I have a box that contains 2 absolutely positioned header and paragraph elements, I am experimenting on ways on how to center text and I tried tinkering using the method from this site.
Now the issue here isn't about ways on how to position text, because that's not my problem so you should not address that.
My problem is this.
How to make the parent element contain it's children?
Since the parent element contains elements that are absolutely positioned, that means the children are not in the flow and in turn the parent collapses.
Now this is a shocker, because I discovered that the containing/wrapping methods used in the same way for floats DO NOT WORK AT ALL.
Clearfix method.
Clearing div method
Overflow method.
They do not work at all!
The only method that decently works is the "Explicit Height" method which is very inefficient, unpredictable (might break on smaller windows) and not fluid.
Here is a simple, fixed-width rounded corner box who's "h1" and "p" elements I'd like to center using the above referred method.
Sample CSS,
body {
margin: 8px;
padding: 0;}
.box {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 335px;
position: relative;
background: #40331A url(bottom.gif) no-repeat left bottom;}
.inner {
background: url(top.gif) no-repeat left top;}
.box h2 {
width: 180px;
height: 27px;
top: 50%;}
.box p {
width: 120px;
height: 20px;
top: 50%;}
.box h2, .box p {
margin: 0;
position: absolute;}
Sample markup,
<div class="box">
<div class="inner">
<h2>This is a heading.</h2>
<p>This is a paragraph.</p>
</div>
</div>
So my question.
Is there any simple way to make a parent element contain its absolutely positioned children?
The entire point of absolutely-positioned elements is that the parent of those elements should be laid out as if those elements were never there. If you want the layout of your parent element to take into account its children, don't position them absolutely.
Since you're not including any relevant properties other than position: absolute, it seems completely superfluous, given that absolutely-positioned elements default to their static positions anyway. Just remove that declaration. It doesn't get any simpler than that.
The reason none of those methods work is because they are designed for floats, and absolutely-positioned elements are not floats:
You can't really "clear" anything that isn't a float.
Ditto.
The reason setting overflow works for floats is due to a consequence of the way floats participate in block layout, which does not apply to absolutely-positioned elements. What exactly this entails falls outside the scope of this question, but read up on block formatting contexts.
I would like to ask how height and float work. I have an outer div and an inner div that has content in it. Its height may vary depending on the content of the inner div but it seems that my inner div will overflow its outside div. What would be the proper way to do it?
<html>
<body>
<div style="margin:0 auto;width: 960px; min-height: 100px; background-color:orange">
<div style="width:500px; height:200px; background-color:black; float:right"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The floated elements do not add to the height of the container element, and hence if you don't clear them, container height won't increase...
I'll show you visually:
More Explanation:
<div>
<div style="float: left;"></div>
<div style="width: 15px;"></div> <!-- This will shift
besides the top div. Why? Because of the top div
is floated left, making the
rest of the space blank -->
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
<!-- Now in order to prevent the next div from floating beside the top ones,
we use `clear: both;`. This is like a wall, so now none of the div's
will be floated after this point. The container height will now also include the
height of these floated divs -->
<div></div>
</div>
You can also add overflow: hidden; on container elements, but I would suggest you use clear: both; instead.
Also if you might like to self-clear an element you can use
.self_clear:after {
content: "";
clear: both;
display: table;
}
How Does CSS Float Work?
What is float exactly and what does it do?
The float property is misunderstood by most beginners. Well, what exactly does float do? Initially, the float property was introduced to flow text around images, which are floated left or right. Here's another explanation by #Madara Uchicha. So, is it wrong to use the float property for placing boxes side by side? The answer is no; there is no problem if you use the float property in order to set boxes side by side.
Floating an inline or block level element will make the element behave like an inline-block element.Demo
If you float an element left or right, the width of the element will be limited to the content it holds, unless width is defined explicitly ...
You cannot float an element center. This is the biggest issue I've always seen with beginners, using float: center;, which is not a valid value for the float property. float is generally used to float/move content to the very left or to the very right. There are only four valid values for float property i.e left, right, none (default) and inherit.
Parent element collapses, when it contains floated child elements, in order to prevent this, we use clear: both; property, to clear the floated elements on both the sides, which will prevent the collapsing of the parent element. For more information, you can refer my another answer here.
(Important) Think of it where we have a stack of various elements. When we use float: left; or float: right; the element moves above the stack by one. Hence the elements in the normal document flow will hide behind the floated elements because it is on stack level above the normal floated elements. (Please don't relate this to z-index as that is completely different.)
Taking a case as an example to explain how CSS floats work, assuming we need a simple 2 column layout with a header, footer, and 2 columns, so here is what the blueprint looks like...
In the above example, we will be floating only the red boxes, either you can float both to the left, or you can float on to left, and another to right as well, depends on the layout, if it's 3 columns, you may float 2 columns to left where another one to the right so depends, though in this example, we have a simplified 2 column layout so will float one to left and the other to the right.
Markup and styles for creating the layout explained further down...
<div class="main_wrap">
<header>Header</header>
<div class="wrapper clear">
<div class="floated_left">
This<br />
is<br />
just<br />
a<br />
left<br />
floated<br />
column<br />
</div>
<div class="floated_right">
This<br />
is<br />
just<br />
a<br />
right<br />
floated<br />
column<br />
</div>
</div>
<footer>Footer</footer>
</div>
* {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box; /* Just for demo purpose */
-webkkit-box-sizing: border-box; /* Just for demo purpose */
box-sizing: border-box; /* Just for demo purpose */
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.main_wrap {
margin: 20px;
border: 3px solid black;
width: 520px;
}
header, footer {
height: 50px;
border: 3px solid silver;
text-align: center;
line-height: 50px;
}
.wrapper {
border: 3px solid green;
}
.floated_left {
float: left;
width: 200px;
border: 3px solid red;
}
.floated_right {
float: right;
width: 300px;
border: 3px solid red;
}
.clear:after {
clear: both;
content: "";
display: table;
}
Let's go step by step with the layout and see how float works..
First of all, we use the main wrapper element, you can just assume that it's your viewport, then we use header and assign a height of 50px so nothing fancy there. It's just a normal non floated block level element which will take up 100% horizontal space unless it's floated or we assign inline-block to it.
The first valid value for float is left so in our example, we use float: left; for .floated_left, so we intend to float a block to the left of our container element.
Column floated to the left
And yes, if you see, the parent element, which is .wrapper is collapsed, the one you see with a green border didn't expand, but it should right? Will come back to that in a while, for now, we have got a column floated to left.
Coming to the second column, lets it float this one to the right
Another column floated to the right
Here, we have a 300px wide column which we float to the right, which will sit beside the first column as it's floated to the left, and since it's floated to the left, it created empty gutter to the right, and since there was ample of space on the right, our right floated element sat perfectly beside the left one.
Still, the parent element is collapsed, well, let's fix that now. There are many ways to prevent the parent element from getting collapsed.
Add an empty block level element and use clear: both; before the parent element ends, which holds floated elements, now this one is a cheap solution to clear your floating elements which will do the job for you but, I would recommend not to use this.
Add, <div style="clear: both;"></div> before the .wrapper div ends, like
<div class="wrapper clear">
<!-- Floated columns -->
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
</div>
Demo
Well, that fixes very well, no collapsed parent anymore, but it adds unnecessary markup to the DOM, so some suggest, to use overflow: hidden; on the parent element holding floated child elements which work as intended.
Use overflow: hidden; on .wrapper
.wrapper {
border: 3px solid green;
overflow: hidden;
}
Demo
That saves us an element every time we need to clear float but as I tested various cases with this, it failed in one particular one, which uses box-shadow on the child elements.
Demo (Can't see the shadow on all 4 sides, overflow: hidden; causes this issue)
So what now? Save an element, no overflow: hidden; so go for a clear fix hack, use the below snippet in your CSS, and just as you use overflow: hidden; for the parent element, call the class below on the parent element to self-clear.
.clear:after {
clear: both;
content: "";
display: table;
}
<div class="wrapper clear">
<!-- Floated Elements -->
</div>
Demo
Here, shadow works as intended, also, it self-clears the parent element which prevents to collapse.
And lastly, we use footer after we clear the floated elements.
Demo
When is float: none; used anyways, as it is the default, so any use to declare float: none;?
Well, it depends, if you are going for a responsive design, you will use this value a lot of times, when you want your floated elements to render one below another at a certain resolution. For that float: none; property plays an important role there.
Few real-world examples of how float is useful.
The first example we already saw is to create one or more than one column layouts.
Using img floated inside p which will enable our content to flow around.
Demo (Without floating img)
Demo 2 (img floated to the left)
Using float for creating horizontal menu - Demo
Float second element as well, or use `margin`
Last but not the least, I want to explain this particular case where you float only single element to the left but you do not float the other, so what happens?
Suppose if we remove float: right; from our .floated_right class, the div will be rendered from extreme left as it isn't floated.
Demo
So in this case, either you can float the to the left as well
OR
You can use margin-left which will be equal to the size of the left floated column i.e 200px wide.
You need to add overflow:auto to your parent div for it to encompass the inner floated div:
<div style="margin:0 auto;width: 960px; min-height: 100px; background-color:orange;overflow:auto">
<div style="width:500px; height:200px; background-color:black; float:right">
</div>
</div>
jsFiddle example
You are encountering the float bug (though I'm not sure if it's technically a bug due to how many browsers exhibit this behaviour). Here is what is happening:
Under normal circumstances, assuming that no explicit height has been set, a block level element such as a div will set its height based on its content. The bottom of the parent div will extend beyond the last element. Unfortunately, floating an element stops the parent from taking the floated element into account when determining its height. This means that if your last element is floated, it will not "stretch" the parent in the same way a normal element would.
Clearing
There are two common ways to fix this. The first is to add a "clearing" element; that is, another element below the floated one that will force the parent to stretch. So add the following html as the last child:
<div style="clear:both"></div>
It shouldn't be visible, and by using clear:both, you make sure that it won't sit next to the floated element, but after it.
Overflow:
The second method, which is preferred by most people (I think) is to change the CSS of the parent element so that the overflow is anything but "visible". So setting the overflow to "hidden" will force the parent to stretch beyond the bottom of the floated child. This is only true if you haven't set a height on the parent, of course.
Like I said, the second method is preferred as it doesn't require you to go and add semantically meaningless elements to your markup, but there are times when you need the overflow to be visible, in which case adding a clearing element is more than acceptable.
Its because of the float of the div. Add overflow: hidden on the outside element.
<div style="overflow:hidden; margin:0 auto;width: 960px; min-height: 100px; background-color:orange;">
<div style="width:500px; height:200px; background-color:black; float:right">
</div>
</div>
Demo
You confuse how browsers renders the elements when there are floating elements. If one block element is floating (your inner div in your case), other block elements will ignore it because browser removes floating elements from the normal flow of the web page. Then, because the floated div has been removed from the normal flow, the outside div is filled in, like the inner div isn't there. However, inline elements (images, links, text, blackquotes) will respect the boundaries of the floating element. If you introduce text in the outside div, the text will place arround de inner div.
In other words, block elements (headers, paragraphs, divs, etc) ignore floating elements and fill in, and inline elements (images, links, text, etc) respect boundaries of floating elements.
An fiddle example here
<body>
<div style="float:right; background-color:blue;width:200px;min-height:400px;margin-right:20px">
floating element
</div>
<h1 style="background-color:red;"> this is a big header</h1>
<p style="background-color:green"> this is a parragraph with text and a big image. The text places arrounds the floating element. Because of the image is wider than space between paragrah and floating element places down the floating element. Try to make wider the viewport and see what happens :D
<img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nKxzQGcCLtQ/TBYPAJ6xM4I/AAAAAAAAAC8/lG6XemOXosU/s1600/css.png">
</p>
Try this one
.parent_div{
display: flex;
}
you can use overflow property to the container div if you don't have any div to show over the container eg:
<div class="cointainer">
<div class="one">Content One</div>
<div class="two">Content Two</div>
</div>
Here is the following css:
.container{
width:100%;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
overflow:hidden;
}
.one{
width:200px;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
}
.two{
width:200px;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
}
-----------------------OR------------------------------
<div class="cointainer">
<div class="one">Content One</div>
<div class="two">Content Two</div>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</div>
Here is the following css:
.container{
width:100%;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
overflow:hidden;
}
.one{
width:200px;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
}
.two{
width:200px;/* As per your requirment */
height:auto;
float:left;
}
.clearfix:before,
.clearfix:after{
display: table;
content: " ";
}
.clearfix:after{
clear: both;
}
I'm looking to clear an inline-block element (in this case an <a> within a <p>) to the next line, without having to set display:block and defining a width.
Here's an example: http://jsfiddle.net/alecrust/zstKf/
Here's the desired result (using display:block and defining a width): http://jsfiddle.net/alecrust/TmwhU/
If you want to avoid setting an explicit width so you can style the background according to the actual length of the text, you can do the following:
Wrap your link:
<p>To stay up to date <span>Follow Us</span></p>
Note that I have added a <span> tag around the link.
Style your wrapper with CSS:
span {
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
}
Setting the width to 100% forces the wrapper to take up the whole line. Keeping the <a> tag for the link set to inline-block allows it to have padding and a background applied while not having it expand to fit the container's width of 100%.
Forked JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/Cm9kZ/
It's a bit of a kludge, but it will work:
a {
display: inline-block;
padding: 5px 18px;
background-color: #8C4AD5;
text-decoration: none;
position:relative;
top:25px;
left:-30%
}
You'll have to fudge the left position, but that basically puts you back into setting a known value, just like the width issue in your display:block example. Not really any better, just a different approach.
The closest I can get to what I want is using :before to insert a new line before the <a> (Fiddle). This unfortunately doesn't clear it to the next line though.
This only works if you want to line break after the last element in the p.
I've experimented quite a bit and this works for me, in Safari 6:
p.linebreak-after-last-element:after {
content: "";
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
}
I have not tested this in other browsers, but it's so simple it should work in all browsers supporting display: inline-block.
An empty <div/> after the inline-block element, clears the inline-block.
With the requirements you have, I don't think it's possible.
I was hoping that this would help, but it doesn't because you don't have an element before your link.
You should just change your HTML, for example: http://jsfiddle.net/thirtydot/zstKf/10/
Using the pseudo class :: after you could add content with a clear:both; property to it.
Not tested but should work in theory.
I often find that I want an element to adjust its width to the size of the elements it contains. inline-block acheives this. However, I do NOT want the inline part of inline-block -- i.e., I still want the next inline-block element to appear below it.
Is there a simple way to achieve this in CSS? I know I can't always but <br> tags after the element in my HTML, but that's annoying.
You can do that with two elements:
<div>
<div class="element">
content...
</div>
</div>
With the CSS rule:
.element { display: inline-block; }
Treat .element as the "real" element that you're adjusting the width of. The enclosing <div> is just there to force each element into its own inline flow.
there are many solutions, the most common one is to use float
<div class="float">
<div class="child">here is content</div>
</div>
.float{float: left;}
if you want enforce that an element is in the new line you add clear: both (or left or right, depending on your needs)
please take into account, that display: inline-block does not work in IE7. The only problem with float is when you want this div to adjust to the width of a child AND to position it at the middle of the page horizontaly
one more note, remember that overflow: hidden property is your best friend whenever you encounter any issues with floated divs :)
Here is a fiddle that achieves what you describe: http://jsfiddle.net/PhilippeVay/VwCgJ/
It uses floating elements (thus width is ajusted to content), a class on the last element you want on a line and the clear property on the next element, with the help of the adjacent selector .rightmost + span
HTML:
<p>
<span>lorem</span>
<span class="rightmost">ipsum</span>
<span>third item: below please</span>
<span>fourth and last</span>
</p>
CSS:
span {
display: block;
float: left;
padding: 20px;
background: lightblue;
border-right: 2px solid white;
}
.rightmost {
background: red;
color: white;
}
.rightmost + span {
clear: both;
}
Inline content (as for inline-block) will occupy the whole width of its container and you've to force a new line with the br element.
On the other side, floating elements can be cleared (and with adjacent selector, you can clear the element after a particular one).
As a web developer I frequently will have two floated (child) divs inside of another (parent) div. Actually I do this all day long.
<style type="text/css">
#left {float:left;}
#right {float:right;}
</style>
<div id="parent">
<div id="left" class="child"> </div>
<div id="right" class="child"> </div>
</div>
This doesn't work without an extra bit of css/html because the parent doesn't automatically grow to fit floated children. There are two popular ways of overcoming that:
1) Add overflow:hidden to the parent's css.
2) Add a 3rd "clearing" child <br style="clear:both;" />.
I know there's a few other similar questions about such things, but my question is:
Which method is better and why? What
are the pros and cons of each?
Hidden overflow - pretty solid method. The main disadvantage is if you set a height on the parent element, any overflow will be...well, hidden. I found this when creating a menu with floated list items - the submenus would not appear.
Clearing element - rather than a line break, I would use a div with height: 0; clear: both; since it won't create a gap below. This is a more solid method, the only disadvantage being an extra element in the markup.
Float the parent - in my experience there are too many situations where you don't want to float the parent element, so I would avoid it.
You can also use the generated content method:
#parent:after {
content: ".";
visibility: hidden;
clear: both;
}
This saves the need for an extra element in the markup, but it won't work in IE7 and below.
Use inline blocks - just remembered this method. Instead of floating the two columns, set them to display: inline-block and they will appear side-by-side:
.child {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
Only thing you must remember with this method is if there is any whitespace between the close tag of one block and the opening tag of another, a space will appear between the columns (the size of which depends on the font so it difficult to gauge). As long as you do ...</div><div id=... then this method works fine and is superior to floating elements IMO.
The second is totally unnecessary and adds extra markup. Just something else to go wrong. Use the first if it fits the bill. You can also float the parent element to do the same thing though it might not fit what you're doing.
PPK discusses this in Clearing floats over on QuirksMode.