In the Castle.Windsor demo the configuration file contains
<component
id="form.component"
type="GettingStartedPart1.Form1, GettingStartedPart1" />
Why the namespace GettingStartedPart1 is repeated? Couldn't we write just:
<component
id="form.component"
type="GettingStartedPart1.Form1" />
?
it's not a namespace
when you have
"GettingStartedPart1.Form1, GettingStartedPart1"
it's:
"NamespaceName.TypeName, AssemblyName"
So you can't really omit that.
you could have:
"System.String, mscorlib"
That's not a Windsor's format BTW - it's so called fully qualified type name.
Related
I am trying to add a block to product page by using my custom module.
I do not want to modify any magento default files for this. I know it's possible by modifying the code in view.phtml template. Below is what I tried so far. I have copied the default magento view.phtml file in all module template folder as below. I included layout file inside config.xml of my module and written code for the block.
view.phtml file I placed under each template of module folder.
app/desifn/frontend/default/default/template/mymodule/view.phtml
config.xml file of module -
<frontend>
<routers>
<modulename>
<use>standard</use>
<args>
<module>Module_name</module>
<frontName>modulefrontname</ntNafrome>
</args>
</modulename>
</routers>
<layout>
<updates>
<modulename module="module_name">
<file>module.xml</file>
</modulename>
</updates>
</layout>
</frontend>
This file is under -
app/desifn/frontend/default/default/layout/modulename.xml
<reference name="product.info">
<block type="module_name/product_view" name="product_list">
<action method="setTemplate" ifconfig="module_name/sp_category/status">
<template>modulename/product/view.phtml</template>
</action>
</block>
</reference>
Node modulename is invalid (wrong closing tag)
<updates>
<modulename module="module_name">
<file>module.xml</file>
</module>
</updates>
and also template paths do not match
/mymodule/view.phtml
and
modulename/product/view.phtml
But back to your initial Question:
view.phtml of default template does not contain getChildHtml without any parameters. So the only way to inject custom stuff is to use a block of type core/text_list, which is "product.info.simple.extra". All you need is to make use of before or after attributes in your xml layout.
So my question is relatively simple.
In my Parameters.xml file I have the following line:
<parameter name="SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC" description="Email address of developer" defaultValue="" tags="">
<parameterEntry kind="XmlFile" scope"\\web.config$" match="/configuration/appsettings/add[#key='SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC']/#value" />
</parameter>
When publish this is creating a file that ends up like this:
<setParameter value="" name="SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC" />
When going live, this should replace the current web.config value for SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC to an empty string. Instead, when I try an publish I get the following:
Error: The 'SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC" argument cannot be null or empty.
Error count: 1.
at InRelease.MSDeploy.Program.Main(String[] args)
Have to tell MSDeploy that it is okay for the value to be empty ...
<parameter name="SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC" description="Email address of developer" defaultValue="" tags="">
<parameterValidation kind="AllowEmpty" />
<parameterEntry kind="XmlFile" scope"\\web.config$" match="/configuration/appsettings/add[#key='SEND_TO_FRIEND_BCC']/#value" />
</parameter>
So, by pure chance I tried entering a single empty space and it worked.
If there is a better way I am still eager to learn more...
I have a part of my web application that is an RESTfull api and part a more standard web-pages.
I wish to have the REST part with some custom filters such as the EntryPoint, SuccessHandler and FailureHandler. This part is within the /rest/** mapping.
In the other hand, everything else needs to have more common filters and is mapped with /**.
The problem is to find an easy way to define the filterChainProxy with different mapping-filters.
Right now this solution doesn't work:
<!-- Normal web app -->
<http auto-config="true" use-expressions="true" authentication-manager-ref="authenticationManager">
<form-login/>
<logout/>
<intercept-url pattern="/**" access="hasRole('ROLE_USER')" />
</http>
<!-- Configure RESTfull services -->
<http use-expressions="true" authentication-manager-ref="authenticationManager" entry-point-ref="restAuthenticationEntryPoint" >
<form-login authentication-success-handler-ref="restAuthenticationSuccessHandler" login-page="/rest/login" username-parameter="username" password-parameter="password" />
<logout logout-url="/rest/logout" />
<intercept-url pattern="/rest/**" method="GET" access="hasRole('ROLE_USER')" />
<intercept-url pattern="/rest/**" method="POST" access="hasRole('ROLE_ADMIN')" />
<intercept-url pattern="/rest/**" method="PUT" access="hasRole('ROLE_ADMIN')" />
<intercept-url pattern="/rest/**" method="DELETE" access="hasRole('ROLE_ADMIN')" />
</http>
It complains with: the univseral match being before other patterns.
Is there a way to define such a thing without resorting to define the filterChainProxy with the definition? The http version does help quite a lot to reduce the amount of configuration as I will have to manually set a UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter etc.
The next problem is more simple: I have to respond, after the form-login authentication with a JSON object.
So far, I have implemented a SuccessHandler (actually a version of the SimpleUrlAuthenticationSuccessHandler without the redirect part).
How do I write my JSON output?
I must have something like this:
HTTP 200 OK
with:
{"success":true,"customer {"email":"customer#email.com","session_id":"b83a41dfaca6785399f00837888886e646ff9088"}}
and a similar thing with the FailureHandler. It must be quite simple and it's surely is some very basic thing, but how do you do that? Redirecting to a custom controller is not a solution since I will have the 301 redirect status that a very simple REST client might not be able to understand.
At the very least, I wish to have only the http header and no body at all.
thanks!
If you can upgrade to Spring Security 3.1 it supports multiple chains using namespace configuration.
I am looking to get as close as I can to parsing out an AS3 file into objects or XML. For instance, imagine the following class:
package {
class SomeClass extends AnotherClass {
private var someVariable:Number
public function someMethod(someParameter:Number = 4):void {
var someLocalVariable:Number = someParameter * (2 + someVariable);
}
}
}
When parsed, it might be something like:
<package name="">
<class id="783" name="SomeClass" extendsId="782">
<variable id="784" visibility="private" type="Number"/>
<function id="785" name="someMethod" returnType="void">
<parameter id="786" name="someParameter" type="Number">
<expression>
<number value="4"/>
</expression>
</parameter>
<variable id="787" name="someLocalVariable" type="Number"/>
<code>
<assign toId="787">
<expression>
<variable id="786"/>
<operator type="*"/>
<expression>
<number value="2"/>
<operator type="+"/>
<variable id="786"/>
</expression>
</expression>
</assign>
</code>
</function>
</class>
</package>
.. even if I don't get a nice, neat xml structure like this, even if it could just parse AS3 to some kind of capacity, it would be way beyond where I am now.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Eric
I have actually ported the PMD parser to AS3.
You can check out http://github.com/teotigraphix/as3parser-framework
Mike
FlexPMD has an as3 parser. (FlexPMD is a Java project by Adobe that does reporting of best practices violations in as3 source code.)
FlexPMD is hosted at http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexpmd/FlexPMD
The code is on a subversion repo at http://opensource.adobe.com/svn/opensource/flexpmd/trunk
The down side is you would need to use Maven to build FlexPMD (me, I never managed to get it to work), but since you need just one or three projects, it might be possible to extract those by hand without too much cursing and shouting.
You may also want to wander further into the Flex SDK source code (also on opensource.adobe.com) to see if Adobe provides any other software for parsing as3,but I have not looked there.
There's a lexer, parser, and tokenizer in the AS3eval project:
AS3eval
Take a look at the flash.utils.describeType() documentation.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/gumbo/langref/flash/utils/package.html#describeType()
It's for describe actionscript items at runtime, but should have some use in this case.
I'm trying to create interceptors for specific methods but I'm having a hard time. I can't bind an aspect to a specific method. I create the faicilities most of examples show but it still doesn't work. Can anyone give me an example of how to do this? I prefer xml conifguration, if possible.
Another question, I have this code:
<component id="SampleAspect"
service="WindsorSample.Aspect.SampleAspect, WindsorSample"
type="WindsorSample.Aspect.SampleAspect, WindsorSample">
</component>
<component id="HtmlTitleRetriever"
type="WindsorSample.DummyObject, WindsorSample">
<parameters>
<interceptors>
<interceptor>${SampleAspect}</interceptor>
</interceptors>
</parameters>
</component>
Then...
IWindsorContainer container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter());
IDummyObject retriever = container.Resolve<DummyObject>();
retriever.SomeMethod();
This aspect is not executed. Am I missing something? Am I using the wrong approach for aop?
Thanks
You can only intercept virtual method, you know that, right?