Can MySQL 5.4 beta be compiled for 32-bit processors under Linux?
The current beta only has binaries for some 64-bit versions, but if you're keen on starting to beta test right now you should be able to compile from the sources on a 32-bit systems. (It IS a beta, of course, so unreliability IS to be expected -- don't run it in production, whether on 32-bit or 64-bit systems!)
According to this blog it's only available for 64-bit machines.
http://willysr.blogspot.com/2009/04/mysql-54-preview.html
or here
First, the preview release of MySQL
5.4 only includes the InnoDB scalability fixes (addressing more
CPU's/cores). Second, it is limited to
the Solaris and Linux 64-bit platforms
at this time. The other features
mentioned in this article and
additional platform support will be
appearing very shortly, so be looking
for upcoming announcements soon.
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:iLgUTcXAmGUJ:mirror.facebook.com/mysql/tech-resources/articles/mysql-54.html+mysql+5.4+64bit+only&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
google cache because that website is down
if you can run ./configure and make without any errors, it should work properly.
Related
I tried the latest version of IDA (the free version), and it didn't work.
It seems that only a 64-bit version had been installed.
My computer is 32-bit.
Can IDA only run on 64-bit environment now?
I've seen no announcement regarding such change.
Can IDA only run on 64-bit environment now?
Actually even paid license version of IDA runs on x64 only. The HexRays company provides limited support for 32 bit with a single goal - support for old 32bit plug-ins for old versions of the IDA.
In this case you have to use IDA Freeware 5.0 or something else, depending on your OS. For macOS and Linux good disassembler is Hopper Disassembler.
For downloading IDA Free 5.0 check this answer (same question with a problem of running on 32 bit OS): https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/19179/older-versions-of-ida-free
IDA free version support only x64 binary files.
If you want to disassemble x86 binary files you should use non-free versions.
The wxPython package must run in 32 bit mode, but the official MySql download page does not have any link to download the 32bit installer. Do you know where to download the 32bit installer of MySql?
Thanks
UPDATE: I am trying to download MySql 32 bit for Mac.
You are incorrect. The Cocoa build of wxPython supports both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. From the wxPython downloads page:
The file with "cocoa" in the name use the Cocoa API for implementing the GUI, requires at least OSX 10.5, and supports either 32-bit or 64-bit architectures.
The Carbon builds are built for i386 and PPC.
Also note that if you go into the Development Releases tab on the MySQL downloads page, it has 32-bit tars and dmgs
I was planning on starting to use CUDA on a machine with Kubuntu 12.04 LTS and a Quadro card. I installed CUDA 5.5 using the .deb from here, and the installation seems to have gone fine. Then I built the CUDA samples, again everything went fine.
When I run the samples in sequence, however, some of them botch my display, and others simply crash my computer.
What causes the crash? How can I fix it?
I'll mention that my NVidia card is the only display adapter the machine has, but that shouldn't make CUDA crash and burn.
The problem was due to the X server using the FOSS nouveau drivers. These are known to conflict with NVidia's way of accessing the card. When I restarted X (actually, I restarted the machine), the samples did run and work properly.
Not all the samples are runnable if you just installed CUDA on a clean ubuntu system. Some of them require additional libraries, and some of them require particular CC versions.
You could read the CUDA sample document of those crashed samples for more information.
http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-samples/index.html
The download page does not have a Windows build for the most recent version - 2.0.1. There is a windows 64 bits installation for the version 2.0.0.
I was wondering about the reasons of not supporting Windows 32 bits since 2.0.0 and Windows at all since 2.0.1.
Is it that they do not provide the binaries, but one could still build it for Windows 32 bits using the build instructions ?
Or there is a deeper reason, like using an API unavailable for Windows 32 bits (2.0.0) or unavailable for Windows at all (2.0.1) ?
I am asking because I am considering building it on Windows, both 32 and 64 bits, but would like to be sure the effort is not doomed to failure from the start.
we are well aware of the situation. The plan is to release 2.0.1 for 64 bits as soon as possible. We're having some delays for our Windows builds and want to make sure the quality is as high as possible. So expect a 2.0.1 64bit soon.
That said, I don't think that we'll have production ready versions of 2.0.x 32bit. What we are currently working on is a 32bit build that people can use to develop against, but is not recommended to use in production (similar to our Mac OS X builds).
I can't give you a specific timeline, but I think we're talking about "weeks". If you want to get direct feedback from one of the developers, please get in touch with Trond Norbye over twitter (#trondn).
Does this answer your question?
MySQL 6.0 is for production. Can I use it for database storage of a large project?
MySQL 5.1 is the latest stable version, I'd recommend sticking with that. 6.0 will be quite unstable at this point.
EDIT as of 2011-05-26 MySQL 5.5.12 is the latest stable version. See this link for the lastest stable version: http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/
MySQL 6.0 in this moment is a alpha version, so I suggest you to use the current stable release -> MySQL 5.1
Here you can find some info about the table size limit depending on operating System. MySQL has not internal limit.
Only if there are critical enhancements that your site requires. And even then I'd hold back and use workarounds until it at least gets to beta.
We tried to use the latest PHP and MySQL 5.1 with failure on an IIS7 machine. I am sure if you download the source of PHP and compile it, it would have support for 5.1, but out of the box it seems to support 5.0. So, we replaced 5.1 with 5.0 and everything worked flawlessly.
Short story is use what works well. I would try it in development and avoid it in production until everything works well.