incrementing data type in phpmyadmin - mysql

Is there a certain data type on phpmyadmin that works like in ms access that if you don't specify a primary key, ms access will prompt to create a primary key named 'ID' which will then be incrementing(1,2,3..) as you are adding more records to the database.

I'm assuming you're referring to MySQL, the database, and not phpmyadmin, the web-app used to interface with it. You can use AUTO_INCREMENT to do this very thing. See the CREATE query on the documentation page for a simple and succinct example how of to accomplish this.

Related

Access VBA Create Index on SQL Server View always creates Primary Key

I have a typical Access front-end with SQL Server back-end. I created some views in SQL Server and linked to them in Access. When I use "CREATE INDEX index_name ON view_name (field_name)" it creates a primary key even though I have not specified it to do so (and do not want it to do so). Why is that? and how can I create a non-primary key index?
How this works?
Any view, any linked table, in fact ANYTHING you hit, use, consume from SQLServer?
All indexing is setup 100% in SQLServer. The Access client side does not, cannot, and WILL not create any kind of index for you.
The create index command to specify and setup a primary key? It does not really create an index in Access but ONLY SETS and TELLS Access what PK to use.
In fact, when you link to a view, you are prompted to select the PK when linking to a view.
SQLServer views DO NOT have the concept or even a setting that tells you or EVEN LETS you specify the PK column. Part of the reason for this is in fact that a view can consist of more than one table - so which table now is to define the primary key. And in fact if your view has a join with say 5 tables? Then in fact that view has 5 different primary keys from 5 different tables).
So, when you link to a view in access, you will note this prompt:
If you don't select a column for the pk?
Then you have no PK set. However, you can use VBA to TELL ACCESS what row to be the PK setting.
So, say in above I did not select a PK when linking with the GUI. Or say I am using code to link to a view?
Then in code to set the PK value, I would and could and should execute the following command:
CurrentDb.Execute "CREATE UNIQUE INDEX IXPK ON dbo_ViewHotelsTest (ID) WITH PRIMARY"
AGAIN: Note above comments. The create unique index DOES NOT create an index in Access. Nor does it create an index on SQLServer. That command is how you can tell Access which column is to be seen and treated as the PK.
So, above command?
In plain English:
Please Mr. Access, will you set the PK column and we are using the above
command to do this.
In other words, there is no other command in code to "tell" Access what the PK is supposed to be, so the DDL sql create index command is used. But I STRESS AGAIN THIS does NOT really create an index, but ONLY tell Access what column to use as the PK.
This command results in the SAME and IDENTICAL results if you select a PK during a linking of a view.
If you want to create an index in SQLServer? Then go to SQLServer, and create your index(es) in SQLServer.
FYI:
As a further explanation, in 99% of cases you NEVER want, nor need, or even should even create an index on a view on the SQLServer side of things.
In EVERY case, if the base table used for the source of the view has an index that can be used, it WILL IN ALL cases be used if you build an on-the-fly query, build a SQLServer side view, or even create a sql stored procedure. IN ALL cases, a simple create of an index on the base source table (using SQLServer tools) will suffice, and in ALL cases, include views, and including linked view from Access will automatic use ANY and ALL existing indexes on the base table from SQLServer.
So, not only is there zero requirements to EVER try and create an index in Access on linked tables (or linked views), but in fact it not even possible. Of course the create index command DOES need to be used to set the PK column when linking to a view.
If you link to table, then Access can figure out which column is the PK, and will set this for you. But SQLServer does not have a setting, nor even the concept of a PK column for a view, and thus you have to select the PK during linking using the GUI, or as noted, you can in code execute the above command that tells access which column to use as the PK, and as noted, that command does not in fact even create an index, but that command is ONLY to tell Access client side which column to see/use as the PK.
You can for views that don't require you to "update" the data. So, a linked view without you selecting (or better said "setting") the PK column will be read only.
So, if you using the view for a combo box, or say just a report? Then you don't care, and don't need to set the PK for that view, and it will be "read only". So this means that you ONLY need to set the PK column for a view if you need to update that view (say in place of updating the base table that the view is based on).
So, in summary:
that create index command does not actually create an index.
That create index command is ONLY required if you need a linked view that allows Access client side to update such views. Without the setting, then the linked view will be read only. So the purpose, the act, the role, the "thing" that create index does on the linked view? It is ONLY to tell Access what column is to be used for the PK - it does not actually create an index anywhere - including NOT creating one in Access client side. (So, ONLY purpose is for TELLING access which column to use for the PK. Can't really say why they use that command that way but best guess was no other way existed to tell Access what column to use for the PK - so we use that command).
If you use the linked table manager, and re-fresh the table links? Access WILL remember the PK settings for a view. However, if during linking you change the database that the linked tables point to? Then the PK settings in views will be lost during that re-linking process. (and then you have to re-execute those commands to re-tell Access which column in the linked view is to be seen/used as PK column.
You don't need to ever create an index client side for Access in regards to linked tables, or views - all indexing is automatic, and if an index exists on the server table, it will and can be used.
So, create index command is HOW you setup a PK column for linked views. In all other cases (linked tables - but not a view), then that command is not required, and ANY and all existing indexes that exist and were created on the server side table will be used (and thus no need to try or create an index in Access, since all such indexes are handled by the server side - Access has no say, nor even control over how SQLServer uses indexes). But, a correct use of index on a SQLServer table will automatically be used by Access in the requests it makes to SQLServer. But that "job" of indexing is 100% managed by the server - not Access.

still error "multiple primary keys defined" when tables/databases are dropped

I want to put my live site (wordpress) on localhost, so I exported the database (turning on the options for dropping database and tables) with phpmyadmin. When importing on localhost with BigDump I get the error message that "Multiple primary keys are defined".
How can I solve this?
All the suggestions I have read so far say to drop the tables and/or database when exporting from live site. I did that but it makes no difference. What else can I do to succesfully import the DB on localhost?
Check your create table statements in exported file. May be somewhere in your create statemate two primary keys are defined.
A table can have only one primary key, which may consist of single or multiple fields. When multiple fields are used as a primary key, they are called a composite key.
If possible cereate database and tables manually and remove table creation statements from expoted file and you can source only data from the file.

Is there an alternative to SQL-Server's uniqueidentifer datatype in MySQL?

I'm migrating a login page from one server to another. The old server hosts an SQL-server database and the new one MySQL. The login page uses the guid from the user table to identify users with a session variable. Is there a similar alternative to use in MySQL?
You can generate a universally unique identifier using the UUID() function:
mysql> select uuid();
bb2647fb-bed7-11e2-a78a-001f166db385
To store one of those you can use CHAR(36).
The standard MySQL way to create an unique ID (in that table) is with a PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT column. See the documentation.

access 2010 with linked sql tables

I have a split form view with data coming from linked sql server (2008).
How do I go about updating the record?
Currently, it will not let me change anything in the text boxes i assume this is because the data is coming from linked tables?!
In order to update do i have to create command and coonn objects and program it in the usual vb manner?
And if so, what is the syntax for referencing the linked tables when creating the update query?
On my split form I dropped a button on there and I can see options to make it run macro, run code, etc etc, which one is suitable?
many thanks,
KS
First make sure the table was not linked read-only.
When you link to a remote table, Access will make it read-only if it is unable to identify a primary key or another combination of fields to uniquely identify each row. Sometimes, but not always, it may ask you to tell it which field(s) to use as the primary key if it is uncertain.
But this issue is simple to check. Open the linked table directly in Datasheet View and see whether you can edit any values. If not, re-link the table and look for an option to inform Access about the primary key.
If the link is not read-only, make sure your form's Allow Edits property is set as Yes.
Also you could try a simple form rather than a split form to determine whether something about the split form is causing the problem.
Solution:
MS Access barfs when trying to register tables with a primary key of type BigInt which is 8 bytes, Access can only handle Ints of 4 bytes. Workaround is below:
Drop the constraint (bigint PK) in SQL table
Create a new primary key (int) with identity seed
Link the table in MS Access
Drop new constraint (int PK) & Re-Add your previous constraint (bigint PK) in MS SQL
Voila!

Export table data without Primary Key

I want to export data from a sql table, but I dont want the primary key to be exported.
The reason is that I have data on my localhost that needs to be inserted in a remote database (remote and local db have the same structure). But on the remote db, the table already has data, and they will be primary key conflicts if I try to add the data from my localhost.
This question has somehow been treated here before: table-without-dumping-the-primary-key.
I used this method in the past, but it's annoying to have to create a new table to make the transfer...
It surprises me that I can't export data from a table while omitting a column, in this case, the primary key column.
Been looking the mysql documentation but it wasn't helpful...
Any idea?
Can you create a VIEW without the primary key, and then export VIEW DATA?