error does not occur if I am moving to the NEXT frame, only if I am moving to the PREVIOUS one. Therefore I assume that some kind of initialization is not getting called while going one frame back.
I was also thinking that the objects would just not "live" to the next timeframe, that is, their value would be lost and re-initialized because of scope, but if there is no dynamically created object on the stage, I can navigate back and forth just fine.
Is there a way to ensure that the objects created on the stage do not disappear while navigating back to the previous frame?
The first, and more useful, part of the answer is this: timeline keyframes and scripts can give conflicting information about display objects - whether they should exist, where they should be, and so on. For example, when you add an item by playing into its frame, and then delete it with script, and then play into its frame again. When this happens, there's no unambiguously correct thing for Flash to do, so it tends to be unpredictable. I believe what generally happens is that once you fiddle with a given object via script, it's considered to no longer pay attention to the timeline - but your mileage will vary.
Having said that, the reason things are different when you play backwards is the second and more arcane part of the answer. Internally Flash functions differently when seeking forward and backwards on the timeline. Flash internally treats keyframes as changes to be applied in the forward direction, so as you play forward, it applies those changes in sequence. When you move backwards, however, from frame N+X to frame N, it doesn't scan through the intervening X frames reversing those changes - it jumps back to frame 1 and fast-forwards along to frame N. Normally, it amounts to the same thing and you don't need to worry about it, but when you get into the twitchy area where scripts and the timeline have a different idea of what should be on the stage, you're liable to see things behave differently depending on which way you jump (as you are now).
The super-short version is, for things to work predictably, try to ensure that any given object gets added, updated, and removed the same way - either all via script, or all via the timeline. When that seems impossible, fiddle with your content structure - usually, the best solution is to change your object into two nested ones, so that the things you want to do with script occur one level higher or lower than the things you want to do with the timeline.
I'm not sure I got your question right, but as3 does not instantiate elements on the timeline as soon as you gotoAndSomething, but later that frame.
That is, you can't
this.gotoAndPlay(10)
this.elementOnTimelineFrame10.DoSomething()
without errors.
I remember using this chunk of code in the past to work around this problem. It uses the Stage.Invalidate() function to wait for an Event.RENDER before trying to access and children, more info (although vague as hell) is here
private function init():void
{
stage.addEventListener(Event.RENDER, stage_renderHandler);
}
private function stage_renderHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// Run your code here
updateChildren();
}
private function enterFrameHandler(evt:Event):void
{
// triggers the RENDER event
stage.invalidate();
}
This also might me very costly (performance wise). I would strongly advise against dynamically adding/removing objects to an existing timeline, is there any way in which you can place an empty Sprite above the timeline animation and use that for all your dynamic content?
Hope this helps