I'm using the IE 11 (version 11.0.9431.0), to test our current website and see how it would work when IE 11 will be released with Windows 8.1 mid-October.
What I see on almost all pages is the following message:
HTML1514: Extra "<body>" tag found. Only one "<body>" tag should exist per document.
When I look through the source code, there is no second <body> anywhere. Is this a IE 11 bug? Is this something I should take seriously? The pages work fine btw...
Thanks.
EDIT:
I don't have access to that website anymore, therefore I can't try any new solutions you guys are posting.
If you placed some element (that should appear only inside body) before the <body> tag, the <body> is inserted automatically by the parser (the "Anything else" paragraph) - and this is still valid HTML because body has optional both opening and closing tags. That would mean that the actual <body> is the second one the parser sees. Couldn't this be your case?
My guess is you probably have if IE statements, something like:
<!--[if IE 9]> <body class="ie ie9 lte9"> <![endif]-->
They don't actually work in IE10, let alone IE11 so that's why you'd be getting the extra tag found.
The problem (which is present in IE 10, too) is caused by the element
<script type="text/javascript" src="/_clients/binck_nl/data/js/analytics.js?nl_1377516473" ></script>
It probably modifies the DOM so that IE gets confused.
it's probably your body tag in the css. Replace the body-tag in the css with a class for example .bodystyle {} and refere in your html to it with the tag. That should do the trick.
Hi this may be a very late for suggesting. But, just to help others the probable cause may be any iframe coming in the page which has body tag
I had this same effect showing up in IE10 and IE11 saying there was an extra body tag in the console. What fixed it for me was that I found an element outside of the body that was a div for a spinner while the page loads that should have been within the body.
My guess is that it may be content in the header part which Edge wants in the body part. (If you have a header part).
This works in any other browser but Edge.
I solved this by removing: <header><title>something</title></header> from the tag body. Now edge no longer complains.
This question already has answers here:
How to display raw HTML code on an HTML page
(30 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'd like to add an area to a page where all of the dynamic content is rendered as plain text instead of markup. For example:
<myMagicTag>
<b>Hello</b> World
</myMagicTag>
I want the <b> tag to show up as just text and not as a bold directive. I'd rather not have to write the code to convert every "<" to an "<".
I know that <textarea> will do it, but it has other undesirable side effects like adding scroll bars.
Does myMagicTag exist?
Edit: A jQuery or javascript function that does this would also be ok. Can't do it server-side, unfortunately.
You can do this with the script element (bolded by me):
The script element allows authors to include dynamic script and data blocks in their documents.
Example:
<script type="text/plain">
This content has the media type plain/text, so characters reserved in HTML have no special meaning here: <div> ← this will be displayed.
</script>
(Note that the allowed content of the script element is restricted, e.g. you can’t have </script> as text content (it would close the script element).)
Typically, script elements have display:none by default in browser’s CSS, so you’d need to overwrite that in your CSS, e.g.:
script[type="text/plain"] {display:block;}
You can use a function to escape the < >, eg:
'span.name': function(){
return this.name.replace(/</g, '<').replace(/>/g, '>');
}
Also take a look at <plaintext></plaintext>. I haven't used it myself but it is known to render everything that follows as plain text(by everything i mean to say it ignores the closing tag, so all the following code is rendered as text)
The tag used to be <XMP> but in HTML 4 it was already deprecated. Browser's don't seem to have dropped its support but I would not recommend it for anything beyond quick debugging. The MDN article about <XMP> lists two other tags, <plaintext> and <listing>, that were deprecated even earlier. I'm not aware of any current alternative.
Whatever, the code to encode plain text into HTML is pretty straightforward in most programming languages.
Note: the term similar means exactly that—all three are designed to inject plain text into HTML. I'm not implying that they are synonyms or that they behave identically—they don't.
There is no specific tag except the deprecated <xmp>.
But a script tag is allowed to store unformatted data.
Here is the only solution so far showing dynamic content, as you wanted.
Run code snippet for more info.
<script id="myMagicTag" type="text/plain" style="display:block;">
<b>Hello</b> World
</script>
Use Visible Data-blocks
<script>
document.querySelector("#myMagicTag").innerHTML = "<b>Unformatted</b> dynamic content"
</script>
No, that's not possible, you need to HtmlEncode it.
If your using a server-side language, that's not really difficult though.
In .NET you would do something like this:
string encodedtext = HttpContext.Current.Server.HtmlEncode(plaintext);
In my application, I need to prevent HTML from rendering
"if (a<b || c>100) ..."
and
"cout << ...".
Also the entire C++ code region HTML must pass through the GCC compiler with the desired effect. I've hit on two schemes:
First:
//<xmp>
#include <string>
//</xmp>}
For reasons that escape me, the <xmp> tag is deprecated. I find (2016-01-09) that Chrome and FF, at least, render the tag the way I want. While researching my problem, I saw a remark that <xmp> is required in HTML 5.
Second, in <head> ... </head>, insert:
<style type="text/css">
textarea { border: none; }
</style>
Then in <body> ... </body>, write:
//<br /> <textarea rows="4" disabled cols="80">
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
//</textarea> <br />
Note: Set "cols="80" to prevent following text from appearing on the right. Set "rows=..." to one more line than you enclose in the tag. This prevents scroll bars. This second technique has several disadvantages:
The "disabled" attribute shades the region
Incomprehensible, complex comments in the code sent to the compiler
Harder to understand
More typing
However, this methhod is neither obsolete nor deprecated. The gods of HTML will make their faces to shine unto you.
Can I use /* */ comment tags in html .
If not why because they are common for comments ?
No you cannot. You can use <!-- -->
As to the second part of the question, I can't really help you there :)
EDIT - Just realized that /* */ wouldn't be tags at all, which would make sense as to why you can't use them,
No, you can't, because the specification says so:
HTML comments have the following syntax:
<!-- this is a comment --> <!-- and so is this one,
which occupies more than one line -->
White space is not permitted between the markup declaration open
delimiter(""). A common error is to include a
string of hyphens ("---") within a comment. Authors should avoid
putting two or more adjacent hyphens inside comments.
Information that appears between comments has no special meaning
(e.g., character references are not interpreted as such).
Note that comments are markup.
That last line tells you why you can't use /* */ - because HTML comments are markup too, just like any other tag, and those "universal comments" would not be tags.
You need to use:
<!-- A Comment -->
in HTMl as far as I'm aware.
/*
*/
is not universal, although it is common for block comments
I want to create something like
<menu>
<lunch>
<dish>aaa</dish>
<dish>bbb</dish>
</lunch>
<dinner>
<dish>ccc</dish>
</dinner>
</menu>
Can it be done in HTML5?
I know I can do it with
<ul id="menu">
<li>
<ul id="lunch">
<li class="dish">aaa</li>
<li class="dish">bbb</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<ul id="dinner">
<li class="dish">ccc</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
but it is so much less readable :(
You can use custom tags in browsers, although they won’t be HTML5 (see Are custom elements valid HTML5? and the HTML5 spec).
Let's assume you want to use a custom tag element called <stack>. Here's what you should do...
STEP 1
Normalize its attributes in your CSS Stylesheet (think css reset) -
Example:
stack{display:block;margin:0;padding:0;border:0; ... }
STEP 2
To get it to work in old versions of Internet Explorer, you need to append this script to the head (Important if you need it to work in older versions of IE!):
<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script> document.createElement("stack"); </script>
<![endif]-->
Then you can use your custom tag freely.
<stack>Overflow</stack>
Feel free to set attributes as well...
<stack id="st2" class="nice"> hello </stack>
I'm not so sure about these answers. As I've just read:
"CUSTOM TAGS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ALLOWED IN HTML."
http://www.crockford.com/html/
The point here being, that HTML was based on SGML. Unlike XML with its doctypes and schemas, HTML does not become invalid if a browser doesn't know a tag or two. Think of <marquee>. This has not been in the official standard. So while using it made your HTML page "officially unapproved", it didn't break the page either.
Then there is <keygen>, which was Netscape-specific, forgotten in HTML4 and rediscovered and now specified in HTML5.
And also we have custom tag attributes now, like data-XyZzz="..." allowed on all HTML5 tags.
So, while you shouldn't invent a whole custom unspecified markup salad of your own, it's not exactly forbidden to have custom tags in HTML. That is however, unless you want to send it with an +xml Content-Type or embed other XML namespaces, like SVG or MathML. This applies only to SGML-confined HTML.
I just want to add to the previous answers that there is a meaning to use only two-words tags for custom elements.
They should never be standardised.
For example, you want to use the tag <icon>, because you don't like <img>, and you don't like <i> neither...
Well, keep in mind that you're not the only one. Maybe in the future, w3c and/or browsers will specify/implement this tag.
At this time, browsers will probably implements native style for this tag and your website's design may break.
So I'm suggesting to use (according to this example) <img-icon>.
As a matter of fact, the tag <menu> is well defined ie not so used, but defined. It should contain <menuitem> which behave like <li>.
As Michael suggested in the comments, what you want to do is quite possible, but your nomenclature is wrong. You aren't "adding tags to HTML 5," you are creating a new XML document type with your own tags.
I did this for some projects at my last job. Some practical advice:
When you say you want to "add these to HTML 5," I assume what you really mean is that you want the pages to display correctly in a modern browser, without having to do a lot of work on the server side. This can be accomplished by inserting a "stylesheet processing instruction" at the top of the xml file, like <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="menu.xsl"?>. Replace "menu.xsl" with the path to the XSL stylesheet that you create to convert your custom tags into HTML.
Caveats: Your file must be a well-formed XML document, complete with XML header <xml version="1.0">. XML is pickier than HTML about things like mismatched tags. Also, unlike HTML, tags are case-sensitive. You must also make sure that the web server is sending the files with the appropriate mime type "application/xml". Often the web server will be configured to do this automatically if the file extension is ".xml", but check.
Big Caveat: Finally, using the browsers' automatic XSL transformation, as I've described, is really best only for debugging and for limited applications where you have a lot of control. I used it successfully in setting up a simple intranet at my last employer, that was accessed only by a few dozen people at most. Not all browsers support XSL, and those that do don't have completely compatible implementations. So if your pages are to be released into the "wild," it's best to transform them all into HTML on the server side, which can be done with a command line tool, or with a button in many XML editors.
Creating your own tag names in HTML is not possible / not valid. That's what XML, SGML and other general markup languages are for.
What you probably want is
<div id="menu">
<div id="lunch">
<span class="dish">aaa</span>
<span class="dish">bbb</span>
</div>
<div id="dinner">
<span class="dish">ccc</span>
</div>
</div>
Or instead of <div/> and <span/> something like <ul/> and <li/>.
In order to make it look and function right, just hook up some CSS and Javascript.
Custom tags can be used in Safari, Chrome, Opera, and Firefox, at least as far as using them in place of "class=..." goes.
green {color: green} in css works for
<green>This is some text.</green>
<head>
<lunch>
<style type="text/css">
lunch{
color:blue;
font-size:32px;
}
</style>
</lunch>
</head>
<body>
<lunch>
This is how you create custom tags like what he is asking for its very simple just do what i wrote it works yeah no js or convoluted work arounds needed this lets you do exactly what he wrote.
</lunch>
</body>
For embedding metadata, you could try using HTML microdata, but it's even more verbose than using class names.
<div itemscope>
<p>My name is <span itemprop="name">Elizabeth</span>.</p>
</div>
<div itemscope>
<p>My name is <span itemprop="name">Daniel</span>.</p>
</div>
Besides writing an XSL stylesheet, as I described earlier, there is another approach, at least if you are certain that Firefox or another full-fledged XML browser will be used (i.e., NOT Internet Explorer). Skip the XSL transform, and write a complete CSS stylesheet that tells the browser how to format the XML directly. The upside here is that you wouldn't have to learn XSL, which many people find to be a difficult and counterintuitive language. The downside is that your CSS will have to specify the styling very completely, including what are block nodes, what are inlines, etc. Usually, when writing CSS, you can assume that the browser "knows" that <em>, for instance, is an inline node, but it won't have any idea what to do with <dish>.
Finally, its been a few years since I tried this, but my recollection is that IE (at least a few versions back) refused to apply CSS stylesheets directly to XML documents.
The point of HTML is that the tags included in the language have an agreed meaning, that everyone in the world can use and base decisions on - like default styling, or making links clickable, or submitting a form when you click on an <input type="submit">.
Made-up tags like yours are great for humans (because we can learn English and thus know, or at least guess, what your tags mean), but not so good for machines.
Polymer or X-tags allow you to build your own html tags. It is based on native browser's "shadow DOM".
In some circumstances, it may look like creating your own tag names just works fine.
However, this is just your browser's error handling routines at work. And the problem is, different browsers have different error handling routines!
See this example.
The first line contains two made-up elements, what and ever, and they get treated differently by different browsers. The text comes out red in IE11 and Edge, but black in other browsers.
For comparison, the second line is similar, except it contains only valid HTML elements, and it will therefore look the same in all browsers.
body {color:black; background:white;} /* reset */
what, ever:nth-of-type(2) {color:red}
code, span:nth-of-type(2) {color:red}
<p><what></what> <ever>test</ever></p>
<p><code></code> <span>test</span></p>
Another problem with made-up elements is that you won't know what the future holds. If you created a website a couple of years ago with tag names like picture, dialog, details, slot, template etc, expecting them to behave like spans, are you in trouble now!
This is not an option in any HTML specification :)
You can probably do what you want with <div> elements and classes, from the question I'm not sure exactly what you're after, but no, creating your own tags is not an option.
As Nick said, custom tags are not supported by any version of HTML.
But, it won't give any error if you use such markup in your HTML.
It seems like you want to create a list. You can use unordered list <ul> to create the rool elements, and use the <li> tag for the items underneath.
If that's not what you want to achieve, please specify exactly what you want. We can come up with an answer then.
You can add custom attribute through HTML 5 data- Attributes.
For example: Message
That is valid for HTML 5. See http://ejohn.org/blog/html-5-data-attributes/ to get details.
You can just do some custom css styling, this will create a tag that will make the background color red:
redback {background-color:red;}
<redback>This is red</redback>
you can use this:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>MyExample</title>
<style>
bloodred {color: red;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<bloodred>
this is BLOODRED (not to scare you)
</bloodred>
</body>
<script>
var btn = document.createElement("BLOODRED")
</script>
</html>
I found this article on creating custom HTML tags and instantiating them. It simplifies the process and breaks it down into terms anyone can understand and utilize immediately -- but I'm not entirely sure the code samples it contains are valid in all browsers, so caveat emptor and test thoroughly. Nevertheless, it's a great introduction to the subject to get started.
Custom Elements : Defining new elements in HTML
Can I use specific html if the browser is IE? (Assuming FF is the default browser)
Foe example:
html line 1
if IE
html line 2
else
html line 2
html line 3
html lin3 4
I am aware of using different CSS, but that won't work for this.
Thanks.
Sure - conditional comments
IE understands "conditional comments," which you can use to selectively show markup even to specific versions. Here's an introduction:
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/condcom.html
I'd like to offer a bit more explanation, since a solution to your question necessarily involves both "downlevel-revealed" and "downlevel-hidden" conditional comments. Both work very well in Internet Explorer, but it's in non-Microsoft browsers that the distinction becomes important:
Content inside "Downlevel-revealed" conditional comments will always display in non-Microsoft browsers (since they do not follow the standard <!-- --> syntax of HTML comments).
Content inside "Downlevel-hidden" conditional comments (which seem to be discussed more often) will never show up in other browsers (since they do follow the standard <!-- --> syntax of HTML comments).
So, marking up your example code:
html line 1
<!--[if IE]>
html line 2
<![endif]-->
<![if !IE]>
html line 2
<![endif]>
html line 3
html lin3 4
You could use conditional comments for code only IE reads:
<!--[if IE]>
IE only code here.
<![endif]-->
Or PHP:
<?php
function ae_detect_ie()
{
if (isset($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT']) &&
(strpos($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'], 'MSIE') !== false))
return true;
else
return false;
}
?>
<?php if (ae_detect_ie()) { code here } else { code here } ?>
Ryan
One way you can do this is using Javascript to check which browser is being used. You could have default HTML in your file and then hava Javascript change it out, or add to it, if the user is using IE.