I have an existing mysql replication set up (Windows 2008 to Ubuntu 9.04) and created several new tables in the master database. These are not showing up in the slave database.
Do new tables automatically get copied to the slave DB, or do I need to set up replication again?
Thanks!
I'm going to assume that other data is successfully replicating.
Replication in mysql is per-server, so the most likely problems are that either you aren't binloging the events, or that the slave is ignoring them.
For binglogs, verify you aren't turning sql_log_bin off for the connection (which would require SUPER) and that the various options binary-log options are set correctly. You can verify this by running mysqlbinlog on the server's binlogs.
On the slave side, check the replication options.
Related
I am trying to configure MySQL databases using the Master-Slave replication. Before I realized that I had to set up my environment using this replication, I already have 2 separate servers running their own MySQL DB. Each of these servers are configured the exact same. The MySQL DB are configured with hundreds of tables.
Is there a way that i can set up (Master-Slave) Replication using the configured DB's? Or will i have to start from scratch and configure the replication first and then load in all the DB tables?
You can delete all data from one of the servers. Remaining one with the data will be your Master. Then use mysqldump to backup all the data and insert it to the slave.
Take a look for the detailed instructions on the page below:
https://livecaller.io/blog/how-to-set-up-mysql-master-slave-replication/
If the data is exactly same in both the MySQL database then you can start master slave replication, but you need to be sure that the data is same. MySQL will not check that, and if there is some discrepancy in the primary key then it will throw error immediately after next DML statement.
To be on a safer side, drop the database from one server, and restore it using the MySQL dump of another server. This will give the surety that database is same on both the server.
Take the reference from the below link to establish replication between two MySQL servers.
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-master-slave-replication-in-mysql
I am having a difficult time in setting Master-Slave configuration.
Master Database runs on Ubuntu( Amazon AWS instance) and successfully set-up master replication.
I have localhost as a Slave Server. (Windows Machine).
Snapshot of Master Database
Master database has record
Binar Log Information
Process List on Master Replication
Status of Master Replication
I debug master replication which works okay I guess.
On the Salve Side:
Status on Slave Side
Even though MASTER_LOG and MASTER_POS are synced but data doesn't.
Currently, I have 0 table on Slave side and 34 tables on Master side.
Tables on Slave side
I am open to any suggestion or any reference do you have.
I spend an entire day and trying to find what I did wrong.
I want to Sync my Local database with a database hosted on remote-server.
Update: Thigs I did to debug the Master-Slave Replication
Checked Master Database is up and running.
Master Status and Connected Slaves. [Which includes unique id for
each server.]
Slave database is up and running [Including Slave IO Thread and
SQL thread is running.]
These three steps ensure that Master-Slave replication is up and running without any problem.
Handling Data Sync Problem
Created/update/delete data in the master database to check
whether data is sync on a server or not.
Checked Binary Log [Specifically I checked the file size. If I
entered data file size will continuously increasing.]
Thanks in advance.
we had similar problem - read more about gotchas in "binlog-do-db" and "replication-do-db" and related parameters. Here is a big problem with crossdatabase references. At the and we had to remove these settings limiting replication.
Why MySQL’s binlog-do-db option is dangerous
Gotchas in MySQL replication
As your show slave status output says you enabled Replicate_DO_DB for the DB "Arihantpos" at the same time you did Binglog_Do_Db for the same db
try to remove Binglog_Do_Db from config file and restart mysql and start replication again
I have a MySQL Replication setup up and running:
Database A (Server 1 as master) --> Database A (Server Z, acting as the slave)
I now want to use the same Slave Server (Z) to be a slave of two other databases; totally different databases (e.g. B and C), not other copies if Database A.
I've followed this simple guide:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-master-slave-replication-in-mysql
But when it comes to adding the second database to the slave server in /etc/my.cnf, I don't see how it's possible to have more than one profile.
Basically I am thinking I need both of these blocks in my.cnf on the slave server but it won't be that simple, right?
log_error="/var/log/mysql/error.log"
server-id=2
log_bin="/var/log/mysql/mysql-bin.log"
binlog_do_db=database_a
log_error="/var/log/mysql/error.log"
server-id=3
log_bin="/var/log/mysql/mysql-bin.log"
binlog_do_db=database_b
Is it possible, or do I literally need a new slave server for each unique database I want to replicate?
Is it possible to, on the slave server, have specific conf files for each database, e.g. /etc/databasea.cnf and /etc/databaseb.cnf so I can specify different settings for each database?
Thanks in advance
Multi-source replication is only available in MySQL starting with 5.7.6 or MariaDB starting with 10.0.1.
Multi-Source Replication enables a replication slave to receive transactions from multiple sources simultaneously. Multi-source replication can be used to back up multiple servers to a single server, to merge table shards, and consolidate data from multiple servers to a single server. Multi-source replication does not implement any conflict detection or resolution when applying the transactions, and those tasks are left to the application if required. In a multi-source replication topology, a slave creates a replication channel for each master that it should receive transactions from.
Source:
MySQL : http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/replication-multi-source.html
MariaDB: https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/multi-source-replication/
I have 2 MYSQL server.
MySQL#1
and
MySQL#2
MySQL#1 hosts a database which has been replicated thanks to this tutorial https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-set-up-master-slave-replication-in-mysql to MySQL#2. Let's name this first database DATABASE1
MySQL#2 hosts another database DATABASE2 which has nothing to do with DATABASE1.
Is it possible to replicate as master-slave without creating conflict with the first replication, to let MySQL#1 becoming the slave for MySQL#2 ?
Thanks for any tips.
It is possible. I used to do that myself. There are several ways to do so.
At slave server configuration file, add replicate-ignore-db = DATABASE_YOU_WANT_TO_IGNORE
At master server configuration file, only log the database you want replicate to slave. binlog_do_db = DATABASE_YOU_WANT_TO_REPLICATE
Not only you can specified what database to repliace, you can even specified only what table in particular database that you want to replicate. See also replicate_wild_do_table
Further Reading
Replication Slave Options and Variables
How To Set Up Selective Master Slave Replication in MySQL
Why MySQL’s binlog-do-db option is dangerous
I have been trying to start replication in a mysql database. I followed all the steps from the mysql manual to setup and configure the replication.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-howto.html
I could start the replication without any trouble. Newly inserted data was replicated properly.
But after a while I observed that though INSERT are working, the UPDATEs are not replicating. So, my replicated database contains data just as it was inserted first time.
My master database is on an UNIX server with MYSQL-5.1.56. The slave is used in Windows using WAMP package with MYSQL 5.5.8. I have also tried a slave with lower version mysql with WAMP5, with same effect.
Please share your ideas and experience on this. Thanks.
I have similar problem. I know it's old thread but it can help others:
link: mysql replication works only if I choose database by USE database
I sorted it out a few months ago. The problem was, I tried to replicate only one single database, and set binlog_do_db and binlog-ignore-db options in master to select only that database. But that left out any statement which was executed without selecting database by USE database, as kayn said. Using replicate-ignore-db and replicate-do-db options in slave would do the same. So I finally fixed it by using the replicate-wild-do-table option in the slave, referenced here. Added the following line in the configuration of the slave server.
replicate-wild-do-table=mydb.%