This article was written using a translator.
There are many products in my company.
Like Atlasian, I want to create a service that allows my company's products to move pages only for the products that customers have.
In order to do so, you need to know the products of each customer, and I need to make sure that only those products can be clicked, but can you not use the database?
Using the database makes it so complicated that I want to implement it as simple as possible.
You need to know a programming language/ framework that allows you to create a service/api.
There are various ones available.
Search on the internet.
The architecture of a service is slightly different from directly having a data entry form that stores into a database.
Most apis'/ service entails you creating classes to do CRUD operations(i.e create,read,update and delete operations) by coding classes and then consuming the API into the application.
So yes you can have within the API classes that can be called and then used to store information that the customer has installed into a database, and also retrieve product values specific to a specific customer.
See API as mid layer between front end,and database
Related
I am trying to build an API first web app that has two parts:
Part A: The Project Management App. This would be built using php/mysql. One of the table in the mysql DB will be the users table where all users information will be stored viz username, password, email etc.
Part B: The online chat App. The users of the project management system will be able to chat among themselves. This will be built using nodejs/mongo. The mongodb DB would store the chat transcripts of each users and so would have a users collection containing the user details. The users collection would contain the same user information that the mysql users table has viz username, password, email etc.
Now, i have a couple of questions in terms of the architecture of this app.
Question 1: Is it at all a wise idea to maintain two different sources to store the user's information? The reason why I wanted to have a replica of the users table in the MongoDB as well is because since there will be too many reads and writes happening in the chat app so its best we use a nosql DB. (Lets assume here that my app will be used heavily going forward)
Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", how do we make sure of data consistency? I have thought of two approaches to achieve this:
Option A: Since we are using the API first approach, so during the registration of a user when the CREATE user api call is made, it will add the user in both mysql and mongodb databases.
Option B: I setup a cron that will sync the data between the mysql users table and the mongodb users collection periodically.
Can someone please throw some light on this and tell me if my approaches are right and that if I am going towards the right direction.
Many thanks
I was looking into how to add a create user account/login to my website, so I could have members join and come back, etc and ended up finding out in order to do that, I'd need to create a new database in my SQL, to store the users credentials, I dont have the option to create any new databases by my webhost. Only the one database is what I can use. Could I just add this to my existing database? Do I really need more than 1 database on SQL for my website? If so, could I add another SQL server direct on my computer and use both, Mine and the web host one where I'm creating the site to manage my website? Im sorry for the few questions, Im really new to all this and so confused and overwhelmed.
You can create multiple tables in same database.just make a table with fields such as user id,password etc. and use it for saving,fetching user details using sql queries.
Could I just add this to my existing database?
Yes, you can tables to the existing database.
Do I really need more than 1 database on SQL for my website?
There are a lot of websites that use just one database. Some websites use connections to multiple databases. What information is stored in which database is frequently the result of factors other than the website. The ability to connect to multiple databases means that a website could use authentication/authorization info from one database, store user profiles and submissions in another, and read information from other sources (for example, historical stock prices, stored in another database.
All of that information could be stored in a single database. Having them as separate databases means that the databases can be managed separately (frequencye of backups, replication to DR site) and makes it easier to share the database across multiple applications. (For example, we would probably want employee payroll and health care information stored in a separate database, with separate access controls.
Could I add another SQL server direct on my computer and use both, Mine and the web host one where I'm creating the site to manage my website?
It may be technically possible to do that, but that's not the way you want to go. That would add another dependency... the website at the web hosting provider would be dependent on having access to another database, which is not being backed up and managed along with your website.
We are developing an enterprise application which provides cloud storage services for its clients (via Software As A Service). Some of our clients want to track users coming from their web portal (landing page) by adding some custom fields specific to that client (example: license type, key, serial number etc). At this point, we only have one client which uses our application and provides services to its end users, but we are negotiating with a new client which will use our service as well in near future.
At this point, we have a relational database (MySql) table specific to that first client which we use to handle that client's custom fields, and we don't want to create tables specific to the new client's custom fields as it would require changing the database schema every time we add a new client to our application.
Our research has indicated that there are few methods we could use for our relational databse to solve our problem. They are (Source: http://www.percona.com/live/mysql-conference-2013/sites/default/files/slides/Extensible%20Data%20Modeling.pdf):
Adding Extra columns (in a custom field table)
Entity - Attribute - Value Model
Class Table Inheritance Model
Serialized LOB & Inverted Indexes
Our question is : How do mature companies (specifically like Salesforce, NetSuite etc) store custom fields in the database architecturally and how should we store them?
Any help / pointers in the right direction would be helpful. Thanks.
I am making a semi-simple web application for my mother using php, mysql, and javascript.
She is a teacher, and this wil allow her to manage various components of her lesson plans.
For each component there is a table, and for each component that can contain another component there is another table that holds the relationship. (That table type has two columns each has a foreign key to the related tables)
I am nearly done, but she now wants to allow her friends to use this, I don't care too much about sql injection, but I would like to implement User Control so that only users that create a component can view and edit that component.
I also want them to be able to make public components, so that users can copy components to their own dataset.
My question To implement the user control should I have each user have there own database instant, or should each table have an owner column and column for public/private status, or is there another alternative that I have not thought of.
An issue that I see is that it would require additional mysql query when creating the relations between components because I would need to check that both components user tag matches the current user.
Any feedback/suggestions are helpful
Update The only people using/accessing this will be other teachers, that will be developing their own lesson plans
I would certainly implement this within the same database. Having a different database for each user is not a good solution in this case. Think, for example, how you would build a search function if each user's data is in a separate database will clashing UIDs. It would be a nightmare. Separate databases work where each database serves a separate application and there are precisely zero relations between the data in different databases.
So that brings you on to how to implement it. This will depend on your model. Will each lesson plan only ever have, for example, one and only one owner? If so, then adding that info to the components table might work. Or else you might need a separate table to define ownership and hence access to the different components. Either way, I would make sure the access logic is decoupled and encapsulated in your application to make sure you can change it in the future. Imagine for example you start with a simple, single-owner model but the site grows and grows and soon groups of people all need ownership/edit access to components.
One of my sites is a social networking site running on MySQL. I use postal code and country information to geolocate users using a webservice. This webservice also allows you to download all their many tables of information so that you can access it locally. My site has gotten big enough that I wish to do this now.
My question is, should I create a new database on my site for all of this postal code and country information and all its tables, or should I incorporate those tables into my existing database for my social networking site?
What are the pros/cons either way?
When you're talking about scaling and want to know about other databases like NOSQL, you might find this article interesting: http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/12/6/what-the-heck-are-you-actually-using-nosql-for.html
I'd vote in favor of a separate database if you planned to use the data as read-only and put a web service in front of it to access it. Users would search it based on a small handful of parameters (e.g. address info to get lat/lon data).
I'd say put it in the existing database if you planned to JOIN it with other information in your current schema.
it will live on the same disk probably.
so disk space is not an issue.
if you query the tables in a completely separate manner, then no impact on the existing site.
if you query things together, then easier when all in one database.
overall administration of one database vs 2 is easier.
i think it's a no brainer... they go in one db.