I've trying to process a file that uploads+renders fine on the demo autodesk viewer (i.e. viewer.autodesk.com). The GetManifest result has a progress of "complete" but a status of "failed". If I dump the contents of the GetManifest() call I get the following which has Unrecoverable exit code from extractor: -1073741829 in the message. Wondering why it completes and renders on the online Autodesk viewer. The translation completes w\ "success", but when I try and get the manifest (so that I can download the derivatives), it fails on the GetManifest() call.
? manifest.ToString()
"{
\r\n "urn": "dXJuOmFkc2sub2JqZWN0czpvcy5vYmplY3Q6a2FodWFtb2RlbHMvOWNjNjA2Njg2NGIwNDViNDg5NjhhNDMxNjI1NmEzNTMuSUZD",
\r\n "derivatives": [
\r\n {
\r\n "hasThumbnail": "false",\r\n "name": "LMV Bubble",\r\n "progress": "complete",\r\n "messages": [
\r\n {\r\n "type": "error",
\r\n "message": "Unrecoverable exit code from extractor: -1073741829",
\r\n "code": "TranslationWorker-InternalFailure"\r\n }\r\n ],\r\n
"outputType": "svf",\r\n "status": "failed"\r\n }\r\n ],
\r\n "hasThumbnail": "false",\r\n "progress": "complete",\r\n "type": "manifest",\r\n "region": "US",\r\n "version": "1.0",\r\n "status": "failed"\r\n}"
Since this IFC model is IFC4, please use the modern conversion method instead.
curl --location --request POST 'https://developer.api.autodesk.com/modelderivative/v2/designdata/job' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer ' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'x-ads-force: true' \
--data'{
"input": {
"urn": "{URN}"
},
"output": {
"formats": [
{
"type": "svf",
"views": [
"3d"
],
"advanced": {
"conversionMethod": "modern"
}
}
]
}
}'
Related
Good Day,
I'm trying to convert an IFC file using the "Revit engine".
I've tried conversionMethods "modern" and "v3".
https://forge.autodesk.com/en/docs/model-derivative/v2/reference/http/job-POST/
SVF2 Output > Formats > advanced
But the "Navisworks engine" is always used.
Here is the Request Header:
Content-Type: application/json
x-ads-derivative-format: fallback
x-ads-force: true
Authorization: Bearer ...
User-Agent: PostmanRuntime/7.29.0
Accept: */*
Cache-Control: no-cache
Postman-Token: 60ace5f6-a41c-4314-b3de-e2057f4f8795
Host: developer.api.autodesk.com
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 521
Cookie: PF=zlUuSLBAdPBYRrnJUXxwq1
Here is the Request Body:
{
"input": {
"urn": "dXJuOmFkc2sub2JqZWN0czpvcy5vYmplY3Q6bmVhbmV4LXN0YWdpbmcxLTE2MTk2MTgyOTM4MjMvMTY1NTIxOTY2OTY5MS1BQzIwLUZaSy1IYXVzLmlmYw"
},
"output": {
"destination": {
"region": "us"
},
"formats": [
{
"type": "svf2",
"views": [
"3d"
],
"advanced": {
"conversionMethod": "v3"
}
}
]
}
}
The Response:
{
"result": "success",
"urn": "dXJuOmFkc2sub2JqZWN0czpvcy5vYmplY3Q6bmVhbmV4LXN0YWdpbmcxLTE2MTk2MTgyOTM4MjMvMTY1NTIxOTY2OTY5MS1BQzIwLUZaSy1IYXVzLmlmYw",
"acceptedJobs": {
"output": {
"destination": {
"region": "us"
},
"formats": [
{
"type": "svf2",
"views": [
"3d"
],
"advanced": {
"conversionMethod": "v3"
}
}
]
}
}
}
And here is a snippet from the Manifest:
"name": "........ifc",
"progress": "complete",
"outputType": "svf2",
"properties": {
"Document Information": {
"Navisworks File Creator": "LcNwcLoaderPlugin:lcldifc",
"IFC Application Name": "ARCHICAD-64",
"IFC Application Version": "20.0.0",
"IFC Organization": "GRAPHISOFT",
"IFC Schema": "IFC4",
"IFC Loader": "3"
}
},
"status": "success"
Any ideas?
TIA
Wolfgang
It looks like you missed passing x-ads-force: true to the request header. Could you call the API like this way?
curl --location --request POST 'https://developer.api.autodesk.com/modelderivative/v2/designdata/job' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer ' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'x-ads-force: true' \
--data-raw '{
"input": {
"urn": ""
},
"output": {
"formats": [
{
"type": "svf2",
"views": [
"3d"
],
"advanced": {
"conversionMethod": "v3"
}
}
]
}
}'
Everything works as designed, but the documentation is not clear on this issue.
The documentation says that the Revit IFC Loader is used for modern and V3:
Also, this blog post mentions that Revit will be used instead of Navisworks:
https://forge.autodesk.com/blog/model-derivative-ifc-pipeline-call-change
So you would expect that the external IDs in the properties to be Revit element IDs or uniqueIDs when using modern or V3.
But all IFC conversion methods are running on the Cloud version of Navisworks on Forge env.
Both modern and v3 IFC conversion methods or loaders are based on the Revit technics integrated with Navisworks, so they are called Revit-based IFC loaders.
You can see a similar thing on Navisworks Desktop.
You can check which conversion method was used in the Manifest (> "IFC Loader": "3").
I want to process sensor data into a time series database via FIWARE ORION CONTEXT BROKER. However, instead of writing each data individually, I want to write it collectively as a 1-minute time series. Is something like this possible?
Could you help me? What path should I follow?
You need to split this problem into separate parts. Firstly define the payload of your batch operation. If the device can collect a series of readings and then deliver them as NGSI you can use the /v2/op/update/ for NGSI-v2 or /ngsi-ld/v1/entityOperations/upsert for NGSI-LD
For NGSI-v2 it would be something like
curl -L -X POST 'http://localhost:1026/v2/op/update/' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{
"actionType":"append",
"entities":[
{
"id": "urn:ngsi-ld:TemperatureSensor:002",
"type": "TemperatureSensor",
"temperature": {
"type": "Property",
"value": 21,
"metadata":{
"unitCode": "CEL",
"TimeInstant": {
"type": "DateTime",
"value": "XXXX-XXX-XXXXX"
}
}
}
},
{
"id": "urn:ngsi-ld:TemperatureSensor:003",
"type": "TemperatureSensor",
"temperature": {
"type": "Property",
"value": 27,
"metadata":{
"unitCode": "CEL",
"TimeInstant": {
"type": "DateTime",
"value": "XXXX-XXX-XXXXX"
}
}
}
}
]
}'
For NGSI-LD it would be something like this:
curl -L -X POST 'http://localhost:1026/ngsi-ld/v1/entityOperations/upsert' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Link: <http://context/ngsi-context.jsonld>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context"; type="application/ld+json"' \
--data-raw '[
{
"id": "urn:ngsi-ld:TemperatureSensor:002",
"type": "TemperatureSensor",
"temperature": {
"type": "Property",
"value": 21,
"unitCode": "CEL",
"observedAt": "XXXXX-XXXX-XXXXXX"
}
},
{
"id": "urn:ngsi-ld:TemperatureSensor:003",
"type": "TemperatureSensor",
"temperature": {
"type": "Property",
"value": 27,
"unitCode": "CEL",
"observedAt": "XXXXX-XXXX-XXXXXX"
}
}
]'
The important thing here is to include the observedAt or TimeInstant in the payload so that it can be passed when creating a subscription into QuantumLeap (amend the fiware-service to the correct Tenant:
curl -iX POST \
'http://localhost:1026/v2/subscriptions/' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'fiware-service: openiot' \
-H 'fiware-servicepath: /' \
-d '{
"description": "Notify QuantumLeap of temperature changes",
"subject": {
"entities": [
{
"idPattern": "TemperatureSensor.*"
}
],
"condition": {
"attrs": [
"count"
]
}
},
"notification": {
"http": {
"url": "http://quantumleap:8668/v2/notify"
},
"attrs": [
"temperature"
],
"metadata": ["dateCreated", "TimeInstant"]
},
"throttling": 1
}'
Now it could be the case that you have a device writing to a file and periodically uploading a batch of readings. In this case you can create a Custom IoT Agent which deciphers the payload and transforms each reading into a batch upsert request - an example can be found in this FIWARE Video on YouTube.
The steps are always the same:
Ingest the payload holding the readings (in format X)
Transform format X to an in-memory representation.
Tweak the representation into the entities part of an NGSI request
Send the upsert to the context broker.
The subscription to QuantumLeap will persist the data to a database where you can make time-series queries. The FIWARE Tutorial will cover the steps.
Now if you are using NGSI-LD you can still use QuantumLeap, but you could also look at using the Temporal interface directly. More details in the video here
Looking at the documentation for the Forge Post Job. The examples show that region is a sub object of destination. However the docs seem to show that they are on the same level.
Doc was uploaded as image.
Curl Request Example:
curl -X 'POST' \
[![enter image description here][2]][2]-H 'Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer PtnrvrtSRpWwUi3407QhgvqdUVKL'
-v 'https://developer.api.autodesk.com/modelderivative/v2/designdata/job' \
-d
'{
"input": {
"urn": "dXJuOmFkc2sub2JqZWN0czpvcy5vYmplY3Q6bW9kZWxkZXJpdmF0aXZlL0E1LnppcA",
"compressedUrn": true,
"rootFilename": "A5.iam"
},
"output": {
"destination": {
"region": "us"
},
"formats": [
{
"type": "svf",
"views": [
"2d",
"3d"
]
}
]
}
}'
Thanks for reporting this.
I've let our Dev Portal team know to take a look and will get back to you once they fix this up. Thanks!
so I have this body of a CURL:
-d '{
"documentType": "SQMProjectFact",
"status": "published",
"selectAttributes": [
"Supplier"
],
"filterExpressions": [
{
"name": "createdDateFrom",
"field": "TimeCreated",
"op": ">=",
"defaultValue": "2018-08-05T01:01:59Z
" },
{
"name": "createdDateTo",
"field": "TimeCreated",
"op": "<=",
"defaultValue": "2018-08-15T01:01:59Z"
}
]
}'
When I run it on postman, it works tottaly fine, but when I try to do it on CMD, it keeps throwing me "Invalid body format".
I research and try chagning ' for ", and " for \", and a lot of conmbinations of that, erasing the spaces (just to see if it that solved it), but it stills throwing me that error.
Just for info, these are the headers:
-H "Authorization: Bearer xXxXXXxx-xxXx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx"
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
-H "accept: application/json"
-H "apiKey: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Thanks for those who will reply!
I'm trying to use Orion CB as Contex Provider for an IoT Agent in which I have registred a device with lazy attributes only.
On the IoT Agent I need to handle updateContext requests so I did a handler for these requests like this:
iotAgentLib.setDataUpdateHandler(updateContextHandler);
And in the updateContextHandler function I have only one instruction:
console.log(attributes);
In order to see if all the values I want to update have been received correctly.
Now if I do an update on one of the attributes of the entity represented by the device:
curl -i -X POST \
-H "fiware-service:service1" \
-H "fiware-servicepath:/subservice1" \
-H "X-Auth-Token:wNRwDwqYlLoLD8U9sFkTAEE6PfYMbQ" \
-H "Content-Type:application/json" \
-d \
'{
"contextElements": [
{
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"attributes": [
{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"value": "some_value"
}
]
}
],
"updateAction": "UPDATE"
} ' \
'http://{orion_address}/v1/updateContext'
What I see on the IoT Agent output console is:
time=2018-01-09T08:14:59.539Z | lvl=DEBUG | corr=2f4fdb0c-f515-11e7-86b2-0242ac110003 | trans=6ac5c35d-d7bf-419c-8f64-bc843b991d47 | op=IoTAgentNGSI.GenericMiddlewares | srv=service1 | subsrv=/subservice1 | msg=Body:
{
"contextElements": [
{
"type": "nccestimate",
"isPattern": "false",
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"attributes": [
{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"value": ""
}
]
}
],
"updateAction": "UPDATE"
}
Where as you can see the value field is empty, as I can also see from the console.log() output in the UpdateHandler function that is:
[ { name: 'arrival', type: 'string', value: '' } ]
It seems that Orion is deleting the value before sending it to the IoT Agent. What could be the problem? Am I wrong doing something?
edit:
Here is the response for the call to: /v1/registry/contextEntities/ncc_estimate
{"contextRegistrationResponses":[
{"contextRegistration":
{"entities":[
{
"type":"nccestimate",
"isPattern":"false",
"id":"ncc_estimate"
}
],
"attributes":[
{
"name":"transport_type",
"type":"string",
"isDomain":"false"
},
{
"name":"arrival",
"type":"string",
"isDomain":"false"
}
],
"providingApplication":"http://192.168.199.151:4044"}
}
]}
edit2:
This is what Orion is sending to the iot agent when performing the updateContext operation described before:
POST //updateContext HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: orion/1.10.0-next libcurl/7.19.7
Host: 192.168.199.151:4044
fiware-service: service1
Fiware-ServicePath: /subservice1
X-Auth-Token: M62UkJc7yKX5aQwaHrsODfIrV4Ou85
Accept: application/json
Content-length: 169
Content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Fiware-Correlator: 42561e9a-f615-11e7-8610-0242ac110003
{"contextElements":[{"type":"nccestimate","isPattern":"false","id":"ncc_estimate","attributes":[{"name":"arrival","type":"string","value":""}]}],"updateAction":"UPDATE"}
As you can see the "value" field for the attribute is empty.
I'm using Orion version 1.10.0 and iot agent node lib version 2.5.1.
I have done the following test using CB same version as yours (i.e. 1.10.0)
First, create a registration as the one that IOTA would create:
(curl -s -S localhost:1026/v1/registry/registerContext -H "fiware-service:service1" -H "fiware-servicepath:/subservice1" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d #- | python -mjson.tool) <<EOF
{
"contextRegistrations": [
{
"entities": [
{
"type": "nccestimate",
"isPattern": "false",
"id": "ncc_estimate"
}
],
"attributes": [
{
"name": "transport_type",
"type": "string",
"isDomain": "false"
},
{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"isDomain": "false"
}
],
"providingApplication": "http://localhost:4044"
}
],
"duration": "P1M"
}
EOF
Next, check that it is exactly the same registration shown in the question post (except by the providingApplication, that points to localhost):
curl localhost:1026/v1/registry/contextEntities/ncc_estimate -s -S -H "fiware-service:service1" -H "fiware-servicepath:/subservice1" -H 'Accept: application/json' | python -mjson.tool
which response is
{
"contextRegistrationResponses": [
{
"contextRegistration": {
"attributes": [
{
"isDomain": "false",
"name": "transport_type",
"type": "string"
},
{
"isDomain": "false",
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string"
}
],
"entities": [
{
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"isPattern": "false",
"type": "nccestimate"
}
],
"providingApplication": "http://localhost:4044"
}
}
]
}
Next, run nc process at localhost on providingApplication port.
nc -l -p 4044
Once the setup is done, let's test first with an update based on the one in the question.
curl -s -S -X POST http://localhost:1026/v1/updateContext -H "fiware-service:service1" -H "fiware-servicepath:/subservice1" -H "Content-Type:application/json" -d #- <<EOF
{
"contextElements": [
{
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"attributes": [
{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"value": "some_value"
}
]
}
],
"updateAction": "UPDATE"
}
EOF
In this case, Orion doesn't recognized the registration and returns a Not Found response:
{
"contextResponses": [{
"contextElement": {
"type": "",
"isPattern": "false",
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"attributes": [{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"value": ""
}]
},
"statusCode": {
"code": "404",
"reasonPhrase": "No context element found",
"details": "ncc_estimate"
}
}]
}
In other words, Orion is not forwarding the response. I don't know why in your case is forwarded and leaves a trace in IOTA log file.
Next test uses the same request but adding a type field for the entity.
curl -s -S -X POST http://localhost:1026/v1/updateContext -H "fiware-service:service1" -H "fiware-servicepath:/subservice1" -H "Content-Type:application/json" -d #- <<EOF
{
"contextElements": [
{
"id": "ncc_estimate",
"type": "nccestimate",
"attributes": [
{
"name": "arrival",
"type": "string",
"value": "some_value"
}
]
}
],
"updateAction": "UPDATE"
}
EOF
In this case, the request is forwarded and I get this in the nc terminal.
POST //updateContext HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: orion/1.10.0 libcurl/7.38.0
Host: localhost:4044
fiware-service: service1
Fiware-ServicePath: /subservice1
Accept: application/json
Content-length: 179
Content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Fiware-Correlator: 42e75f8a-fa0d-11e7-93f1-000c29173617
{"contextElements":[{"type":"nccestimate","isPattern":"false","id":"ncc_estimate","attributes":[{"name":"arrival","type":"string","value":"some_value"}]}],"updateAction":"UPDATE"}
Note the some_value in the response. Orion seems to be progressing correctly the request in this case.
EDIT: according to user's feedback, entity type solved the problem. We are highlighting it in the documentation regarding Context Providers:
You should include entity type in the query/update in order for the ContextBroker to be able to forward to Context Providers