Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I remember looking at D about 2 years ago, and it looked nice, was actually faster than C for some of the typical language benchmarks, and in general seemed ok, but I didn't find any real projects written in D back then, so I just left as a I came.
Now that a few years have passed I was wondering if there have been any projects done in D, hopefully open source to look at the code and see how its going, or is D dead?
Check the projects in DSource.
Give a look also to the DLinks page.
On SourceForge, if you apply the filter "Require", "Programming language", "D", you get 113 hits, so it would seem so.
I've always been a bit worried about developing in D since I know little about this Digital Mars mob. Does D have a future outside of just piquing the interest of some nerds (using that term in a non-disparaging way)?
If you like games, check out Kento Cho at ABA Games (anything under Windows). His Windows games are written in D and demonstrate D with SDL.
His code is very, very nice to read. Highly recommended.
look also at code.google.com for some more D projects.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a package written entirely in C, which creates a mySQL table and executes queries.
Given that R is written in C, are there alternatives to using Rcpp to write wrappers around this C code to construct an R package? Or is Rcpp the best method available (or only method available) to do this?
For backward compatibility to S lang, you may find "useful" learn something about:
.C()
.Call()
Rcpp is nowadays the most modern, performant and closest option to reuse your existing code.
There is no need for anything to call C code from R, and this is documented in Writing R Extensions. So if you want to avoid using Rcpp for some reason (and I can think of a few), you can just use the R C api. It typically requires more work and more care.
There are many packages on CRAN that use C or C++ without Rcpp, purrr comes to mind as an example.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
i have open source project done in c++ , it is big and has no documentation
now to "only" to debug it and understand its flow it is possible but very hard.
im looking for well define methods and ways of work , to make this process easier.
like some kind of tools that can help me to draw the objects and class's relationship.
UPDATE
well after digging some more , i know the proper name for this is :
Sequence Diagrams , so i looking how to get Sequence Diagrams out of c++ code
it have to be free tools
here you can find your answer, System Sequence Diagram maybe helps you. if answer not enough tell me to say more details :)
http://www.devcurry.com/2010/03/generate-sequence-diagrams-in-visual.html
and also this link is useful too:
http://weblogs.asp.net/gunnarpeipman/archive/2009/11/20/visual-studio-2010-generating-sequence-diagrams-on-the-fly.aspx
Understand for C++ from Scientific Toolworks has a good reputation. I have no specific experience with it.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a open source project for dictionary for a language (probably you never heard of it) which has not been "digitized". The dictionary will be from one language to several others, and several others to THE language. Since the language has not been "digitized", I need following features along with searching a word:
1 - Add your own translation to existing words/phrases
2 - Add a new word/phrase and add translation
3 - Request a word/phrase to be translated
4 - Rate (like/dislike or rate within the range) the translation (depending on the rating "correctness" get points")
5 - Possibly relate words (especially nouns) with pictures
6 - Easier to implement mobile version of it
I guess it's more "collaboration site", than dictionary. So the project I'm looking for may not be called as "Dictionary".
I know it's possible to design and write from the scratch, but would be good to begin with something in hand, especially if you are just spending your time/effort for non-profit stuff.
I'm looking around for the project, but didn't find something useful. At the same time designing the architecture in my mind.
If you could share some open source projects, it would be really great.
Thanks.
I am unsure what exactly you need, but would Wiktionary be of any help? There are a lot of localized variations to support different languages and there will probably be a way to ask them to support your language of interest, if it is not already there.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a decent website or service out there where developers can propose a new idea for an open source project (regardless of language) and have the community vote it up / down, form teams, and do everything that precedes writing the first line of code?
There is the SomeBodyMakeThis reddit. Also, project sites like SourceForge allow you to create a project which is in the "planning" stage. Often, this is used by people who think they have a good idea and want somebody else to make it for them.
Kind of like Kickstarter (for funding), SourceForge (for hosting), or an IdeaStorm (for brainstorming and community feedback)? The Apache Foundation, or the Horde project (for incubating a plethora of related projects)? It really depends on to what your idea relates. Try joining one of the relevant extant open-source communities and sounding off on your idea.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a Common Lisp implementation I ran across once, sometime in the past year or two. I only remember a few things, and I don't know how to search for it based on these facts, so maybe somebody here can help.
it was open-source, but wasn't one of the big ones (SBCL, CMUCL, MCL, etc.)
it was likely incomplete; it looked almost more like an exercise in writing the simplest possible self-hosted Common Lisp
the main webpage was plain black-on-white, and had 2 columns, where the left column was a link to the source file for a particular area of functionality (loop, format, clos, etc.), and the right column was a link to the tests for that functionality
the source files themselves were pretty-printed for the web, with syntax highlighting that looked kind of like an old Redhat Emacs default config: slate-gray background, etc.
Where can I find this Lisp implementation?
Thanks!
I don't know which one you are referring too, but you can find a list of Common Lisp Implementations here.
Is there any particular reason why this Lisp is grabbing your attention now?
Its hard to pin down, but open-source + minimalistic + incomplete sounds vaugely similar to Paul Graham's Arc programming language.