I wanted to put a bar over my variable such as not(x) and also some set symbols in my web page? How do I incorporate that in my html page.
For the set symbols, you ought to use unicode HTML entities.
For the line over a variable (p), I'd rather use an alternate symbol for not, such as:
¬p (¬p)
You may also, as a commenter pointed out, use the combining diacritical unicode HTML entity like so:
p̅ (p̅)
Lastly, you may use one of the CSS methods provided.
<div style="text-decoration: overline">X</div>
Related
On a webpage I found a tag that begins with a Unicode letter 休
Is there a list somewhere of the letters and symbols may validly follow right after the less than sign?
They're not using a mark-up less than sign "<" on their site but rather they are using the HTML entity less than < to display the reserved character as text rather than HTML.
This can be treated just like ordinary text. So in essence, it's not a tag, its just ordinary text.
For instance the line:
<font style="color:#F00;"><休闲文化></font>
Actually is:
<font style="color:#F00;"><休闲文化></font>
Thus, <休闲文化> isn't a tag itself, but rather just text (which uses HTML reserved characters within it - perhaps marking you confuse it for a tag)
In which context is it used? XML, HTML,...?
In case of HTML there are tags already defined, you can't use a random one. In XML you can define you're own tags. In both cases you might use random tags, while not ending up with error you would notice, the tag might just get skipped.
I believe this Wiki page might help you:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_XML_and_HTML_character_entity_references
All characters you want (but you should quote few).
As you notice, the character <休 come in <a href="http:(...)" target="_blank" title="<休闲文化>【成都大熊猫基. So this is inside a string (an attribute value). The < in this case will not indicate a start of a tag.
.icon-a:before { content: '\e803'; }
.icon-b:before { content: '\e96f'; }
Okay I know content can be used to render URL or quotes but what is happening in the above code?
I came across this code and it is confusing, I tried googling I can't find any.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Quoting papiro as suggested here
Put simply, they're Unicode references. The "\e601", for example, is the hex code 0xe601. If you go here: http://unicodelookup.com/#0xe601/1 you'll see that the entry for that character is totally blank. It's in a part of the Unicode character set reserved for "private" use. Meaning icon libraries and the like can place whatever they want in those spots and not have to worry about overriding common characters like those of any of the alphabets of the world or a Chinese character, for instance.
In your case \e803 reffers to unicode character this
Hope this helps
It depends on font you are corrently using in parent element. This code is Unicode character code, which can display �. After \ code of character is entered.
I'm loading data with an RSS feed into a Flex application.
Some of the data has html special characters. It can't read é,è,à,ç and other similar letters that are used in French for example. It gives a strange code instead of the letters with accents.
Now I use for reading HTML texts in Flex, but how can I remove these special characters?
Thanks!
Guillaume
use "restrict" property of the component so that it takes some specific type of string. Something like mentioned below
myTextBox.restrict = "A-Z a-z 0-9",
You can use RegExp for removing those French letters.
escaping html is fine - it will remove <'s and >'s etc.
ive run into a problem where i am outputting a filename inside a comment tag eg. <!-- ${filename} -->
of course things can be bad if you dont escape, so it becomes:
<!-- <c:out value="${filename}"/> -->
the problem is that if the file has "--" in the name, all the html gets screwed, since youre not allowed to have <!-- -- -->.
the standard html escape doesnt escape these dashes, and i was wondering if anyone is familiar with a simple / standard way to escape them.
Definition of a HTML comment:
A comment declaration starts with <!, followed by zero or more comments, followed by >. A comment starts and ends with "--", and does not contain any occurrence of "--".
Of course the parsing of a comment is up to the browser.
Nothing strikes me as an obvious solution here, so I'd suggest you str_replace those double dashes out.
There is no good way to solve this. You can't just escape them because comments are read in plaintext. You will have to do something like put a space between the hyphens, or use some sort of code for hyphens (like [HYPHEN]).
Since it is obvoius that you cannnot directly display the '--'s you can either encode them or use the fn:escapeXml or fn:replace tags for appropriate replacements.
JSTL documentation
There's no universal working way to escape those characters in html unless the - characters are in multiples of four so if you do -- it wont work in firefox but ---- will work. So it all depends on the browser. For Example, looking at Internet Explorer 8, it is not a problem, those characters are escaped properly. The same goes for Googles Chrome... However Firefox even the latest browser (3.0.4), it doesn't handle escaping of these characters well.
You shouldn't be trying to HTML-escape, the contents of comments are not escapable and it's fine to have a bare ‘>’ or ‘&’ inside.
‘--’ is its own, unrelated problem and is not really fixable. If you don't need to recover the exact string, just do a replacement to get rid of them (eg. replace with ‘__’).
If you do need to get a string through completely unmolested to a JavaScript that will be reading the contents of the comment, use a string literal:
<!-- 'my-string' -->
which the script can then read using eval(commentnode.data). (Yes, a valid use for eval() at last!)
Then your escaping problem becomes how to put things in JS string literals, which is fairly easily solvable by escaping the ‘'’ and ‘-’ characters:
<!-- 'Bob\x27s\x2D\x2Dstring' -->
(You should probably also escape ‘<’, ‘&’ and ‘"’, in case you ever want to use the same escaping scheme to put a JS string literal inside a <script> block or inline handler.)
I am not very good with Regex but I am learning.
I would like to remove some html tag by the class name. This is what I have so far :
<div class="footer".*?>(.*?)</div>
The first .*? is because it might contain other attribute and the second is it might contain other html stuff.
What am I doing wrong? I have try a lot of set without success.
Update
Inside the DIV it can contain multiple line and I am playing with Perl regex.
As other people said, HTML is notoriously tricky to deal with using regexes, and a DOM approach might be better. E.g.:
use HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath;
my $tree = HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath->new;
$tree->parse_file( 'yourdocument.html' );
for my $node ( $tree->findnodes( '//*[#class="footer"]' ) ) {
$node->replace_with_content; # delete element, but not the children
}
print $tree->as_HTML;
You will also want to allow for other things before class in the div tag
<div[^>]*class="footer"[^>]*>(.*?)</div>
Also, go case-insensitive. You may need to escape things like the quotes, or the slash in the closing tag. What context are you doing this in?
Also note that HTML parsing with regular expressions can be very nasty, depending on the input. A good point is brought up in an answer below - suppose you have a structure like:
<div>
<div class="footer">
<div>Hi!</div>
</div>
</div>
Trying to build a regex for that is a recipe for disaster. Your best bet is to load the document into a DOM, and perform manipulations on that.
Pseudocode that should map closely to XML::DOM:
document = //load document
divs = document.getElementsByTagName("div");
for(div in divs) {
if(div.getAttributes["class"] == "footer") {
parent = div.getParent();
for(child in div.getChildren()) {
// filter attribute types?
parent.insertBefore(div, child);
}
parent.removeChild(div);
}
}
Here is a perl library, HTML::DOM, and another, XML::DOM
.NET has built-in libraries to handle dom parsing.
In Perl you need the /s modifier, otherwise the dot won't match a newline.
That said, using a proper HTML or XML parser to remove unwanted parts of a HTML file is much more appropriate.
<div[^>]*class="footer"[^>]*>(.*?)</div>
Worked for me, but needed to use backslashes before special characters
<div[^>]*class=\"footer\"[^>]*>(.*?)<\/div>
Partly depends on the exact regex engine you are using - which language etc. But one possibility is that you need to escape the quotes and/or the forward slash. You might also want to make it case insensitive.
<div class=\"footer\".*?>(.*?)<\/div>
Otherwise please say what language/platform you are using - .NET, java, perl ...
Try this:
<([^\s]+).*?class="footer".*?>([.\n]*?)</([^\s]+)>
Your biggest problem is going to be nested tags. For example:
<div class="footer"><b></b></div>
The regexp given would match everything through the </b>, leaving the </div> dangling on the end. You will have to either assume that the tag you're looking for has no nested elements, or you will need to use some sort of parser from HTML to DOM and an XPath query to remove an entire sub-tree.
This will be tricky because of the greediness of regular expressions, (Note that my examples may be specific to perl, but I know that greediness is a general issue with REs.) The second .*? will match as much as possible before the </div>, so if you have the following:
<div class="SomethingElse"><div class="footer"> stuff </div></div>
The expression will match:
<div class="footer"> stuff </div></div>
which is not likely what you want.
why not <div class="footer".*?</div> I'm not a regex guru either, but I don't think you need to specify that last bracket for your open div tag