I am trying to make my 2x2 grid of divs take on a different order. I am trying to use flexbox for this.
I have tried to simplify my situation in a Codepen and I come quite far, yet I cannot perform the last step.
I want to swap number 2 and 3 so the order is goes from top right to top left.
Here is the code I use for the above output:
.container {
height: 600px;
width: 800px;
background-color: red;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row-reverse;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.container2 {
// flex-direction: column-reverse <-- this does not work
}
.square {
font-size: 84px;
text-align: center;
margin: 20px;
background-color: green;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="container1">
<div class="square">
0
</div>
<div class="square">
1
</div>
</div>
<div class="container2">
<div class="square">
2
</div>
<div class="square">
3
</div>
</div>
</div>
Does anyone know a simple addition or, if necessary, a bigger change that will make this work?
Thanks in advance for your responses!
EDIT: Perhaps it is important to say that there will not always be 4 squares. 4 will be the maximum but there may also be 1, 2 or 3 squares.
You can manage this by manipulating the size of the overall container and adjusting the various flex-directions of each sub-container.
.container {
height: 180px;
width: 180px;
background-color: red;
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: row-reverse;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.container1 {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: flex-end;
}
.container2 {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column-reverse;
}
.square {
font-size: 42px;
text-align: center;
background-color: green;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
margin: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="container1">
<div class="square">
0
</div>
<div class="square">
1
</div>
</div>
<div class="container2">
<div class="square">
2
</div>
<div class="square">
3
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="container1">
<div class="square">
0
</div>
<div class="square">
1
</div>
</div>
<div class="container2">
<div class="square">
2
</div>
</div>
</div>
why don't you use a simple approach?
#flex { display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
#a { order: 2; }
#b { order: 1; }
#c { order: 3; }
<div id="flex">
<div id="a">A</div>
<div id="b">B</div>
<div id="c">C</div>
</div>
you can change the order of any flex child using order
check this to know more about flex in css
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
.container {
height: 600px;
width: 800px;
background-color: red;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row-reverse;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.container1,.container2 {
display:flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content:flex-end;
}
.square {
font-size: 84px;
text-align: center;
margin: 20px;
background-color: green;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
}
.order-1{
order:1;
}
.order-2{
order:2
}
<div class="container">
<div class="container1">
<div class="square">
0
</div>
<div class="square">
1
</div>
</div>
<div class="container2">
<div class="square order-2">
2
</div>
<div class="square order-1">
3
</div>
</div>
</div>
Related
I want to build a simple scroll slider with flexbox with three items. I want the first item to be centered in the page (under the headline) but the following items only should have a less margin.
HTML:
<div class="page-width">
<h1>Headline</h1>
<div class="container">
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Center me
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Hello World
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Hello World
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.page-width {
max-width: 500px;
border: 5px solid green;
}
h1 {
text-align: center;
}
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-start;
overflow: scroll;
}
.flex-item {
margin-left: 20px;
}
.flex-wrapper {
background: blue;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
How can I achieve to center the first item, while the second and third only remain with a margin of 20px? Also, it should be responsive, for example when the page width is smaller, the first item should still be centered.
I tried to use
.flex-item {
flex: 0 0 100%
}
and center the wrapper inside, so the box would be in the center, but then the second and third item are outside of the screen.
Codepen: https://codepen.io/ascena/pen/wvqZgzg
.page-width {
max-width: 500px;
border: 5px solid green;
}
h1 {
text-align: center;
}
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-start;
overflow: scroll;
padding-left:20%;
}
.flex-item {
margin-left: 20px;
}
.flex-wrapper {
background: blue;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
<div class="page-width">
<h1>Headline</h1>
<div class="container">
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Center me
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Hello World
</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
<div class="flex-wrapper">
Hello World
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I have this mockup, there are some nested containers. some of the link-class have multiple elements (par and ref) and I want them to display next to each other if there's space, but responsively move them below each other when total width gets smaller.
It works somewhat, but I expect (want) the link-element containing two childs to return to the same width as the link-element with one single child as it wraps.
For some reason, it remains wider than the single-child ones.
Any hints appreciated!
Code:
let name = 'world';
:global(body) {
margin: 0;
padding: 0
}
.main {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
width: 100%;
background-color: gray;
}
.Container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
background-color: lightblue;
padding: 3px
}
.linkContainer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
padding: 3px;
background-color: salmon;
}
.par {
width: 80vw;
max-width: 300px;
background-color: red
}
.links {
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
padding: 3px;
background-color: orange
}
.ref {
background-color: olive;
width: 30vw;
max-width: 100px
}
.item {
width: 80vw;
max-width: 300px;
background-color: steelblue
}
<div class="main">
<div class="Container">
<div class="item">
header
</div>
<div class="linkContainer">
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="Container">
<div class="item">
another header
</div>
<div class="linkContainer">
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
<div class="ref">
a ref
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
<div class="ref">
a ref
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
you could simply add a max-width:300px; to .links and have the box in size but then you couldn't have the desired stacking effect you wanted so i went a bit further and with the help of css variables and media queries and adding a class .single to single .pars which didn't have a .ref after them, i came up with this:
:root {
--ref-size: 100px;
}
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.main {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
width: 100%;
background-color: gray;
}
.Container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
background-color: lightblue;
padding: 3px
}
.links {
min-width: 300px;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
padding: 3px;
background-color: orange;
}
.par {
width: calc(100% - var(--ref-size));
background-color: red;
}
.ref {
background-color: olive;
width: var(--ref-size);
}
.item {
width: 80vw;
max-width: 300px;
background-color: steelblue
}
#media all and (max-width:300px){
.par{
width: 100%;
}
}
#media all and (min-width: 300px){
.par.single{
width: 100%;
}
}
<div class="main">
<div class="Container">
<div class="item links">
header
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par single">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par single">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par single">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="item links">
another header
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
<div class="ref">
a ref
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par single">
some text
</div>
</div>
<div class="links">
<div class="par">
some text
</div>
<div class="ref">
a ref
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I stumbled upon an issue with image centering within a flexbox with direction:column.
Imagine you have two elements within a flexbox, where the first one contains an image:
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
.img {
height: 100%;
}
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
}
I would expect the image to be center horizontally within the div, but it appears the left border of the image is exactly at the center of the div.
When I replace the image with another div which contains some text it is placed as expected.
Can anybody explain to me whats happening there?
Checkout this fiddle
Because your <div> that contains the image (and has align-self: center on it) is by default a block-level element, and has a width of 100% by default. As such, it is constrained in relation to the parent.
In order to have your image centered correctly, you'll want to add display: contents with:
container .image-container {
display: inline;
}
This can be seen in the following:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.container .image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
display: contents;
}
.container .image-container .img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
The issue is that you are using an SVG with no intrinsic dimension and only an intrinsic ratio so it's like your image has a width equal to 0 which make its centred container with a width equal to 0, too.
Here is before using height:100%
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
}
.img {
/*height: 100%;*/
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
After setting height:100% the image will fill all the space and will keep its ratio but you will have an overflow because the browser will not go back to calculate the width of the container again:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg" >
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
To avoid this give the image a width and make sure to add min-height:0 to the container to allow it to shrink
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
min-height:0;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg" width="250">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
If you were initially using an image with intrinsic dimension you won't have this issue and you don't need to define a width. You will only need to add min-height:0 to avoid the overflow:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
min-height:0;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1/400/400">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
Note that the above doesn't work the same way in Firefox and you will need to add text-aling:center to make sure it works the same everywhere:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
text-align:center;
min-height:0;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1/400/400">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
You will notice that the difference is related to the width calculation of the container which a bit complex due to the use of height:100%
Things may get worse if the size of the image is very small:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
text-align:center;
min-height:0;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1/50/50">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
In Firefox text-align:center will do nothing and you may need a nested flexbox container
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
justify-content:center;
border:2px solid blue;
display:flex;
min-height:0;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/1/50/50">
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
The below is almost the same issue you were having with the initial SVG that can fixed with this same code but it won't remove the overflow:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
display:flex;
justify-content:center;
border:2px solid blue;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg" >
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
Another intresting thing to note is that your initial code may work fine if you add height:100% to the container making the calculation of the nested height easier:
.container {
height: 300px;
background-color: green;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
border:2px solid blue;
box-sizing:border-box;
height:100%;
}
.img {
height: 100%;
display:block;
}
.another-flex-child {
flex: none;
background-color: red;
}
.spacer {
height: 20px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<img class="img" src="https://interactive-examples.mdn.mozilla.net/media/examples/firefox-logo.svg" >
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
<div class="spacer"></div>
<div class="container">
<div class="image-container">
<div>Properly centered content</div>
</div>
<div class="another-flex-child">
Random content here
</div>
</div>
Add the justify-content like below:
.image-container {
flex: 1;
align-self: center;
justify-content:center;
}
it should works
hey I'm new in Flexbox and I'm trying to get it as best as I can. However i faces a problem with some heights and orders, maybe some here could help out.
Note: Don't suggest using Grid/tables please.
this is what I have right now:
this is what I want to get:
html:
<div class="movie-container">
<div class="upper-container">
<div class="image">Image</div>
<div class="title">Title</div>
<div class="more">More</div>
</div>
<div class="lower-container">
<div class="runtime">Runtime</div>
<div class="description">Description</div>
<div class="director">Director</div>
</div>
</div>
css:
.movie-container{
display:flex;
flex-flow: column wrap;
}
.upper-container {
display: flex;
width:80%;
margin:0 auto;
flex-flow: raw wrap;
}
.upper-container div {
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
}
.lower-container {
display: flex;
width:80%;
margin:0 auto;
flex-flow: column wrap;
}
.lower-container div {
border: 1px solid black;
padding: 10px;
}
.image {
flex: 1;
}
.title {
flex: 3;
}
.more {
flex: 0.1;
}
.runtime{
}
.description{
}
.director{
}
Maybe other stuff need to be added beside flexbox I'm not sure, that's why I ask here. Any solution will be helpful!
If you change your HTML structure slightly you can accomplish this fairly easily:
<div class="movie-container">
<div class="upper-container">
<div class="image">Image</div>
<div class="side-container">
<div class="title">Title</div>
<div class="more">More</div>
<div class="runtime">Runtime</div>
<div class="description">Description</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="lower-container">
<div class="director">Director</div>
</div>
</div>
JSFiddle
Flex isn't very good at stretching across multiple rows / columns like tables or Grid is, while you state you don't want that solution it is typically a better option in cases like this.
I find it easiest to work with flexbox on a row-by-row basis instead of using wrapping (although you can certainly do that too).
As a starting point, I think this snippet is what you're going for?
div {
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
.box {
border: 1px solid black;
}
.flex {
display: flex;
}
.image {
width: 120px;
flex: 0 0 auto;
}
.more {
flex: 0 0 auto;
}
<div class="flex upper">
<div class="box flex image">Image</div>
<div class="upper-detail">
<div class="flex title-container">
<div class="box title">Title</div>
<div class="box more">More</div>
</div>
<div class="box runetime">Runtime</div>
<div class="box director">Director</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="box description">Description</div>
<div class="box other">Other stuff...</div>
Hope this helps.
.upper-container{
display: flex;
height: 200px;
}
.upper-left{
background: #ddd;
flex: 1;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.upper-right{
flex: 3;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 100%;
}
.title-more, .runtime, .director{
flex: 1;
border: 1px solid #222;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
}
.lower-container{
border: 1px solid #222;
padding: 10px;
}
.title-more{
justify-content: space-between;
}
.more-button{
height: 30px;
width: 100px;
border: 1px solid #333;
margin-right: 5px;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
<div class="movie-container">
<div class="upper-container">
<div class="upper-left">
Image
</div>
<div class="upper-right">
<div class="title-more">
<div class="title-container">
Title
</div>
<div class="more-button">
More
</div>
</div>
<div class="runtime">Runtime</div>
<div class="director">Director</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="lower-container">
Description
</div>
</div>
The key is to add some divs and remove some others:
.movie-container *{padding:.5em;}
.upper-container {
display: flex;
padding:0;
}
.image {
border: 1px solid;
flex: 1 1 25%;
}
.tmrd{flex: 1 1 75%;padding:0}
.title-more {
display: flex;
padding:0;
}
.title{flex: 1 1 75%;border: 1px solid;}
.more{flex: 1 1 25%;border: 1px solid;}
.runtime,.description,.director{border: 1px solid;}
<div class="movie-container">
<div class="upper-container">
<div class="image">Image</div>
<div class="tmrd">
<div class="title-more">
<div class="title">Title</div>
<div class="more">More</div>
</div>
<div class="runtime">Runtime</div>
<div class="description">Description</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="director">Director</div>
</div>
I want adapt the .flexrow div's width to content but i can't set it with flex.
HTML
<div class="fullwidth">
<div class="sidebar">
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
</div>
<div class="center">
<div class="flexrow">
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.center {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexrow {
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flexrow .card {
width: 300px;
height: 60px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
I have created a snippet here
This is an example of what i want:
Any suggestion?
The main problem here is that when an item wrap, whether one use Flexbox or not, its container won't adjust its width to the new content width.
With the existing markup, here is a simple fix in 2 steps to achieve that:
Add justify-content: center; to your .flexrow rule
For every possible column you need one less ghost element to push elements on the last row all the way to the left. The added elements together with new .flexrow .card:empty rule will do the magic.
.flexrow .card:empty {
height: 0;
margin: 0 10px;
padding: 0 10px;
}
Updated codepen
Stack snippet
.fullwidth {
background-color: grey;
display: flex;
}
.sidebar {
flex: 0 0 280px;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
background-color: black;
color: white;
}
.flexrow {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
align-content: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.flexrow .card {
width: 300px;
height: 60px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
.flexrow .card:empty {
height: 0;
margin: 0 10px;
padding: 0 10px;
}
<div class="fullwidth">
<div class="sidebar">
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
</div>
<div class="center">
<div class="flexrow">
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<!-- Ghost elements, if max columns is 4 one need 3 -->
<div class="card"></div>
<div class="card"></div>
<div class="card"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Try this code-example
.flexrow .card {
height: 60px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
I removed the width, so that flexrow can adapt to the content.
Is this what you wanted? If not please specify (maybe a picture?)
UPDATE
Try this one:
.flexrow {
width: 90%;
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
-webkit-align-content: center;
align-content: center;
-webkit-justify-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.flexrow:after {
content: "";
width: 300px;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
Hope that what you're looking for :)
I guess what you want is that if you want the sidebar and the content to be side by side you need to use flex on the fullwidth div, check the code below:
.sidebar {
background: black;
color: white;
}
.fullwidth {
display: flex;
}
.center {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items:center;
width:100%;
}
.flexrow {
display: inline-flex;
flex-direction: row;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width:100%;
}
.flexrow .card {
width: calc(33.33% - 20px);
box-sizing:border-box;
height: 60px;
background-color: red;
margin: 10px;
padding: 10px;
text-align: center;
}
<div class="fullwidth">
<div class="sidebar">
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
<p>sidebar</p>
</div>
<div class="center">
<div class="flexrow">
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
<div class="card">
<p>card</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>