I keep on getting this error the moment I enabled error messaging in Django. I research about it. This binance thingy is about bitcoin and it is not related to what I'm doing.
Is this an attack that's trying to check/access my Django Web app?
Invalid HTTP_HOST header: 'api.binance.com'. You may need to add 'api.binance.com' to ALLOWED_HOSTS.
Report at /api/v1/time
Invalid HTTP_HOST header: 'api.binance.com'. You may need to add 'api.binance.com' to ALLOWED_HOSTS.
Request Method: GET
I check the api.binance.com. It is like an api and it says "ok"
What's your thought about this?
This is issue just means that external device on the internet is trying to connect on Django however since the the URL " api.binance.com" is not on the allowed list on Django settings.
It is giving error only when you enable the debugging to sent on your email.
Related
This morning, multiple client accounts started returning this error when attempting to use their refresh_token to obtain a new access token:
refreshAccessToken error response:
{
"error": "invalid_client",
"error_description": "AADSTS70002: Error validating credentials. AADSTS50012: No client secret is provisioned in the store.",
"error_codes": [70002, 50012],
"timestamp": "2018-04-06 08:39:48Z",
"trace_id": "40f2883e-68c2-4a15-87e9-8544c3430c00",
"correlation_id": "a3536a53-b5ad-4494-ba43-a039c6bcfb45"
}
This smells like a system problem. Where/how does one contact Microsoft or do they report system status errors somewhere?
Thanks!
There is a feedback forum for each Azure service area that you can use to report a bug. You can make a post here:
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/169401-azure-active-directory
I'm not sure if this is the correct link:
https://github.com/microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-docs/issues
Its the Issue Tracker for the Graph Documentation, but there are multiple non Documentation related bugs submitted.
There seems no direct way to report a bug
(got this link from the support site https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/support)
I set the authentication in control panel as below:
and i call the viewer by this code:
$.ajax({url: 'http://192.168.17.31/viewer',
headers: {'thisistheheadername':'thisistheheadername'},
type : 'GET'
});
but still request redirects to login page:
http://192.168.17.31/viewer/login
I'm not totally sure what you're trying to do. I've never seen AJAX used with Datazen like this, although I suppose I can understand how it might work. Of course, it won't be secure, because the browser could always indicate who the user should be--there's no checking.
The top chart in this answer might help you. But beyond that, what tells you it's sending to the login page? Where are you trying to display the results?
The two things I would check on outside of those, though, are:
Your header is not correct, unless you've got a user named "thisistheheadername" as well. You should be passing a username through that value. I don't recall specifically, but it could send you to the login page if it doesn't recognize the username.
Are you sure external authentication is enabled? I would check in the "Configuration" section on the server to ensure it isn't still "default." The core service must be stopped before changes are persisted.
MY AIM : I am creating a Service provider at my local server using opensaml-java latest library from shibboleth.I want a Test IdP.I chose https://fed-lab.org/ . There is no clear procedure for this configuration also
1.I have created Metadata programmatically using opensaml.
I need to check whether my metadata is correct according to its standard schema.How can i check this?
2.I have registered my SP at https://fed-lab.org/ site after logging in.
3.I have downloaded the Identity Provider from https://fed-lab.org/online/identity-provider-metadata/
It has two IDPSSODescriptors.
In that SIngleSignOnServices are
1.https://openidp.feide.no/simplesaml/saml2/idp/SSOService.php and
2.https://fed-lab.org/simplesaml-test/module.php/fedlab/SingleSignOnService.php
I am using HTTP-Redirect binding
I have created the AuthnRequest message first . then did , deflate , base64encoding , URL encoding as per specification of SAML
https://openidp.feide.no/simplesaml/saml2/idp/SSOService.php?SAMLRequest=processedAuthnRequest
I am trying to access this URL , But I am getting nothing Response from the site.
WHere am I wrong ? please Let me help to figure it out.
Can u provide Test IdPs where there is a clear way(documentation) to do the configuration.
There is a very simple Idp at http://stubidp.kentor.se that doesn't require any kind of registration. Just enter your acs url and a subject nameid to send an unsolited Saml2Response.
It won't let you test everything (yet), but it can get you started on receiving a basic message and handling that.
My site was valid until today, wondering wether it is my site's or the validator's fault.
I am getting this message:
The error encountered was: 500 Can't connect to localhost:8888 (connect: Connection refused)
HTTP Error 500 is an Internal Server Error, so that will be their fault. Try validator.nu whilst you are waiting.
W3C validator maintainer here. Tip: Next time you see that message, try validating your document directly at http://validator.w3.org/nu/ instead.
Because if you see that 500 error it means the validator is trying to reach the HTML5 backend, which runs as a separate service/process responding at localhost:8888 on the validator host.
But we actually run several validator hosts, round-robin, so if you see that 500 error it could mean that only one of the HTML5 backends on one of the hosts is temporarily down. And if you go to http://validator.w3.org/nu/ you might get lucky and hit a different host and it'll work.
On the other hand if you get a 404 from http://validator.w3.org/nu/
it most likely means you caught me in the middle of restarting/redeploying the W3C HTML5 validator backends to pull in changes I've made to the sources from https://github.com/validator/validator
But that never takes me more than a few minutes, so on your end you should never be seeing that 500 error for more than, say, 10 minutes at most. So if/when you do see it for any longer than that, please report it either by tweeting to #w3c or #sideshowbarker on twitter, or pinging me on IRC (MikeSmith on #whatwg or #w3c on irc.freenode.net).
I think it's pretty clear from the error that it's a problem at their end:
Checking the Document Type of this document requires the help of an external tool which was either not enabled in this validator, or is currently unavailable. Check in the validator's system configuration that HTML5 Validator is enabled and functional.
The error encountered was: 500 Can't connect to localhost:8888 (connect: Connection refused)
(My emphasis.) I expect they'll get it fixed Right Quick Like.
We were getting the following error while checking the domain in W3C validator and we managed to fix it by installing CA Bundle and Intermediate Root certificates for the same domain. Now, the domain is able to pass through the W3C validation check and reporting appropriate result.
===================================
Sorry! This document cannot be checked.
Error
I got the following unexpected response when trying to retrieve <https://our-xx-domain.in/>:
500 Can't connect to our-xx-domain.in:443
If you made recent changes to your domain name (DNS) configuration, you may also want to check that your domain records are correct, or ask your hosting company to do so.
===================================
I am getting the following error while sending mail using a button in MS access form
I am using sendObject to send mail using vba code.
The host 'smtp' could not be found. Please verify that you have entered the server name correctly. Account: 'pop3', Server: 'smtp', Protocol: SMTP, Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Socket Error: 11001, Error Number: 0x800CCC0D
Please help
I know that, this is a smtp settings problem. But where should i check this ... is this in my outlook client or is there anywhere the settings are configured in the code ?
SendObject is so basic there is nothing for you to configure outside of your default email provider. Which you've stated is Outlook. Check the default profile.
Also see SendObject's twenty limitations and the Microsoft Access Email FAQ fpr alternatives to SendObject if required.
Even if you get past this error, there are several more limitations involved with SendObject. It's almost not even worth running this particular approach down. I would suggest taking a look at Outlook Redemption. I have had excellent results from this library for many years.