I am trying to make the page content dynamic. I am using ck-editor in which i added html content and used the same vue variables inside it which i declared in the vue file where i want to show ck-editor data. I found a similar post vuejs - “editing” html inside variable
which works fine if i write the html inside a variable. But in my case, i am saving data in database. It is saving properly with html tags, without converting the tags. When i get data using axios it returns it in form of string. And i used vue variable to display that html.
Here is my code for better understanding:
<div v-html="htmlText"></div>
new Vue({
el: '#app',
created() {
this.getSalesContent();
},
data: {
salesContent: '',
pageName: 'Sales',
salesNumber: '987-586-4511'
},
computed: {
htmlText() {
return `${this.salesContent}`;
//return this.salesContent;
}
},
methods: {
getSalesContent(){
axios.get('api/Sales').then(({ data }) => { // getting data from DB
this.salesContent = data.sales; //data.sales have this.pageName and this.salesNumber variables
});
}
}
});
Here is the example of data saved in db:
<p style="font-weight:bold"><span style="color:red">{{pageName}}</span>,</p>
<p style="font-weight:bold"><span style="color:red">${this.pageName} ${this.pageName}</span></p>
<p style="font-weight:bold">Contact Sales at ${this.salesNumber} {{salesNumber}}</span></p>
I used variables in all possible ways. But on the page they are printing in it the same way i saved it. Here is the output:
screenshot
Can anyone help me make it working.
Thanks in Advance.
According to the docs this does not seem possible:
https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/syntax.html#Raw-HTML
Particularly:
The contents of the span will be replaced with the value of the
rawHtml property, interpreted as plain HTML - data bindings are
ignored.
You could as suggested in that answer just use a computed based on what you get from the server.
IMHO since the salesContent is fetched from db, it's a plain String. Thus nor vuejs or vanilla javascript will replace the inline variables with their values. (It may be possible by using eval, but it's totally out of question...) You should manually do that with String replace function. Like the following:
<p style="font-weight:bold"><span style="color:red">{{pageName}}</span>,</p>
<p style="font-weight:bold">Contact Sales at {{salesNumber}}</span></p>
methods: {
getSalesContent(){
axios.get('api/Sales').then(({ data }) => { // getting data from DB
let salesContent = data.sales; //data.sales have this.pageName and this.salesNumber variables
salesContent = salesContent.replace(/{{pageName}}/g, this.pageName)
salesContent = salesContent.replace(/{{salesNumber}}/g, this.salesNumber)
this.salesContent = salesContent
});
}
}
Related
I am trying to get Kendo Grid data which is hydrated from client side to a MVC controller method. My view contains several single fields like name, date of birth etc and tabular field which I hooked with a Kendo Grid. Since its a new operation I have no data in the grid ( and other fields) and user enters them from client side.
I have no idea how to proceed on this. Ideally I would like to get this data to a list in my viewmodal. So that when the user hits save, I have all other data and the grid data coming into a controller method.
I am able to successfully bind a list with kendo grid and display it. I have very little experience on JavaScript and Kendo and web programming.
If any of you can point me to the right direction, sample code would be greatly appreciated.
$("#departmet").kendoGrid({
dataSource: dataSource,
height: 250,
scrollable: true,
sortable: true,
filterable: true,
pageable: {
input: true,
numeric: false
},
columns: [
"DepartmentName",
"SubDivision"
]
});
From experience I know their documentation is not easy to navigate. It seems there is the documentation and then the API. The API is usually what you will always want to find. What you will need is the information from here https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/ui/grid. If I understand the question correctly. There are several ways you can achieve posting. You could make use of editor templates. Click the Open in Dojo to get an idea how it looks.
https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/ui/grid/configuration/editable.template
With this you do not have to worry about modifying the data via javascript. Assuming your grid is surrounded with a form element it will get posted when submitted. Note paging is not accounted for here. Also, this method by default can auto post after each edit. If you don't want this behavior then you will have to have advanced knowledge of the API.....Correction on that last statement. The API is different when dealing with the data all on the client side. Click the Open in Dojo to see it all on the client side. If you are not wanting to use editor templates and want to manage the data editing yourself then you need to use the grid methods provided.
Once you have your grid created. To access the data source of the grid you will need to get the dataSource.
$('#departmet').data('kendoGrid').dataSource;
https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/data/datasource
If you need to use a different data source(or change it) you can use the setDataSource method below(grid function).
https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/ui/grid/methods/setdatasource
To add to the data source use the add function to add a new object.
$('#departmet').data('kendoGrid').dataSource.add({ id: 2, name: 'name'});
https://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/api/javascript/data/datasource/methods/add
It is important with kendo to ALWAYS use the methods provided to change the data source so that the proper events can fire to update the UI accordingly. This includes if you need to set a property on a specific data item. In that case you need to use the set method on the item itself.
After you are done modifying your data. Within javascript get the data and either create DOM elements within a form
//JQuery sudo code example
var data = $("#departmet").data("kendoGrid").dataSource.data();
var dataLen = data.length;
var myForm = $('#my-form'); //Already within DOM
for (var i = 0; i < dataLen; i++) {
var item = data[i];
var idEl = $('<input type="hidden" name="userData[' + i + '].id" />');
idEl.val(item.id);
var nameEl = $('<input type="hidden" name="userData[' + i + '].name" />');
nameEl.val(item.name);
myForm.append(idEl);
myForm.append(nameEl);
}
myForm.submit();
This assumes your controller function(??) on the backend is expecting an array of objects with the property name of userData.
Alternatively, you can post it via ajax. For example, the ajax jquery function. Passing your data as the data of the ajax call.
http://api.jquery.com/jquery.ajax/
Don't want to ramble. Let me know if you need more help.
SO won't let me comment yet so have to add another answer. You will not need to define the data source within the .NET code when dealing with client only data. Just use this.
.DataSource(dataSource => dataSource
.Ajax()
.ServerOperation(false)
)
If you will have data coming from the backend then you need to use the generic-less constructor and pass in the object else keep what you have.
Html.Kendo().Grid(Model.MyList)
However, if you are preprocessing some client data on the screen that you want to initialize then you will need to do this on ready. Don't worry about the schema part of the data source. It already knows this when you used the .NET MVC wrapper because you gave it the schema(type) via the generic or the parameter provided.
var initialDS= new kendo.data.DataSource({
data: [
{ ActionName: "Some Name", ActionType: "Some Type" }
]
});
$(document).ready(function () {
$('#docworkflow').data('kendoGrid').setDataSource(initialDS);
});
As I mentioned in the other answer. Use the data source functions for adding additional data to the data source. No need to setDataSource each time you want to add. Just
//Assuming you have 2 inputs on the screen the user is entering info into
var nameEntry = $('#action-name').val();
var typeEntry = $('#action-type').val();
$('#docworkflow').data('kendoGrid').dataSource.add({ ActionName: nameEntry , ActionType: typeEntry });
So after some efforts I come up with. But I don't know where to specify the
data in the html code. Is it possible this way?
#(Html.Kendo().Grid <DockData.Action> ()
.Name("docworkflow")
.Columns(columns =>
{
columns.Bound(e => e.ActionName);
columns.Bound(e => e.ActionType);
}).DataSource( **How do I load a script variable here***)
//This script variable should be fed to the above code.
This variable is populatedwhen the user adds data from the UI which works fine.
var dataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
data: result,
schema: {
model: {
fields: {
ActionName: { type: "string" },
ActionType: { type: "string" }
}
}
},
pageSize: 20
});
I have a very long document - 40000 words - I would like to display in a styled manner, like html.
I need to display it with headers, paragraphs and bold styling.
I am building an Angular app. I tried loading the converted document as a local html, but it takes a very long time.
For instance, I tried this:
var html = this.http.get("../data.html").map(ref => {
console.log(html);
} );
Are there any other ways I can load this text? Maybe break it up into smaller chunks somehow?
Based on what you've provided with no other context:
You need to subscribe to the Observable otherwise, nothing will ever happen since Observable execution is lazy:
var html = this.http.get("../data.html")
.map(ref => {
console.log(html);
return ref;
})
.subscribe(ref => ...);
Also, you're using console.log(html) in your map, but html does not exist in the context of map so you would need to do something like:
var html = this.http.get("../data.html")
.map(ref => {
console.log(ref); // Does this log appear and what does it contain?
return ref;
})
.subscribe(ref => ...);
Finally, var html is an Observable not HTML so I'd probably rename this to something a bit more descriptive if you're passing it around and subscribing to the response:
const data$ = this.http.get("../data.html")
.map(ref => {
console.log(ref);
return ref;
});
// ... do other stuff
data$.subscribe(ref => ...);
Or if not passed chain it and subscribe which indicates the Observeable has completed:
this.http.get("../data.html")
.map(ref => {
console.log(ref);
return ref;
}).subscribe(ref => ...);
If this doesn't help answer the question it's because you haven't provided enough information, and I'd suggest answering:
In the second example what does console.log(ref) output?
Include more code that provides more context like do you use subscribe already and what does the data you're using look like?
Make an example in StackBlitz that replicates the issue. Just click Angular and you get a pre-made Angular application you can drop your code into and then people can hack directly on the issue. Takes tops 5 seconds to setup
I'm trying to use $sanitize provider and the ng-bind-htm-unsafe directive to allow my controller to inject HTML into a DIV.
However, I can't get it to work.
<div ng-bind-html-unsafe="{{preview_data.preview.embed.html}}"></div>
I discovered that it is because it was removed from AngularJS (thanks).
But without ng-bind-html-unsafe, I get this error:
http://errors.angularjs.org/undefined/$sce/unsafe
Instead of declaring a function in your scope, as suggested by Alex, you can convert it to a simple filter :
angular.module('myApp')
.filter('to_trusted', ['$sce', function($sce){
return function(text) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(text);
};
}]);
Then you can use it like this :
<div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.html | to_trusted"></div>
And here is a working example : http://jsfiddle.net/leeroy/6j4Lg/1/
You indicated that you're using Angular 1.2.0... as one of the other comments indicated, ng-bind-html-unsafe has been deprecated.
Instead, you'll want to do something like this:
<div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.htmlSafe"></div>
In your controller, inject the $sce service, and mark the HTML as "trusted":
myApp.controller('myCtrl', ['$scope', '$sce', function($scope, $sce) {
// ...
$scope.preview_data.preview.embed.htmlSafe =
$sce.trustAsHtml(preview_data.preview.embed.html);
}
Note that you'll want to be using 1.2.0-rc3 or newer. (They fixed a bug in rc3 that prevented "watchers" from working properly on trusted HTML.)
You need to make sure that sanitize.js is loaded. For example, load it from https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/[LAST_VERSION]/angular-sanitize.min.js
you need to include ngSanitize module on your app
eg: var app = angular.module('myApp', ['ngSanitize']);
you just need to bind with ng-bind-html the original html content. No need to do anything else in your controller. The parsing and conversion is automatically done by the ngBindHtml directive. (Read the How does it work section on this: $sce). So, in your case <div ng-bind-html="preview_data.preview.embed.html"></div> would do the work.
For me, the simplest and most flexible solution is:
<div ng-bind-html="to_trusted(preview_data.preview.embed.html)"></div>
And add function to your controller:
$scope.to_trusted = function(html_code) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(html_code);
}
Don't forget add $sce to your controller's initialization.
The best solution to this in my opinion is this:
Create a custom filter which can be in a common.module.js file for example - used through out your app:
var app = angular.module('common.module', []);
// html filter (render text as html)
app.filter('html', ['$sce', function ($sce) {
return function (text) {
return $sce.trustAsHtml(text);
};
}])
Usage:
<span ng-bind-html="yourDataValue | html"></span>
Now - I don't see why the directive ng-bind-html does not trustAsHtml as part of its function - seems a bit daft to me that it doesn't
Anyway - that's the way I do it - 67% of the time, it works ever time.
You can create your own simple unsafe html binding, of course if you use user input it could be a security risk.
App.directive('simpleHtml', function() {
return function(scope, element, attr) {
scope.$watch(attr.simpleHtml, function (value) {
element.html(scope.$eval(attr.simpleHtml));
})
};
})
You do not need to use {{ }} inside of ng-bind-html-unsafe:
<div ng-bind-html-unsafe="preview_data.preview.embed.html"></div>
Here's an example: http://plnkr.co/edit/R7JmGIo4xcJoBc1v4iki?p=preview
The {{ }} operator is essentially just a shorthand for ng-bind, so what you were trying amounts to a binding inside a binding, which doesn't work.
I've had a similar problem. Still couldn't get content from my markdown files hosted on github.
After setting up a whitelist (with added github domain) to the $sceDelegateProvider in app.js it worked like a charm.
Description: Using a whitelist instead of wrapping as trusted if you load content from a different urls.
Docs: $sceDelegateProvider and ngInclude (for fetching, compiling and including external HTML fragment)
Strict Contextual Escaping can be disabled entirely, allowing you to inject html using ng-html-bind. This is an unsafe option, but helpful when testing.
Example from the AngularJS documentation on $sce:
angular.module('myAppWithSceDisabledmyApp', []).config(function($sceProvider) {
// Completely disable SCE. For demonstration purposes only!
// Do not use in new projects.
$sceProvider.enabled(false);
});
Attaching the above config section to your app will allow you inject html into ng-html-bind, but as the doc remarks:
SCE gives you a lot of security benefits for little coding overhead.
It will be much harder to take an SCE disabled application and either
secure it on your own or enable SCE at a later stage. It might make
sense to disable SCE for cases where you have a lot of existing code
that was written before SCE was introduced and you're migrating them a
module at a time.
You can use filter like this
angular.module('app').filter('trustAs', ['$sce',
function($sce) {
return function (input, type) {
if (typeof input === "string") {
return $sce.trustAs(type || 'html', input);
}
console.log("trustAs filter. Error. input isn't a string");
return "";
};
}
]);
usage
<div ng-bind-html="myData | trustAs"></div>
it can be used for other resource types, for example source link for iframes and other types declared here
This question is similiar to them one asked in Mike's post Using ng-model within a directive.
I am writing a page which is small spreadsheet that displays calculated output based on user input fields. Using a directive, I'm making custom tags like this:
<wbcalc item="var1" title="Variable 1" type="input"></wbcalc>
<wbcalc item="var2" title="Variable 2" type="input"></wbcalc>
<wbcalc item="calc" title="Calculation" type="calc"></wbcalc>
The 'item' field references scoped data in my controller:
$scope.var1 = '5'; // pre-entered input
$scope.var2 = '10'; // pre-entered input
$scope.calc = function() {
return parseInt($scope.var1) + parseInt($scope.var2);
};
And the 'type' field is used in the directive's logic to know whether to treat the item as a string or a function.
Here's a fiddle for this: http://jsfiddle.net/gregsandell/PTkms/3/ I can get the output elements to work with the astonishing line of code:
html.append(angular.element("<span>")
.html(scope.$eval(attrs.item + "()"))
);
...and I'm using this to get my inputs connected to my scoped controller data (I got this from Mike's post:
var input = angular.element("<input>").attr("ng-model", attrs.item);
$compile(input)(scope);
html.append(input);
...while it does put the values in the fields, they aren't bound to the calculation, as you can see by changing inputs in my fiddle.
Is there a better and/or more intuitive way to link my controller-scoped data to the jqlite-generated html in my directive?
Take a look at this, I think you can simplify the process a fair bit.
http://jsfiddle.net/PTkms/4/
angular.module('calculator', []).directive('wbcalc', function($compile) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
template: '<div><div class="span2">{{title}}</div><input ng-model="item"></div>',
scope: {
title: '#',
item: '='
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
// Don't need to do this.
}
}
});
function calcCtrl($scope) {
$scope.var1 = '5';
$scope.var2 = '10';
$scope.calc = function() {
// Yes, this is a very simple calculation which could
// have been handled in the html with {{0 + var1 + var2}}.
// But in the real app the calculations will be more
// complicated formulae that don't belong in the html.
return parseInt($scope.var1) + parseInt($scope.var2);
};
}
I know you said you like jQuery - but to make best use of Angular you need to think in an Angular way - use bindings, don't manipulate the DOM directly etc.
For this example, it would be helpful to read up on the isolated scope bindings used - '#' and '=', see:
http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive
Is this possible.. here's what I have atm, but my data object is just returning a load of jargon, what am I doing wrong? Am I doing anything.. right, for that matter?
I basically want to print out a list of a users videos (thumbnail and title, and make each one a clickable link to the video itself)
Thanks!
$(document).ready(function(){
$player.init();
})
var $player = (function(){
var player = {};
player.init = function(){
//init Youtube knockout
player.initYoutubeKnockout();
}
player.knockoutModel = {
videoData : ko.observableArray([]),
}
player.initYoutubeKnockout = function()
{
//load the Youtube json feed
$.ajax({
url: 'http://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/users/USERNAME/uploads?v=2&alt=json',
type: 'GET',
dataType: 'jsonp',
data: {
count: 5
},
success: function(data, textStatus, xhr) {
player.doYoutubeKnockout(data.item);
}
});
}
player.doYoutubeKnockout = function( data )
{
player.knockoutModel.videoData(data);
ko.applyBindings(player.knockoutModel, $('#youtube-feed')[0]);
console.log($(this));
}
return player;
})();
Frankly you weren't doing much at all.
The JSON data you get back from YouTube is not from data.item, it's in a completely different structure.
I'm assuming you wish to get 5 uploads from the user. The parameter name would be max-results, not count.
Probably the only thing you did fine was set up the url but that's about it.
You need to examine how the JSON returned looks like. Check the API reference for the structure of an atom feed. This is in XML but the corresponding JSON responses will have pretty much the same format with some minor differences. Examine the object by writing it to the console to verify you're getting the right properties.
Once you understand that, you need to use the correct query to get what you're expecting. Check out their API reference on their query parameters.
To help simplify your knockout code, I would strongly recommend you take the response you get back and map it to an object with simplified property names. For instance, to get the thumbnails for an entry, you would have to access the media$group.media$thumbnail array. It would be easier if you can just access it through thumbnail.
Also, if your elements you are binding to need to bind multiple values, it would help to map the values in such a way that your bindings are made easier. For instance, when using the attr binding, you'd set up a property for each of the attributes you want to add. Instead you could just group all the properties in an object and bind to that.
I wrote up a fiddle applying all that I said above to do as you had asked for. This should help give you an idea of what you can do and how to do it.
Demo