##[error]No file matched with specific pattern: /appsettings.json - github-actions

After reading this answer:this
I tried to do the same.
I have a .net core project and in my case, I am using a repo with a publish version so my appsettings.json is in the root of the repo.
# This is a basic workflow to help you get started with Actions
name: DeployToStaging
# Controls when the action will run. Triggers the workflow on push or pull request
# events but only for the master branch
on:
pull_request:
types: [assigned, opened, synchronize, reopened]
# A workflow run is made up of one or more jobs that can run sequentially or in parallel
jobs:
FTP-Deploy-Action:
name: FTP-Deploy-Action
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout#v2.1.0
with:
fetch-depth: 2
- uses: microsoft/variable-substitution#v1
with:
files: '${{env.DOTNET_ROOT}}/appsettings.json'
env:
ConnectionStrings.ToBudget: 'This is just a test'
- name: FTP Deploy
uses: SamKirkland/FTP-Deploy-Action#3.1.0
with:
ftp-server: <MyServer>
# FTP account username
ftp-username: <MyUsername>
ftp-password: ${{ secrets.FtpPassword }}
So basically I want to transform my connection string (for now it is just a test, in the future I will create a secret) and then push it to the server through FTP.
Everything is working except the variable substitution. The error is: No file matched with specific pattern: /appsettings.json
Any help would be much appreciated

Just found the issue.
instead of files: '${{env.DOTNET_ROOT}}/appsettings.json' I just need to do files: 'appsettings.json'
Now I am having a second issue. SamKirkland/FTP-Deploy-Action#3.1.0 doesn't like the change. It is avoiding uploading because the repo is dirty.
EDIT: regarding the second issue I moved to sebastionpopp/ftpaction

Related

Unable to push my storybooks into chromatic

I have integrated chromatic into my repository and purpose is to push my storybooks into chromatic.
I have two folder in my repo: 1- backend 2- frontend and I have all storybooks in my frontend folder and my .github/workflows/chromatic.yml file looks like below:
# .github/workflows/chromatic.yml
# Workflow name
name: 'Chromatic'
# Event for the workflow
on: pull_request
# List of jobs
jobs:
chromatic-deployment:
# Operating System
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
defaults:
run:
working-directory: frontend
# Job steps
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout#v1
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Install dependencies
run: yarn
# 👇 Runs yarn in ./frontend
working-directory: frontend
# 👇 Adds Chromatic as a step in the workflow
- name: Publish to Chromatic
uses: chromaui/action#v1
# Chromatic GitHub Action options
with:
# 👇 Chromatic projectToken, refer to the manage page to obtain it.
workingDir: frontend
projectToken: ${{ secrets.CHROMATIC_PROJECT_TOKEN }}
Is there anything wrong in chromatic.yml file? I have set event on pull request and whenever I create pull request from my branch to another branch(dev) I received notifications that "no job were run" (also attached the screenshot). And when I click "View workflow run" button I got following error:
Error: .github#L1
The job was not started because recent account payments have failed or your spending limit needs to be increased. Please check the 'Billing & plans' section in your settings.
(I have researched this error and also tried different ways as suggested but same issue I am getting).

Running a Github Actions workflow only on events in a pull request events that change files matching a path

I currently have a Github Actions workflow setup with the following trigger:
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- 'myFolder/*.yml'
I want this workflow to run on pull request events where a file matching with myfolder/*.yml has been changed. While this workflow does run on pull request events where this file has changed, it also runs on subsequent events even if they do not make any further changes.
The workflow this trigger is for runs a process using configuration from within the yml files and so if no changes happen to any of these files between commits (even if other files that do not match the filter are changed), the result will always be the same and does not need to be run.
I looked through the documentation for Github Actions and could not find anything that exactly matches my situation so would appreciate some help and pointers.
A simplified version with some name changes of the full workflow yml is:
name: Read yml files
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- 'myFolder/*.yml'
jobs:
promote:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
name: Read files
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout#v2
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Read
run: npm run read-yml
It's not possible to do on YML workflow level.
You can however detect your case and leave early from a workflow.
I can suggest using changed-files action:
- name: Get changed files
id: changed-files
uses: tj-actions/changed-files#v17.2
- name: List all added files
run: |
for file in ${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.added_files }}; do
echo "$file was added"
done
or you can use renamed_files, deleted_files if it fits better to your needs.
Then you can detect if there are any files that may trigger your generation action - if not, simply end the workflow.

Working Directory for local github actions in subdirectory

I'm trying to keep multiple github actions in the same monorepo using subdirectories, and run them like:
workflow.yml
// [...]
jobs:
run_my_script:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Check out current repo
uses: actions/checkout#v2
- uses: ./my_action2
with:
my_input_var: "david"
./my_action2/action.yml
// [...]
runs:
using: "composite"
steps:
# Checkout files in this repo
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout#v1
- name: Run myscript
run: python myscript.py "${{ inputs.my_input_var }}" # location: ./my_action2/myscript.py
shell: bash
The problem I'm having is that my action uses a python script in it's subdirectory, but the uses: action appears to run from the GITHUB_WORKING_DIR of the workflow and not the directory of the action itself.
python: can't open file 'myscript.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
I've looked through most of the working-directory questions surrounding github actions, but I'm still stumped.
I've also tried adding working-directory: ./my_action2 to the job's defaults: but it looks like it's not propagating to run: commands within the uses: step.
My workaround in the meantime has been to add an input for myaction2_working_directory in the workflow, and then add working-directory: ${{ inputs.myaction2_working_directory }} to every run: command in the action. This seems inelegant and repetitive. Is there a better way to do this?
contrary to the answer by Grzegorz, you cannot just run: cd foo and then expect all following steps to have a working directory of foo. as far as i can tell, the only way to do this is with the "workaround" the OP already posted -- add an input named e.g. working-directory to your action and then add working-directory: ${{ inputs.working-directory }} to every step. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions/metadata-syntax-for-github-actions#runsstepsworking-directory
I had similar problem and for my composite actions I just added a first step as:
run: cd ${{ inputs.working_directory }}
and then all next steps are running in it.
I couldn't find a better way and having working-directory copy pasted was also something I didn't like.

Git Hub actions for multiple repos

Just wondering if there is a way to use a Github action across multiple repos. Basically seeing if there is a similar way to do something similar to this from azure devops.
I have the same script i need to run on multiple repos, which currently I have created a template of so I can quickly create it across repos, however if I need to modify that template I will need to change it in all the repos which would be fairly time consuming.
My thinking is that i can create a plugin similar to the ones you can get on the marketplace and create a step to use that, but is this the best way of doing it/is there a way to do this privately.
Thanks
EDIT:
With some looking i have got a action that looks like the following (ignore the names etc that are still in from a sample)
name: "Hello World"
description: "Greet someone"
inputs:
unity-key:
default: ""
description: "Unity Key"
required: true
runs:
using: composite
steps:
- uses: game-ci/unity-builder#v2
env:
UNITY_LICENSE: "${{ inputs.unity-key }}"
with:
buildMethod: UnityEditor.SyncVS.SyncSolution
targetPlatform: StandaloneWindows
- uses: nikeee/docfx-action#v1.0.0
name: Build
with:
args: Documentation/docfx.json
- uses: actions/upload-artifact#v2
name: "Upload site artifact"
with:
name: _site
path: _site
and then calling it in another repos step process as following snippet. It does find the action and attempts to run it. But then errors out. Looking around i can not see any references that say i can have uses steps within another action, but this seems like a very limited feature, so not sure if im just missing something.
jobs:
# This workflow contains a single job called "build"
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout#v2
# with:
# submodules: true
- uses: Greener-Games/Generate-Documentation#v1.0.5
with:
unity-key: ${{ secrets.UNITY_LICENCE_2019_4_12F1 }}

Triggering a new workflow from another workflow?

Can I trigger a new workflow from another workflow?
I'm trying to run a workflow after the first workflow has pushed a new release and it seems to ignore it.
Found the answer here:
An action in a workflow run can't trigger a new workflow run. For example, if an action pushes code using the repository's GITHUB_TOKEN, a new workflow will not run even when the repository contains a workflow configured to run when push events occur.
EDIT:
The quote above might be confusing. When I add a Personal Access Token (PAT) to the checkout action with repo permissions granted (and not repository's GITHUB_TOKEN), the following commands DO trigger other workflows:
- name: Checkout Repo
uses: actions/checkout#v2
with:
token: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }}
(In my case, running semnatic-release after this checkout, which creates a new release with a new tag - did trigger another workflow that runs only if a tag was created)
As described here, you can trigger another workflow using the workflow_run event.
For example we could think of two workflow definitions like this (the only prerequisite is, that both reside in the same repository - but I'am sure, there's also an event for other repos as well):
release.yml
name: CI release
on: [push]
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout#v2
- name: Release artifact
run: ...
do-something-different.yml
name: Do anything after the release of the first workflow
on:
workflow_run:
workflows: ["CI release"]
types:
- completed
jobs:
notify:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout#v2
- name: Do something
run: ...
A crucial point here is that the name: CI release definition of the first yaml file must exactly match the workflow_run: workflows: ["CI release"] definition in the second yaml file. Another point is that this approach needs to be done on the default branch (which is mostly main or master) as the docs state:
Note: This event will only trigger a workflow run if the workflow file
is on the default branch.
If you don't want to use a general Personal Access Token (which has access to all of your repos), you can generate a dedicated SSH keypair for this purpose and add it to the repository as a Deploy Key. This is done as follows:
Generate an SSH keypair:
ssh-keygen -N "" -f deploy_key -C "github-actions"
Add the private key (generated file deploy_key) as an encryped secret, e.g. COMMIT_KEY to the GitHub project.
Add the public key (generated file deploy_key.pub) as a deploy key with write access to the GitHub project. Tick the Allow write access checkbox.
When checking out the source code in your workflow, add the SSH key:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout#v3
with:
ssh-key: "${{secrets.COMMIT_KEY}}"
Subsequent push actions in the same workflow will then trigger any configured GitHub workflow as if they were pushed manually.