Googled myself stupid, still couldn't seem to find any information on it. Following issue:
Adding an ::after selector to a link adds it as part of the link. Is there a way that the ::after selector will not extend the link (be text only, not clickable)? See example, is there a way, that the "»" will not be part of the link?
Example:
a::after {
content: " »";
}
Test
Make its width 0 and add pointer-events: none;
a::after {
content: " »";
display:inline-block;
margin-left:8px;
width:0;
pointer-events: none;
}
a {
font-size:35px;
margin-right:20px; /* to avoid overflow issue and cover the area of the pseudo element */
}
Test some text after
Related
how can i configure the Ckeditor to add automatic a <span> tag in a new <li></li> element.
Like so <li><span></span></li>
Thanks for helping
As an alternative route to style the UL bullet points differently from the text within them, there is a CSS hack using :before you can use - it's not pretty though! See fiddle by BoltClock here: http://jsfiddle.net/BoltClock/q9RRg/
The relevant CSS code is this:
ul li {
color: black;
list-style-type: none;
margin-left: 1em;
}
ul li:before {
content: '\2022 ';
color: red;
padding-right: 0.5em;
}
If this is not usable, the secondary option would be to post-process your data. During your saving phase, simply add the spans to any LI element where the first child is not yet a span. I do recommend adding a class to the spans for future usage and easy targeting as well.
I have this in line:
<div class="blue-car">
Car
</div>
<div class="iColor">
Blue
<div>
.blue-car:hover { color: red; }
.iColor:hover { color: read; }
I would like to make when someone hover to Car div second div which iColor change css and when hover to iColor div blue-car change css.
ie. I hover to 'Car' , 'Blue' will change color to red and when I hover to 'Blue' , 'Car' will change color to red, I want to make people aware that this two link is related.
I would love to have this in css only. No jquery. I have tried many no achievement at this moment.
Let me clear this, here is an example on this site. You could see when you hover to a country map, css link on right side will change, and you could see when you hover to a country link, country map css will change. This means this two div work each other. How they do this on this site: http://www.avito.ru
To start, CSS does NOT have a previous sibling operator. The only siblings that can be selected are adjacent (using +) or general (using ~).
It is possible to achieve the effect that you are seeking using only HTML and CSS. Below is one solution: http://jsfiddle.net/KGabX/. Basically, the .area is displayed as a table, which makes it wrap around the link and the image. However, the link is positioned absolutely, which prevents it from being "included" in a territory wrapped by the .area. This way, the .area is wrapped only around the image. Then, hovering over the .area we highlight the link. And, by hovering over the link we highlight the image.
Markup:
<div class = "area">
Link
<img src = "http://placehold.it/100x100" />
</div>
Styles:
.area {
display: table;
position: relative;
}
.area:hover > a {
color: red;
}
.area > img {
cursor: pointer
}
.area > a {
position: absolute;
right: -50px;
top: 50%;
font: bold 15px/2 Sans-Serif;
color: #000;
text-decoration: none;
margin-top: -15px;
}
.area > a:hover {
color: initial;
text-decoration: underline;
}
.area > a:hover + img {
opacity: 0.5;
}
Although I could not interpret what you wrote very well, I immediately noticed a flaw in your css selector.
Change your code to this:
<style>
.blue-car:hover a { color: red; }
.iColor:hover a { color: red; }
</style>
What's different about it? iColor:hover a. Look at the a, anchor selector. It was added because your previous CSS was only selecting the div. In css the child element, in this case the anchor, will supersede it's parents. There's two ways you can approach this. The first, or make the anchor tags color in css inherit.
If this wasn't your problem I'll fix my answer.
I'm not quite sure what you're asking because your question is a bit unclear.
From what I can understand, your issue stems from the fact that you're referring to the color property of the div, rather than the color property of the link.
That's a simple fix: all you need to do is drill down through the div to the link.
.blue-car:hover a{
color: red;
}
.iColor:hover a{
color: red;
}
Demo
Keep in mind that this isn't the best way to do this unless you absolutely need to refer to the links within the context of the div. I understand that your question fits into a broader context within your code, but for the example you gave here, all you really need is this:
a:hover{
color: red;
}
Again, I realize that you may need to change the colors or be more specific, but there's probably a better way to do this, even if that's the case.
The issue with this particular implementation is that your div is larger than your link, and a hover on your div is what activates the color change, so you'll run into this issue:
It seems IE doesn't care for text-decoration: none; defined for a:before pseudo element (or pseudo class).
Here is a JS Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/9N35f/
I'd expect the ">" to lose the underline. It does in FF, Chrome and Safari, but not in IE. Tested with IE10 and IE9.
The question:
Any workarounds that I could try to make the :before element lose the underline? Ideally in IE9+
Is there a bug report for this somewhere? Or is it actually by the standards?
I'm aware this is a rather elderly thread, but having just been up against this problem in IE 11, and unable to find much help, I decided to experiment. Aided by a significantly improved dev tools than in the earlier versions I managed to figure it out - for what I'm working on at any rate. Chances are it'll work for others as well, although you might need to tweak. YMMV.
The HTML:
<li>Whatever</li>
The CSS (edited after #frnhr pointed out that the initial version I posted didn't actually work):
a {
display: block;
position: relative;
padding-left: 15px;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:hover {
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:before {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: calc(100% - 2px);
overflow: hidden;
content: ">";
}
The secret sauce is setting the height and the overflow: hidden; line; it means that the underline is still there but outside the viewport provided by pseudo element, and so never gets seen on screen. It also works across other browsers (tested on Chrome and Firefox as well). Depending on your existing styling you'll probably want to tweak the pixel value in the calc() value.
See http://jsbin.com/biwomewebo/1/edit?html,css,output
IE seems to be in error here, since display: block in your code should remove the underlining. According to clause 16.3 Decoration in the CSS 2.1 spec, “User agents must not render these text decorations on content that is not text. For example, images and inline blocks must not be underlined.”
There does not seem to a bug a report on this at the IE Feedback Home.
In this case, a suitable workaround might be to use an image as the generated content:
a:before {
content: url(arrow.png);
}
where arrow.png refers to a suitable small icon. The use of url(...) in content is described in CSS3 Generated and Replaced Content Module, which is a seriously outdated draft (the last version is from 2003), but this part has been widely implemented in browsers. Not in IE 7, however. So if you wish to cover IE 7 as well, consider the approach in #EugeneXA’s answer, possibly generating the extra markup dynamically with JavaScript.
If the background is white you may use the bottom border:
a {
text-decoration: none;
border-bottom:1px solid blue;
}
a:before {
content: "> ";
border-bottom:1px solid white;
}
Not sure what standards say, but IE behavior seems to be more logical. Think of :before as an element inside of <a> tag, not outside of it. Child's text-decoration property should have nothing to do with its parent's.
This workaround will work
http://jsfiddle.net/9N35f/4/
<span>a link</span>
a {
text-decoration: underline;
}
span:before {
content: ">";
}
Another solution is to set a small line-height (heightdoes work too) and set overflow: hidden so the underline disappears.
I know this is not the best solution, because the line-height value depends on the character you use. In this case 0.6 is a good value but maybe not for another character.
In my case it was a good solution because I had the problem with only one certain character with a fixed font-size.
a {
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:before {
content: ">";
display: inline-block;
text-decoration: underline; /* simulate IE behavior */
line-height: 0.6; /* line-height must be smaller than font-size */
overflow: hidden;
}
JSFiddle Demo
This works for me:
html:
<span>a link</span>
css:
a {
text-decoration: none;
}
a span {
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:before {
content: ">";
}
In this the before tag is still part of the anchor.
I'm aware that the :empty pseudo-class will select all elements with no children, but I want to only select elements with text-nodes as children.
I have a bottom-border on my hyperlinks that're a different color than the text, but this is a problem because the hyperlinked images are also getting this underline.
I've tried a *:not(*){ border-bottom-width: 0; } in an attempt to fix this, but it didn't work. Is there a way to select a tags with only text-nodes for children?
If I understand your problem correctly, you are trying to keep your hyperlinked images from being underlined. If so, why not do something like: a img { text-decoration:none }?
Edit: If its the links on img tags you don't want underlined, apply a class to those links with text-decoration:none
NEW ANSWER:
If you want a border under the image, but not the text do this:
a img { border-bottom: 1px solid #000; }
a:emtpy { border: none; }
If you want the opposite (border under the text but not the image) do this:
a:empty { border-bottom: 1px solid #000; }
a img { border: none; }
OLD ANSWER:
If it's just a problem with images that are wrapped in a tags, try:
a img { border-bottom: none; }
Instead of a crazy selector, why not hide the border with a negative margin:
a img {
margin-bottom: -6px;
}
Demo
When the ONLY CHILD of <a> is not an img ...
a:only-child:not(img)
{
border-bottom-width: 1;
}
This cannot be accomplished because of the way border property is applied and rendered outside the top-most box of your anchor - effectively the only way to achieve such an effect with a border would be to negate the property. Sometimes it coult be visually acceptable to use a bottom border in a background colour to overlay over that of of your anchor's - an unreliable practice to be frowned upon. Maybe the effect could be simulated with filters, but I wouldn't count on it being sufficiently well-supported cross-browser.
What I propose is going back to the text-decoration property *while still maintaining a different, independent underline colour` - a neat approach overall, but not without the overhead of an additional element:
<style>
.fancy-underline { color:blue; text-decoration:underline; }
.fancy-underline a { color:black; text-decoration:none; }
</style>
<span class="fancy-underline"><a href="#">I am a fancy link
<img src="//placekitten.com/30/30/" /> with an image in the middle of it
</a></span>
http://jsfiddle.net/ovfiddle/TwmmF/3/
I ended up just using jQuery. I don't believe it's possible with just CSS right now.
jQuery('document').ready(function(){
jQuery("a").each(function(){
if(this.children.length !== 0)
this.style.borderBottomWidth='0';
});
});
I have this html code
<div id="mybox"> aaaaaaa </div>
and this is my css
#mybox{
background-color:green;
}
#mybox:hover{
background-color:red;
}
the question is how to hide the content of the div (aaaaaaa) when the mouse hover event by using css only and without changing the structure of the code
I think I should put some code under #mybox:hover but I don't know the code.
Without changing the markup or using JavaScript, you'd pretty much have to alter the text color as knut mentions, or set text-indent: -1000em;
IE6 will not read the :hover selector on anything other than an anchor element, so you will have to use something like Dean Edwards' IE7.
Really though, you're better off putting the text in some kind of element (like p or span or a) and setting that to display: none; on hover.
Here is the simplest way to do it with CSS3:
#mybox:hover {
color: transparent;
}
regardless of the container color you can make the text color transparent on hover.
http://caniuse.com/#feat=css3-colors
Cheers! :)
Hiding through CSS is achieved by using either the "visibility" or the "display" attributes. Though both achieve similar results, it's useful to know the differences.
If you only want to hide the element but retain the space occupied by it, you should use:
#mybox:hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
If you want to hide the element and remove the space occupied by it, so that other elements can take its space, then you should use:
#mybox:hover {
display: none;
}
Also remember that IE6 and below do not respond to :hover for anything except A tags. In which case, you'll need some Javascript to change the classname:
document.getElementById('mybox').className = 'hide';
and define the "hide" class in CSS:
.hide { display: none; }
sounds silly but font-size:0; might just work. It did for me. And you can easily override this with the child element you need to show.
You could make the text color the same as the background color:
#mybox:hover
{
background-color: red;
color: red;
}
What about opacity
#mybox:hover {
opacity: 0;
}
Best way to hide in html/css using display:none;
Example
<div id="divSample" class="hideClass">hi..</div>
<style>
.hideClass
{display:none;}
</style>
This is a late answer but still, guess setting the color to transparent is the best option.
#mybox:hover{
background-color:red;
}
There are many ways to do it:
One way:
#mybox:hover {
display:none;
}
Another way:
#mybox:hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
Or you could just do:
#mybox:hover {
background:transparent;
color:transparent;
}
#mybox:hover { display: none; }
#mybox:hover { visibility: hidden; }
#mybox:hover { background: none; }
#mybox:hover { color: green; }
though it should be noted that IE6 and below wont listen to the hover when it's not on an A tag. For that you have to incorporate JavaScript to add a class to the div during the hover.
I would say:
#mybox{
background:green;
}
#mybox:hover{
color:transparent;
}
<div id="mybox">
This text will disappear on hover
</div>
This will hide text, but of course, it still contains the text, but it is a tricky way to hide the text (make in invisible), but it will work well
Sorry to be 7 years late but this could be achieved by using the below:
.your-block{
visibility: hidden;
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
}
This will keep the content on the page and won't occupy any space whereas display:none will completely hide the content.
Using the above code can be useful if you need to reference code in a div but don't need it to display.
.button {
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
font-size: 0;
background: url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20width%3D%2224%22%20height%3D%2224%22%20viewBox%3D%221284%20207%2024%2024%22%3E%3Cg%20fill%3D%22none%22%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M1298.5%20222.9C1297.5%20223.6%201296.3%20224%201295%20224%201291.7%20224%201289%20221.3%201289%20218%201289%20214.7%201291.7%20212%201295%20212%201298.3%20212%201301%20214.7%201301%20218%201301%20219.3%201300.6%20220.5%201299.9%20221.5L1302.7%20224.2C1303%20224.6%201303.1%20225.3%201302.7%20225.7%201302.3%20226%201301.6%20226%201301.2%20225.7L1298.5%20222.9ZM1295%20222C1297.2%20222%201299%20220.2%201299%20218%201299%20215.8%201297.2%20214%201295%20214%201292.8%20214%201291%20215.8%201291%20218%201291%20220.2%201292.8%20222%201295%20222Z%22%20fill%3D%22%239299A6%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E") #f0f2f5 no-repeat 50%;
}
<button class="button">Поиск</button>