Has anyone ever tried to change swing's look and feel? This code, taken from an example, simply yields a null pointer exception, and I wonder what might be wrong:
(javax.swing.UIManager/setLookAndFeel
(javax.swing.UIManager/getSystemLookAndFeelClassName))
Thanks!
Try this:
(prn "LAFs:" (map #(.toString %)
(javax.swing.UIManager/getInstalledLookAndFeels)))
to get a list of installed L&Fs; then you can hand-pick one you like.
Not a complete solution (I agree with Brian that your code Should Simply Work™) but this should at least give you some options.
Related
I try to implement a nested tab module the following way.
By clicking on a .tabs__menu item I want to get the next .tabs__contents to display the correct entry.
I've prepared a codepen with markup and leave out all unimportant code so don't be irritated that it's not working. I don't understand why the variable debug2 is 0 and debug3 is 1. I expect debug2 to be 1 as well since I expect the following expression should find the element. Can anyone help me with this?:
.find(".tabs__contents").not(".tabs__contents .tabs__contents");
https://codepen.io/anon/pen/JNLWQp
Thanks in advance and best wishes,
duc
ok I have an assumption why it's not working. It seems that the .not method doesn't starts to search relatively from the given collection but globally. With this statement
.not(".tabs__contents .tabs__contents")
debug2 finds itself and exclude it from the collection thats why the length is 0.
Maxima input of
2*sqrt(2)
by default returns the output
2^(3/2)
How can I get Maxima to just return 2*sqrt(2) ?
(I use this in the tex() function.)
To the best of my knowledge, there is no way to prevent Maxima from simplifying 2*sqrt(2) to 2^(3/2), with two probably-hard-to-use exceptions:
(1) Turn off simplification entirely. But that disables all simplifications, e.g. 1 + 1 simplifying to 2. But if you want to try it: just enter simp : false;.
(2) Disable the simplification sqrt(2) to 2^(1/2) via :lisp (setf (get '%sqrt 'operators) nil) But then Maxima for the most part doesn't know what to do with sqrt.
I don't recommend either one of these.
You can try something like
simp: false;
tex(2*sqrt(2));
block code...;
simp: true;
That way you don't have to disable the simplification permanently.
You can do this:
(%i1) matchdeclare(n_, integerp,m_, integerp)$
tellsimp(n_*sqrt(m_), n_*sqrt(box(m_)))$
and afterwards:
(%i3) 2*sqrt(2);
(%o3) 2 √2
(%i4) sqrt(3)*9;
(%o4) 9 √3
You'll notice that the number under the square root sign in the output is colored red, because of box(). But if you select the expression in wxMaxima, and then popup "Copy LaTeX", you'll get exactly what you want, e. g.
\[2\,\sqrt{2}\]
Unfortunately if you try tex(2*sqrt(2)) to get the TeX code, you'll get $$2\,\sqrt{\boxed{2}}$$instead.
The children functions returns the set of the member.
But I need the children of several members.
The problem is, that I can't use Union to make it work like that:
Union([Geography].[Geography].[USA].children,[Geography].[Geography].[Canada].children)
I don't know how many member it will be... So I actually would need all children of a set of members.
like:
([Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada],[Geography].[Geography].[GB]).children
Is there a function like that?
I couldn't answer my question and so I just edit it. With the help of DHN's answer and some brain work I found a solution I could use:
Except(DRILLDOWNLEVEL( {[Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]},,0 ),
{[Geography].[Geography].[USA],[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]})
That does work for me.
Explanation: I drilldown the elements the tool provides me, which returns children plus parents and then I use DHN's idea and except the parents so clean the list up a bit.
Hopefully it is understandable.
You can use the Descendants method (the fourth form of the description linked uses a set as its first argument. Thus,
Descendants( {
[Geography].[Geography].[USA],
[Geography].[Geography].[Canada],
[Geography].[Geography].[GB]
},
1,
SELF
)
should deliver exactly what you want.
Well actually, you could use a Crossjoin to get the set you want.
Something like
[Geography].[Geography].[USA] * [Geography].[Geography].[Canada] * [Geography].[Geography].[GB]
But this is only a proper solution, if you have only a few different search criteria.
Alternatively, you could use Except to remove those criteria you're not interested in. E.g.
Except([Geography].[Geography].children, [Geography].[Geography].[Germany])
This would give you the whole content of the [Geography] dimension, except the one of [Germany].
Hope this helps a bit.
Edit after comment of TO
Ok, this wasn't part of your question, but I think what you need is the MemberToStr() function. Please find the doc here.
I think something like this should do the trick.
with member [Measures].[Cities]
as membertostr([Geography].[Geography].members.children)
select [Measures].[Cities] on 0
from [WhatEverYourCubeNameIs]
where (
[Geography].[Geography].[USA],
[Geography].[Geography].[Canada]
)
Please note that this query is totally untested. I also may have lost some of my skills, because it's been a while, since I used mdx. You will also have to create the query dynamically, since the selection seems to be user dependant. But I'm sure that you're aware of it. ;)
I'm writing some folding functions and I am at a point where I need to check if the current line is actually a fold.
The reason for this is because it is a custom fold method that depends on searching/matching certain lines.
For example, if the current line is folded and looks like:
-FOO------------------------
If you do something like:
getline('.')
You would basically get FOO so there is no way (that I know of) to know if I am at a fold or not.
Is there a helper function for this?
I would think it would have to be something like:
is_folded('.')
I could probably mess with the foldtext to assign a special title for the fold but I want to avoid this.
From :help eval.txt
foldclosed({lnum})
The result is a Number. If the line {lnum} is in a closed
fold, the result is the number of the first line in that fold.
If the line {lnum} is not in a closed fold, -1 is returned.
You can check for a given line if it returns -1 or a line number, you can probably implement your isfolded() function this way.
If you are looking for Vim script function or feature , it is a good idea to start by searching in eval.txt which contains lots of relevant information.
I'd be happy to have very soft character ">>" instead of white-space, like this:
Mono develop http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/pictures/Valabinding-classpad.png
How can I achieve that in Emacs?
EDIT: Just realized that blank-mode is superseded by whitespace. Load this and customize whitespace-style to at least contain tabs and tabs-mark. I currently have:
(setq whitespace-style '(trailing tabs newline tab-mark newline-mark))
There is also blank-mode which allows you to achive what you want and it gives you some nice functions to cleanup the whitespace to your likings:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BlankMode
On my Emacs version (24.3) no additional modules are needed. It's enough to launch
M-x whitespace-mode
To customize go to whitespace-style variable help,
C-h C-h v whitespace-style
This mode has many functionalities. To made it simpler one may choose not to use `Face visualization'.
Use "M-:" (M-x eval-expression) and enter the following expression:
(let ((d (make-display-table)))
(aset d 9 (vector ?> ?>))
(set-window-display-table nil d))
To get back to normal enter:
(set-window-display-table nil nil)
Google search brought up show whitespace-mode. Haven't tried it myself.