Here is my jsfiddle code.
<div class="gallery-thumbnail">
<a href="google.com">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg/1024px-13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg" />
</a>
</div>
.gallery-thumbnail {
display: flex;
max-width: 400px;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
background: silver;
}
.gallery-thumbnail a { /* This magic makes a square, because the padding % is of the element's width. */
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
position: relative;
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
background-color: green;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/hgw7s9qf/
I spent a while searching around how to make an element square for all screen sizes, and then some more time trying to set a not-perfectly-square image inside that area. I am finding I can't have everything at once.
How can I get that image to fit-fill the square responsively, the way one would expect object-fit: cover to work, yet still maintain the area as a dynamically-resizing square?
Important: I need this to be responsive, so the square shrinks as the window does, and the image inside should too.
I found a way.
I am not really sure why it works, exactly. Maybe one of you brilliant people can help with that.
.gallery-thumbnail {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
position:absolute;
object-fit: cover;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/7f13rnvu/
I'm not entirely sure what your end goal is but with the same markup, I got this to work:
.gallery-thumbnail {
max-width: 400px;
background: red;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
display: block;
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
height: 400px;
}
After reading this, I think that the image needs both width and height for object-fit to work its magic as it's fitting within the image sizing.
Hope that helps.
To make an image properly square you need to specify same height and width for the image. You can try like this
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg/1024px-13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg" alt="">
</div>
</div>
.square {
border: 5px solid red;
text-align: center;
width: 50vw;
height: 50vw;
}
.content {
}
.content img{
height: 50vw;
width: 50vw;
}
Working Fiddle
Square Image
I would just like to know how to resize an image width to fit the browser width, The image is basically my header image that i want to fit the screen width.
I would thereafter need to place a div on the image. I have the following at the moment but nothing seems to work.
#container {
position: relative;
}
#divWithin {
position: relative;
top: 20%;
left: 20%;
padding: 5px;
background-color: white;
}
#imgWithin{
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
left: 0;
}
<div id="container">
<img id="imgWithin" src="~/images/image(2).png" style="height:325px; margin-top: 75px;" />
<div id="divWithin">Testing</div>
</div>
Any help or ideas would be gladly appreciated
What I am trying to achieve is displayed in an image below:
With 1 being : The image that I want displayed across the screen width (fit screen width)
and with 2 being : The div that I would want to place upon the image
To make a image responsive You need to use a class like this:
.responsive {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
If you need more details about responsive images this link should help https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_css_image_responsive.asp
Try changing your css to this:
html, body {
width: 100%;
}
#container {
width: 100%;
position: relative;
}
#imgWithin {
width: 100%;
}
#divWithin {
position: absolute;
top: 20%;
left: 20%;
padding: 5px;
background-color: white;
}
This will make the image the full width of the browser window with the text overlaid on top.
You are going to warp the image with a fixed height in your html though. If you provide a link to an image mocking up what you are trying to achieve I might be able to help you further
Why don't you use background: url()?
so new html now is:
<div id="container">
<div id="divWithin">Testing</div>
</div>
and css:
#container {
background: url("Your image url") no-repeat center center;
background-size: cover;
}
learn more about background and background-size
what ever media query you use put every where
CSS:-
.container{
padding: unset;
width:auto;
}
i am expecting inside container id is your image this works perfectly fine in every screen if you face any problem ping me
I'm building a web site based on a theme built with Twitter Bootstrap: http://demo.graphikaria.com/agilis/theme.
Whenever I decrease the width of my browser the background image for the home page carousel becomes distorted.
For the default faded background image the template uses, this isn't a big deal, but if you want to use a clear image or logo instead it will appear distorted or squished.
If you use an IMG tag, it will always end up no wider than its container DIV. Because bootstrap re-sizes fixed images for fluid layout, especially on mobile, the images are squished to the screen width.
An alternative that seems to work well so far for me is to use a <div> tag with a background image.
The class:
.carousel-inner > .item > .carousel-image {
width: 100%;
height: 500px;
text-align: center;
align: center;
}
The Item Code:
#csl-item1 {
background:url(img/carousel_image1.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center top;
}
The Item:
<div class="item active">
<div id="csl-item1" class="carousel-image"> </div>
<div class="container">
<div class="carousel-caption">
<!-- Caption -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
I'd be curious to see if anyone has any bugs with this method tho, so let me know if you think its a bad idea...
The cleanest solution I've found is adding this css to your image in the slide:
object-fit: cover;
overflow: hidden;
You can even just add it inline to the img tag:
<img style="object-fit: cover; overflow: hidden;" class="first-slide" src="/images/beach.jpg" alt="sunny day at the beach">
There's a great write-up that shows examples of CSS3 properties and their impact on image aspect ratios here: http://www.creativebloq.com/css3/control-image-aspect-ratios-css3-2122968
You have:
.carousel .item>img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
min-width: 100%;
height: 500px;
}
Change the height to 100%.
Looking at it in Chrome, the default max-width: 100% seems to not be what you want.
In your CSS, you can add to the already defined rules to get the browser to use the default.
.carousel .item > img { max-width: none }
It's worth noting that you specify min-width: 100% combined with an absolute height, so on large screens (like mine, which is 1080p), it will still distort the image if it gets too wide, thus changing the aspect ratio and again distorting the image.
OK, the best I could do was this…
/* Carousel base class */
.carousel {
height: auto;
margin-bottom: 60px;
}
/* Since positioning the image, we need to help out the caption */
.carousel-caption {
z-index: 35;
}
/* Declare heights because of positioning of img element */
.carousel .item {
background:#e64c6c;
border:.5px solid #e7c1af;
overflow:hidden;
padding:3px;
min-height: 500px;
}
.carousel-inner > .item > img {
float:right;
padding: 2px;
padding-left: 3px;
min-width: 500px;
}
.carousel-inner > .item > img:hover {
border: 1px solid #e7c1af;
}
With bootstrap 3.3.7, I could fix this issue by simply removing the 'height' line in carousel.css here:
.carousel-inner > .item > img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
min-width: 100%;
/*height: 500px;*/
}
In my case the image was distorted when the screen size increased. I was working off one of the start Bootstrap free templates (https://startbootstrap.com/) using Bootstrap 4.
Based on the answer above from Ira Herman (and I would comment if I had enough credit points), I ended up with the code below to solve my problem:
.carousel-item {
height: 32rem;
background-color: #777;
}
.carousel-item > img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
min-width: 100%;
height: 32rem;
object-fit: cover;
overflow: hidden;
object-position: 20% 19%;
}
The object-position x and y coordinates can be tweaked depending how you want the image to increase, decrease. Adjusting the image from the right also helped in my case. I hope that helps.
How do you auto-resize a large image so that it will fit into a smaller width div container whilst maintaining its width:height ratio?
Example: stackoverflow.com - when an image is inserted onto the editor panel and the image is too large to fit onto the page, the image is automatically resized.
Do not apply an explicit width or height to the image tag. Instead, give it:
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
Also, height: auto; if you want to specify a width only.
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/xwrvxser/1/
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
.portrait {
height: 80px;
width: 30px;
}
.landscape {
height: 30px;
width: 80px;
}
.square {
height: 75px;
width: 75px;
}
Portrait Div
<div class="portrait">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/xkF9Q.jpg">
</div>
Landscape Div
<div class="landscape">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/xkF9Q.jpg">
</div>
Square Div
<div class="square">
<img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/xkF9Q.jpg">
</div>
It turns out there's another way to do this: object-fit.
<img style='height: 100%; width: 100%; object-fit: contain'/>
will do the work. Don't forget to include other necessary attributes like src and alt, of course.
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/mbHB4/7364/
Currently there is no way to do this correctly in a deterministic way, with fixed-size images such as JPEGs or PNG files.
To resize an image proportionally, you have to set either the height or width to "100%", but not both. If you set both to "100%", your image will be stretched.
Choosing whether to do height or width depends on your image and container dimensions:
If your image and container are both "portrait shaped" or both "landscape shaped" (taller than they are wide, or wider than they are tall, respectively), then it doesn't matter which of height or width are "%100".
If your image is portrait, and your container is landscape, you must set height="100%" on the image.
If your image is landscape, and your container is portrait, you must set width="100%" on the image.
If your image is an SVG, which is a variable-sized vector image format, you can have the expansion to fit the container happen automatically.
You just have to ensure that the SVG file has none of these properties set in the <svg> tag:
height
width
viewbox
Most vector drawing programs out there will set these properties when exporting an SVG file, so you will have to manually edit your file every time you export, or write a script to do it.
Here is a solution that will both vertically and horizontally align your img within a div without any stretching even if the image supplied is too small or too big to fit in the div.
The HTML content:
<div id="myDiv">
<img alt="Client Logo" title="Client Logo" src="Imagelocation" />
</div>
The CSS content:
#myDiv
{
height: 104px;
width: 140px;
}
#myDiv img
{
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
margin: auto;
display: block;
}
The jQuery part:
var logoHeight = $('#myDiv img').height();
if (logoHeight < 104) {
var margintop = (104 - logoHeight) / 2;
$('#myDiv img').css('margin-top', margintop);
}
You have two ways of making the image responsive.
When an image is a background image.
#container{
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background-image: url(https://images.fonearena.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Lenovo-p780-camera-sample-10.jpg);
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
}
<div id="container"><div>
Run it here
But one should use img tag to put images as it is better than background-image in terms of SEO as you can write keyword in the alt of the img tag. So here is you can make the image responsive.
When image is in img tag.
#container{
max-width: 400px;
overflow: hidden;
}
img{
width: 100%;
object-fit: contain;
}
<div id="container">
<img src="https://images.fonearena.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Lenovo-p780-camera-sample-10.jpg" alt="your_keyword"/>
<div>
Run it here
Make it simple!
Give the container a fixed height and then for the img tag inside it, set width and max-height.
<div style="height: 250px">
<img src="..." alt=" " style="width: 100%;max-height: 100%" />
</div>
The difference is that you set the width to be 100%, not the max-width.
You can set the image as the background to a div, and then use the CSS background-size property:
background-size: cover;
It will "Scale the background image to be as large as possible so that the background area is completely covered by the background image. Some parts of the background image may not be in view within the background positioning area" -- W3Schools
Check out my solution: http://codepen.io/petethepig/pen/dvFsA
It's written in pure CSS, without any JavaScript code.
It can handle images of any size and any orientation.
Given such HTML:
<div class="image">
<div class="trick"></div>
<img src="http://placekitten.com/415/200"/>
</div>
the CSS code would be:
.image {
font-size: 0;
text-align: center;
width: 200px; /* Container's dimensions */
height: 150px;
}
img {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
.trick {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
height: 150px;
}
There are several ways to fit the image to <div>.
img {
object-fit: cover;
}
The CSS object-fit property is used to specify how an <img> or <video> should be resized to fit its container.
This property tells the content to fill the container in a variety of ways; such as "preserve that aspect ratio" or "stretch up and take up as much space as possible".
fill - This is default. The image is resized to fill the given dimension. If necessary, the image will be stretched or squished to fit
contain - The image keeps its aspect ratio, but is resized to fit within the given dimension
cover - The image keeps its aspect ratio and fills the given dimension. The image will be clipped to fit
none - The image is not resized
scale-down - the image is scaled down to the smallest version of none or contain
You can find out more working samples here.
I have much better solution without need of any JavaScript. It is fully responsive, and I use it a lot. You often need to fit an image of any aspect ratio to a container element with a specified aspect ratio. And having whole this thing fully responsive is a must.
/* For this demo only */
.container {
max-width: 300px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.img-frame {
box-shadow: 3px 3px 6px rgba(0, 0, 0, .15);
background: #ee0;
margin: 20px auto;
}
/* This is for responsive container with specified aspect ratio */
.aspect-ratio {
position: relative;
}
.aspect-ratio-1-1 {
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.aspect-ratio-4-3 {
padding-bottom: 75%;
}
.aspect-ratio-16-9 {
padding-bottom: 56.25%;
}
/* This is the key part - position and fit the image to the container */
.fit-img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
margin: auto;
max-width: 80%;
max-height: 90%
}
.fit-img-bottom {
top: auto;
}
.fit-img-tight {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%
}
<div class="container">
<div class="aspect-ratio aspect-ratio-1-1 img-frame">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/400x300" class="fit-img" alt="sample">
</div>
<div class="aspect-ratio aspect-ratio-4-3 img-frame">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/400x300" class="fit-img fit-img-tight" alt="sample">
</div>
<div class="aspect-ratio aspect-ratio-16-9 img-frame">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/400x400" class="fit-img" alt="sample">
</div>
<div class="aspect-ratio aspect-ratio-16-9 img-frame">
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/300x400" class="fit-img fit-img-bottom" alt="sample">
</div>
</div>
You can set max-width and max height independently; the image will respect the smallest one (depending on the values and aspect ratio of the image). You can also set image to be aligned as you want (for example, for a product picture on an infinite white background you can position it to center bottom easily).
This solution doesn't stretch the image and fills the whole container, but it cuts some of the image.
HTML:
<div><img src="/images/image.png"></div>
CSS:
div {
width: 100%;
height: 10em;
overflow: hidden;
img {
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
I just published a jQuery plugin that does exactly what you need with a lot of options:
https://github.com/GestiXi/image-scale
Usage:
HTML
<div class="image-container">
<img class="scale" data-scale="best-fit-down" data-align="center" src="img/example.jpg">
</div>
JavaScript
$(function() {
$("img.scale").imageScale();
});
I see that many people have suggested object-fit which is a good option. But if you want it to work in older browsers as well, there is another way of doing it easily.
It's quite simple. The approach I took was to position the image inside the container with absolute and then place it right at the centre using the combination:
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Once it is in the centre, I give to the image,
// For vertical blocks (i.e., where height is greater than width)
height: 100%;
width: auto;
// For horizontal blocks (i.e., where width is greater than height)
height: auto;
width: 100%;
This makes the image get the effect of object-fit:cover.
Here is a demonstration of the above logic.
https://jsfiddle.net/furqan_694/s3xLe1gp/
This logic works in all browsers.
The following works perfectly for me:
img{
height: 99999px;
object-fit:contain;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
display: block;
margin: auto auto;
}
I fixed this problem using the following code:
<div class="container"><img src="image_url" /></div>
.container {
height: 75px;
width: 75px;
}
.container img {
object-fit: cover;
object-position: top;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
A simple solution is to use Flexbox. Define the container's CSS to:
.container{
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
align-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
/* Any custom height */
}
Adjust the contained image width to 100% and you should get a nice centered image in the container with the dimensions preserved.
<style type="text/css">
#container{
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
height: 200px; /* Set height */
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
background-image: url('../assets/images/img.jpg');
background-size: content; /* Scaling down large image to a div */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
}
</style>
<div id="container>
<!-- Inside container -->
</div>
As answered here, you can also use vh units instead of max-height: 100% if it doesn't work on your browser (like Chrome):
img {
max-height: 75vh;
}
I centered and scaled proportionally an image inside a hyperlink both horizontally and vertically this way:
#link {
border: 1px solid blue;
display: table-cell;
height: 100px;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 100px;
}
#link img {
border: 1px solid red;
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-height: 60px;
max-width: 60px;
}
It was tested in Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari.
More information about centering is here.
Give the height and width you need for your image to the div that contains the <img> tag. Don't forget to give the height/width in the proper style tag.
In the <img> tag, give the max-height and max-width as 100%.
<div style="height:750px; width:700px;">
<img alt="That Image" style="max-height:100%; max-width:100%;" src="">
</div>
You can add the details in the appropriate classes after you get it right.
The code below is adapted from previous answers and is tested by me using an image called storm.jpg.
This is the complete HTML code for a simple page that displays the image. This works perfect and was tested by me with www.resizemybrowser.com. Put the CSS code at the top of your HTML code, underneath your head section. Put the picture code wherever you want the picture.
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#myDiv
{
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
#myDiv img
{
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
margin: auto;
display: block;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="myDiv">
<img src="images/storm.jpg">
</div>
</body>
</html>
You have to tell the browser the height of where you are placing it:
.example {
height: 220px; /* DEFINE HEIGHT */
background: url('../img/example.png');
background-size: 100% 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
Edit: Previous table-based image positioning had issues in Internet Explorer 11 (max-height doesn't work in display:table elements). I've replaced it with inline based positioning which not only works fine in both Internet Explorer 7 and Internet Explorer 11, but it also requires less code.
Here is my take on the subject. It'll only work if the container has a specified size (max-width and max-height don't seem to get along with containers that don't have concrete size), but I wrote the CSS content in a way that allows it to be reused (add picture-frame class and px125 size class to your existing container).
In CSS:
.picture-frame
{
vertical-align: top;
display: inline-block;
text-align: center;
}
.picture-frame.px125
{
width: 125px;
height: 125px;
line-height: 125px;
}
.picture-frame img
{
margin-top: -4px; /* Inline images have a slight offset for some reason when positioned using vertical-align */
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0; /* Remove border on images enclosed in anchors in Internet Explorer */
}
And in HTML:
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px125">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/lesa2wS.png"/>
</a>
DEMO
/* Main style */
.picture-frame
{
vertical-align: top;
display: inline-block;
text-align: center;
}
.picture-frame.px32
{
width: 32px;
height: 32px;
line-height: 32px;
}
.picture-frame.px125
{
width: 125px;
height: 125px;
line-height: 125px;
}
.picture-frame img
{
margin-top: -4px; /* Inline images have a slight offset for some reason when positioned using vertical-align */
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0; /* Remove border on images enclosed in anchors in Internet Explorer */
}
/* Extras */
.picture-frame
{
padding: 5px;
}
.frame
{
border:1px solid black;
}
<p>32px</p>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px32 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/lesa2wS.png"/>
</a>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px32 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/kFMJxdZ.png"/>
</a>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px32 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/BDabZj0.png"/>
</a>
<p>125px</p>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px125 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/lesa2wS.png"/>
</a>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px125 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/kFMJxdZ.png"/>
</a>
<a href="#" class="picture-frame px125 frame">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/BDabZj0.png"/>
</a>
Edit: Possible further improvement using JavaScript (upscaling images):
function fixImage(img)
{
var $this = $(img);
var parent = $this.closest('.picture-frame');
if ($this.width() == parent.width() || $this.height() == parent.height())
return;
if ($this.width() > $this.height())
$this.css('width', parent.width() + 'px');
else
$this.css('height', parent.height() + 'px');
}
$('.picture-frame img:visible').each(function
{
if (this.complete)
fixImage(this);
else
this.onload = function(){ fixImage(this) };
});
The accepted answer from Thorn007 doesn't work when the image is too small.
To solve this, I added a scale factor. This way, it makes the image bigger and it fills the div container.
Example:
<div style="width:400px; height:200px;">
<img src="pix.jpg" style="max-width:100px; height:50px; transform:scale(4); transform-origin:left top;" />
</div>
Notes:
For WebKit you must add -webkit-transform:scale(4); -webkit-transform-origin:left top; in the style.
With a scale factor of 4, you have max-width = 400/4 = 100 and max-height = 200/4 = 50
An alternate solution is to set max-width and max-height at 25%. It's even simpler.
A simple solution (4-step fix!!) that seems to work for me, is below. The example uses the width to determine the overall size, but you can also flip it to use the height instead.
Apply CSS styling to the image container (for example, <img>)
Set the width property to the dimension you want
For dimensions, use % for relative size, or autoscaling (based on image container or display)
Use px (or other) for a static, or set dimension
Set the height property to automatically adjust, based on the width
ENJOY!
For example,
<img style="width:100%; height:auto;"
src="https://googledrive.com/host/0BwDx0R31u6sYY1hPWnZrencxb1k/thanksgiving.png"
/>
All the provided answers, including the accepted one, work only under the assumption that the div wrapper is of a fixed size. So this is how to do it whatever the size of the div wrapper is and this is very useful if you develop a responsive page:
Write these declarations inside your DIV selector:
width: 8.33% /* Or whatever percentage you want your div to take */
max-height: anyValueYouWant /* (In px or %) */
Then put these declarations inside your IMG selector:
width: "100%" /* Obligatory */
max-height: anyValueYouWant /* (In px or %) */
VERY IMPORTANT:
The value of maxHeight must be the same for both the DIV and IMG selectors.
The simplest way to do this is by using object-fit:
<div class="container">
<img src="path/to/image.jpg">
</div>
.container{
height: 300px;
}
.container img{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
If you're using Bootstrap, just add the img-responsive class and change to
.container img{
object-fit: cover;
}
If you're using Bootstrap, you just need to add the img-responsive class to the img tag:
<img class="img-responsive" src="img_chania.jpg" alt="Chania">
Bootstrap Images
As seen in my 2014 Codepen example, I've made a solution that would work for any unknown combination of width/height (aspect-ratio) with the help of a as little javascript as possible, to change the CSS of how the image is centered when the aspect-ratio of the container changes above/below the aspect ratio of the image:
Try resizing the container by dragging the bottom right corner:
// Detects when the window width is too narrow for the current image
// aspect-ratio, and fits it to height 100% instead of width 100%.
const photo = document.images[0]
const onPhotoResize = new ResizeObserver(entries =>
window.requestAnimationFrame(checkRatio)
)
onPhotoResize.observe(photo.parentNode)
function checkRatio(){
const photoParent = photo.parentNode,
imageAspectRatio = photo.clientWidth / photo.clientHeight,
parentAspectRatio = photoParent.clientWidth / photoParent.clientHeight
photo.classList[imageAspectRatio > parentAspectRatio ? 'add':'remove']('max')
}
.box{
width: 20%;
height: 60%;
margin: auto;
position: absolute;
top:0; left:0; right:0; bottom:0;
resize: both;
overflow: hidden;
border: 5px solid red;
}
.box > img{
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
width: 100%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.box > img.max{ width:auto; height:100%; }
<div class='box'>
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Mona_Lisa.jpg">
</div>
The solution is easy with a bit of maths...
Just put the image in a div and then in the HTML file where you specify the image. Set the width and height values in percentages using the pixel values of the image to calculate the exact ratio of width to height.
For example, say you have an image that has a width of 200 pixels and a height of 160 pixels. You can safely say that the width value will be 100%, because it is the larger value. To then calculate the height value you simply divide the height by the width which gives the percentage value of 80%. In the code it will look something like this...
<div class="image_holder_div">
<img src="some_pic.png" width="100%" height="80%">
</div>