I want the code to show "123" without using built-in print function, but it does not. What should I do?
from IPython.core.interactiveshell import InteractiveShell
InteractiveShell.ast_node_interactivity = "all"
def myf():
"123"
myf()
If I got right, you just want to print the "123", right?
def myf():
print("123")
myf()
If you want to receive the "123" as a result of your def, would be something like this :
def myf():
x = "123"
return x
Z = myf()
print (Z)
"123"
You can use the display function:
Although, I don't think that's what you want. The settings you're enabling:
from IPython.core.interactiveshell import InteractiveShell
InteractiveShell.ast_node_interactivity = "all"
Only apply to returned values; that's why you don't see it printed. If you return the value and call the function a few times, you'll see them:
I don't have a direct answer to this, but I have some pointers to the problem.
Normal output is written either in stdout or stderr by some Python provided method. However, when utilizing the IPython feature of checking a value by using either direct value ("123") or variable (first line a = "123", second line a). This output stream can not be captured with simple %%capture magic in Jupyter; the output vanishes in the scope of the function definition.
I do agree that this would be useful; in machine learning we sometimes use dependency inversion like structures, where we modify functions instead of line-by-line code, where debugging gets hard since we can not capture some of the outputs without injecting a print or display. However, not using display might have unwanted and hard to predict consequences as some of the models can be rather verbose in what they write. However, capturing some outputs without extra prints and displays from user defined cells might be nice feature.
Notice that sometimes print doesn't work, but display does. Print might not always understand how our utilities in pandas or matplotlib works.
Related
I'm new to lisp and my professor gave some .lisp files to play around with.
http://pastebin.com/eDPUmTa1 (search functions)
http://pastebin.com/xuxgeeaM (water jug problem saved as waterjug.lisp)
The problem is I don't know how to implement running functions from one file to solve problems from another. The most I've done is compiled functions from one file and played around with it in the terminal. I'm not sure how to load 2 files in this IDE as well as how I should run the function. I'm trying, for example, to run the breadth-first-search function to solve the problem to no avail.
I'm currently using emacs as the text editor SBCL as the common lisp implementation along with quicklisp and slime.
Assuming each file is in its own buffer, say f1.lisp and f2.lisp, then you only have to call slime-compile-and-load-file when you are in each buffer. This is bound by default to C-c C-k. You have to compile the first file first, because it contains definitions for the second one.
But, your second file (f2.lisp) has two problems: search for (break and (bread and remove those strings. Check if the forms around them have their parenthesis well balanced.
Take care of warning messages and errors while compiling your file.
Then, if you want to evaluate something directly from the buffer, put your cursor (the point) after the form you want to evaluate, and type C-x C-e (imagine the cursor is represented by % below):
(dump-5 (start-state *water-jug*))%
This will print the result in the minibuffer, in your case something like #<JUG-STATE {1004B61A63}>, which represents an instance of the JUG-STATE class. Keep a window open to the REPL buffer in case the functions write something to standard output (this is the case with the (describe ...) expression below).
If instead you do C-c I, this will ask you which expression you want to inspect, already filled with the form before the point. When you press enter, the inspector buffer will show up:
#<JUG-STATE {1004BD8F53}>
--------------------
Class: #<STANDARD-CLASS COMMON-LISP-USER::JUG-STATE>
--------------------
Group slots by inheritance [ ]
Sort slots alphabetically [X]
All Slots:
[ ] FIVE = 0
[ ] TWO = 2
[set value] [make unbound]
Read http://www.cliki.net/slime-howto.
When I use the Execute Script operator, where there is one input arc and this input is of type ExampleSet and I run, for example, the one-line script return operator.getInput(ExampleSet.class), and then connect the output to an Extract Performance operator, which takes an ExampleSet as input, I get an error: Mandatory input missing at port Performance.example set.
My goal is to check a Petri-net for soundness via the Analyse soundness operator that comes with the RapidProm extension, and to take and change the first attribute on the first line to either 0 or 1 depending on whether this string matches "is sound", so I can then use Extract Performance and combine it with other performances using Average.
Is doing this with Execute Script the right way to do it, and if so, how should I fix this error?
Firstly: Don't bother about the error Mandatory input missing at port Performance.example set
It will be resolved when you run the model.
Secondly: It is indeed a bit ugly, the output of the operator that checks
the soundness of the model, since it is a very long string that looks like
Woflan diagnosis of net "d1cf46bd-15a9-4801-9f02-946a8f125eaf" - The net is sound End of Woflan diagnosis
You can indeed use the execute script to resolve this :)
See the script below!
The output is an example set that returns 1 if the model is sound, and 0 otherwise. Furthermore, I like to use some log operators to translate this to a nice table useful for documentation purposes.
ExampleSet input = operator.getInput(ExampleSet.class);
for (Example example : input) {
String uglyResult = example["att1"];
String soundResult = "The net is sound";
Boolean soundnessCheck = uglyResult.toLowerCase().contains(soundResult.toLowerCase());
if (soundnessCheck){
example["att1"] = "1"; //the net is sound :)
} else {
example["att1"] = "0"; //the net is not sound!
}
}
return input;
See also the attached example model I created.
RapidMiner Setup
I have a basic problem in Python where I have to verify if my backtracking code found some solutions (I have to find all sublists of 1 to n numbers with property |x[i] - x[i-1]| == m). How do I check if there is some solution? I mean the potentially solutions I find, I just print them and not save them into memory. I have to print a proper message if there is no solutions.
As I suggested in comment, you might want to dissociate computing from I/O printing, by creating a generator of your solutions of |x[i] - x[i-1]| == m
Let's assume you defined a generator for yielding your solutions:
def mysolutions(...):
....
# Something with 'yield', or maybe not.
....
Here is a generator decorator that you can use to check if an implemented generator has a value
from itertools import chain
def checkGen(generator, doubt):
"""Decorator used to check that we have data in the generator."""
try:
first = next(generator)
except StopIteration:
raise RuntimeError("I had no value!")
return chain([first], generator)
Using this decorator, you can now define your previous solution with :
#checkGen
def mysolutions(...):
....
Then, you can simply use it as is, for dissociating your I/O:
try:
for solution in mysolutions(...):
print(solution) #Probably needs some formatting
except RuntimeError:
print("I found no value (or there was some error somewhere...)")
def copy_file(from_file,to_file):
content = open(from_file).read()
target = open(to_file,'w').write(content)
print open(to_file).read()
def user_input(f1):
f1 = raw_input("Enter the source file : ")
user_input(f1)
user_input(f2)
copy_file(user_input(f1),user_input(f2))
What is the mistake in this ? I tried it with argv and it was working.
You're not calling the function user_input (by using ()). (fixed in question by OP).
Also, you need to return a string from user_input. currently you're trying to set a variable f1 which is local to the function user_input. While this is possible using global - I do not recommend this (this beats keeping your code DRY).
It's possible to do something similar with objects by changing their states. String is an object - but since strings are immutable, and you can't have the function change their state - this approach of expecting a function to change the string it's given is also doomed to fail.
def user_input():
return raw_input("Enter the source file :").strip()
copy_file(user_input(),user_input())
You can see user_input does very little, it's actually redundant if you assume user input is valid.
I'm working in Python here (which is actually pass-by-name, I think), but the idea is language-agnostic as long as method parameters behave similarly:
If I have a function like this:
def changefoo(source, destination):
destination["foo"] = source
return destination
and call it like so,
some_dict = {"foo": "bar"}
some_var = "a"
new_dict = changefoo(some_var, some_dict)
new_dict will be a modified version of some_dict, but some_dict will also be modified.
Assuming the mutable structure like the dict in my example will almost always be similarly small, and performance is not an issue (in application, I'm taking abstract objects and changing into SOAP requests for different services, where the SOAP request will take an order of magnitude longer than reformatting the data for each service), is this okay?
The destination in these functions (there are several, it's not just a utility function like in my example) will always be mutable, but I like to be explicit: the return value of a function represents the outcome of a deterministic computation on the parameters you passed in. I don't like using out parameters but there's not really a way around this in Python when passing mutable structures to a function. A couple options I've mulled over:
Copying the parameters that will be mutated, to preserve the original
I'd have to copy the parameters in every function where I mutate them, which seems cumbersome and like I'm just duplicating a lot. Plus I don't think I'll ever actually need the original, it just seems messy to return a reference to the mutated object I already had.
Just use it as an in/out parameter
I don't like this, it's not immediately obvious what the function is doing, and I think it's ugly.
Create a decorator which will automatically copy the parameters
Seems like overkill
So is what I'm doing okay? I feel like I'm hiding something, and a future programmer might think the original object is preserved based on the way I'm calling the functions (grabbing its result rather than relying on the fact that it mutates the original). But I also feel like any of the alternatives will be messy. Is there a more preferred way? Note that it's not really an option to add a mutator-style method to the class representing the abstract data due to the way the software works (I would have to add a method to translate that data structure into the corresponding SOAP structure for every service we send that data off too--currently the translation logic is in a separate package for each service)
If you have a lot of functions like this, I think your best bet is to write a little class that wraps the dict and modifies it in-place:
class DictMunger(object):
def __init__(self, original_dict):
self.original_dict = original_dict
def changefoo(source)
self.original_dict['foo'] = source
some_dict = {"foo": "bar"}
some_var = "a"
munger = DictMunger(some_dict)
munger.changefoo(some_var)
# ...
new_dict = munger.original_dict
Objects modifying themselves is generally expected and reads well.