I have a fixed size wrapper consisting of:
Header that is sized to the whats inside
Footer that is fixed size
Content container that should use the remaining space of the wrapper
The problem occurs with images. I would like for images to resize to fit the content container both in height and width. Right now images overflow the wrapper in height.
Here is the code. The wide image is acting correct, resizing to fit, but the long giraf is not.
In the following fiddle overflow is set to scroll to debug. The endgoal is no overflow.
https://jsfiddle.net/sghp68r0/
A not so flexible solution would simply be to give the imageFit class a height like
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
.imageFit {
object-fit: contain;
height: 150px;
}
But this I would rather avoid hardcoding the height.
My goal is that it looks like this (no overflow):
if i am right you want this. Please do let me know.
Drag the height in fiddle you see the images are adjusting with heigh.
Here is my fiddle link:-
https://jsfiddle.net/exa3y7w9/
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header">
Sized to content <br />
Sized to content <br />
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="imageWrapper">
<img src="https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/10/10/22/24/wide-format-2839089_960_720.jpg">
</div>
<div> 2 images and some text that fills remaining space </div>
<div class="imageWrapper">
<img src="http://clipart-library.com/data_images/258951.jpg">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
There is some text in fixed size container
</div>
</div>
So apparently you can fix overflow in flexbox by setting height of the containing div to 0 (for safari it should be min-height: 0). Have a look at this example. If you remove height breaks.
https://jsfiddle.net/oz20qgw9/
.content {
background-color: green;
flex:2;
height: 0; //THIS IS THE KEY!
}
Related
I have a page which looks like this:
Content contains a static table of fixed width (determined by content) inside a centered div. Below content there is a div that contains a line of text and an image below that text. It is meant to float on the left of the Content. The page and image has max-width and max-height. But when page is resized, Image shrinks twice slower than the page. This causes the page to look like this:
I want Image to always be filling the most of that white gap on the left. When the page is resized, the Image should also resize accordingly.
http://jsfiddle.net/FZ4KG/
Html:
<section align="center">
<h4 align="center">Heading</h4>
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="image_box">
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Css:
#image_box {
padding-left: 15px;
height: 0px;
top: -75px;
position: relative;
}
#image {
float: left;
max-width: 20%;
}
A few things before I'm able to fully comprehend what it is you're looking for.
It's strange how you're using the HTML5 <section> tag with a deprecated, and as of HTML5 removed, align attribute. And still strange the use of an inline style when using css on those elements.
I will assume you're looking to center those elements within their parent containers. To achieve this, you would need to use a set width and set the horizontal margin of the element to auto.
div {
margin: 0 auto;
}
You also have a typo in your mark up. The DIV id says imabe_box. Assume it's supposed to be image_box.
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="imabe_box"> // ID should be set to 'image_box'
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
Please add more code or reply to the answer and we can help you further.
Please help me with this responsive design.
This is my HTML layout:
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="images">
<div id="cats">
<img src="cat-image-1.png" />
<img src="cat-image-2.png" />
</div>
<div id="dogs" style="display: none;">
<img src="dog-image-1.png" />
<img src="dog-image-2.png" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="chat_wrapper">
<div id="chat_messages">
Chat messages in here
</div>
<div id="chat_input">
<input type="text" value="Type to chat" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Now let me explain what the CSS should do:
There is a div #images and a div #chat_wrapper in #wrapper.
The divs #cats and #dogs in #images have an unknown number of images in them (= height is unknown).
The #chat_wrapper should always try to fill the entire screen, but if the div #cats or #dogs is visible the #chat_wrapper should collapse to avoid the document element to have a height greater than window height. (min-height should be at least 400px, so if let's say #dogs fills 100% of the window height, you should be able to scroll down to the chat.
I don't known if it's possible with CSS only, can you help? :)
Thanks a lot!
Screenshot #1:
#dogs is visible, the #chat_wrapper fills the rest of the remaining space, you just can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input doesn't move)
Screenshot #2:
Just chat is visible, you just can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input doesn't move)
Screenshot #3:
#dogs is visible with some images, you can scroll the entire window, the chat is 400px high, you can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input just moves if you scroll the entire window)
I edited the 3rd link to add http://.
The #dogs div could be scrollable.
Fix a max-height to the div and use the overflow property to make it scrollable.
As described here : Mozilla Developer Network - overflow property
div {
width:150px;
height:150px;
overflow:scroll;
}
Note : Note: The value "inherit" is not supported in IE7 and earlier. IE8 requires a !DOCTYPE. IE9 supports "inherit".
If you don't want a scrollable #dogs div, then use display: block for img
Try :
img {
display: block;
}
#chat_input {
position: fixed;
background-color: white;
padding: 5px;
witdh: 100%;
bottom: 0px;
}
And fix a max-height for the message-container if you want to.
When using display: table-cell it's not possible to give that element position:relative. So in order to overlay the entire element with something (e.g a translucent div) you first have to wrap the contents in a div with position:relative and then put the overlay inside there.
But when I set a minimum height on the wrapper too then the overlay doesn't extend to the full height and I can't seem to find a way to make the wrapper's contents height-aware. Is there away, using just css, to have a 100% height overlay on top of a div with display:table-cell and minimum height?
<div style="table-row">
<div style="table-cell; min-height: 100px">
<div style="position: relative; height: 100%;"> // this refuses to extend to 100% height when the table row forces the cell height to grow
<p> content </p>
<div style="position:absolute; top:0;left:0;height:100%;width:100%"> // ... therefore so does this
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="table-cell; height: 150px"></div> // forces the entire row to grow in height
</div>
I have a floated div with "sidebar" text. Its parent container has text as well.
I don't want to have text below my floated "sidebar" div:
example http://img864.imageshack.us/img864/6058/screenshot2011052613084xv.png
How can I fix this?
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated" style="float:right">Foo bar</div>
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p>Text!</p>
</div>
If it doesn’t mess up anything else, you can use overflow: hidden or overflow: auto to fix this:
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated" style="float:right">Foo bar</div>
<div class="next-to-float" style="overflow: hidden;">
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p>Text!</p>
</div>
</div>
See http://jsfiddle.net/pauldwaite/YL5P3/
I’ve written about this more fully here, including code to make it work in IE 6: xHTML/CSS: How to make inner div get 100% width minus another div width
I still don’t really understand the reasoning behind why overflow: hidden does this, but I understand that it does follow from the CSS spec.
Set right margin on non-floated element
JSFiddle
The only requirement is that you must predefine your floated element's width. Then it can have whatever height you like and the non-floated content (when applied right margin) won't stretch under floated element.
How it works?
We have floated element on the right with width = X
We have usual content but set its right margin = X+s where s is some predefined space between your content and floated element so they don't touch.
And that's it.
Since you have multiple content elements (heads, paragraphs) you have to put them inside a container with this right margin setting.
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated">Foo bar</div>
<div id="content">
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p>Text!</p>
</div>
</div>
And CSS:
#floated
{
float: right;
padding: 1em;
background: #ccc;
width: 10em;
}
#content
{
margin-right: 13em; /* 10em width + 2 x 1em padding + 1em space */
}
Why is this solution better than setting main content width?
Because setting main content width will only work when you want to limit your document content to a fixed width (like 960 grid). But when you want your content to stretch over the whole browser window width, this solution will work regardless of browser window size.
And a small advice
Avoid using inline styles whenever possible because maintainability of your application/site will become a nightmare.
You can nest 2 div tags inside the container. Float them both and resize them as you need them to be.
Set a bottom margin on the floated element that equals the length of the remainder. Or add a width to the larger element and float it the other direction.
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated" style="width:200px; float:right">Foo bar</div>
<div id="content" style="width:600px; float:left">
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p>Text!</p>
</div>
</div>
OR
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated" style="width:200px; margin-bottom:200px; float:right">Foo bar</div>
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p>Text!</p>
</div>
its easy simply add width in [P] tag see here
example
<div id="parent">
<div id="floated" style="float:right">Foo bar</div>
<h2>Foo</h2>
<p style=" width: 500px; ">Text!</p>
</div>
for example your ( id="parent" ) have 800px width
and (id="floated") right-side bar have 200px width
then make your [P] 800px - 200px = 600px
so set your [P] width to 600px
---------- or
if you want some space between text and bar make [P] width 580px
it means 20px for space
I'm helpless, tried my best understanding CSS but it's just not for me.
I would like to make a really simple MasterPage:
at the top a div of full width and height 40px (1)
at the bottom also a div of full width and height 40px (2)
in the middle:
on the left: a div of width 200 px (3)
on the right side of the left div: a div with contentPlaceHolder (4)
What I would like to get is: if i make some site that uses my master page and place a panel in the contentPlaceHolder that has width 800px, I would like my site to adjust to it - top, middle and bottom divs to have their width of 1000px (200 + 800). I also wouldn't like (and I have a huge problem with that) the (4) to move down if I resize (shrink) the browser window - I would like all the divs to be blocked.
This is my master page html:
<div>
<div class="header">
</div>
<div>
<div class="links">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
</div>
</div>
What kind of CSS do I have to write to make this finally work?
Not sure if you have checked into this or not, but we use the YUI-Grids CSS Framework for our layouts. It keeps us from having to spend a lot of time on CSS, which we are not great at being developers.
There is even a grid builder which will let you graphically layout a page, and then copy and paste the required HTML to make it happen :)
To prevent floated divs from being "squeezed" out of the alignment you want, you usually use either width or min-width.
For example, in this code the div containing the links and content will never be smaller than 1000 pixels. If the screen is smaller than 1000 pixels, a scrollbar is displayed.
<div style="min-width: 1000px">
<div class="links"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
You could also use width instead of min-width:
<div style="width: 1000px">
<div class="links"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
The difference between the two is simple: if you specify min-width, the div CAN grow to be larger if it needs to. If you specify width, the div will be exactly the size you specified.
Be aware that min-width is not supported by IE6.
Here's a quick stab at specific CSS/Markup for this problem.
Markup:
<!-- Header, etc. -->
<div class="contentView">
<div class="links">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- Footer, etc. -->
CSS:
.contentView {
/* Causes absolutely positioned children to be positioned relative to this object */
position: relative;
}
.links {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 200px;
}
.content {
padding-left: 200px;
}
You might want your footer to be "sticky." Check here for information on that: http://ryanfait.com/resources/footer-stick-to-bottom-of-page/
How appropriate this is depends on precisely what the design calls for. This makes the links section more of a floating box on the left than a column for example.
This ends up looking like this (.content is green, .links is red):