I've got a customised instance of GraphEditor in a view in an ASP.NET MVC app and I've got it set to use a database for diagram persistence. When opening, I've programmed it to create a new model to initialise the graph using the model data stored in the database. This works, except that vertexes and edges that were black and white when saved become blue when loaded. I'm guessing there's some default mxGraph style variable that's responsible for this, but I'm not sure. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks!
So, in case it's useful to anyone else, I actually found the solution. The default colours are defined in mxClient as hexadecimals and can be replaced with whatever you want to use.
Related
I am new to UE5. Trying to work out some UI. I have created a Widget Blueprint (HUD) on which I have placed a canvas (TheCanvas), on which I have placed a text:
Now I am trying to access the canvas (TheCanvas) in the Graph / node editor of the Widget Blueprint (HUD). I need this for some programming logic, such as e.g. getting a list of all the children on the canvas etc.
I have seen on screenshots that people can access this canvas, however I am unable to get a reference to it. When I type Canvas in the filter, it does not show up.
I thought I need to make TheCanvas a variable of the HUD, but I cannot find a way to do that either. There is no Promote to variable context menu, and no Expose checkbox on the details of the Canvas.
Being new to this, the concepts are not clear for me. Please can you advise what I am doing wrong? I need to programmatically access TheCanvas in the Graph/node editor of the HUD.
Thank you
Someone showed me the Is Variable checkbox on top of the Details panel. I was looking for it down in the properties box
Several weeks ago I have been asked to upgrade a web application based on a very old version of MXGraph library (version 2.4). The application integrated also the 'grapheditor' a sort of demo application evolved later in Diagramly
and then in Draw.io). Recently I completed the more problematic step, the transition from old "grapheditor" to Draw.io, so I am now able to open all the previous diagrams (saved as plain XML), modify and save them consistently.
Ok, this is the nice part. The bad side is the 'read-only' section of the application ,where the users can more or less, only view the graph.
This page is based on the mxClient.js that renders the graph described in the xml through this code:
var graph = new mxGraph(container);
var diagram = mxUtils.parseXml(xml);
var codec = new mxCodec(diagram);
codec.decode(diagram.documentElement, graph.getModel());
graph.fit();
Upgrading the MX library to the last version (3.9.10) the same code works but some shapes are not rendered properly, they appears as squares instead of
circles, ellipses, etc. The two following images are an example of this misbehavior
Graph in the draw.io:
Same graph rendered by mxClient:
After some tries I discovered that the old mxClient is able to render the same graph perfectly (as draw.io does) so I think there have to be something wrong (or missing) in my code or mxGraph installation/configuration.
As a temporary workaround I can keep in place the old version of mxGraph but obviously I'd like to use the new one.
Can someone give me an hint on this? Any help would be very appreciated.
The tape shape isn't part of core mxGraph, it's part of the GraphEditor example, in the additional shapes JavaScript.
If you look at the style of the ellipse, it's probably not the one in the core, most likely another one from Shapes.js.
Either pull in shapes.js, or use the viewer in draw.io.
How would someone go about coding a 'window'? I'm starting to make a GUI, and I want to learn how to code one. One that can be skinnable, and one that actually loops and creates itself at runtime. I understand that this might be a bit vague, so I'll add details.
One that actually 'creates' itself. Most GUI tutorials I've looked on depends on an 'image' that just gets added on the screen. I want to be able to use skins in my windows. One where my 'skin' is just a collection of 'borders'. Then when I insert window.create(50,50) where 50,50 is my height, width, It would just create that window, following the skin.
I understand that it probably follows just like when a language draws a rectangle, it just follows a different set of rules (maybe?). However, for all my Google-fu skills I cannot find a tutorial that teaches me this.
Please Help. I didn't include the language I used as you can see, because I believe I just need to know how to create one. Anyway though, I am using Actionscript 3. A tutorial would be just fine, or even A SINGLE CLASS THAT HAS THIS FUNCTIONALITY, I'll just study the code. Or if you know one, maybe a whole book about GUI and programming it :D
Pure As3.0 GUI coding is quite troublesome. I try to Googling, but not come out well. anyway for my case, i generate using a SWC, and Class Mapping and Customizing. but i'm not sure best way. in other way i use a bit101 library. this is gives me want Window, Charts, Componets easily of high abstraction. see the below image.
It can be pretty hard and complicated to do, or very easy, it just depends on how flexible your solution should be. You need firstly to design a structure of your program and approach to the problem.
I like to go from the image of how it should look like from API point of view. I think I would create a GUI element like this:
var wholeGui:MyGUI = new MyGUI();
var window:IGuiElement = new GuiWindow(dataObject, skinObject);
wholeGui.addElement(window);
So what would you need?
1) Object that would manage all GUI elements. Why? Simply because your GUI elements shouldn't be destroyed by themselves if user will click "X" on your little window. The wholeGui object would manage them and listen for any events including those that would destroy them. You may consider creating custom events for interaction between the wholeGui object and your window object if this interaction is going to be complicated.
2) Interface for your GUI objects. Some problem here is that AS3 actually doesn't have interface for Sprite, and you would like to interact with it like with extended Sprite. The workaround here is to have in this interface a declaration like this:
function asSprite():Sprite;
And your implementation in GuiWindow would look like this:
public function asSprite():Sprite {
return this;
}
And your GuiWindow class should extend Sprite of course. Then you would have access to it's Sprite properties and methods by writing for example: window.asSprite.startDrag();
This interface should give you abilities that you need to operate on your GUI element.
3) Class for your GUI element, in this example GuiWindow.
4) Class for your data that would be injected into your element. If you would load data dynamically, and from some location, you would need to deal with the situation when no data can be provided - but that logic would be inside your window.
5) Class for your skin - so you would be able to dynamically create a skin object and use it to create your window in a way you want.
That's just few thoughts to consider.
PS. It may be good idea to fill GuiWindow object with data AFTER creating it, and not in constructor, as you would be able to visualize loading process then.
Okay, so I've been busting my hump the last week or so on this project for my OOP/AS3 course and this past Sunday I realized that my approach wasn't going to work so I scrapped the better part of it and started over.
Our assignment is to create an XML based flash menu that demonstrates an understanding of the OOP patterns we've just learned. It was kind of a 'test the waters' project where he gave us a ton of tutorials and information and told us to make our best attempt at making sense of it so I'm certain there are more efficient ways to do what I'm doing, but that's a moot point.
We need to employ at least two patterns in our menu, though at the moment I'm just focusing on MVC so that I can get the mainUI working before I finalize the second part of the UI. It essentially flows like so:
MainUI has 4 menus that slide out.
Each slider has 3 thumbnails on it.
Clicking on any of the thumbnails will move to the next part of the UI. This functionality is currently disabled.
The program runs with 0 compiler errors, but the images are not being placed on the stage correctly and I can't figure out why. All the image paths are being pulled and stored from the XML properly. The main background image is pulled once and is supposed to be only placed once (if statement that uses a count to determine whether to run the placement function or not), but it is being placed 4 times with the sliding menu image. The sliders are being placed in the correct positions (switch statement that iterates through the mainUI function in the View class and creates a separate loader for each one), but the thumbnails are not all showing up. So here is what I'm seeking help with:
The mainPanel image should only be placed once, rather than 4 times with each slider.
The sliders, while being placed correctly, must be tweened in different directions through the as (using TweenMax), but each instance is unidentifiable from the other so right now they all have an eventListener that calls the same tween method. How can I distinguish them in a way that lets me apply a different tween to each (This will likely be a concern with the thumbnail functionality later as I will need to load different XML data based on which thumb is clicked).
I have added what I hope are very informative comments to each script so hopefully people can help. Also included are images of what I want the mainUI to eventually look like and how it's coming out currently.
pastebin with all 3 classes and XML (2 hyperlink limit) - http://pastebin.com/u/crookedparadigm
top image is how the stage is outputting, bottom image is what I'd like to to be - http://imgur.com/a/bOmsS
Last quick note, stage is currently set to 600x480 with a black background. Ideally, to reinforce OOP principles, our professor wants us to avoid using the timeline or library if possible.
Any advice at all will be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Install FlexPMD This is a very good add on( sometimes hard to install ) It basically is used to show areas of your code that you are not following standards. For example your classes lack the use of "this". And you should avoid passing parameters in constructors. It would be good practice to develop standardized writing skills while you are still new.
Looking at your code I see you are calling buildUI from within a loop.
buildUI is assigning a MainView object to mainUI.
So each time you go through a loop iteration you are reassigning mainUI.
In the end mainUI will only be the last iteration of that loop.
Not sure this is your issue but is an issue.
[EDIT]
Excellent Singleton guide for Flex SDK
Part 1
Part 2
Some Good writing on pure AS3 Singletons.
I would prolly start from scratch as your XML data is miss formatted.
your XML should resemble something like this.
<MainProject>
<MainUI>
<Thumbnail Name="Spring">
<Destination Name="Spring" Price="99" ratingPath="images/SP1/SP1rating.png" />
</Thumbnail>
<Thumbnail Name="Winter">
<Destination Name="Winter" Price="152" ratingPath="images/SP1/SP2rating.png" />
</Thumbnail>
</MainUI>
</MainProject>
Then you should have the following structure on your stage. These movieclips should be empty and already placed inside on your stage with instance name.
Stage
MenuUI MovieClip
ThumbNail1 MovieClip <- feed it thumbnail from the XML
ThumbNail2 MovieClip <- feed it thumbnail from the XML
ThumbNail3 MovieClip <- feed it thumbnail from the XML
ThumbNail4 MovieClip <- feed it thumbnail from the XML
This might be a bit too vague, just tell me if you need more details.
Hope this helps !
I just started to study the Model View Controller pattern. I now understand the basic usage of MVC, but when i tried to implement MVC in a simple test, i ran into a problem. Ofcoarse I could easily adjust the code so it works, but I wish to learn how to correctly implement the MVC pattern.
The test:
I used actionscript 3 to make a simple program. It consist of a turret, and a mouseclick. The turret is in the middle of the screen. When I click anywhere the turret rotates towards the point where I clicked. Both the mouse and the turret have their own model,view and controller. When I click, the MouseModel changes correctly. But for the actual TurretView to respond, the TurretModel must change its rotation variable and send out an event.
The question is who responds to the MouseModel event?
/------->MouseControl------\
/ \
MouseView ?<---MouseModel
TurretView <------------------TurretModel
TurretControl
I figured its best not to have MouseModel directly influence TurretModel or TurretControl, because this would require them to be an eventListener. Making TurretView listen to the MouseModel, and then tell TurretControl to adjust TurretModel, after wich TurretView can update trough a TurretModel event looks like a lot of extra code for a simple task. Also I'd rather not have MouseControl affect TurretModel, this would break the flexibility of the mouse as input for future classes.
Ow, also in which class do I put the code for the angle calculation?
Thanks in advance
Remember that the goal with MVC is primarily the separation of Model and View, and the Controller can serve as the communicator between the two.
Unless you are planning on storing each action that occurs (clicking, rotating, etc.), there is no real need for an action (in this situation) to send data to the Model. Everything you'd like to do should be easily handled with the Controller. So the flow would be:
Mouse click
Event is fired to trigger a command (in the Controller), passing along the mouse location
The command calculates the turret's rotation
The command tells the View to rotate the turret
This is, of course, my suggestion based off of your example. In truth, depending on the project, the above flow could easily change (for instance, in this situation it seems good to do rotation calculation in the command, but in other situations that may not make as much sense). Look at MVC as a goal - you're trying to separate these elements as much as possible, but there is no 100% "works-every-time" way to do it.
Robotlegs, a popular MVC framework, has a great diagram on their site showing how they tackled MVC:
http://www.robotlegs.org/diagram/
I'm not advertising that you NEED to use Robotlegs (it's good, but there's plenty of other alternatives), but they definitely made a pretty diagram :)
You should have one model, which then has pieces in it that you are currently calling MouseModel and TurretModel. You can either keep those names and breakdowns, or do something else once you have a better "handle" on what needs to be done.
The View that is tracking the mouse clicks should dispatch an event that your Controller component catches to update the TurretModel (at this point, there's probably no need for a MouseModel). Your TurretView can then update itself based on the TurretModel, or the Controller can update the TurretView based on the new value. This will depend on how you have it wired.
Usin a Framework such as Robotlegs can help you figure out all the ins and outs of this process, and I've heard that this book http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920021216.do provides a great explanation of MVC, even if you don't choose to use Robotlegs after you read it.