whats up :D
I hav set up a very, very eased up noreply mailresponder.
UseCase:
We send some kind of notification via Email from our service (Like: "Hey, check out new message")
But the receiver of that mailnotification should not respond to our email notification.
If he still does we have set up an email auto responder ->
curently what i have done with apps scripts on google is following:
function AutoResponder() {
var query = "is:unread" ;
var unread = GmailApp.search(query);
for (var i in unread)
{
var thread = unread[i];
var messages = thread.getMessages();
if (messages.length === 1) { // the reply
body =
"<p> Blabla dont reply to our email thx </p>"
options =
{
name: "This is the subject of mail",
htmlBody: body
};
thread.reply("", options);
}
}
}
Ive set a trigger like every 15 mins the code will get excecuted.
Works quite well but i have an issue:
When recipient has set an autoresponder aswell, they keep looping (sending each other this autoresponder mail) until i delete the last email of that user, so script wont be able to see that thread in the google message list screen.
But i would like to implement that in the code, somehow try to cache the sendermail and not send an response for few hours.
Is that somehow possible?
Thank you guys in advance and have a nice week guys!!
Related
I have a working script for creating a new Gmail draft but when I use createDraftReplyAll in an existing thread, it puts the sender of the last email of the thread as the recipient of the draft.
So if I sent the last email, I become the recipient of the reply, and the other party is Cc'd. And if the other person wrote the last email, they are the recipient but I get CC'd. This is not normal behavior compared with manually creating a draft in Gmail (i.e. from clicking Reply To All), in which case the recipient will always be the other party.
Shown here (result of running the script below):
And normal behavior from clicking Reply All in Gmail:
This is the function I use to create the draft. The thread has already been found via the Subject and original message date:
function createDraftReplyInThread(emailThread, htmlTemplateFileName) {
Logger.log(">> IN createDraftReplyInThread");
Logger.log("htmlTemplateFileName: " + htmlTemplateFileName);
if (emailThread) {
let emailTo = emailThread.to;
Logger.log('Thread TO: ' + emailTo);
let threadMessages = emailThread.getMessages();
let messageCount = threadMessages.length;
let lastMessage = threadMessages[messageCount - 1];
let htmlTemplate = HtmlService.createTemplateFromFile(htmlTemplateFileName);
let htmlBodyContent = htmlTemplate.evaluate().getContent();
var myReplyID = lastMessage.createDraftReplyAll(
"Plain text for draft reply (not used)",
{
'htmlBody': htmlBodyContent
}).getId();
Logger.log(`Draft created in thread; myReplyID: ${myReplyID}`); // just to show it's executed okay
return;
}
return null;
}
It's probably best to ignore this, but I did try to use the limited existing update methods to copy the content, change the recipient and reinstate the the content in a new draft (pure guess work). Noting that draft.update() does work to change the recipient but it also requires a Message argument which I failed to get to work. Possible?
// based off stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54745999/modify-only-the-subject-and-send-the-draft
function _sandbox_draftModify() {
var draft = GmailApp.getDrafts()[0];
var draftAsMessage = draft.getMessage();
var recipients = draftAsMessage.getTo();
var subject = draftAsMessage.getSubject();
var origRaw = draftAsMessage.getRawContent();
var newRaw = origRaw.replace("new draft", "old draft");
var newRawB64 = Utilities.base64EncodeWebSafe(newRaw, Utilities.Charset.UTF_8);
var emailTo = 'recipientsemail#gmail.com';
Logger.log(`recipients: ${recipients}`);
Logger.log(`subject: ${subject}`);
Logger.log(`newRaw: ${newRaw}`);
draft.update(emailTo, subject, { message: { raw: newRawB64 } });
var draftNew = GmailApp.getDrafts()[0];
userId = 'me';
Gmail.Users.Drafts.update({ message: { raw: newRawB64 } }, userId, draftNew.getId());
Logger.log("Done");
}
In the end all I need is to be able to create a draft email to an existing thread (which I can do already) but with the correct recipient(s), however that may be achieved.
This seems to be the expected behavior for the createDraftReplyAll method.
If you check the documentation page here:
createDraftReplyAll(body)
Creates a draft message replying to the sender of the last message in this thread, using the reply-to address and all recipients of this message. The size of the email (including headers) is quota limited.
However, you can file a feature request on Issue Tracker if you would like to have a functionality which replicates the UI behavior. The form can be found at this link and make sure to fill in all the necessary information.
Reference
Apps Script GmailThread Class - createDraftReplyAll().
I have an HTML form which saves its responses to a Google Sheet. The form contains the following fields:
Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message:
Now, what I want is I want to automate sending a thank you email to a recipient as soon as he/she fills the form to the address mentioned in the "Email" field. I don't want to use Google Forms as the backend as it is hard to bypass the "Response Recorded" Confirmation page. Also, avoiding PHP would be better for me!
Is there a way to send these e-mails automatically? The format of the email is as follows:
From: <my email address>
To: <email address from the "Email" field in the spreadsheet>
Subject: Re: Submission Received
Hey <name from the "Name" field in the spreadsheet>!
Body of the mail
If there is a way to bypass the confirmation page of Google Forms, please let me know! That would also do!
If you have the data in google sheets, then you can handle your automation there. I setup this sample file that you could probably base your data set on.
From there I attached the below script to the spreadsheet. You would then need to set a trigger to execute this script on a somewhat regular frequency (5 minutes? 1 minute?). I think it should accomplish what you are going for. There's a check built in to ensure that partial data is not sent.
const ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
const sentMessageColumn = ss.getRange("E:E").getColumn();
function regularProcedure(){
var aCell = ss.getRange(ss.getLastRow(),sentMessageColumn)
while(aCell.isBlank()){
var eRow = aCell.getRow();
if(!(ss.getRange(eRow,2).isBlank() ||
ss.getRange(eRow,3).isBlank() ||
ss.getRange(eRow,4).isBlank()))
{
var newMail = GmailApp.createDraft(
ss.getRange(eRow,2).getValue(),
ss.getRange(eRow,3).getValue(),
ss.getRange(eRow,4).getValue());
newMail.send();
aCell.setValue(true);
}
aCell=aCell.offset(-1,0);
}
}
OK, I think web Gmail is being screwy. I run a Google apps script that in part adds my "To-do" label to any thread I manually star, then archives and unstars it. A snippet is below. I'd appreciate any help.
After running the script the thread gets the label and is unstarred, except the star icon next to the thread/message in web Gmail still shows as selected. If I go to Starred messages label/folder nothing is displayed. If I immediately rerun the script it doesn't find any Starred threads. This seems to indicate the script is working OK. The problem seems to be that web Gmail still wants to show it as Starred even though it isn't. Gmail Android app doesn't show the star applied to the thread. Pictures are worth more...
What my inbox looks like after the script runs. Note the star:
Yet no Starred messages:
function addStarred2ToDo() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
for (var h in threads) {
var messages = threads[h].getMessages();
for (var i in messages) {
if (messages[i].isStarred()) {
messages[i].unstar();
}
}
}
}
EDIT:
I also tried this and neither produce what is expected.
function thisOne() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
for (var h in threads) {
var messages = threads[h].getMessages();
for (var i in messages) {
if (messages[i].isStarred()) {
messages[i].unstar().refresh();
}
}
}
}
function andThisOne() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
var toUnstar = [];
threads.forEach(function (thread) {
thread.getMessages().forEach(function (message) {
if (message.isStarred()) {
toUnstar.push(message);
}
});
});
GmailApp.unstarMessages(toUnstar);
}
If you refresh gmail and hover over the star, you will see that the popup says it is Not Stared. Also, this seems to be an issue when you select the star from gmail, as stars that are set by my filters work correctly when my script unstars them.
This display issue is caused because you do not force Gmail to update the message with a call to refresh() after your call to unstar().
Per documentation of GmailMessage#refresh():
Reloads this message and associated state from Gmail (useful in case the labels, read state, etc., have changed).
messages[i].unstar().refresh();
Should be sufficient to inform Gmail of the new starred status.
Alternately, a batch call to modify the messages will be more efficient in terms of quota usage:
var toUnstar = [];
threads.forEach(function (thread) {
thread.getMessages().forEach(function (message) {
if (message.isStarred()) {
toUnstar.push(message);
...
}
});
});
GmailApp.unstarMessages(toUnstar);
In my sample I avoid the assumption that iterating an array is safe with for .. in.. and use the more expressive Array.forEach() to indicate that the code is something that we want to apply to every thread and every message in said thread.
Documentation on GmailApp.unstarMessages():
Removes stars from these messages and forces the messages to refresh.
I'm having a similar problem. I have enabled a superstar, the green-check. I manually set them.
My script finds the relevant threads using "l:^ss_cg" in a search. It finds the starred email, sends a copy of the email somewhere, and then does the unstar.
Afterward, in the web gmail, if i search for the same message again, it shows up with a green star visually, but if I hover over the star icon, it shows 'not starred'.
However, if I run the script again, the thread is found using the search. It doesn't send another copy of the email, however, because I have a check for ".isStarred()" before it sends a copy of the specific email. I have also been able to reduce the number of threads it double-checks by adding a .hasStarredEmails() check to the thread before it starts looking at individual emails.
Doing a search in the web interface for has:green-check reveals only the emails it should.
There is something about .unStar() that doesn't work properly, I think.
I had considered trying to remove the star at the thread level by removing the ^ss_cg label, but that won't work because there is no way to get a GMailLabel object to send to the function.
Still having same issue where the Gmail web app shows the star. But just made interesting finding.
Assuming
var threads = GmailApp.getStarredThreads()
var thread = threads[0]
var message = thread.getMessages()[0]
GmailApp.unstarMessage(message) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() true
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() true
GmailApp.unstarMessage(message).refreshMessage(message) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() false
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() true
And GmailApp.unstarMessage(message).refreshMessage(message).refreshThread(thread) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() false
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() false
I had this case. Actually what was happening was I was starring everything that hit the inbox with a filter. Once my script processed the message I unstarred it. But my script was also forwarding the message and that new sent message was being starred by the filter. So the thread still contained a starred message. Argh.
My solution was to create another filter to delete any messages from me.
Same problem here.
I am unable to unstar() emails which I starred manually in my browser/on my phone.
If I star an email via a rule or a script and then unstar it with a gapps script, unstarring works.
I also tried doing refresh right after unstarring - no difference:
message.unstar()
message.refresh()
I wrote a script which stars always the last message of a previously starred thread to keep my starred threads with the most recent replies at the top of my mailbox. The only problem is that it's not really working if I star an email manually at the beginning and not with a rule or another script.
The code going through my threads:
for(var z=0;z<messages.length;z++){
var message = messages[z]
var messageTime = message.getDate()
var messageTimeInCET = Utilities.formatDate(messageTime,'CET','yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
//Logger.log('messageTime: '+ messageTime)
//Let's add star to the last email in the thread and remove stars from all previous emails
if(threadLastMessageDateInCET==messageTimeInCET){
Logger.log('Starred email from: '+ messageTimeInCET)
message.star()
}
else{
message.unstar()
message.refresh()
Logger.log('Unstarred email from: '+messageTimeInCET)
}
}
OK, I think web Gmail is being screwy. I run a Google apps script that in part adds my "To-do" label to any thread I manually star, then archives and unstars it. A snippet is below. I'd appreciate any help.
After running the script the thread gets the label and is unstarred, except the star icon next to the thread/message in web Gmail still shows as selected. If I go to Starred messages label/folder nothing is displayed. If I immediately rerun the script it doesn't find any Starred threads. This seems to indicate the script is working OK. The problem seems to be that web Gmail still wants to show it as Starred even though it isn't. Gmail Android app doesn't show the star applied to the thread. Pictures are worth more...
What my inbox looks like after the script runs. Note the star:
Yet no Starred messages:
function addStarred2ToDo() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
for (var h in threads) {
var messages = threads[h].getMessages();
for (var i in messages) {
if (messages[i].isStarred()) {
messages[i].unstar();
}
}
}
}
EDIT:
I also tried this and neither produce what is expected.
function thisOne() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
for (var h in threads) {
var messages = threads[h].getMessages();
for (var i in messages) {
if (messages[i].isStarred()) {
messages[i].unstar().refresh();
}
}
}
}
function andThisOne() {
var threads = GmailApp.search('is:starred');
var toUnstar = [];
threads.forEach(function (thread) {
thread.getMessages().forEach(function (message) {
if (message.isStarred()) {
toUnstar.push(message);
}
});
});
GmailApp.unstarMessages(toUnstar);
}
If you refresh gmail and hover over the star, you will see that the popup says it is Not Stared. Also, this seems to be an issue when you select the star from gmail, as stars that are set by my filters work correctly when my script unstars them.
This display issue is caused because you do not force Gmail to update the message with a call to refresh() after your call to unstar().
Per documentation of GmailMessage#refresh():
Reloads this message and associated state from Gmail (useful in case the labels, read state, etc., have changed).
messages[i].unstar().refresh();
Should be sufficient to inform Gmail of the new starred status.
Alternately, a batch call to modify the messages will be more efficient in terms of quota usage:
var toUnstar = [];
threads.forEach(function (thread) {
thread.getMessages().forEach(function (message) {
if (message.isStarred()) {
toUnstar.push(message);
...
}
});
});
GmailApp.unstarMessages(toUnstar);
In my sample I avoid the assumption that iterating an array is safe with for .. in.. and use the more expressive Array.forEach() to indicate that the code is something that we want to apply to every thread and every message in said thread.
Documentation on GmailApp.unstarMessages():
Removes stars from these messages and forces the messages to refresh.
I'm having a similar problem. I have enabled a superstar, the green-check. I manually set them.
My script finds the relevant threads using "l:^ss_cg" in a search. It finds the starred email, sends a copy of the email somewhere, and then does the unstar.
Afterward, in the web gmail, if i search for the same message again, it shows up with a green star visually, but if I hover over the star icon, it shows 'not starred'.
However, if I run the script again, the thread is found using the search. It doesn't send another copy of the email, however, because I have a check for ".isStarred()" before it sends a copy of the specific email. I have also been able to reduce the number of threads it double-checks by adding a .hasStarredEmails() check to the thread before it starts looking at individual emails.
Doing a search in the web interface for has:green-check reveals only the emails it should.
There is something about .unStar() that doesn't work properly, I think.
I had considered trying to remove the star at the thread level by removing the ^ss_cg label, but that won't work because there is no way to get a GMailLabel object to send to the function.
Still having same issue where the Gmail web app shows the star. But just made interesting finding.
Assuming
var threads = GmailApp.getStarredThreads()
var thread = threads[0]
var message = thread.getMessages()[0]
GmailApp.unstarMessage(message) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() true
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() true
GmailApp.unstarMessage(message).refreshMessage(message) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() false
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() true
And GmailApp.unstarMessage(message).refreshMessage(message).refreshThread(thread) would immediately give the following results:
var isMessageStarred = message.isStarred() false
var isThreadStarred = thread.hasStarredMessages() false
I had this case. Actually what was happening was I was starring everything that hit the inbox with a filter. Once my script processed the message I unstarred it. But my script was also forwarding the message and that new sent message was being starred by the filter. So the thread still contained a starred message. Argh.
My solution was to create another filter to delete any messages from me.
Same problem here.
I am unable to unstar() emails which I starred manually in my browser/on my phone.
If I star an email via a rule or a script and then unstar it with a gapps script, unstarring works.
I also tried doing refresh right after unstarring - no difference:
message.unstar()
message.refresh()
I wrote a script which stars always the last message of a previously starred thread to keep my starred threads with the most recent replies at the top of my mailbox. The only problem is that it's not really working if I star an email manually at the beginning and not with a rule or another script.
The code going through my threads:
for(var z=0;z<messages.length;z++){
var message = messages[z]
var messageTime = message.getDate()
var messageTimeInCET = Utilities.formatDate(messageTime,'CET','yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss')
//Logger.log('messageTime: '+ messageTime)
//Let's add star to the last email in the thread and remove stars from all previous emails
if(threadLastMessageDateInCET==messageTimeInCET){
Logger.log('Starred email from: '+ messageTimeInCET)
message.star()
}
else{
message.unstar()
message.refresh()
Logger.log('Unstarred email from: '+messageTimeInCET)
}
}
I have a simple Google Form that collects data, and, using AppScript, sends confirmation emails to users who fill it out. After user submits the form, on confirmation, s/he will see a link to edit his/her response.
I'd like to include that link as a part of the confirmation email (Right now, it only shows up on the page.) How can I obtain the URL to edit a submitted response?
I am able to get the link to the Form through SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getFormUrl(). It gives me the following format: https://docs.google.com/a/domain.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=<formKey>
The link however doesn't include the edit key, which is required for users to edit his/her response. The expected URL should look like this: https://docs.google.com/a/domain.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=<formKey>&edit=<editKey>
Thanks for the help in advance!
-K
Edited:
Added a feature request on this: http://code.google.com/p/google-apps-script-issues/issues/detail?id=1345&thanks=1345&ts=1337773007
The answer that this wasn't possible by #Henrique Abreu was true until very recently. Google seems to have added getEditResponseUrl() to the FormResponse class and with that it becomes possible to use code like this to get the edit URL for a bunch of existing forms:
function responseURL() {
// Open a form by ID and log the responses to each question.
var form = FormApp.openById('1gJw1MbMKmOYE40Og1ek0cRgtdofguIrAB8KhmB0BYXY'); //this is the ID in the url of your live form
var formResponses = form.getResponses();
for (var i = 0; i < formResponses.length; i++) {
var formResponse = formResponses[i];
Logger.log(formResponse.getEditResponseUrl());
}
}
To make it automatically email the user as they respond one could add a trigger on form submit. As The situation I'm working with doesn't require people to log in with an apps account I don't have access to an email address automatically so I have a text question that captures the user's email address.
It does ask the question about whether or not editing the forms is what you want. I've been grappling with the relative advantages of editing an existing response or sending a prefilled form using toPrefilledUrl() so that I can see how things have changed over time. I guess this comes down to the value that tracking this will provide you.
If you are using Google Apps your responders can edit there form responses.
See: How to Edit Form Responses
--edit this is now possible. See other answers.
After user submits the form, on confirmation, s/he will see a link to
edit his/her response. I'd like to include that link as a part of the confirmation email
That is not possible, period.
That link is not accessible anywhere and one can't guess/construct it. But, there's some workarounds that might suit you (some suggested here that I'll re-phrase), e.g.
Send a per-populated form link and have the user re-send it. You'd need to have some kind of control field (e.g. the username), so you can know and delete/ignore his older submits. Possibly automatically via a script.
You could also develop and publish an apps-script GUI and send a link to this apps script plus a parameter that you generate where you can determine which entry you should edit. The down-side of this approach is that it's somewhat cumbersome and overkill to re-design the whole form on Apps Script. But again, it works.
At last, you could open an "Enhancement Request" on Apps Script issue tracker and wait until they and Google Spreadsheet/Forms team get together to develop a solution.
Here is a clear blog post that shows you how to do it step by step and explains what's going on under the hood for AppsScripts newbies:
http://securitasdato.blogspot.com/2014/11/sending-confirmation-emails-from-google.html
While collectively you can get there from the all the excellent answers provided here, the script from that post worked best for me.
Does this help - I haven't tried it but I was looking for the same thing a while ago and noticed this.
From this page
https://developers.google.com/apps-script/reference/forms/
code from there contains this:
Logger.log('Published URL: ' + form.getPublishedUrl());
Logger.log('Editor URL: ' + form.getEditUrl());
Jon
Great, script works! Thanks.
For newbies, like me: Just paste the andre's code for function SendConfirmationMail(e) into your spreadsheet's code editor and set 'on form submit' trigger to run it. That's in spreadsheet script editor, not form script editor.
You need to hack in some values. Read the code. For me the confusing one was the need to replace the ********COLUMN SEQUENCE EX 14****** with the sheet column number where you want the edit urls to end up. I used 39 which is one column more than my form was using up.
However, I got runtime probs in this part:
for (var i in headers) {
value = e.namedValues[headers[i]].toString();
// Do not send the timestamp and blank fields
if ((i !== "0") && (value !== "")) {
message += headers[i] + ' :: ' + value + "<br>";
}
}
Dunno why, but I replaced it with this:
for (var keys in columns) {
var key = columns[keys];
if ( e.namedValues[key]) {
message += key + ' :: '+ e.namedValues[key] + "<br>";
}
}
Works for me.
Try This: (Credits is not for me, because i merge two solutions of the third part)
Source: Send Confirmation Email with Google Forms
/* Send Confirmation Email with Google Forms */
function Initialize() {
var triggers = ScriptApp.getScriptTriggers();
for (var i in triggers) {
ScriptApp.deleteTrigger(triggers[i]);
}
ScriptApp.newTrigger("SendConfirmationMail")
.forSpreadsheet(SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet())
.onFormSubmit()
.create();
}
function SendConfirmationMail(e) {
var form = FormApp.openById('***YOUR FORM CODE***');
//enter form ID here
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('***SHEET NAME***');
//Change the sheet name as appropriate
var data = sheet.getDataRange().getValues();
var urlCol = ***************COLUMN SEQUENCE EX 14******; // column number where URL's should be populated; A = 1, B = 2 etc
var responses = form.getResponses();
var timestamps = [], urls = [], resultUrls = [], url;
for (var i = 0; i < responses.length; i++) {
timestamps.push(responses[i].getTimestamp().setMilliseconds(0));
urls.push(responses[i].getEditResponseUrl());
}
for (var j = 1; j < data.length; j++) {
resultUrls.push([data[j][0]?urls[timestamps.indexOf(data[j][0].setMilliseconds(0))]:'']);
url = resultUrls[i-1]
}
sheet.getRange(2, urlCol, resultUrls.length).setValues(resultUrls);
try {
var ss, cc, sendername, subject, headers;
var message, value, textbody, sender;
// This is your email address and you will be in the CC
cc = Session.getActiveUser().getEmail();
// This will show up as the sender's name
sendername = "****YOUR NAME******";
// Optional but change the following variable
// to have a custom subject for Google Docs emails
subject = "Registro de Oportunidade submetido com sucesso";
// This is the body of the auto-reply
message = "Nós recebemos seu registro de oportunidade.<br>Muito Obrigado!<br><br>";
ss = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
headers = ss.getRange(1, 1, 1, ss.getLastColumn()).getValues()[0];
// This is the submitter's email address
sender = e.namedValues["********COLUMN NAME OF DESTINATION E-MAIL************"].toString();
for (var i in headers) {
value = e.namedValues[headers[i]].toString();
// Do not send the timestamp and blank fields
if ((i !== "0") && (value !== "")) {
message += headers[i] + ' :: ' + value + "<br>";
}
}
message += "<br>Link to edit" + ' :: ' + url + "<br>";
textbody = message.replace("<br>", "\n");
GmailApp.sendEmail(sender, subject, textbody,
{cc: cc, name: sendername, htmlBody: message});
} catch (e) {
Logger.log(e.toString());
}
}
you can try to populate a form with the values given from that email address than delete previous answers ...
it's not a beautiful way but it can works ...
I don't think we have access to what that value is through the Spreadsheet API (which means Apps Script doesn't have it either). The closest I can think of would be the "key" value in this feed. You'd have to test to find out though. There's no other alternative that I know of other than accessing the Spreadsheet API directly. So first, you'd have to get the last row through the api use ?reverse=true&max-results=1