Wondering if the document translation api in preview will have a flow connector coming soon to enable scenarios such as sharepoint documents, teams attachments etc?
Document translation would have SDK as part of GA announcement.
We are gathering use case scenarios to prioritize on cross product integrations and connectors.
Related
I am trying to integrate our third party application with NetSuite. I want to be able to import sales invoice details generated from our third party system (which uses REST API) into the NetSuite invoice form.
The frequency of import is not too crucial- an immediate import will be ideal, but sending data once a day is fine as well.
I want to know what I have to use to do this API integration - SuiteTalk, RESTlet or Suitelet.
I am completely new to this topic and after a few days of research, I learned that there are 3 options for an API integration with netsuite (Suitelets, restlets and suitetalk which comprises REST and SOAP based web services). I also learned that there are scheduled scripts and user events, but I'm not too clear on the idea.
I need some help identifying which integration option I should choose.
Any and all information about netsuite API integration is appreciated!
I would avoid REST/SOAP. SOAP is outdated, and REST is incomplete and difficult to use.
Suitelet's are for when you want to present your own custom UI to frontend users, like a special new kind of custom form not relevant to any particular record. Probably not what you want.
What you probably want is to design a restlet. A restlet is a way for you to setup your own custom url inside NetSuite that your program can talk to from outside NetSuite. Like a webpage. You can pass in data to the restlet either inside the URL, or inside the body of an HTTP request (e.g. like a JSON object), and you can get data back out from the body of the HTTP response.
A restlet is a part of SuiteTalk. The method of authenticating a restlet is the same for the method of authenticating a request to the REST API. So, learning about SuiteTalk is helpful. The code you use to write the restlet, SuiteScript, is the same kind of code used to write suitelets and other kinds of scripts.
So you will want to learn about SuiteTalk, and then, in particular, SuiteTalk restlets.
this is a really subjective issue.
It used to be that SOAP/SuiteTalk was a little easier in terms of infrastructure and since Netsuite's offerings are ever changing the REST/SuiteTalk might fill this space in the future.
Since Netsuite deprecated the Full Access role setting up integrations almost always involves the integrator having to provide a permissions spec. The easiest way to do that is via a Bundle. For token based authentication (TBA) there also needs to be an integration record from which you need Consumer Id and Secret Tokens.
So as of this writing the set up for SOAP/SuiteTalk and RESTLets is roughly the same. The easiest way to communicate these is with a bundle so if you are a Netsuite dev with a dev account you can set these up in a bundle and have your customer import them.
So equal so far but differences:
SOAP/Suitetalk is slow. IMO not suiteable for an interactive interface
SOAP/Suitetalk the code is all in your external app so changes to the code don't require any changes in the target account.
RESTlets can be pretty speedy. I've used these for client interactions.
Updates require re-loading your bundle or overwriting your bundle files in the target account (with the resulting havoc if an admin refreshes the bundle)
RESTlets give you access to the features of the account on which you are running so that code can run appropriate chunks For instance features such as matrix items, multi-location inventory, one-world, pick/pack/ship, volume pricing, multi-currency will all change the data model of the account your code is running against. RESTlets can detect which features are enabled; SOAP/SuiteTalk cannot.
So really the only advantage at this point that I see for SOAP/Suitetalk is that code updates don't require access to the target account.
Who is making the changes? If it is your NetSuite developers, then your options are SUITELET or RESTLET.
If its your third-party application team, they own the code and the process and do all their work sitting outside of NetSuite - your option is SUITETALK/SOAP. Of course, they need to know something about NetSuite, but your business analyst would be sufficient to support them. As of 2020.1+, there is also support for native REST APIs in addition to SOAP in case you still want to use REST, but not write your own RESTLETS.
As the above comments mention, Suitetalk does perform a little slower than calling RESTLETS. So that maybe one of the deciding factors.
You may consider SUITELETs for integration only if you want to bypass all authentication schemes, by setting the suitelet as public. Highly inadvisable though.
If the third-party application supports REST APIs, you could call them directly from within NetSuite - either from user events or from scheduled scripts.
You can also consider iPAAS platforms like Dell Boomi, Celigo, Jitterbit, etc. These are general-purpose integration platforms, and make connecting one platform to another easy, with minimal coding. If your Company is already invested in these iPAAS platforms for other enterprise applications, then the choice is that much simpler.
I'd like to have a page or a section of information that only is relevant to a specific API. Is that possible in the new portal?
In this case it has to do with information about event data that is sent out (to webhooks) when new items are created and that are then available in operations for the API. If it's not possible to have i an "API-specific" page, where would you put something like this?
I believe in this case you are trying to add some sort of static page or documentation to explain the functionality about a specific API. You may refer to this. As mentioned in the thread, you can try with swagger but in APIM portal it might not work immediately. Microsoft product team has confirmed that they working on improving support for OpenAPIv3. The ETA is about end of September.
However, you may also check the self-hosted gateway feature
The self-hosted gateway feature expands API Management support for hybrid and multi-cloud environments and enables organizations to efficiently and securely manage APIs hosted on-premises and across clouds from a single API Management service in Azure.
Official Documentation
According to Edit files on 3rd-party storage systems article it is possible to edit Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides (Google files) stored on 3rd-party storage systems, such as Box.
Are there public API to provide a possibility to introduce an integration with extra 3rd party storage system (like it is done for example in Box for G Suite native integration, i.e. a file is automatically saved in Box instead of Drive)? Does it require business or enterprise G Suite account?
Thanks.
You could build your own integration with the Google Drive API to transfer content into and out of Google Drive, assuming you're comfortable with exporting and importing that content as traditional Office docs rather than Google's format.
If you'd like to use it with an arbitrary 3rd party storage system, one way is to build your own app that integrates with both Google and that storage system to allow you to transfer content between them.
Neither of these approaches require your Google account to specifically be a Business or Enterprise account. With both approaches, the data is actually saved within Google Drive but then synced to the other storage platform as well behind the scenes. If that is acceptable, then these solutions might meet your requirements.
Tools like Kloudless let you connect to several different cloud storage SaaS apps and protocols with a single implementation. (Disclosure: I'm the CTO). Check out Kloudless' unified Storage API docs and the Kloudless File Explorer to prompt users to pick files to sync.
Project background: Building an API driven Learning Management System. The back-end system will be receiving data from multiple systems and interfaces: web, mobile, VR.
Looking at API Gateways to front our APIs. Preferably an Open Source API gateway but need to be sure that the support and service is available. Tried out Tyk.io and it feels like it might be the way to go. Been reading other StackOverflow threads around this and looks like TYK's gateway fairs quite well against the likes of Kong and WSO2.
Main areas of consideration for us are:
Rate-limiting
Open ID Connect authentication
Analytics
Scalability
Hybrid model of hosting - combination of on-prem and cloud depending on compliance requirements of educational institutes (Probably rules of AWS' gateway)
It would be really helpful if anyone who is using or has used TYK.io for their production projects can share their experience, especially for enterprise clients/projects.
Full disclosure: I work for Tyk, so of course think that Tyk is the best fit for your project ;)
Seriously, though - Tyk can do all those things you’re after. Here are some links to the documentation for each item that is big on your list:
Rate-limiting
Open ID Connect authentication
Analytics
Scalability
Hybrid model of hosting
You can also post on the Tyk community for help, if you haven’t already, or search to see what else others have said.
The Tyk Open Source API Gateway will do everything you need, even outputting analytics to difference sources, like ElasticSearch, Mongo or just CSV.
In addition, you can also use our API Management Platform to control your open source gateway. The Tyk API Management platform includes a Dashboard with analytics and out-of-the-box developer portal. Tyk is free to use, under a developer license, to manage a single gateway node, ideal if you are doing a POC.
Hope this helps and please keep in touch to let us know more about your use case.
Me and my team will be working on APIGEE which is an API development platform to expose some services in our application. I am going through their documentation and also trying to understand the need of APIGEE or any other API development platform like Mashery. One very good article on the need of API proxy as been very well explained in the given link, http://apievangelist.com/2011/06/11/the-battle-for-your-api-proxy/
One question that i am confused about is What is the difference between APIGEE and any ESB like ALSB or Mule. We know Apigee too supports message transformation via policies and protocols like http/https/soap.
Can anyone please tell me the differences between the two? Does Esb support more protocols like SMTP/JMS etc.
Any information is most welcome
Though API management definition is still evolving but API management is defined as transforming APIs to reach to your target audience [ here is a good description - http://searchcloudapplications.techtarget.com/definition/API-management].
This technology has it's root in SOA but different from ESB.
ESB is more for system-to-system integration but API tends to be securely exposing your internal systems in a managed fashion to wider audience - we call them "developers".
ESB tends to be equipped with many adapters and strong message oriented middleware for supporting different interaction patterns. It is also generally couple with business process management software to automate internal processes by integrating multiple services or systems.
API management also does some integrations and orchestrations but focus is more simplifying the interfaces to easier consumption of the services - that's why it is always come with developer on-boarding capabilities, security , caching , api design , oauth etc.
Apigee gateway service [ API management platform ] has support for limited JMS and SMTP functionality serving our diverse customer base and our technology stack is capable of building other protocol support.
Many API management products [ including Apigee gateway ] also include API analytics to help you getting insight of API program and API traffic.
Nowadays, APIGEE and Mule are direct competitors in the API management offering realm. In the case of Mule, there was a great transformation on the company, towards API-ification of all systems. Current Mule runtime is integrated with strong API management capabilities including analytics (functionalities from the former Mulesoft's API Gateway product, which was merged into the Mule runtime since v3.8.0), as well the usual ESB capabilities. Further info is available at Mule dev doc site.
API Management & ESB are two different capabilities which may have little overlap in terms of exposing the integrations themselves as API's which Mulesoft does.
Apigee also supports few ESB capabilities but it's not as exhaustive as Mulesoft. Ofcourse ESB is bigger scope & if you don't need that capability & just need API management with Full API lifecyle Mulesoft & APIGee both serves that need.
Personally I am a big fan of Mulesoft's API policies which comes out of box & it's an exhaustive list.